Unexplained: Caught on Camera (2019– ) User Reviews

Fun show for entertainment

[michaelglpn · 7/10 · 27 October 2023]

That blond psychic Deborah would think a person with a sheet over their head, with eyes holes cut out was an actual ghost. Every video she sees she gives slight variations of, "I absolutely believe that person encountered something paranormal!" There's videos of people running around with cameras at crazy angles, then claiming, "I feel a cold spot!" or "OMG SOMETHING JUST TOUCHED ME!" and Deborah jumps on the paranormal bandwagon to exclaim "I absolutely believe those people encountered something paranormal. That was absolutely a real video!" If she's trying to sell herself as a true psychic she's sadly sabotaging herself and her business. At least the others sometime question what they see.

Also, I'm not tuning in to watch "Paranormal FELT on Camera" or "Unexplained: FELT on Camera". I don't care to watch people screaming because they felt a cold spot, or felt something "touch" them. I turn the TV on to see the "paranormal" and/or "unexplained"...however fake it may be. That's the fun part. That Deborah thought...she's annoying. I wish they'd take her off. Send her back to her 1-800-PSYCHIC job.

Excellent Show just 1 major annoyance that go away!

[spaldini-65892 · 7/10 · 3 April 2022]

I think the shows great! I noticed everyone doesn't jump on the band wagon and often offer up different theories as took what's happening on the footage. The 1 Sceptic is absolutely annoying! Sometimes actually to the point I change channels.... Flat out rude and ignorant! Show would be much better off without him.... In my opinion of course!!! I'm sure there's other willfully ignorant people out there that side with him....

Rehashed hash.

[frednickertx · 18 July 2021]

Paranormal: Caught On Camera and Unexplainded: Caught On Camera are twins. You see a video on one, you can be sure it'll show up on the other. Problem is, they choose some videos that have been pretty much debunked or just sadly pathetic.

>yawn<

[rockingjerry · 2/10 · 23 November 2021]

Only marginally better than "Paranormal Caught on Camera". These are the two shows that will cause me to turn off the Travel channel. The clips are mostly reruns and the experts excel in stating the obvious and ruin it. This show would fit comfortably in under 30 minutes without all the "experts".

If you like shows like this and need commentary, I suggest watching "The Osbournes Want to Believe". Same clips, but at least the Osbournes are funny.. and just as insightful as any of these so-called experts.

For shame

[camcgee-84807 · 3/10 · 26 November 2022]

Watching these fake exorcisms where they are using slight of hand pulling items out of the mouth away from the camera and your "experts" supporting the claims (can clearly see not coming from mouth) is not only shameful but disgraceful. Either learn your field or let people like myself evaluate and tell the truth. I am an investigator and believer since I experienced at a young age but don't give non believers ground to say "see told ya" by being on this show for a pay check! I have seen some things on this show I could not explain on video since not being there but especially these third world "exorcism" is like watching a "B" rated horror flick. HORRIBLE acting.

Some cast members

[newmanja-57050 · 9/10 · 15 July 2021]

Susan Slaughter does not add anything to the show and sometimes says what I think distracts. She does not appear to be experienced and yet is allowed to discuss issues about which she appears to know nothing about.

So funny. Some vids are actually done pretty well.

[frankblack-79961 · 3/10 · 21 February 2023]

So, this is a great place to view some decently done fakes. There are a couple that might be genuine. They even have a skeptical analyst to make you think these are being critically assessed. Most are easy to spot how they were faked. Where I called it quits was in season 3, where they have the vids from this Hispanic guy named Frank at a hotel room. There is a part where he is in front of the mirror and a towel on the sink counter gets pulled off. Very obviously there is a string on the towel attached to his hand that is just outside of view. You can SEE IT! All these analysts that have been semi credible are excusing his giggles and saying how it's such a great example of paranormal caught on film. GAG. I know these are all junk shows, but some part of me always hopes to see something credible. Not on this crappy show folks. Keep looking.

Too strick is simply denial

[wroth151 · 8/10 · 28 November 2021]

The Parapsychologist who likes to find even the most obscure possibility, as a debunk for phenomena, especially repeative phenomena, is simply in denial. One example he used to white wash all Orbs is that the only happen on digital format cameras. That isn't true first of all, I've seen many orb photos on film except the exposures are usually longer and one would see trails instead. Even if it were true, different formats see different ranges or types of phenomena, even instruments in the same venue. For example, an AM radio won't de-modulate a FM signal or vice-versa, and there are many examples of what a particular device can "see". He as a self proclaimed scientist should know that. I use multiple instruments, not because any of them are ineffective, but because they all have limits to what they are designed to sense.

In general, and with the exception noted above, I find this show better than the other program which uses completely unqualified commentators who merely repeat the obvious.

Fake, Recycle, Repeat

[rsplace · 1/10 · 13 July 2023]

Why does this look familiar? All of these shiftless paranormal "dudes" use the same wardrobe. Same poor video skills, same lame video effects from the 80's, same utter lack of science. The camera is permanently stuck at 1hr 13mins. Absolutely laughable. And what on earth is a "psychical researcher" ?!? I hope they make enough money to afford better production values instead of blowing it on cheap weed and Doritos. Even the video overlay is fake when it says 1080p and this charade is presented at less than 480i quality! Go to the pawnshop, get a hoody and a toque and produce something below the level of highschool film productions.

Simple basic physics

[cindyu-71280 · 15 May 2022]

This show depends on totally ignorant people. Simple physics could explain 70% of the so-called "unexplained". How on earth are people this stupid now? You have two guys running around with a tape recorder and a camera. One guys say "oh! I think I just saw something" but there is no recording or photo. So? I'm supposed to believe these guys? No!! Just cancel this garbage.

Terrible descriptions of what's really going on

[tje-57524 · 1/10 · 3 July 2023]

There isn't a single "expert" on this show that knows what they are talking about. These are ALL demons every single last one. It isn't a rare occurrence there aren't good spirits and bad spirits there is no family member coming to talk to you. These are DEMONS they are real they will torment you and oppress you and there is only ONE way to get rid of them and that's the power of the HOLY SPIRIT! I have BEEN demon oppressed and it wasn't until going to a DELIVERANCE minister that they were brought out of me. This show is full of misinformation. If your struggling with a demon or any occurrence you see on this show contact a deliverance minister asap!

Sandy Ladkar makes the show

[imdb-25288 · 9/10 · 29 January 2022]

I caught this about a couple years after I'd been watching "Paranormal Caught On Camera". What I like is their clips are longer than on PCOC. Not sure why the other show trims them, and also less blurry, which PCOC does on purpose. The show has interesting clips, some that have never made it on PCOC.

Does anyone know where the headless woman in a dress walking in the intro credits come from? I have yet to see that clip presented! It looks like a fake, a video-shop, perhaps from the Philippines.

I have a strong aversion to the British accents (all of them!) and I find them grating on my nerves like fingernails on a blackboard. (I can say this, because everyone else thinks they're fine!) They have way too many hosts talking with a British accent. It sounds pretentious. Me, I have to mute them whenever they talk like that, it physically hurts me, it's that bad.

Sandy Ladkar is a breath of fresh air in comparison. She has a lovely French accent and she brings a touch of French class to the show. She has a genuine perspective, she's not reaching to make herself sound interesting, she's simply speaking her honest opinion. She is very well dressed, but not overtly so: the Parisian casual chic, which is classy, subdued, discreet and doesn't overpower anyone else. I wonder if she broadcasts on Zoom from her town of Angers or if she was filming in USA?

I looked her up and she has a witchy boutique in France and has published several books on her experiences with the paranormal. She deserves her own show, or to spend more time oncamera here. (How does an unmarried French woman end up with an Indian name like "Ladkar"?)

I wish they would bring Sandy Ladkar to PCOC, she's sorely needed there. (Maybe get rid of Rachel Evans?) It seems that Susan Slaughter copied her entire look, that was funny, but she improved considerably on her former incarnation. They both look great actually.

Just wish they would make more of these. Tired of the marathon repeats with no new shows in sight. Come on: in 2022, with everyone having cameras and a lot of people having experiences, they should submit stuff fast. I did but it never made either show.

Please get rid of Joy Harris (I think that's her name) the dark redhead with long hair wearing black. Her voice and accent are horrible, can't stand them!

If you've never had paranormal stuff in your life, you'll scoff at this. Those of us who know, it's addictive as we want to find out more about what happened to us. A solid 9/10 from me.