"Law & Order: Special Victims Unit" Starved (TV Episode 2005) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Just a Doormat
bkoganbing1 October 2013
In this story the SVU squad is investigating three reported rapes with the same M/O and the victims are all successful professional women. What they have in common was a speed dating service and Mariska Hargitay goes undercover to nail the perpetrator.

What the squad comes up with is Dean Cain who is a surgeon and a domineering type of personality who doesn't like his women to question him in the slightest. All three victims dated him, but all three were raped by a man with a hooded mask. No identification and he has an alibi, a live-in girl friend played by Tina Holmes.

And Holmes is just a doormat of a personality, the kind who is not good at relationships, but she's fixated on Cain.

After this the story goes off in different directions as Holmes finally testifies for the prosecution in court and then attempts a suicide that leaves her a vegetable.

In the end we see what kind of master manipulator Cain truly is.

Cain's as evil as they come and for him you should see this SVU episode.
21 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Starved of greatness
TheLittleSongbird14 April 2021
The previous seven episodes, and actually the whole of Season 7, were a very mixed bag on the whole. Which is disappointing after such a great Season 6. As far as the previous episodes go, there were fantastic outings such as "Raw" and especially "911" (the latter being up there with the best of the whole show). But also disappointments with "Demons" (which didn't feel like a season premiere) and particularly "Name" (a change of pace episode that ended up not feeling like 'Law and Order: Special Victims Unit').

"Starved" for me has always been one of the disappointments. It is marginally better than "Name", but "Raw" and "911" it is not. One of the biggest examples for the whole of 'Special Victims Unit' of a truly great guest star turn that was infinitely better than the episode in question and deserved better. The concept sounded interesting and it is an interesting and polarising issue to raise, but "Starve" just didn't execute it that well. There are also other episodes in the franchise, such as 'Law and Order's' "Age of Innocence" that came out at a similar time, that explored the same issue and did it a lot better.

By all means, "Starved" does have things that it does well. Production values are slick and have a subtle grit, with an intimacy to the photography without being too claustrophobic. The music isn't used too much and doesn't get too melodramatic. The episode does start off great and very intriguingly, not to mention very creepy.

All the regulars are reliably excellent with no weak link, in fact the acting is fine. The best thing about "Starved" though is Dean Cain, here against type as the most despicable character he has ever played and he is magnificent and absolutely skin crawling. The amount of contempt one has for his character by the end of the episode is through the roof.

He did however deserve a much better episode, which started off well but went downhill drastically too early and got worse. Do have to agree that "Starved" would already have been a better episode by revealing the perpetrator much later, that way there would have been more suspense. The investigation elements of the case could have had more depth as the policing did seem underused in favour of Olivia's undercover work to the point that it seemed wasted. There are some taut and thought-provoking moments, but generally the script could have been tauter and more tasteful and too much is crammed in in the second half.

Too much of the case is predictable, no real surprises here beyond seeing how much further the perpetrator would go with his manipulation, and it is lacking in tension. The issue of right to life it tackles is interesting on paper, but the episode offers nothing new or illuminating on it (to the point where one questions its point) and also doesn't execute it in good taste, instead of handling it sensitively it felt like it was being exploited and rather heavy-handed. Like the writers were looking for another opportunity to push forward their views on the subject and doing so in a way where it is too clear which side of the argument they're on. Of the characters, the only meaty one is Cain's, the others are ciphers and not made to look good. Cora especially is portrayed as too naive and too easily manipulated to an insulting degree. It didn't sit well with me seeing a character so obviously vile and not one to trust being seemingly treated the opposite when talking about the issue that dominates the second half.

On the whole, disappointing. 5/10.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Cain plays evil well, but leaves a little to be desired
cinemaman25 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Dean Cain does a great job of playing the evil and conniving rapist. But honestly I've never been a fan of the episodes where the perp is identified right away in the beginning, and the rest of the show is spent trying to find a way to nail the slippery sucker who keeps annoyingly getting off by technicality. A little more mystery or at least a little bit of a hunt would be nice. You almost assume that the perp is going to turn out to be somebody different but what you see is what you get. The detectives don't do as much detecting in this one. The part of the wife is a little uneventful as well. I was hoping there would be more depth to her finally standing up for herself and her morals, but as another reviewer stated she's just sort of a doormat.
15 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Jumbled Mess
alicentrix12 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Im watching this show from the beginning for thr first time. This was probably the worst ending I've seen so far. We get no actual closure on the case against the doctor. They make no circle back to what was said during the crimes or to the other victims. When Mike talked about how Cora would never have wanted to be a vegetable near the end of the episode, he admits that he lived with Cora "every day for nearly a year" after the search of his apartment was ruled out earlier because she "was not a live in girlfriend". The episode is just incredibly sloppy all around. It felt like two completely different episodes smashed together.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Appropriately Named
jeanpierrexxiii4 July 2022
First off, the one thing I love about this episode is that a friend of mine, who I did theater with some 7-8 summers ago, played one of the victims. The joy I felt seeing her in one of my favorite TV shows!!

That's where the fun ends. Dean Cain is painful to watch in this. I grew up watching him in Lois & Clark, so there's some bias to overcome. He's not believable. What a waste of a guest.

This is a sloppy story that gets taken over by a subplot I didn't care for. The mother (I recognize her from Scary Movie lol) overacts. The ending has predictable elements and is one of the most unsatisfying I can recall. Part of it doesn't even make sense but I don't want to spoil it, even if I already think it's rotten.

I gave it 4 stars...1 for my friend, 1 because it's SVU, and 2 for not having Adam Beach.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed