I think of all the episodes that demonstrate the vapidity of the application of the prime directive, this one does so the most effectively. Most of the episode is spent on the chastisement of a man whose work effectively saves an entire race of people, on the bizarre notion that it is somehow unethical to interfere with the course of a civilization when that civilization is being wiped out by natural disasters completely unrelated to their own actions.
Look, given that the federation is not composed of evil idiots, surely any democratic vote would result in the decision that interference in alien cultures when those cultures would otherwise be wiped out through natural disasters is eminently ethical and correct? The central conflict of this episode is so forced and silly, as is this specific application of the prime directive whenever it pops up.
And as the story concludes Worfs Brother's actions, opposed vehemently by the supposed moral federation crew, result in the preservation of an alien species and culture. How anyone could watch through the episode and not come to the conclusion that any alternative course of action would be wrong is beyond me. It doesn't really feel like the writers don't want you to conclude that either, which really raises the question of why they continue to write the enlightened federation as ridiculous rules lawyers willing to witness the destruction of entire species on the basis of poorly envisioned dogma.
Look, given that the federation is not composed of evil idiots, surely any democratic vote would result in the decision that interference in alien cultures when those cultures would otherwise be wiped out through natural disasters is eminently ethical and correct? The central conflict of this episode is so forced and silly, as is this specific application of the prime directive whenever it pops up.
And as the story concludes Worfs Brother's actions, opposed vehemently by the supposed moral federation crew, result in the preservation of an alien species and culture. How anyone could watch through the episode and not come to the conclusion that any alternative course of action would be wrong is beyond me. It doesn't really feel like the writers don't want you to conclude that either, which really raises the question of why they continue to write the enlightened federation as ridiculous rules lawyers willing to witness the destruction of entire species on the basis of poorly envisioned dogma.