Wolfsbergen (2007) Poster

(2007)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Wolfsberger
rajdoctor15 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I had seen the trailer of this movie a couple of months back, and had liked the images. Later I knew that Tamar van den Dop is one of the actresses in the movie. Thus I decided to see this Dutch movie. I had seen one Dutch movie earlier – Blind directed by Tamar van den Dop and had loved it. So I had high expectations from this movie.

The story is about a family. Four generations. The great grand father Konraad (Piet Kamerman) after his wife's death; writes a letter to his daughter Maria asking them to come and be with him during the last days. Maria's family and life is in a mess. Maria is stressed with getting old and her relationship with her husband. Their daughter Sabine (Tamar van den Dop) is cheating on her husband, who is in love with Sabine's psychologically depressed sister. The daughters of Sabine are young and the elder one is neurotic reactionary violent behavior whenever she faces her parent's breaking relationship. But eventually for the sake of Konraad everyone goes to their country house. The movie ends with the death of Konraad.

The movie is typically slow. It is arty stuff; rightly suited for critics and intellectual awards.

Director Ms.Nanouk Leopold has developed her own style of film making. Stand still images, use of only part of the screen space with actual subjects, minimal dialogues, over emphasized capture of body and face to tell a story on its own and intimate moments (merging towards feminine and masculine sexualities).

All the actors have acted well. The images are beautifully captured. The story is thin, so moves slowly and dwells more in show-casing individual personalities and traumatic events surrounding them. There is some music – only at places where required. One observation, there were a few patches in the movie were the film was different, or developing was different, or camera used was different. It stood out as sour thumb on the flow.

Did I like the movie? I would not say whole heartedly – YES. I know there are critics who have acclaimed it and I have read that it won an award too. When I compare this with Blind, this movie falls too / two notches short.

It surely has the hallmark stamp of Nanouk on the movie, who I think, has marketed her good self well enough for some producers to fund her – even though with marginal budgets. I just hope there are producers to fund Tamar van den Dop. She is very sensitive as a director. I am longing to see her next directorial movie.

(Stars 6 out of 10)
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Worth watching for Nanouk's remarkable abilities as a director
hideme6664 October 2007
I saw this at the TIFF (Toronto International Film Festival) and it was definitely a highlight for me.

Do NOT watch this movie when you're looking for something that allows you to "sit back and relax". It's not exactly fast (but, that's not a bad thing in this case!!!) and, if you're used to the action-adventure type movie and are more engaged by action than by other elements of a movie, this may not be your cup of tea.

That said, it is a worthwhile movie to watch. Nanouk Leopold manages to tell a masterful tale and force you to think about death, dying and family relations using her abilities as a director. Little dialogue makes it a film that can easily be enjoyed by Dutch speakers and sub-title readers alike (I suspect, I am bilingual so I can't provide a 100% objective commentary on the experience with subtitles).

This story is really told by the director's unique vision -- if you're able to devote a few brain cells to watching this movie, I would strongly recommend it. It's slow but never seems to drag.

PS the literal translation of wolfsbergen into English is wolf mountains.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
powerful and personal images
dvwat232 September 2007
Nanouk Leopold lets the images speak for themselves. They are both beautiful and powerful. She leaves out all superficial stuff and goes right to the essence of things. Dialoques are short but meaningful. The actors speak with their body and with the way they look at each other. The angle of the scenes is chosen carefully. There is a mixture of scenes with a slow pace and very short scenes that keeps the attention of the viewer focused. She can tell a lot in a very short scene and she does not shy away from difficult subjects and emotions. Now in only her third movie she proves to be a full grown filmmaker with a very personal style and voice.
4 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Wonderful!
fledermausfour30 August 2008
I saw this film at TIFF 07 where it was easily the best movie I saw at the festival. It remains one of the best movies I have seen since then. Beautifully paced, it pulls the viewer into its exploration of the various relationships shown that one is left pondering life, the different types of love and family well after leaving the theater. It displays a certain northern European sensibility in how the characters relate to each other, where more is said by what is not said. Subtleties rule the day. This is so refreshing as a contrast to films where everything must be spelled out for the audience.

I have to add that it was also such a delight to hear the director speak after the screening. Articulate and kind - a lovely breath of fresh air!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed