"Law & Order: Special Victims Unit" Harm (TV Episode 2007) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
17 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Rendering a Top Rated Cop Show into an obvious Propaganda piece for the Political Left!
redryan6423 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
We all too often are subjected to comparisons between the Military and our Police Departments. Both are trained in and most usually are armed with some weapon or another. They both exist in order to provide protective bodies who act for the individual and for all citizens of our Nation collectively.

Even a Law Enforcement Body like the Chicago Police Department, in which this writer spent 35 years of his adult life, has been highly consistent over the years in spewing out such platitudes of questionable veracity as: "The Chicago Police Department is a Semi-Military Organization." Hmmmmmm, that's very interesting! Let us dissect and examine it a little more closely. You know, get out the old Gilbert Kids' Junior Microscope and look in closer, a lot closer! In the Military, be it our Army, the Navy, the Air Force, the Marine Corps and the Coast Guard, all operations are designed to be conducted in a strictly co-ordinated manner. Thererfore, they move out and proceed to carry out their given orders for a particular mission, all as a cog in the wheel of a greater campaign. Seldem, if ever, do the members of a particular unit, ship or plane realize then just how their action effects the whole big picture.

In Police work, there is a daily grind in an ongoing succession of mostly unrelated occurrences. The guys on the front line, usually called 'Trooper', 'Patrolman' or some such appropriate designation. They mainly do just what the one name implies; namely they go on patrol, looking for trouble spots and particular incidents and remain available to receive assignment to complaints via that marvel invention of the 20th Century, the 2 Way Radio!* The Cops who staff these 'Cruisers' or 'Beat Cars' are usually in two man operations mode, but often are 'riding solo'. And following a daily Roll Call, where their Shift or 'Watch' 'Boss', inspects the personnel, hands out certain assignments, makes any Court Notifications, disseminates crime pattern info and otherwise conducts the on-going Roll Call training. After that, the guys all leave for their particular 'Routes' or 'Beats', at which time until the end of their shifts, THEY ARE VIRTUALLY THEIR OWN BOSS! This is nowhere near being Military-styled activity. If anything, as far as the domestic scene goes, it is our Red-Suspendered friends, the Firemen, who operate in closely coordinated operations, performing under the orders of an Officer of Higher Rank (Lieutennant, Captain, Batallion Chief, Chief, etc.).

This particular episode of "LAW & ORDER:SPECIAL VICTIMS UNIT" does its best to confuse us and blur the distinctions between that which is Military and that which belongs to Civil Life in the U.S. of A. The purpose of this slant on the War Against Terror, Iraqui Theatre of Operations is to have the public at large make an unfair, skewed assessment of the on-going War there.

The story involves the death of an Iraqui born Naturalized Citizen of the United States who dies because of 'Torture' inflicted on him in a "Super Secret" C.I.A. Prison Camp, while the Doctor who had been present in supervising him, looked on and even tried to help him back in the Island of Manhattan, New York, N.Y.

C'mon, Mr. Dick Wolf, try to keep this anti-War, anti-George Bush excrement out of your stories. There are plenty of angles to pursue in the Police World! (And, by the way, how did this occurrence qualify as a "Sexually Oriented Crime", which is the Critereon for this Unit to exercise and pursue?).

We know that this would be a very different view taken by your Dick Wolf Productions staff if the lives in question were say the product of a "Partial Birth" abortion procedure. That'd be perfectly with the "Liberal" view point, right? Just remember, there is very little in common between Solderin' and Copperin'! And don't you forget that, Mr. Dick Wolf!

This leaves one to wonder, just what would have been the outcome of say WORLD WAR II if such irresponsible behaviour carried on then! Remember the 3,000+ lives lost on 9/11/2001 and the ruination to so many families. This is a real War we're in and don't you forget it!

NOTE: * There was an old Comic Strip from King Features called "Radio Patrol", which centered on the exciting(?)adventures of the Police Cars with 2 way Radios. It was later adapted into a RADIO PATROL(1937) Serial by Universal Pictures and as well as a Radio Show.
20 out of 70 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
What does it mean to do harm?
roslynr22 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I just watched this episode again. It concerns the death of a young woman who helps immigrants with her Arabic language skills, and the death of a New York City taxi driver, and the connections between these two victims. I think it is a fascinatingly complex story of two people who died, their families, and those who may have been responsible for this. Particularly interesting is the tension between the medical doctors in the story. Medical examiner Dr. Warner insists that the Hippocratic Oath cannot be compromised. FBI psychiatrist Dr. Wong is not so sure. Dr. Sutton, who is put on trial, really believes it is right to use her skills as a psychiatrist to interrogate prisoners who are kept in "stress positions" up to 48 hours. The doctors disagree strongly about what serves the greater good. While all are sincere in their beliefs, ultimately, only Dr. Warner behaves ethically.
27 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Critic
yazguloner16 June 2021
Thanks God I do not see universal human rights only within my own borders. Thanks God, by saying left and politics to everything. I don't pretend to be a keyboard masculinity.

Criticism is a constructive force, a collaboration. Taking the right steps in the future is necessary to be better. It's like looking at yourself in the mirror. It's a kind of reverse empathy. But collective user reviews of svu episodes in 22 seasons. Especially if foreign origin human rights are involved. In reality, it is deliberate, not criticism. It has the intention to do harm on purpose.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Did any of these jerks watch the episode?
rcuthbert-327 December 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The premise of the crime was the murder of a young woman made to look like an attempted rape. Remember? Nah. Probably not. It was discovered that she had traveled to Iraq and was involved with an organization that treated former torture victims, of which the Iraqi expatriate was one, who subsequently died from a condition incurred under torture. This torture was carried out by a PRIVATE contractor in a PRIVATE prison and the good doctor was a private contractor for the company that carried out the torture. Under the USA Patriot Act, the private contractors working in Iraq have immunity. If you will remember, or watch the damn show again, you will discover that the private security company protected and transferred the employee that carried out the torture, murdered the young woman at the beginning of the show, and the NY police had no authority to extradite him because he was protected by the Dept. of Homeland Security as was the doctor.

This is a plausible plot, and to make it absolutely clear to the right wing morons who have commented, this was not about the military against terrorists. This was about the murder of a US citizen (the young woman, remember?) by a criminal, protected by a for profit corporation and the USDHS.
44 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"Harm"
allmoviesfan16 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Elizabeth McGovern (later to find fame in Downtown Abbey) is a guest star in a very well crafted and executed thought-provoking episode about a doctor participating in what could charitably be called enhanced interrogation techniques or, less charitably, torture, and how that participation fits in with the oath a medical professional takes.

Benson and Stabler took a bit of a back seat in this episode, which is driven by Tamara Tunie's Medical Examiner Warner and Diane Neal's Assistant District Attorney Novak, and both actresses shine in the limelight. Particularly great to see Warner outside the morgue setting where we usually see her. Hope there is more of that to come.

Steven Weber guest stars, too, as Matthew Braden, a cop turned criminal defense lawyer.

A thought provoking and, at times, grim episode. Some of the examples of torture brought up throughout were hard to listen to. But a very good episode in the context of the show.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Political harm
TheLittleSongbird2 September 2021
Like "Avatar", "Harm" did nothing for me on first watch, one of not many early season episodes where that was the case. In Seasons 1-6, 'Law and Order: Special Victims Unit' was a very good show with several outstanding episodes and few disappointments, but it was around Season 7 where it became more inconsistent and Season 9 was very rocky. Watched "Harm" recently again, like most 'Special Victims Unit' episodes, for the third time as there have been episodes that grew on me quite a bit on re-watch.

Sadly, "Harm" is not one of those episodes. Actually thought the flaws were more noticeable this time and even more problematic than before and noticed more along the way. Of a very up and down Season 9, "Harm" is definitely one of the season's worst in my view. It is not a waste of time as an episode as it did start intriguingly, but very quickly it became an episode that could have easily passed for one from another show. As much as "Avatar" disappointed, "Harm" underwhelmed more.

Certainly there are good things about "Harm". The production values are still slick and suitably gritty (without being too heavy in it). The music is not too melodramatic and is not used too much, even not being too manipulative in revelations.

Whatever major flaws the episode has, the performances of the regular cast are far from being among them. Diane Neal in particular brings the most out of the material that is beneath her. It does start intriguingly.

"Harm" however has a lot of drawbacks and am saying this with regret, being someone who really liked 'Special Victims Unit' in the early seasons and still watches it every now and again. "Harm" just doesn't feel like a 'Special Victims Unit' episode, as hugely disappointing as "Avatar" was (and it was) that was nowhere near as much of a "belonged in a different show" feel in the way that there is here. "Harm" starts off well, but most of the episode felt like an over-stretched rammed down the throat political statement and very quickly the actual case is forgotten about. It is not the first, only or last time 'Special Victims Unit' made its points of view on subjects and politics too clear and too sidedly, but "Harm" is one of the worst cases of the early seasons.

As a result of how this is emphasised, part of me forgot what "Harm" is about and how it started out as. Really didn't like some of the character writing of the regular writing of the regulars, Novak is too stubborn and self-righteous and really do dislike it when Stabler takes the moral high ground compared to how he was written in Season 6 and the first half of Season 7 (it was the second half of Season 7 where this began to happen).

Too much time is spent on everything with the torture methods and the victims are given short shrift. The story is dully paced and not always easy to follow, while the script lacks tautness and can be heavy handed. Was not crazy on the support acting here, with Steven Weber for instance coming over as annoying.

In conclusion, disappointing. 4/10.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Wasn't Looking for Sunday School
mydad222 December 2017
I voted for John Kerry, opposed the invasion of Iraq, and virulently opposed (and oppose) torture-- sorry, "enhanced interrogation techniques," I am totally on the side of the prosecutors in this episode... and even I found parts of it squirm-inducingly preachy. Yes, horrible things took place in Iraq. Yes, it's true that some of the hypocrisy on the left is also presented. But in "ripping stories from the headlines," you need to leave your personal feelings at the door unless they are likely to be shared by a fairly reasonable majority of your target audience. This episode, in my opinion, crossed the line between entertainment and proselytization.
13 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Sloppy
dilloncamp25 March 2021
This episode was sloppy at best..it started off good ..made you question alot of ethics and believes. But at the end the only point was pushing an agenda. The audience received no answers to the main problem. Who the hell killed the girl???
9 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Preaches rather than entertains
ildpaus5 March 2021
As a large chunk of the reviews indicate, this episode seems more interested in preaching than anything else - which is unusual, as the earlier episodes of SVU seemed intent on showing the 'grey' of crime.
8 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
When You Replace Creative Crime Writers....
caf-1925 April 2021
...With preachy, agenda driven, leftist globalists you get this convoluted mish-mash showing up on Law & Order. It's not about victims of "sexually based crimes". It's not about American victims in NYC. It's not about Americans at all. No, it's about some Middle Eastern people who were questioned too roughly after the attack of Sept. 11, 2001. Apparently, an American television show that is supposed to entertain us, now believes itself to be America's moral guidance counselor regarding what should be allowed by professionals in the Government's war on terrorism. News Flash, NBC TV, you are in the entertainment business, so do your job. Leave the gov't. To do National Security.
10 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
left-wing politics deluxe
mttiro4 May 2018
This episode is well-structured and well-acted, and I won't reveal any spoilers, in case any readers have not seen the episode. But the episode suffers, as many others in the L&O franchise also do, from too much obvious, blatant leftist politics. So be warned, if you haven't seen this one. Just be aware of what you're in for.
14 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What Happened To My Show?
belles-chaussettes31 January 2008
A terrific series is turned into garbage by propaganda writers. It reminds me of the 70s when every returning vet from Viet Nam was portrayed as a crazed loon at the top of a water tower with a rifle.

The supposed torture of an Iraqi story could have been written by John Kerry & company of non-vets. For years they had advertised its episodes as being "ripped from the headlines." The only headlines this story was ripped from was the conspiracy nut newspapers that claim the US blew up the twin towers. When John Munch is the voice of reason we have gone to a very strange place indeed.

Can we please return to compelling stories?
29 out of 104 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
You've Got To Be Kidding!
Bronco4619 October 2010
Warning: Spoilers
The creators, producers, and writers have been using the whole Law & Order franchise as a platform for their political beliefs for sometime now. But this episode sets a new standard for America bashing. Hollywood in general, and this franchise in particular have been creating story lines for some time where the enemy is the United States of America. They went over the top though with episode. If you want to the United States portrayed as an enemy this is the show for you. In this episode the US is portrayed as torturing innocent people with brutal techniques on an almost routine basis. And physicians are involved helping them get maximum brutality for their torture buck. In this episode the American intelligence community and military are portrayed as evil. This kind of America bashing is not only disgusting, but boring as well. If you want to watch anti-US propaganda this is the episode for you.
17 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Left Wing Idiocy
stratus_phere1 June 2018
Nothing to see here, folks. Just more loony left, political propaganda.
13 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Typical Wolf prejudices
SlimJim3911 September 2018
Wolf, the guy who originated this series, was a prejudice jerk. Anytime that jackass could cast a disparaging remark against the government, especially the military and the VA, this jerk Wolf was right there doing it. This episode the moron goes after a doctor who participated in the interrogation of enemy combatants. Being true to form Wolf makes out that they are the bad guys. Wolf is a moron.
8 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This is why I stopped watching.
coreycitn6317 May 2022
When Dick Wolf inserted the one sided political bias is the reason I stopped watching Law & Order & SVU. He tended to do these type of stories when a Republican President such as Bush and Trump and lays off with Obama and Biden in the office.
2 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Politics and entertainment do not mix.
sgd-0387517 October 2023
I found the interrogation/torture methods described in this episode to pale in comparison with the 4000+ American men, women and children murdered on 9/11. And they seem fairly benign when considered in light of the untold terrorist attacks thwarted by these tactics. It's unfortunate that the producers and writers put their personal views ahead of national security. That being said, I'm confused as to why this case was investigated by the SVU unit. Perhaps just an opportunity to proselytize? When you mix politics with entertainment you run the risk of alienating almost half the potential audience. Two stars for the always skillful Elizabeth McGovern.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed