"Law & Order" Virus (TV Episode 1993) Poster

(TV Series)

(1993)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Cyber overdose
TheLittleSongbird4 August 2020
Any episode for anything dealing with this subject always sounds interesting. The premise is not an innovative one, but it does intrigue despite having traps with how it would be executed. With the risk of it being too complicated, with too much going over the head, and with the question of whether it would hold up. Any chance to see technology this early on well before it significantly advanced (and continues to be so) also intrigued quite a lot.

"Virus" is very good and engages and interests, but after such a strong run of episodes between "Promises to Keep" and this part of me was expecting a little more than what was seen here. Far from being one of the best episodes of Season 3 but not one of the worst, it doesn't reach the disappointment level that "Helpless" did as far as the previous episodes go. So much is great here, such as a particularly great performance in a well-rounded role, but the potential traps that the premise had and can be easily fallen into are not completely avoided.

Once again, "Virus" is an episode that has very little wrong. Some of the storytelling could have done with more clarity later on, it's a quite complex case and slightly too much so going into the final third.

From cramming in a little too much. The outcome perhaps could have had longer time to unfold.

Dana Elcar however agreed is stunning, conveying his character's bitterness intensely and even at times movingly. His character is also very interesting, hardly stock. Can't fault the lead performances, always did love Michael Moriarty as Stone and even early on still Jerry Orbach perfectly shows what it was that made Briscoe so popular. The character interaction is also on point, nothing stiff or disconnected here. Especially in the legal scenes.

Rodgers also makes a nice early appearance. The script is well balanced tonally, is lean even with a lot of talk and always treats the viewer with respect. The case could have been more consistent, but is mostly gripping and at times tense and emotional in others. As said, it was very interesting to see how very early technology worked back then, though due to how much this has advanced over the years some may consider it "dated".

Summarising, very good on the whole. 8/10
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Insulin overdoses in the computer age
AlsExGal27 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
One of the first Law and Order episodes involving computer crime is this one, in which two patients die and several become critically ill after being administered incorrect dosages of insulin at a clinic that specializes in diabetes. A discussion with a technician leads to evidence that a computer virus has infected the hospital's computer network, and the virus was uploaded via a person dialing in to to the network.

A suspect and a motive are uncovered for the crime: the suspect's paranoid dad thinks he was blinded by the clinic, so they figure his son wanted revenge. Stone takes this to the judge, but no dice. So Stone decides to go after the father for conspiracy, hoping he can prove the father had knowledge of his son's intentions, and that, as Schiff says, the son will "get a case of the guilts" and confess. They do have a problem, though, in the father, who feels that he was wronged by the clinic and that they - not the diabetes - is at fault for his much worsened eyesight. He is therefore anxious for his day in court even if it might mean prison time.

This might be the earliest incident of technophobia in Law & Order history, and it is an annoying recurrent theme during the first five years of the show. Not until a more techno-savvy Curtis joins the force in 1995 does Law and Order ever talk about any of the good things that computers can do. Castwise, the episode is notable because Leslie Hendrix makes an early appearance as the medical examiner Rodgers.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Seven years before Y2K
safenoe9 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Dial-up modems, AOL, CompuServe, Usenet, floppy disks, laptops, computers, hackers, clunky keyboards and monitors, well that was the setting of 1993 of this high-tech Law and Order that deals with hackers and all with deadly effect with overdoses of insulin.

This episode, Virus, is a skip back in time, 30 years ago, which is the equivalent of 30 million years ago in internet age, but still references to the hard drive, virus, seven years before Y2K.

I wonder how this episode would be reworked now with social media and all and us living in a Black Mirroresque world. So fascinating I guess init.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Cursing the darkness
bkoganbing9 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Dana Elcar who real life suffered from macular degeneration and went blind before he died gives a stunning performance of a very vital man who curses the blindness he now has and blames the doctors at a clinic where he was treated as a diabetic. Symbolizing all of his troubles is Stephen Elliott the doctor who is the head of the clinic.

So the revenge planned was for the hospital computers to be hacked so that it gave false readings for blood sugar levels. It worked all too well as six people went into insulin shock resulting in two deaths.

Elcar is stunning as this revenge obsessed bitter person who just wants to ruin the doctor in his twisted way he feels caused what is happening to him. The problem is that due to his disability he probably could not have pulled off the crime. That's fine with him because he just wants the soapbox a trial would give him. It's what his lawyer Joanna Merlin is afraid of. Still Michael Moriarty prosecutes Elcar.

In the end justice is done, but two lives were lost to an obsession.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed