"Law & Order: Special Victims Unit" Unorthodox (TV Episode 2008) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Against the usual
TheLittleSongbird23 September 2021
Calling "Unorthodox" unorthodox is an understatement. Calling Novak's behaviour and how she conducts herself in prosecuting the case is an even bigger understatement. This is definitely an episode that will polarise fans, and has already done. Thought provoking and powerful for some, too try too hard and frustrating for others. Especially anybody that usually likes the character that behaves in a way that nearly makes anybody go off them.

My opinion on "Unorthodox" contains a bit of both extremes. There is a lot to be impressed by and how it handles some tough issues here is admirable, truly admirable. It doesn't completely come off though, and it definitely could have done with more focus and a less is more approach in the storytelling, as well as more tact in one area. "Unorthodox" is a good episode from Season 9 and of 'Special Victims Unit', but is not a great one.

"Unorthodox" is truly impressive in many ways. The production values are slick and professional, not ever resorting to cheap or untested gimmicks or anything, and liked that the photography was intimate without it being claustrophobic. The music is haunting in the right places and isn't constant or too loud. The direction is strong. The acting is very good from all the regulars, while Novak has been better written in other episodes before and since Diane Neal always plays her with a lot of zeal and determination. The character of Jack is very interesting and part of the intrigue of the episode is not being sure about him and what he does.

The writing is thought provoking and intelligent, not feeling too talky. As well as Jack, what was also interesting about "Unorthodox" was the dilemma as to whether the perpetrator should be tried in family court or as an adult (a familiar argument with 'Special Victims Unit' but always fascinates). Both sides are understandable here, which is what is great about the franchise at its best as while there are too many episodes that see an issue from too much of one point of view many others are great at presenting more than one side and where all are plausible. The story is mostly compelling and it was an absolute delight seeing more of Munch, and in the spotlight this time after being too underused for too long.

For all those good things, there are shortcomings too. "Unorthodox" does suffer from trying to do too much in the story and consequently gets on the over-complicated and over-crowded side, especially later on. Another episode that could have done with a less is more approach. The cultural aspects are not authentic and also not always sensitive, especially the truly sloppy dialects.

On paper, the defense did sound interesting, but the episode missed an opportunity to have Huang showing his perspective on the perpetrator. With him the argument would have rung true more and would have made a difference to the case's outcome. The ending feels unsatisfying, both in the anger-inducing verdict and how rushed it felt. Was very mixed on Novak here, she is a very strong presence and knows her stuff. Yet her attitude towards the case and what to indict him on contradicted that in "Impulsive", where she went out of her way in getting that episode's perpetrator a lighter sentence despite his crime and his attitude being a lot worse.

In summary, well executed in many areas but room for improvement. 7/10.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"Unorthodox"
allmoviesfan30 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
A particularly disturbing - but, as always, very well and even compellingly executed - episode focusing on a young boy who rapes other young boys and girls. Some of the scenes made me cringe, but that is a testament to how good the acting was, from all involved.

Interesting look at the Hasidic way of life, which I knew nothing about. What an insular world they live in. Sometimes, maybe that isn't such a bad thing.

The subplot where the father of the boy charged with rape reacts negatively and tries to disown his son was interesting. I can't imagine what it must feel like to learn your son has done those things.

The defence's angle that it is modern television and the ease with which you can find sex and nudity there (not to mention on the internet, as well) was an interesting one. Of course, not everyone who watches that stuff is then going out and perpetrating sex crimes, but the defendant's mention of how the porn actors he had watched cried out at first but liked it in the end was an interesting real-world point to bring up. All porn is so unrealistic and if that's all you know...
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
If the abuser is a child and doesn't know it's wrong
yazguloner17 June 2021
Because of the ratings of violence and sexuality.

In the ninth season, I thought they were affected by this.

Trying to emulate them. So and was worried

Thanks God. I truly believed there was an Svu level in Episode 8 and beyond. Svu team writers, cast... all.

It dissolves violence in its own quality, just like sexuality.

TV is a svu-quality episode on openness, sexuality, and conservatism.

I agree. It was ingenious to combine new conceptions of sexuality with Jewish conservatism.

Applause performances...
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Family Court
bkoganbing28 February 2015
Although this starts out as an interesting show in the end this SVU story really goes all over the map to find a satisfactory explanation for the events that occurred. Young Braeden Lemasters is discovered to have rectal bleeding which brings the SVU in.

Young Braeden is a kid from a mixed marriage as am I for that matter. But Hassidic Jews don't favor mixing of any kind and the squad is first thinking it was a custody battle. But in the end it turns out to be another kid and it looks like that other kid Alexander Gould favors both sexes for his molestation.

The multiple victims make Diane Neal want to charge him as an adult. But looking at this kid he clearly doesn't warrant it. Why Neal was so bad about this one defies explanation and the show doesn't give it. Even Christopher Meloni thinks this one belongs in family court.

The show's story defies also logic and reason. There are shows and in real life we've seen kids born without conscience or empathy. But this was not one of them.
14 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed