"Oz" Out o' Time (TV Episode 1999) Poster

(TV Series)

(1999)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Season 3: Same weaknesses as before but improves a bit on previous season – ironically by focusing on the brutality more (SPOILERS)
bob the moo30 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
It was many years ago as a student living in a rather dingy flat and staying up late that I discovered Oz and the memory of this amazingly brutal and adult show stayed with me for years, to the point that I cannot watch an episode of Law & Order or some similar show without pointing out the Oz actor who is playing a small role that week. I recently started watching back through the show and was a little disappointed to find it was not quite as flawless as my memory told me it was. In this third season we open with Alvarez in solitary following the terrible act of violence that ended the previous season, Adebisi broken, soft and irrelevant following the murder of his father figure, Kenny reforming himself as "Bricks" in order to take the lead of his group, Hill is in Oz and nobody ever mentions him hiding in a coffin in the final scene of season 2 while Beecher returns from his broken limbs as, well, Wolverine.

Yup, Wolverine. Within the first episode or so Beecher removed the corrupt chief guard by slashing at him with his fingernails until he dies of a cut throat. It is as suddenly violent as it is laughable and it starts the tone that will continue for the rest of the season – brutal violence mixed with half-done plotting. Fortunately this silly moment is one of the sillier ones but it is still a season that isn't willing to put the time in to prop up its plots (not unlike Busmalis' tunnel in season 2). It is actually an improvement on the second season though, because a lot of the plotting is lower level violence and betrayals, all of which can cope with less character development and therefore less time. Whenever it is all backstabbing and political wrangling over the control of drugs then it not only works but it makes the violence all the more relevant. Sadly it is not all this way and the show still makes the mistake of rushing character just. Much like O'Reily suddenly fell in love with Gloria and suddenly his brother had killed her husband, so here we have characters acting in service of the plot rather than the other way round.

The most obvious example of this is Keller; despite all evidence to the contrary (his treatment of Beecher and his treatment of his ex-wives), suddenly Keller loves Beecher. This dynamic sets up some plot lines but it never makes sense in regards the actual character. Adebisi is a little different because his change, although still sudden in some ways, is spread out over time – I would have liked a bit more subtly to it, but it worked better thanks to the time it takes. This rush means that everything gets done quickly and so the writers need to put more and more events into the season – so we have boxing matches, murders of characters introduced simply so they can be murdered and of course that old favourite: family members ending up in the same section of the same prison as their relatives. All of this works when it is brutal and impacting, but unfortunately it is never as smart as it needs to be in terms of developing the threads. The pace of the show creates a real collage of violence but it also undermines how good that same collage is because it isn't allowed to breathe and grow.

The cast all do well despite this – or in some cases, because of it, since they are not all great actors. I shan't list them but suffice to say that the ones that do the best are those that are allowed to play simple violent monsters that ooze threat and as a result Simmons, Winters and Akinnuoye-Agbaje will forever be etched in my mind as the characters they play here. Perrineau continues to do good work as the narrator here and his interludes frequently aid the plot by providing some form of structure.

Season 3 of Oz works because it has a lot going on and focuses on how brutal and impacting it all is, but it still has the same weaknesses that the previous season had and it worries me to see them being built into the fabric of the show. The rush to move plots along means they rarely get to have as much meaning as they could have – whether it is characters murdered within seconds or big character changes that occur in a few lines of dialogue. I note that the fourth season was given more episodes for its run so perhaps this means that the writers take their time a bit more, but we'll see. Enjoyable for what it does – but what it doesn't do is pretty damaging along the way.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An Improvement On Season Two
Theo Robertson15 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
OZ can be a very irritating series . Season two was disappointing and the third season is an improvement on its immediate predecessor but doesn't come anywhere near as being as good as the debut . There's also something else and that is some of the characters and a couple of the subplots aren't carried on in to season three . If you remember the " cliffhanger " to season two featuring Hill sneaking in to a coffin you'll be surprised this is never referred to in series three . I suppose Augustus changed his mind ? It seems strange in an era where television shows are taped by fans so they can watch them over and over again Tom Fontana hasn't tried to make the narrative more cohesive and less episodic and disposable

Season three sees the introduction of memorable characters . Officers Claire Howell and Clayton Hughes and Russian gangster Nikolai Stanislofsky .Hughes works very well as a character in his debut season . He's someone who comes across as an idealistic young man who becomes a hack out of a misguided duty to his dead father and soon finds himself out of his depth in the prison system which is an unforgiving jungle . With hindsight maybe his character should have disappeared at the end of series three without leaving a gun in a pod ? Howell is a sadistic b*tch who finds herself rejected by McManus but one can't help thinking why on earth he'd be interested in her in the first place . Indeed one can't help noticing his taste in women leaves much to be desired . Officer Whittseley ! Officer Howell ! He'd be better off with Sister Pete . Stanislofsky quickly gains his revenge on the person he believes killed his friend though it's never revealed how Hanlon got off on the murder rap for killing Vogel . See what I mean about it being an irritating series ?

As for the other characters we saw several of them introduced in series two but sometimes they seem surplus to requirement . Karl Metzger gets written out in episode one but his demise is never followed up on . Think about it - a correctional officer is murdered and no investigation is held to find out who killed him ? It wouldn't happen in real life would it ? Shirley Bellinger left me with indifference in season two and my feelings remain in season three while Adibisi undergoes more character development as he did in season two but is never entirely convincing though he does have a hidden agenda for working in the AIDS ward

All in all season three is an improvement over season two but still nowhere as compelling as season one . This probably won't matter much to an OZ addict and writer Tom Fontana does try to bring a running thread to the narrative by introducing a boxing contest . It's at this point however you realise we won't be seeing anymore of the realism of season one and that in order to continue enjoying the show a large amount of suspension of disbelief is needed to continue enjoying OZ which is something of a pity
14 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed