Transsiberian (2008) Poster

(2008)

User Reviews

Review this title
206 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Character Driven Train Ride from Hell
WriterDave1 September 2008
Brad Anderson is probably the best unknown director working today. He's the independent Christopher Nolan, often making character-driven, psychologically complex flicks that transcend the trappings of their respective genres. In the past he has successfully combined elements from time-travel thrillers and romantic comedies in 2000's "Happy Accidents", delivered a taut "Shining"-esque thriller in 2001's "Session 9" and then provided a stirring Hitchcock homage with 2004's "The Machinist" (which also featured a gonzo performance from Christian Bale). With "Transsiberian" Anderson attempts to breath life back into the often forgotten train-based thriller. Like those three earlier films, "Transsiberian" was made on the cheap, yet still manages to feature great camera-work and well known faces headlining the cast. In terms of the logistics of the location shooting in Lithuania (doubling as Siberia), this arrives as Anderson's most accomplished film from a technical standpoint.

The story starts off with an American couple (a goofy Woody Harrelson and a criminally underrated Emily Mortimer) returning from missionary work in China by route of the famous Transsiberian railroad. Once on board the train, they befriend a young couple (Kata Mara and Eduardo Noriega) who claim to be student-teachers returning from Japan but might be hiding something sinister. The screenplay does a good job of building up to "something" and developing the characters, especially Mortimer's Jessie, delving into her past with expository dialog that makes you care about where these characters are headed and think deeply about their motives. Without giving away too much of the film, entanglements ensue as a drug smuggling operation comes to light, and in steps Ben Kingsley (excellent as a Russian bruiser) as a narcotics detective with a special interest in the case.

There is a point, however, where (pardon the pun) the screenplay derails, and despite some unexpected twists, there never seems to be that big payoff. The film keeps the viewer on their toes with a bizarre turn of events at an abandoned church and a shockingly grim torture scene, but the psychological ramifications of these events are never probed as deeply as they could've been. The seductively cute Mortimer gives a nervy, complex, and excellent performance as Jessie, keeping the viewer invested in her character and what could happen to her even as the screenplay goes all over the map with her development. Woody Harrelson's performance is more of a conundrum as he seems to be playing a book-smart version of his moronic character from "Cheers". He makes you laugh during some of the more ridiculous scenes as the plot holes get deeper, and whether that was intentional or not to break the tension or gloss over the leaps of logic is never clear.

"Transsiberian" should please those looking for something different from your run-of-the-mill Hollywood thriller. Though the screenplay initially gives us characters that feel like real people, the mechanics of the convoluted plot spoil the potential of that development. However, the film still offers up an exotic locale, solid direction, and interesting performances, which makes it easy to recommend.
150 out of 184 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good but not great thriller
grnhair200114 December 2009
Warning: Spoilers
If I could rate this 6.5, I would...but I suppose it is closer to good than mediocre.

This thriller's plot seemed a bit worn to me, for I read a lot of mysteries, and the corrupt Russian cop is something of a cliché by now. As a hardboiled tale, it's view of humanity is dark indeed, with only the Woody Harrelson character seeming uncomplicatedly good, even naive.

However, this is beautifully shot, wonderfully acted (Noriega is particularly sexy/creepy as Carlos) and always engaging.

The score is brilliant. I had never heard of Alfonso Vilallonga, but I certainly hope I hear more of his music in future films.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Promising First Half, Unrealistic and Disappointing Conclusion
claudio_carvalho21 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
After a period of volunteer work with needy children in China promoted by his church, Roy (Woody Harrelson) and his wife Jessie (Emily Mortimer) decide to travel to Russia by train through the Trans Siberian Railway. Roy is a naive American with a great passion in locomotives and Jessie is an aspirant photographer haunted by her past of "bad girl". During the travel, they share their cabin with the Spanish Carlos (Eduardo Noriega) and his American girlfriend Abby (Kate Mara) and they befriend the young couple. In a layover, Roy visits other trains in the yard and is left behind; Jessie decides to wait for him on the next station and Carlos and Abby stay with her. While waiting for Roy, Carlos invites Jessie to travel to the countryside with him and they see a ruined church in the middle of nowhere. Carlos tries to force Jessie to have sex with him, and Jessie kills him with a plank. Jessie does not report the crime and meets with Roy in the next train. When Roy presents the narcotic division detective Grinko (Ben Kingsley) that is sharing the cabin with him, Jessie finds that Carlos was trafficking drugs and scared, she tells many lies to them. However the experienced Grinko does not buy her story and the couple gets in trouble.

"Transsiberian" is a thriller with a promising beginning, good first half but with a poor commercial conclusion. Roy, performed by Woody Harrelson, for example, is the stereotype of an American tourist overseas, silly and naive. Jessie is a complex, credible and very well developed character, performed by the wonderful Emily Mortimer. Ben Kingsley is outstanding, as usual, and Eduardo Noriega and the unknown Kate Mara complete the great lead cast. The cinematography is very beautiful supporting the tense and cold atmosphere; the screenplay and the direction keep the tension along the plot. However, there are some weird situations, like for example Jessie and Roy disclosing their intimacy to new acquaintances; or Jessie unable to get rid off the drugs in the train. The conclusion is unrealistic and disappointing, but anyway this movie is entertaining. My vote is six.

Title (Brazil): "Expresso Transiberiano" ("Trans-Siberian Express")
32 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A different pace for a thriller vehicle with fresh talent
Movie_Muse_Reviews11 February 2010
A thriller on the Trans-Siberian railway is not an everyday film premise and that is in part what makes "Transsiberian" interesting. It's not typical in any way unless you count the connection between murder and trains. That, and its cast is quality without seeking out big- hitting names and its director, Brad Anderson ("The Machinist") is a fairly understated one. The story of a married couple onboard the railway and encountering something over their heads is not full of devious twists and turns, but it's attention-getting.

Emily Mortimer and Woody Harrleson star as two married travelers who after going to China to do volunteer work through their church, decide to travel through Russia by train to make their trip a bid more adventurous. After all, we wouldn't have much of a film without them deciding to take the train. On board, they meet Carlos and Abby, a young couple whom they bond with, but who appear more and more suspicious as the film inches toward its first big event.

Not much more can be said without giving away large chunks of the suspenseful elements of the film. It's not bland, but the intrigue of this film is summed up into just a handful of moments. Ben Kingsley, however, has a dynamite supporting role as a Russian homicide/narcotics detective. His performance is crucial to the movie's entertainment value.

I would suspect a lot of people would be less than enamored with "Transsiberian" because it floats between suspenseful thriller and a drama about keeping secrets, telling lies and guilt. It's not pure entertainment, nor is profound with regards to the human condition. Expectation for one or the other is a recipe for not having much of a feeling about this film.

I, however, found the subtlety of Anderson's film a delightful change of pace and the characters played by Mortimer and Harrelson (and the performances they give) easy to sympathize with and unique. Anderson doesn't use any familiar clichés in creating suspense with his film. It just builds toward its few moments and with the help of what I felt was an equally effective score from Spanish composer Alfonso Vilallonga. "Transsiberian" is effective in rhythm and mood, not in plot twists and profundity.

~Steven C

Visit my site at http://moviemusereviews.com
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Spain | Germany | UK | Lithuania co-production compellingly shot by magnificent filmmaker Brad Anderson
ma-cortes7 April 2013
This nail-biting film packs mystery , plot twists , violence , suspense in a dark atmosphere with imposing tension and intrigue . It deals with a Trans-Siberian train (at eight days, the Transsiberian Express from Beijing to Moscow is the world's longest train journey) voyage from China to Moscow becomes a thrilling chase of deception and murder when an American couple (Woody Harrelson , Emily Mortimer who can speak Russian in real life) encounters a mysterious pair (Eduardo Noriega , Kate Mara) of fellow travelers . Meanwhile , a narcotics inspector (Ben Kingsley was director Brad Anderson's first choice for the role) is investigating a drug smuggling .

Intriguing film contains thrills , chills , suspense , twists and turns , and results to be quite entertaining . The atmosphere and perverse intrigue enhance as well as the relationship among two couples develops . The picture was partly inspired from director Brad Anderson's youth when he did in fact ride the Transsiberian Express . Among the references that Brad Anderson drew on were the films North by Northwest , Strangers in a train , The lady vanishes , Runaway train , Dead calm and the book "Crime and Punishment" . Transsiberian had the misfortune of opening on the same weekend as Dark Knight , the second biggest film in history. The real starring Emily Mortimer is acceptable as a depressed and former ¨bad girl¨ who leads herself a madness spiral and killing , Eduardo Noriega is pretty good as a suspicious young with dark secrets ; both of whom play two gloomy characters . Furthermore , top-notch Ben Kingsley as a tough Police Inspector and brief acting by German Thomas Kretschmann as Kolzak . Xavi Gimenez cinematography is excellent creating a frightening and scary atmosphere , he's expert on sombre photography (Fragile , Intact , Nameless) , being stunningly shot on location in China , Vilnius , Lithuania and Russia . Mesmerizing and intriguing musical score by Alfonso Villalonga (My life without me , Snow white , Princesses) . The flick was finely produced by the chairman of Filmax Productions , Julio Fernandez along with his brother Carlos Fernandez as executive producer , they're two successful producers and experts on terror genre , producing a lot of hits , such as ¨The machinist¨, ¨Rec ¨1¨, 2¨ and ¨3¨ , ¨Fragiles¨, ¨Darkness¨, ¨El perfume¨ , ¨The nun¨ , ¨Backwoods¨ and many others .

The motion picture was well written and directed by Brad Anderson . He is a good filmmaker who has directed thought-provoking and thrilling films such as ¨Happy accidents¨ , ¨Session 9¨ , ¨The machinist¨ , and ¨The call¨ his last film starred by Halle Berry . Transsiberian , rating : Good and above average, it's one the highest earning suspense picture of the last years ; it is an astounding film with tension , blood, shocks and violence .
14 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Thrilling,but not Gripping.
xebec_roy16 August 2008
This movie could have been a brilliant one but falls short due to over simplification.Roy and Jessie are an American couple on board the transsiberian train from beijing to moscow.This particular route has its fair share of crime with drug transfers via 'mules'(innocent looking people transferring drugs from one location to the other)being rampant.A Spanish hombre Carlos and his American girlfriend Abby become the compartment mates of Roy and Jessie.And the darkness builds up on the white snow...

Emily Mortimer is splendid as Jessie,an amateur photographer, with a wild past.She is a good wife,but irrational and confused sometimes, unwillingly giving way to her wild side through her inherent goodness.Eduardo Noriega (Carlos) is enigmatic as the Macho,Attractive yet Impolite Spaniard,with a sense of danger lurking in his eyes.His pushy side, while repelling for a sedate person, draws adventurous individuals towards him like a magnet.Woody Harrelson ( Roy ) and Kate Mara ( Abby ) do not have enough screen time.However Ben KIngsley delivers an outstanding cameo as Russian narcotics division detective Grinko.

The Russian cold is captured effectively, the screenplay is taut, the camera captures the vivid icy desolation of Russia with some haunting imagery.These are the things that work for the movie.

However, this is not a Whoddunit movie and the Agatha Christie genre of the Orient Express should not be brought into consideration here.The movie focuses on select individuals and is definitely thrilling.The ending is over-contrived and somewhat ludicrous and spoils the building up of tension.The movie never grips the audience,but due to its overall quality definitely worth watching.
27 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A thrilless thriller...
ftyl24 August 2008
Brad Anderson is one of those directors who everyone thinks they like until they look him up. Since getting attention with his creepy (but unsatisfying) Session 9 in 2001 his only feature of note was 2004's The Machinist - a movie which will always remain more famous for the extraordinary physical transformation of its star (Christian Bale) than its effectiveness as a creepy thriller. This is partly because Bale's emaciated form was genuinely mesmerising but mostly because the movie just isn't very good. So, after a few years directing TV episodes, Anderson had something to prove with his latest - Transsiberian.

I've never really thought of Emily Mortimer as a leading lady. She's always seemed either hopelessly insipid or appears to be battling some unrecognisable accent and a cold at the same time. It may come as a surprise then to learn that she is one of the best things about Transsiberian but unfortunately that statement comes with a number of disappointing caveats. In the film Mortimer and a mis-cast, toupee sporting Woody Harrelson play a husband and wife heading home to the US after completing charity work in China. In a decision which screams 'bad choice' to the ever watchful audience, they forgo a simple flight home in favour of the famous 8000 km rail journey through the snowlocked Russian wastes. Hence the title of the film.

What results is billed as a twisty action thriller, with multilayered secrets and lies and the familiar device of a claustrophobic location surrounded by scenic wilderness. This may not sound particularly original but, done well, it could amount to an enjoyable few hours of escapism. And, in fairness to the film, it starts well – meandering slowly through the mystery laden landscape of character development, planting seeds of murky histories and maintaining a convincing sense of unease and displacement – 2 American tourists in the time warp of undeveloped Russia. Events occur in a fashion that makes sense, uncomfortable situations get steadily worse and, around the time Ben Kingsley shows up as a Russian detective, everything seems on a wonderfully dramatic collision course with the revelations of the final act.

But then the 'twists' begin. Not twists in the normal thriller sense of the word but closer to the M Night Shyamalan meaning ie: twists that spoil a perfectly watchable film. The final act of Transsiberian dispels any sense of tension and unease by blowing the films internal logic to smithereens. I'm not suggesting for a second that the follies here are on the level of the denouement of Signs (or the entirety of Lady in the Water), but they do manage to bring the films momentum to a halt. Both The Machinist and Session 9 had problems with their endings, Anderson seems to believe that if everything doesn't reach an overedited fever pitch he isn't doing his job correctly. This is a shame as the deliberate but inexorable pacing of the plot was one of the films strong points.

Ultimately, Transsiberian is a missed opportunity. Some good performances and impressive cinematography are not enough to smooth over the eccentricities of the final act. It cannot maintain the tension well enough to be a thriller but is too mild to fall into the category of suspense/horror. If it is a drama about the fate of foreigners abroad then why does it descend into near Outer Limits territory towards the ending? Brad Anderson may well have potential as a talented filmmaker but so long as he continues to make films which are only halfway effective he will remain in that halfway obscure list of directors-you-have-to-look-up-on-IMDb.
16 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great suspense film!
vickie3249 September 2008
Loved this movie and wonder why it was so under-marketed. I went to see it because I actually took the Trans-Siberian train this summer and so of course this movie intrigued me. (Luckily my trip was not so eventful!) While of course the movie was more personal for me since I could really relate to a lot of the scenes about life on the train and in the stations, this movie will appeal to anyone who likes a good mystery. This movie keeps you on the edge of your seat and is really well-done. And it definitely captures the current political and social climate of Russia today. Having dealt with the border guards in Siberia (over a visa problem) I witnessed first hand the 'wild west' mentality that currently exists in that country. It may be hard for Americans to believe that the events that occur in this movie are realistic. But they are. And Woody Harrelson is a revelation. Ben Kingsley is great as always. I was not familiar with Emily Mortimer prior to this film but I will be on the lookout for her next film. It's a shame not many people will see this movie. Hopefully they'll catch it on pay per view. Highly recommended.
112 out of 155 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
okay
paidinfull132 May 2019
As far as setting and scenery this is a 10. As far as woody's and ben kingsley acting its a 10. Where I feel let down, and I may be a harsh critic but so be it: i think the story is weak. don't get me wrong i was compelled to continue watching because of the suspense and some twists and turns...but when its all said and done i felt like it was pointless...just nothing special, somewhat empty.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
so many little things that bothered me
SnoopyStyle15 October 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Russian police detective Ilya Grinko (Ben Kingsley) investigates a likely gangland murder for drugs in Vladivostok. Roy (Woody Harrelson) and Jessie (Emily Mortimer) are Christian missionaries taking the train from Beijing to Moscow. He befriends cabin mates Spanish Carlos (Eduardo Noriega) and his girlfriend Abby (Kate Mara). Roy is trusting while Jessie has her suspicions. Carlos is transporting a collection of souvenir matryoshka dolls. After a stop, Jessie finds Roy missing from the train. Assuming he missed the train, she leaves at the next stop to wait for Roy. Carlos and Abby get off with her. The next day, Carlos takes Jessie to an abandoned church. He tries something which escalates into Jessie killing Carlos. She returns to the train and finds Roy with a new cabin mate in Grinko.

There's a train. There's an attempt at suspense. It's looking like a Hitchcock movie. However there are things that keep gnawing at me. First of all, I doubt anybody transports drugs from Beijing into Russia. It just makes no sense. It's tough enough to get drugs into China with the death penalty as your reward. Why would anybody keep transporting it around? Just sell it in China. I buy that drugs come into Vladivostok but why bring it into China just to go back into Russia. It's not a short cut anybody with drugs would ever take.

As for movie, it's not that suspenseful. The characters are more annoying than anything. I didn't particularly like Roy or Jessie. They are annoyingly naive. It's some kind of stereotype of Christian missionaries. I also don't really understand why Carlos is waving the dolls around. People just act strangely. Roy seems completely clueless. Carlos seems like such a clingy bad guy that I can't buy Jessie's flirtiness unless they give me a reason like Jessie and Roy have sex problems. In general, I have problems with these character doing what they do. As the story gets more and more twisty, I lose more and more interest. I never buy into these people and I don't care about their predicaments.
25 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Old fashioned train thriller with fresh, intense atmosphere
Chris Knipp19 August 2008
Trains are famously atmospheric, especially on long runs across remote areas like China to Moscow through Siberia. Voilà: the Transsiberian railway. The quartet who meet in a compartment aren't really likable, but you're thrown in with them, like on a train--the way Roy (Woody Harrelson), his wife Jessie (Emily Mortimer), Carlos (Eduardo Noriega) and Abby (Kate Mara) are thrown together in this tight, exciting, basically old fashioned thriller. This is the new Russia of big money and mafia corruption, but the ingredients are tried and true. Strangers on train: there's something Hitchcockian about the way innocent people get roped into incriminating situations and then appear perhaps not to be so innocent after all.

They're on a very long ride, and in the overheated intensity of the cars (you can't seem to pry the windows open) things are blown out of proportion. They're too naive, too suspicious, too sexy. Roy's too pious and decent and upbeat. Look at the donut and not at the hole, is his motto. He's a very Christian hardware dealer and Jessie is his wife with a wild past that comes out when she meets another woman. They're returning from some sort of Christian outreach project in China. Roy's like a little boy: he loves trains. The Express is like a huge toy all for him. He's very devoted to Jessie, but the sex hasn't been going too well.

The next day into the compartment comes a younger couple. Carlos and Abby say they were teaching in Japan. However, Carlos, a handsome devil, who has his eye on Jessie, seems to know a little too much about how to get past customs with a dodgy passport. He shows off theirs proudly to Jessie, who's had a bit of trouble with the Russians. Her passport and Roy's are too pristine, he says. It makes the officials suspicious. His and Abby's are packed with stamps. They look "real." He's got some of those Russian dolls, the little lacquered things like shoots only with babushka heads, one inside the other. He says his are special, and he's going to sell them for a lot of money.

Well, he is, but that isn't why.

The train makes long stops, and Roy is so fascinated with the cars, he gets involved in a conversation with Carlos, and then the train takes off without him. Abby and Jessie have had a heart-to-heart and Jessie has confessed she had a lot of drug and alcohol problems. Roy says they "met by accident" because they met in an accident, when she was driving drunk and he stayed with her in the hospital. That's when he told her the donut and the hole story.

Carlos is dangerous, handsome, and predatory. Jessie has that wild side gesturing wildly to be let out again. And he could be the one to tease it out.

When Roy gets left behind Jessic has to get off at the next stop and wait for him. Carlos and Abby insist on getting off with her and keeping her company. And that's when the trouble really begins. Stuff happens. Surprising stuff. Or not. Depends on how good you are at predicting this kind of plot.

But the thing is, Brad Anderson and his writing collaborator Will Conroy have put together a story rich in atmosphere, that really convinces you all this could only happen here, on the train, in the snow, in the none-too-touristic rural Russian hotel and on a bus, and out in the middle of nowhere. The outdoors is all snow. The train cars are rickety and yet tough. The woman attendants are all Nurse Ratcheds who speak nothing but loud angry disapproving Russian. The food sucks, but the vodka flows. (Jessie refuses it, but when things get tough, she downs a shot. This is a world bad enough to make all but the strongest lose their sobriety, and she wears her heart on her sleeve.) The Russian fellow travelers are a mixture of camaraderie and hostility.

And then, of course, along comes Ben Kingsley, as Grinko, detective of Russian Narcotics Bureau (no articles, please). When Roy reappears, he's made friends with Grinko. Well, before that, early on, we happen to have seen Grinko examine a man at a table with a knife buried in the back of his head. Cherchez les drugs.

I can't tell you any more. I can tell you that the trains are so lovely they make you understand Roy's enthusiasm. Whole cars give off a smoky ooze of white frozen air whenever you look at them. To heighten our sense of the visual in all this, Jessie is a good amateur photographer, armed with an expensive digital Canon with a big lens, and the images on screen often jump with a hand-held camera, but also step back to take in long views of a skeletal ruined Russian church out in the waste, or to snap a hawk in the sky, or a bunch of huddled old ladies at a station near a rubbish bin where Jessie is trying to dump something incriminating. But wait. Mustn't tell.

It all hinges on moral ambiguity--people who used to be bad, who still are bad, or who turn bad, and getting trapped in your lies. There are some questionable details, especially at the end. Mortimer, usually a supporting actor, has depth and a central role here. Kingsley is as good as ever. Unfortunately the character of Roy is bland and conventional, Abby silent, Carlos more a smile and a sexy body than a personality. But the milieu itself is the richest character, and the too little known Brad Anderson, who made Happy Accidents and The Machinist, again proves his originality with material that follows a time-honored template but with a very fresh feel that keeps you absorbed from beginning to end.
105 out of 155 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Turn your brain WAY off & maybe, OK.
bringbackberniew18 June 2021
We have: an American couple in a situation that they know means "Be Careful" & yet they tell their life stories and all their weaknesses to strangers on a train

A woman constantly trying to take pictures of people with her huge, expensive camera and yet never gets shoved to the ground

A woman who c--k-teases an unreliable stranger than travels alone with him to the middle-of-nowhere & when things MAY be going south, kills him, just because

2 women getting away with murder (one we see, the other Ben tells us about) under ridiculous circumstances

a body that never gets discovered, or even gnawed on by the local wolf, for some LONG period of time, just so the other woman can come back and get the loot she initially killed somebody else for .

A guy dressed like a local Russian mafia thug who shows up and is introduced as a cop trying to help find the drugs, "No. Really. I am."

Thrilling, eh.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An Old Concept in New Clothes (thick ones)
wojten11 August 2008
The movie is set in a somewhat unusual environment (geographically speaking), which, in my opinion, is nice. In the movie you'll see several clichés typical for a thriller, with being able to predict most stuff in the film along the way. As said, the movie doesn't have much new really, but the fact that it's set (mostly) on a train in the middle of nowhere managed to give me the feeling that this was something new, and exciting.

Also typical for these kind of movies was the stereotypical view upon Russians, and foreign (non-american) people overall. The two polite and innocent Americans can't even ask the train staff why the toilet isn't functioning without getting shouted at in Russian. On top of this the police are told to be brutal and corrupt. But then this contributes to the feeling one gets while watching the movie, that the two Americans feels lost and insecure, and that they are in the hands of careless strangers who they can't even communicate with. I just wish they would have done this in some other way, without having to rely on silly stereotypes.

Even though the end was quite predictable, I liked it, along with the rest of the movie. Overall this movie is worth the time spent seeing it, and more.
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Completely Unrelatable
mitchlb4528 July 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I'm a writer so maybe I think more about these things than certain other people... BUT SERIOUSLY - if you go to poor Siberian territory and 1) Don't learn the language 2) Shout "I'm American" every 5 seconds 3) Take pictures every five seconds with your GIANT camera 4) Let strangers into your room when your alone 5) Leave said strangers with your stuff 6) Go 4 miles off any main roads ALONE with random strangers 7) INITIATE a kiss and say "I used to love a pointless f***" 8) When, after initiating, he wants to have sex with you, beat him senseless. 9)After you beat him senseless, he is powerless and bleeding and for no reason at all decide to hit him really hard in the head with a 2x4 an extra 3 or 4 times.

THEN YES, bad stuff will happen to you. I'm absolutely shocked the woman who committed the above 9 deadly sins (any combination of 2 could get your stuff stolen or yourself killed) has the gumption to consider herself a pawn of the situation. If you love watching disturbingly stupid people get away with murder then this movie is absolutely for you! Go ahead, watch and enjoy.
79 out of 119 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good, but not perfect thriller in the vein of Hitchcock
astrobdw27 October 2008
First, let me readily admit that while I used to be quite the cinephile, in recent years my tastes have sunk to the extreme lowbrow. My wife and I went to see Transsiberian as part of a date I took her on for her birthday. The occasion was the only reason I didn't (seriously, anyway) suggest that we go see Quarantine or the premier of Saw V instead of Transsiberian. Yes, I've sunk pretty low... :) However, especially in hindsight, I enjoyed the movie much more than I had expected to. As others have noted, there are many direct references to Hitchcock themes and techniques, and the first half of the movie builds quite slowly in order to establish the characters - which is done very well, even considering the necessary mystery surrounding a couple of the principals.

After a key series of rapid events occurs roughly midway through the film, the tension immediately ratchets up to a very thrilling level. Without spoiling anything, there are close-quarters cat-and-mouse movements on the train that are very effectively nail-biting.

I wasn't familiar with many of the female cast, nor the darkly charming Spaniard, but performances were solid all around. Woody Harrelson likely didn't have to put a huge amount of effort or training into his goofy, naive American, but Ben Kingsley, to me, absolutely made the movie with his role (again - no spoilers - see for yourself).

I disagree with other commentators about the ending leaving too much plot unexplained. It seemed to me like things were tied up quite well. The denouement is maybe almost too-quick, but I still didn't feel there were open questions to any negative effect on my opinion of the movie.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Awful Ending Tarnishes Pretty Decent Film
Tecun_Uman31 August 2008
The first 2/3 of Transsiberian is a pretty interesting film. We follow two Americans as they travel from China to Moscow on a famous rail line from the cold war era. The images of life on the train transport you to an old Soviet style of life that can be downright claustrophobic. I am willing to forgive Woody Harrelson's "Aww Shucks" country performance as he gushes in every scene about how "neat" something is. Soon the couple is sharing their cabin with a mysterious Spaniard and American couple, that just ooze intrigue. Hints are dropped about corrupt police and drug dealers as we see the two couples interact. The makings for a pretty good film are firmly established. However, at about the 2/3 mark, the director decides he is just going to fall back and make a clichéd Hollywood action movie. I was rubbing my eyes in disbelief, as I thought I was viewing a different movie. We get standard chases, standard switches and the prettiest bow that has ever been tied on a present. Everything gets wrapped up neatly and happily, which is too bad and too simple. The images of Siberia are beautiful and make for a good show, it is too bad that the director could not close the show.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
what is this movie? what a joke..
sebastian488413 November 2011
Warning: Spoilers
the worst movie i have ever seen in my life! actually i have just registered to IMDb to warn other people not to watch it!! ^^SPOILERS^^ 1) heehaw yeah the Spanish dude killed some Russian guy in Vladivostok with a knife.. yes would love to see that.. and the blood on the knife, still warm when everything around is frozen.. yep pp a good start.. and why Ben Kingsley is speaking in Russian throwing in some stupid English words here and there?!?! EPIC FAIL 2) the travelers .. what a bunch of irritating armholes.. i was hoping all of them are gonna get killed off asap in some super brutal way just to look at them anymore 3) this movie is disrespectful to Russia, portraying those sub-moronic Americans as the good guys and Russians as the bad guys once again.

4) the girl killing Carlos after kissing him first WFF? the guy wasn't even covering himself just accepting blows to the head like some stupid making WFF?!?!?! epic faille.. and he had 1 million Eur's strapped around his belly?!?!? i thought Ur not allowed to carry more than 5k in cash when u go thru customs?!?!?! and those idiotic matriarchies dolls full of heroin... give me a break 5) later in the movie when they're on the train and suddenly they're all alone and everybody else is gone?!?! what?!?!? how did that happen?!? and then they stop the train in middle of a track for some interrogation in a hangar .. and the escape after they left them for 5 minutes!! .. unbelievable who came up with this idiotic script..

6) what is this movie WHY DOES IT HAVE 91 ROTTEN TOMATOES RATING?!?! that website sucks..

7) the girl trying to get rid of these dolls in the train how about u throw out the whole backpack instead of throwing them out one by one u moron.. my God...

8) woody Harrison get late for the train because he was within some soviet steam engines WTF!!?!?!?!?!?! OK I'm going to bed.. cyan la tr
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Into the Cold
kosmasp15 July 2008
Great actors, a nice thriller plot, what else does someone need. I guess not much more. But to me the special something "ingredient" is missing. I can't point out what it is, but it feels like something special is missing to make this really special.

While it starts off traditionally, it takes a few turns and twists that you might entirely expect. Which is a good thing, but can also confuse a few people. Of course when characters start acting implausibly, you might start shaking your head in disbelief. Even more so when it turns out that some outrageous decisions were made rightfully so (as the plot starts to point out later).

If you can suspend your disbelief, you might and will enjoy it. If not, than this might turn out to be torture after half the movie is over.
14 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Wow! Like a Hitchcock Classic!
wmjaho19 January 2008
2008 Sundance Film Festival ★ ★ ★ ★ (out of four)

My favorite movie from the first day of Sundance 2008. Roy (a very young-looking Woody Harrelson) and Jessie (Emily Mortimer) are a young Iowa couple, returning from a church humanitarian mission in China via the Transsiberian Express, where they encounter the much more adventurous Carlos (Eduardo Noriega) and Abby (Kate Mara). Boarding mid-way is Ben Kingsley, who we have learned from the opening scene is a Moscow police detective.

Like a Hitchcock classic, we are grabbed from the start with a feeling that things are not all as they seem, and don't lose that uneasy feeling that something very bad is going to happen until bad things really start happening. The tension is eerie and relentless, with telling glances and social conversation that suggest the relationships between these four are going to take a disturbing turn. Written by Director Brad Anderson (The Machinist), and inspired by a Transibberian trip he once took, the script is inspired and very tight, the characters infused with extraordinary depth and interest, the Russian state a harrowing umbrella and the dialog consistently powerful and compelling. (My favorite line, from Ben Kingsley, goes something like this: "We have a saying in Russia: You can always go forward with a lie, but you can never go back.")

As Anderson said in the Q&A, the confined spaces of trains make for heightened drama. Shot in Lithuania, the cinematography is haunting, capturing the mysterious, bleak and unsettled state of post-Soviet Russia, which makes for a marvelous backdrop to the action.

This movie should do well in national release. Maybe very well.

Sundance Moments: Brad Anderson and all the principals of the cast were at the Sundance premiere. More so than usual, they all praised Anderson as an extraordinary and meticulous director, one of the greats. Ben Kingsley noted that what attracted him to the movie, besides the Russian sub-story, was that the characters were archetypes and not caricatures, which is quite true. Anderson talked about how bitterly cold it was shooting in Lithuania.
155 out of 242 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The nightmare that ensues when a couple venture off the beaten track, following time dedicated to nothing but aiding.
johnnyboyz21 February 2010
If Brad Anderson has displayed a better example of being able to construct a tense and taut thriller prior to the only other film of his that I've seen, namely The Machinist, then I haven't come across it yet. Transsiberian, the 2008 thriller that sees many-a different individual from many-a different nation combine to deliver something thoroughly satisfying, is quite the little train ride into Hell; a return ticket to an isolated place of terror you really don't want to be anywhere near, in which half way down the line, your 'return' half goes missing. The world in which Transsiberian unfolds is cold, distant and lonely; the manner in which the characters act in their efficiency is equally cold, but disturbingly clinical and additionally calculated; whereas the experience of the film is one that is both terrifying and engrossing.

The film centres around an American couple travelling from a volunteering exercise in China, by way of most of Eastern Europe, when it transpires they're taking the Transsiberian train through the snowy; ice cold nether-regions of Russia. Having just finished helping; aiding and making good on those less fortunate, attentions in getting by, and just generally surviving, must drastically switch as they themselves become potential victims of harm; foulness; ruthlessness and corruption. This, as these items plus a real sense of wrongdoing and evil take over as the ingredients of the game for the journey home.

The couple are Woody Harrelson's Roy and Emily Mortimer's Jessie, an odd twosome; a partnership that sees one half in Roy, a guy rather infatuated with a number of hulking, parked trains situated in and around train stop goods yards, waltzing around with his encyclopedic knowledge and somewhat typical appearance of someone of an 'anorak' nature. This as they encounter another young couple in Carlos (Noriega), a ruggedly handsome and somewhat sexualised Hispanic male travelling with Abby (Mara), a pretty but somewhat vampish American girl. The retaining of Jessie, in the nicest possibly sense, as easily unclassifiable in appearance or 'type' helps in us relating to her, becoming aligned with her, and aids in the racking up of tension at later times when her life is at great stake.

Indeed it is Jessie that stands at the station at the beginning of the train trip, looking at the large map directly in front of her just prior to setting out. It's a large map; an intimidating map; a confusing map, with that feeling of it being the sort of journey ahead of you that you'd desperately like to pass off without much incident as you venture out into the unknown. Her gaze lingers on it a while before she shuffles off, unaware of exactly what lies ahead of her. It is a journey of which is instigated by the MacGuffin of the piece, an item that seems to be missing from one of the film's early scenes when the aftermath of a drug deal minus heroin is found by Ben Kingsley's Russian cop, Ilya Grinko, and his crew.

Transsiberian is good, old fashioned thrills and spills without anything fancy; without anything overly visual on screen that feels as if it exists purely in order to grab your attention - it's just good, honest build-up; crucible and straight forward terror. A good example of this approach is highlighted early on during the train journey, when a tiny altercation with a figure of authority plants some ominous seeds followed by a casual overhearing of a conversation on Jessie's behalf, that of which sees a Frenchman talking to someone else of the Russian law enforcers in the area, and the iron fist with which they rule that, on this occasion in this story, something as seemingly trivial as a misspelling on someone's Visa saw a hapless individual loose two toes.

Director Anderson's changing of tact to enforce a sense of observing this harrowing story through the eyes of Jessie is enforced when an instance sees Roy unable to make it back to the train after it pulls out of a station stop, after which Anderson constructs the world Jessie inhabits within the train more in a more ominous and scarier manner than before. The people appear uglier and more hostile; this doesn't suggest Jessie needs Roy to hold her hand as he leads her through the film, more-over, that sense of loss of a companion in a foreign territory twinned with the menace both on and off screen parties carry linger, ominously, at the back of one's mind. Eventually, Jessie's sporadic interactions with Carlos lead them into the rural wilderness in which certain incidences play out, thus paving the way for particular revelations to unfold later on.

Anderson's screenplay, which he co-wrote with Will Conroy, is full of twists and turns that bend the film down routes of both thrills and scares, producing a number of scenes of great effectiveness revolving around a routine set up, as well as finding time to shed some light on one's moral standpoint when certain events unfold out in the wilderness. The film's separating of its different tones and situations is near-flawless. In providing us with this nicest of nice couples, who then rendez-vous with another couple; before branching out into a film that sees a particular character coming into contact with items they really don't want to have anything to do with, the makers demonstrate a clear ability to change gears very naturally and let the film flow. All this, before settling for sheer horror following the noir-infused seeds that were sewn; this when a clear establishment of an antagonistic force to threaten those we've come to associate ourselves with, as well as the overseeing of some serious stakes being raised. Transsiberian is a romping, thrilling ride; a combination of promising to deliver on a level of generic thrills plus creative and natural film-making.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
In a row with Machinist and Session 9 this one is far at the end
dschmeding16 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Come on, Transsiberian could have been an nice Thriller. Its pretty stretched at times but the acting is great, the setting is interesting and the plot about a unsuspecting couple meeting the wrong people on a Transiberan travel from China to Russia starts interesting. But honestly this movie has so many unbelievable elements which are viable to the plot that it soon gets rather annoying. Most of all main actress Emily Mortimers character Jessie is just ridiculous. After her husband misses the train and is left behind in a hotel (at first we think he got beat up but that red herring is soon dropped) which is idiotic in itself she waits in a hotel with Latin lover Carlos (whom the met on the train with his girlfriend Abby) who obviously has a crush on her and even goes on a trip to an abandoned church in the middle of some forest. Sure, her husband is in the middle of nowhere, so why not get everybody lost. After Carlos is a little too eager to get in her pants she doesn't hit him once in self defense, no she beats him to death with multiple hits to the head. But like this isn't stupid enough she meets her husband back on the train who made friends with a Russian detective played by Ben Kingsley. She finds out Carlos placed drugs in her luggage, they give it to the cop but she doesn't tell her story even when the Russian mafia threatens to kill her husband, Abby lies cut up and bruised on a table and everyone is looking for Carlos who also stole money from the mobsters. Like some gangsters looking for money that would care if she killed Carlos. And this behavior carries the movie to a to a ridiculous train crash and then a medium end. To me Transsiberian was a rather bad surprise.
51 out of 74 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Beautifully Shot Thriller in the Cold
sundevil2720 January 2008
Just screened this great film at Sundance 2008 and came away very pleased with the experience. It appears that Director Brad Anderson has successfully created a modern thriller worthy of attention. The backdrop of this film is the wondrous Transsiberian Express railway which in itself makes this completely watchable and makes for fantastic cinematography. The story takes us along the railway with Jesse (Emily Mortimer) and Roy (Woody) who are taking the trek as an adventure after a stint in China. The two Americans find themselves befriended by a young couple Carlos and Amby (I think thats her name,the character was played by Kate Mara) who themselves are traveling around Russia. After some time together an awkward friendship forms between Jesse and Carlos who has several different motives. As the train keeps pushing across the frozen tundra some situations occur that separate the newfound friends and places certain individuals in compromising positions that ultimately result in some stressful events. Russian narcotics officer Grinko (Kingsley) arrives just in time to really make things chaotic and turn the train ride into a thrill ride. Jesse finds herself pushing and pulling between dealing with the truth and what it will take to survive the train trip home.

First of all whether one loves the plot or not, its hard to deny the fantastic cinematography that takes place throughout the film. The train sequences inside are so authentic that one can truly feel the atmosphere breathing. Overall the whole film just feels authentic to the locations and the people who wander in and out of the film are completely genuine. Superb performances by all, just really good stuff from actors you would expect it from. Plot runs a little weaker towards the end and inevitably its somewhat predictable as most thrillers are, but with the train and the location its a enough of a twist to keep viewers interested. Flick definitely should appeal more to mainstream audiences then the typical indie sorts, so buzz might be a bit weak on the indie circuit but this movie should have decent release interest and definitely get good views on video and cable when people give it a chance.
77 out of 116 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Kill off all my demons, Roy, and my angels might die, too.
lastliberal-853-25370831 December 2013
It is good to see that Hitchcock is alive and well. Brad Anderson (Session 9) gives us a good thriller that keeps us guessing throughout.

You never know who the good guys and the bad guys are. It really doesn't matter as the characters are so good that you are drawn to their performances.

Emily Mortimer (Paris, je t'aime, The Sleeping Dictionary) is excellent as a tempted wife who finds that demons still exist within her. When she realizes that she has been set up, the tension became amazing as we watch her efforts to escape.

The tempter is an equally good Eduardo Noriega (Vantage point & the elusive Alatriste). He has met his match with Mortimer, but not before he really complicates her life.

There is some really gruesome torture involving Kate Mara (Brokeback Mountain, We Are Marshall).

And, there is Ben Kingsley, a detective that goes after drug dealers. His performance is amazing. (Kingsley will be in Queen of the South next year, but I don't get my hopes up as that film is written by the same person who wrote Alatriste, which is not to be found.)

Kingsley is his usual amazing self and his character is worth the price of admission all by itself.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Character derailment
mxjane-19 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
The main character makes me wonder if the plot changed somewhere along the line and the writers & director tried to patch things together because Jessie (Emily Mortimer) is totally unbelievable as a reformed chica mala. If she was supposedly such a bad girl from the age of 16 until her late 20's, she would have much more intelligence than to be pulled-in by Carlos time and again.

There were some good mood changes and good acting by all but just too much belief to suspend as Jessie repeatedly blundered along. I was hoping that she would get killed and was thrilled when the movie ended. I do not recommend.
37 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
High-caliber suspense
Agnelin24 March 2009
"Transsiberian" is, in my opinion, one of the best thrillers and suspense movies that have hit the big screen in the recent years. It's got it all to grip and keep the viewer firmly glued to the seat until the final credits start to roll -because there is a story to tell until that very moment.

The movie follows American couple Roy (Woody Harrelson) and Jesse (wonderful Emily Mortimer), who have gone to China to help their church and decide to return on the Transsiberian line across said part of Russia. But they're in for more than they bargained for when they meet the mysterious young couple made up by Carlos (Eduardo Noriega) and Abby (Kate Mara), and nasty surprises begin to come up...

"Transsiberian" is one of those movies which, based on a simple script and just a handful of characters, always manage to surprise the viewer or, at least, keep them interested and guessing -and you probably won't always be able to guess correctly, because there are enough u-turns and red herrings to keep your interest always up. All of the above is enhanced and delivered by a cast in a state of grace -like I said, Emily Mortimer is superb as the main character, a loyal wife and church-goer who, nevertheless, has her own skeletons in the cupboard; but Harrelson, Noriega, Mara, and Ben Kingsley all offer remarkable performances and bring their characters to life, lending them enormous credibility and individuality as nuanced characters, neither all good nor all bad. Not to miss are also the locations, and the train itself, with its ample gallery of peoples from different parts of the world. It is interesting to note that those characters, who seem to have been put there for purposes of adding color and realism to the story, look neutral, picturesque or even funny at first, but suddenly acquire more threatening and somber shadows as the tone of the narration turns more tense and suspenseful and things begin to go wrong for our protagonists.

There is more to "Transsiberian" that is worthy of note, and I vividly recommend this movie to any fan of suspense stories with lots of action and psychological insight.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed