62
Metascore
25 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 100San Francisco ChronicleDavid LewisSan Francisco ChronicleDavid LewisIt’s not easy to make an amusing, accessible diversion that mixes LGBTQ positivity and national politics, but “Red, White & Blue” passes the test with flying colors.
- 88RogerEbert.comNell MinowRogerEbert.comNell MinowDirector Matthew López makes an impressive feature debut with Red, White & Royal Blue, a love story that skillfully blends the familiar beats of a classic movie romance with the distinctive details of two of the world’s most public young men trying to keep their relationship private.
- 75Boston GlobeOdie HendersonBoston GlobeOdie HendersonRed, White & Royal Blue is sweet and funny, and it doesn’t scrimp on the sex scenes. Horny and corny is a good combination for a rom-com, if you ask me.
- 63The Associated PressLindsey BahrThe Associated PressLindsey BahrUltimately, it’s not earth shattering but it’s also perfectly pleasant for what it is and what it knows it isn’t. Red, White & Royal Blue is a beach read in movie form and one that can and should be watched with friends.
- 60Wall Street JournalJohn AndersonWall Street JournalJohn AndersonIn several marvelously postmodern moments it recognizes its own glucose level. And the results are genuinely hilarious.
- 60EmpireHelen O'HaraEmpireHelen O'HaraIt is entirely predictable from moment to moment and frequently laughable in its portrayal of international relations and politics, but it’s also funnier than it needed to be, and, thanks chiefly to Zakhar Perez, often charming.
- 50Chicago Sun-TimesRichard RoeperChicago Sun-TimesRichard RoeperDespite its attempts to be racy and of-the-moment and to earn that R rating, Red, White & Blue comes across as contrived and, at its foundation, quite formulaic. Not even the cake gives a convincing performance.
- 40Paste MagazinePaste MagazineMatthew López’s take on the story suffers from breakneck pacing, shallow characterizations across the board, and filmmaking choices that sometimes baffle, and sometimes betray the film’s low budget. It’s a disappointing, slapdash cash-in that does a disservice not only to McQuiston’s book, but the genre it’s part of.