"Perry Mason" The Case of the Foot-Loose Doll (TV Episode 1959) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
More about Millie, please!
berry12733 August 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This is a fairly good episode. But, it can be confusing... so thank goodness for being able to pause and rewind to check and make sure you heard what you thought you heard.

Mille Crest is an interesting and sympathetic character, very well played by Ms. Ruta Lee.

Millie is jilted by a rat who left her holding the bag for his embezzlement of funds from the business where they both worked.

She leaves town and eventually there is a murder. And then... here come the red herrings, a floozy who grabs a ride, a diamond in the rough roommate, an investigator, a nagging wife, a senator, etc... But, we are left wondering how Millie's situation turned out! What about the charges for embezzlement?
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
'From the pot into the fire' is a nice phrase for this episode
kfo94941 May 2013
There is a lot of things in this episode that does not make sense. I know we have to take some things with a grain of salt just for TV sake but this episode was full of items that was so strange even for a condensed one hour show.

The episode begins with Millie Crest receiving a phone call from her fiancé saying that he just stole some money from the firm where both of the work and it is going to look like she was an accomplice. Instead of calling the police or a lawyer, she gets into her car and drives away. Later she picks up a woman, Fern Driscoll, that was having car trouble. Fern is a troubled woman that decides to pull a gun on Millie to steal her car but the action causes Millie to loose control of the car and drive off a cliff killing Fern.

With Fern dead, Millie takes on her identity. Little does Millie know but she will find more trouble assuming the identity of Fern than keeping her own name. When she is visited by a sleazy investigator it will lead to a situation involving a Senator, some letters and an ice pick. When the investigator is killed with the ice pick it will lead to Millie confessing about her true name but this has no bearing on a murder warrant issued by Hamilton Burger's office.

But as the episode continues we find an odd twist to this mystery. People are not exactly whom they seem nor are people telling the exact truth. With the true murderer rather easy to spot the episode ends with the bailiff having to restrain someone from leaving the courtroom. Then we get a confession that is a constant of any Perry Mason episode. Even with some odd events in this episode it was still a worthy watch.
28 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very interesting, despite a fundamental flaw in the underlying premise
nomad47200228 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This case has a fundamental flaw, in that it should never have come to trial. The prosecution theory was that the defendant killed Carl Davis to conceal her other crimes. In point of fact, she had not committed any other crimes.

As far as Carl Davis believed, she was Fern Driscoll. He had no knowledge that she was in fact Millie Crest, and that she was wanted for embezzlement. He had no substantive reason to believe that she was driving the car, which belonged to the believed-to-be-dead Millie Crest. He was there to get the letters, to which the real Fern Driscoll had legal right of possession, and to which neither Carl Davis nor Senator Baylor had any legal right. Thus the prosecution theory falls apart.

Someone entered the premises in an illegal attempt to obtain those letters. Anyone in lawful and peaceful possession of a residence has every legal right to defend themselves against a known or unknown assailant. There was no murder, only a lawful act of self-defense.

There should never have been a trial.
13 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Ruta Rules
darbski21 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
**SPOILERS** Probably. Ruta Lee is absolutely sexy as a brunette, and she does a good job in her part; she always does. More than competent, she's one of the actresses who do it all, and is totally dependable no matter what the part. Plus, as I've said before, she's a fox.However, Millie crest, her part is too easily led, and too easily frightened.

When her pondscum fiancé informs her that he has embezzled $9,000 from their workplace, she runs instead of calling the police and telling them everything. Of course, if she did that, we wouldn't have much of a story, would we? Another misadventure, and she has an accident that kills someone she thought was someone else; the clot thickens. More and more tangles wrap around a storyline that has Perry unwrapping it like an onion. I gotta say that Ruta is as striking a brunette as Barbara in this episode, and it was great to see them at the defense table.

As far as the killer, it was obvious. What wasn't answered was how Perry was going to get Ruta off the embezzlement rap. I think they should have cleared up the murder - both the killer and accomplice take the fall, and then clear up her involvement in the first theft.

Any way you cut it, you really ought to get this episode and view it to see how right yours truly is. Thanks to IMDb for the reference, and Barton MacLane for another great portrayal. They both did the S.A.G. proud.
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An admirable place to start for anyone who has never seen the original Perry Mason series.
jamesraeburn20038 December 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Mildred Crest (Ruth Lee) is dumped by her boyfriend Bob Wallis who has embezzled money from the firm where they both work and has framed her for it. Realising the police will soon be after her, she makes a run for it and picks up a hitchhiker in her car, a young woman calling herself Fern Driscoll. She pulls a gun on Mildred and the car crashes off of the road and into a ravine catching fire. Mildred is thrown clear, but Fern was burnt to death. Arriving in Los Angeles, Mildred assumes Fern's identity and takes a room with Laura Richards (Eve McVeigh). However, Mildred knows nothing about the past of her dead hitchhiker and it is about to catch up with her when an insurance investigator called Carl Davis (Robert Bray) shows up. First, he asks her to make a statement to the effect that she was driving the death car and, secondly, assuming she is Fern Driscoll, he demands that she turns over some letters to a Johnny Baylor whom he says is prepared to pay a large sum of money to get them back. Since she is not Fern Driscoll, she has no idea what he is talking about. Davis leaves but says he will be back that evening and will have expected her to have produced the letters by then. Realising that she is in terrible trouble as a result of assuming a dead woman's identity - plus being framed for embezzlement back home - Mildred contacts the lawyer Perry Mason (Raymond Burr) for help. He accepts her case and, although he does not let on to his client, he suspects that she has not been telling him the truth and thinks she is in deep trouble but as a victim of circumstance. That night, Mildred is attacked by an unknown assailant at Laura's apartment. She grabs an ice pick to defend herself and she later swears she only grazed her attacker's shoulder with it. But, later it transpires that Carl Davis has been stabbed fatally with an ice pick and dies as a result of that and Mildred is tried for his murder. As usual, the prosecution lead by the DA Hamilton Burger (William Talman) and Lt. Tragg (Ray Collins) believe they have an open and shut case. However, Mason, aided by his secretary Della Street (Barbara Hale) and the private investigator Paul Drake (William Hopper), uncover a complex web of deceit and cover ups that reveals a good number of people had motives for murder other than Mildred. They include Senator Baylor (Barton Maclane), a politician whose son was romantically involved with the real Fern Driscoll, but she was taking out a law suit against him and Baylor feared a scandal would hinder his reelection chances. In addition, Davis's wife, Marjorie (Betty Lou Gerson), kept her husband under close scrutiny by going wherever he went and answering his phone calls since she feared that he would ditch her for another woman. But, was the hitchhiker really Fern Driscoll and, if she was not, who was killed in the car crash and where is she now?

One of the many absorbing cases that ace Defence Attorney Perry Mason encountered in his long and distinguished career. The original series ran for nine years between 1957 and 1966 and, nearly twenty years later, Burr would reprise his role in a long running series of feature length TVM's. This one is adapted from Erle Stanley Gardner's marvelous novel - one that I have read incidentally and, despite only having an hour to do it, I felt the scriptwriter did a more than reasonable job of putting most of its most attractive elements on to the small screen. As with most of Perry's cases, they are all very involved plots and if your concentration lapses for even an incident you will lose track of it and it won't make much sense. The identity of the real murderer is sufficiently well concealed until the courtroom denouement and it is peopled with interesting characters and suspects that will hold your attention throughout. The standard of the acting is excellent from all concerned and, here, we get a real insight into Mason's character. He accepts Mildred Crest's case for thirty-eight cents, which was all she had in her purse at the time. Then later when Perry goes to question Senator Baylor who as you would expect is concerned for his career and nothing else offers him $10,000 to represent him in retrieving some potentially damaging letters from Fern Driscoll. Mason replies that he has already accepted Mildred's case for thirty-eight cents and the Senator is left speechless. He can't understand why he would accept a case for that tiny sum when he was offering him a fortune. We can see that Perry, a lawyer of exceptional ability who could command the earth and cultivate the richest clients going, retains concern for the poorer working class citizens and goes out of his way to help those who don't have the resources to hire somebody of his stature to represent them against crimes they have been accused of committing but, nearly always, did not.

All in all, for anybody who may have seen the 1980's-90's revival series and wants to check the original out, this is an admirable place to start.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
When The Alibi is broken
bkoganbing13 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Barton MacLane heads the guest stars in this Perry Mason episode as none other than a US Senator who breaks up his son's romance and then gets himself caught up in another crime and inadvertently provides the killer with an alibi.

The accused is Ruta Lee who is left holding the bag after her rat of a boyfriend embezzles money from the bank they work at and leaves evidence incriminating her. She flees town and in a chain of circumstances exchanges identities with a woman who was seeing MacLane's son. Ruta fortunately winds up in the capable hands of Raymond Burr.

The deceased is a bottom feeding private eye played by Robert Bray who is not above a little blackmail.

Again there is the Perry Mason paradigm that he does not defend the guilty. And I've told you MacLane is not the killer. But there are a few other suspects to go around. When the alibi is broken however there is only one possible perpetrator.

You'll see what I mean when you watch the episode.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Perry helps out another fugitive on the run
Scarecrow-885 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Ruta is wonderful as this innocent framed by a despicable thief who took money from the company they worked. However, while on the run, a Fran Discoll pulls a gun on her, there is a crash, and then an insurance investigator comes a calling wanting letters for a senator to keep from the public involving a pregnancy and sordid details. The problem I had with the episode isn't the murdered investigator and his marital problems, the senator and his attempts to conceal his son's affairs, or even Mildred's 38 cents case to help get her out of a murder wrap regarding defending herself with an icepick against the investigator. It was about that dirtbag who left her to be involved in embezzlement when she was never in the wrong. I just always felt what drug Mildred into the whole mess could have been cleared up much earlier. Instead, the louse who left Mildred in such bad shape is never addressed as he should have been.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Too many flaws
mygiftiwrite29 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Big problems: Mildred and the woman she picks up at a gas station who claims to be Fern are both brunettes. In the second half of the episode, Perry tells Paul to search for a blonde who is the real Fern. You'd think all the people searching for Fern would know this and realize neither Mildred or the fake Fern fit that description. Next, when Mildred arrives in Los Angeles and meets a woman in a diner, they become roommates. Fine. As they're walking out, though, the cameras focuses on a man who turns out to be one of the guys looking for Fern. A later scene shows him with Mildred's roommate, but they don't mention how the two met and whether the roommate's encounter with Mildred was a set-up or true coincidence. Another problem is that Mildred's embezzlement situation is never cleared up. The murder charge is dropped against her, but instead of being the center of the show, she is merely a means to an end. The final scene deals with the real Fern, her boyfriend and his father, a senator who had set the whole Fern search in motion and Mildred isn't even mentioned. The writers really botched this one.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Case of the Foot-Loose Doll
Prismark1016 July 2023
Poor Mildred Crest (Ruth Lee.) Framed by her beau Bob Wallis who stole money from the firm they both worked for.

At least he has the decency to phone her and tell her to run quickly

On her way to Los Angeles, she picks up a hitchhiker Fern Driscoll who has a suitcase with her initials. Only this Fern is an escaped criminal who pulls a gun on Mildred.

The car crashes and Fern is burnt to death. Mildred thinks it is best to assume her identity and get to LA. Only an insurance investigator called Carl Davis shows up demanding some letters to be returned.

Mildred is advised to see Perry Mason who senses that she is not telling the whole truth. Later Carl is injured by an ice pick, claiming he was attacked by Mildred. Later he dies when his injuries were not deemed to be that serious.

Now Perry has to defend Mildred for murder. Only Perry knows she cannot have killed the investigator.

Also where is the real Fern Driscoll? An escaped prisoner could not had a suitcase with her own initials. Where does the senator seeking re-election fit into all this?

No wonder both Paul Drake and Della Street have questions for Perry at the end. This is a complex story adapted for the screen. It was not always easy to follow.

Despite the twists and turns, the actual murderer of Carl Davies was easy for Perry to figure out.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Well-done but muddled
ronnybee211229 July 2020
This is a very well-made episode,in the technical sense. The camera-work (cinematography?) is very well-done,the musical score is comically dramatic,without overdoing it. The wardrobe,and the sets are all top-notch. However,on the other hand...The story,the plot,was somewhat convoluted and confusing to me,I must admit. Some of it seems rather farfetched,but that's television for you! With a few grains of salt and a willingness to be entertained you will at least get several honest chuckles out of it!
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
You'd better see a man named Perry Mason
sol121817 August 2013
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** Poor confused and totally clueless Millie Crest, Ruta Lee, had better see Perry Mason, Raymond Burr, in order to get her head straighten out in just what kind of trouble that she now finds herself in. It's bad enough that Millie's faïence Bob Wallace, John Bryant, has framed her with him embezzling $9,000.00 from the company that they work for and also checked out on her, to possibly South America, on her wedding day. She also gets involved with a US senator the honorable Harriman Baylor's, Barton Maclane,son the Alaskan bound Johnny, James Kirkwood Jr, who's reportedly to have gotten her pregnant out of wedlock. But Millie is now also then prime suspect in insurance agent Carl Davis' murder. Not bad for a small town girl from Marshall City visiting the big swinging and glittering town of of L.A.

It was Millie's big mistake of taken on the identity of the killed in a car accident Fran Driscoll, Helene Stanley, that started the ball rolling against her. It was in fact Driscoll who carjacked Millie at gun point which lead to her losing control of the car in her struggling with Millie for the gun and falling down an embankment killing her. How Senator Baylor got involved in this royal mess was his son Johnny that Driscoll was having an affair with whose love letters to her telling Dirscoll what an unfeeling rat his father is that can sink his campaign for re-election before it even starts. And it's those letters, eight of them, that are suspected to be in Millie's possession which their not. It's here where insurance agent Davis comes in trying to shake down Millie whom he like everyone else mistakes from Fran Driscoll. That at first ended with him getting stabbed by an ice pick by Millie Crest and later murdered by what the police suspect is the same person.

****SPOILERS*** It's Millie's .38 cent, that's all she could afford to pay him, lawyer Perry Mason who soon realizes that she's not Fran Driscoll and that the late Fran Driscoll who carjacked Millie isn't her either. Then who exactly is Fran Driscoll and if in fact if she's alive or not? By checking hospital records corresponding with the day Fran Driscoll was supposedly killed Perry comes up with the real live Fran Driscoll which cooks Sen. Baylor chances for re-election. It's also proved in court by Perry that it was the murdered Carl Davis who took the hit, or stab wound, to cover the senator's tracks and his involvement in the murder case. But by far the biggest shock of all was who in fact murdered Agent Davis! And as it turned out Davis' murder had nothing a all to do with any of the many goings on in this very strange and confusing Perry Mason episode.
10 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Ice Pick Murder
Hitchcoc29 December 2021
This was an OK episode. It involves the confusing identities of three young women. It also includes a couple of relatively incompetent private detectives. And an ice pick. This is decently paced and somewhat gripping. Unfortunately for me, I knew who the killer was almost instantly.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Nonsensical writing
mttiro8 March 2021
My critique is simple. The Hollywood episode writers in 1959 make the characters sound like they just got off the plane from Britain. Characters sound like they're on the streets of London. A vendor will be asked "Have you any papers?" And he will answer "No, I'm sorry, I haven't any." Not "Do you have any papers?" and not "No, I don't have any."

A witness tells Mason, "I was out with a man." Mason asks, "*Has this man a name?" Not "*Does this man have a name?"

In court Mason will say to the judge "I should like to ask that this item be marked Exhibit A for the defense." Not "I would like . . . " The judge will say "It shall be so marked." Not "It will be so marked."

My complaint is, No American talks that way, not even in 1959. Americans say "Do you have any papers?" and "I would like to ask . . . ," etc. The dialogue in this episode, and in dozens of others in this series, is British English, not American English. Why were American script-writers writing British English for American actors to speak in 1959? When you watch this episode, or any others like it, the dialogue sounds contrived and artificial. It detracts from the otherwise excellent production. Someone should've said something.
3 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed