Hoop Reality (2007) Poster

(2007)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
You Can't Go Home Again
RaiderDuck22 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Sixteen years after the events chronicled in the seminal documentary "Hoop Dreams," Arthur Agee returns to his alma mater (Chicago's Marshall High School) and discovers a new prodigious talent in point guard Patrick Beverley. The documentary both catches viewers up on Arthur's life and gives us another glimpse into the world of high school basketball, as Beverley's team goes downstate to the Illinois high school tournament, just as Agee's team did all those years ago.

Grandfatherly coach Luther Bedford has passed on (the documentary shows us his open-casket wake) and been replaced by stern, profane taskmaster Lamont Bryant. Bryant's obviously a skilled coach who gets great results out of his team, but his presence also lays bare the documentary's big weakness: it makes many of the same points as its unofficial predecessor, but the subjects are less appealing. Bedford's cranky charm wears better over the course of a film than Bryant's constant hectoring, even if their points are equally valid. Similarly, Patrick Beverley does not have Agee's infectious smile or ease before the camera, even if he is the better basketball player. Of the new participants, only Patrick's tough-as-nails mother Lisa matches her earlier counterpart (the equally tough Sheila Agee, who makes a brief appearance). The film could have benefited by featuring Lisa more prominently.

Arthur's life gets an update. We learn that his father Bo Agee had cleaned up his life and become both a minister and clothing seller, only to be brutally murdered in a planned hit. The aforementioned Sheila returns to Chicago to visit her husband's gravestone (and charmingly chews out Arthur for getting the birth year wrong). Arthur never made it to the NBA, but has dedicated his life to the Hoop Dreams brand and is hoping to sell an entire clothing line based on it.

Some points are glossed over or ignored outright. Arthur is reputed to have had two children with two different women, but neither is so much as mentioned in the film. The viewer gets the sense that Arthur is holding his current life very close to the vest. In addition, the earlier film's co-protagonist William Gates is neither seen nor mentioned. William's brother Curtis was murdered in 2001, and William himself is now an inner-city minister and is happily married to his girlfriend from the first movie, but "Hoop Reality" makes no mention of any of this.

In short, "Hoop Reality" is a workmanlike update on the first film, but by no means comes close to its predecessor's excellence.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
More Exploitation of the First Film Than Sequel
Michael_Elliott18 July 2012
Hoop Reality (2007)

* 1/2 (out of 4)

Disappointing "sequel" to HOOP DREAMS is more exploitation than anything else. Arthur Agee narrates this film and appears in a few spots as he updates a few bits of information about his life but it seems the real focus of this movie is to show off a new talent, Patrick Beverley, who is now considered by many to be the next big thing trying to make it to the NBA. It's easy to see why this documentary was attacked by so many people. I mean, if you're going to sell yourself as a sequel to HOOP DREAMS then people are going to expect a lot more than what they actually get here. For the most part the stuff dealing with what Agee has been doing since the release of that classic 1994 film is interesting. We hear some incredibly sad stuff including the brutal murder of his father but sadly there's really not too much else told. What on Earth was the point of having Agee here if we weren't going to learn more? I really don't see any reason for him to be here except so that the producers could push this as a sequel and try to milk fans of the original movie. What's even dumber about this picture is the fact that this so-called sequel doesn't even update us on the status of William Gates. Yes, that's right. As far as the "new" player is concerned, his story might have been interesting but this film has such a low production value that the entire thing just feels cheap. I'm sure another interesting movie could have been made about Beverley as his career certainly got farther than any of the previous two kids but this isn't the movie for that. Again, if you're going to sell yourself as a sequel it's best that you actually deliver and HOOP REALITY doesn't come anywhere close. Hopefully one day someone will come along and give us a real update on those from the original movie.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Dreams" was a reality while "Reality" was a dream
view_and_review22 May 2021
Thirteen years after "Hoop Dreams" we get somewhat of a follow up in "Hoop Realities." "Hoop Dreams" followed Arthur Agee and William Gates, two high school basketball players from two different schools with aspirations of becoming basketball stars. "Hoop Realities" is narrated by Arthur Agee, so we get to see what became of him, while at the same time it charts the basketball life and aspirations of Patrick Beverly. If you're familiar with the NBA, then you know that Patrick Beverly has had a fruitful NBA career. Personally, I think he's one of the peskiest players in the NBA who borders on reckless with his "tenacious" defense, but nevermind that.

Knowing that Patrick Beverly made it to the NBA makes watching "Hoop Realities" a little more fun. Everyone likes to see the origins of a success story. It is sharply contrasted to "Hoop Dreams" which was largely depressing as we saw William Gates' basketball career end before it started, and Arthur Agee was a big unknown. "Realities" wasn't done as professionally as "Dreams," but it was done well enough for a documentary.

I think any aspiring Black high school basketball player should watch BOTH documentaries. They both inform you of how extremely rare it is for a high school basketball player to make it to the NBA (a fraction of a percent) and while "Dreams" shows two guys who never made it, "Realities" shows two guys who did (Patrick Beverly and Derrick Rose). I know that's ironic: "Dreams" is about guys who failed in a sense while "Reality" is about guys who succeeded.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed