"Doctor Who" The Temple of Evil (TV Episode 1964) Poster

(TV Series)

(1964)

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A pretty fast moving opening episode, lots happening.
Sleepin_Dragon24 August 2015
It's the fifteenth Century and the TARDIS lands in an Aztec Priests tomb. Barbara recognises where they are by the artifacts (benefit of being a teacher.) Barbara wanders and is arrested, but soon is mistakenly identified as high priestess Yetaxa. The TARDIS gets locked inside the tomb. Barbara is installed as a leader and guide. A scheming Tlotoxl sets about causing problems, splitting the crew, sending Ian to Ixta, the warrior, and the Doctor to the Garden of Peace. Susan stays with Barbara, who as Yetaxa has to deliver rain. We learn anyone over the age of 52 goes to the Garden of Peace, the Doctor meets Cameca. A human sacrifice must occur, and Ian has to walk the victim to the alter. Barbara refuses to sanction the sacrifice, causing Tlotoxl to deem her a false god and that he will destroy her.

Keith Pyott is fantastic as Autloc, he gives such a good performance, he is almost regal, John Ringham is so good as the nasty Tlotoxl too, he's so devious.

John Lucarotti's script is a very good one, it's a very interesting period in history that's explored.

It's so sad that so many stories were junked, I'm so glad the Aztecs survived, it's a very interesting story.

Part 1, very good, high quality, interesting, a very good and intriguing early plot. 8/10
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Aztecs (episodes 27-30)
movieman_kev28 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This episode starts the 6th adventure for the Doctor (Hartnell) and his three companions. Encompansing episodes 27 through 30, this tale has the TARDIS landing inside an Aztec high priest's tomb. When they exit the tomb the doorway shuts leaving them unable to get back to it. When Barbara gets mistaken as the reincarnation of a the deceased, she gets it in her head that changing history a little might be a good thing, regardless of the Doctor's orders that history has to go unchanged. Her actions places them all in danger, as some of the Aztecs plot against them. This was a pretty good early Dr. Who story, William Hartnell acted superbly, as did the rest of the cast. The villains of the episode arc were a bit one-dimensional, but it didn't detract from my enjoyment of the show. I didn't always emphasize with the passive nature of the first Doctor, buts that's how he was.

My grade: A
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Historical Drama At its Finest
Theo Robertson9 August 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The Tardis lands within an Aztec temple . Barbara finds a bangle and putting on is quickly captured by the Aztecs guarding the temple . Seeing the bracelet they misinterpret her as the reincarnation of the ancient high priest Yetaxa . Finding herself in a powerful position and disgusted by the Aztec tradition of human sacrifice Barbara interferes with a sacrifice about to take place and high priest Tlotoxl recognises Barbara as a false God something he will expose

Keeping to the original format of following a science fiction story with a historical tale you might be struck as to how the over ambition of the sci-fi stories bring them down as dated failed spectacles while the historicals despite the flaws remain well written and acted and this is one of the better historical tales from an era of the show that's unique compared to the show it would become under Troughton and subsequent Doctors

Okay lets get the flaws out of the way . It has a couple of limited sets with very static camera work . If you're expecting DOCTOR WHO with quick editing and a CGI army of Aztec warriors running across South American plains then don't waste your time because we have a handful of very small sets built in front of painted backdrops . Have I mentioned the small sets and the static camera work ? Good because I thought I'd try and say something negative and not sound like one of those NuWho fans who blindly and slavishly vomit praise on everything related to the show

So why is this deserving of praise ? It's simply beautifully written and acted . The dilemma facing the Tardis crew is that while they can travel anywhere in time and space and see great cruelty human beings are no less cruel than the likes of the Daleks and this story reinforces this fact of human development . Perhaps cruelty is too strong a word because amorality and cultural relativism is touched upon and examined in depth not something you'd see in the show nowadays . Interesting too how the Doctor reacts to Barbara's interference and how the intended victim reacts . His death is seen not as an atrocity but as the best thing that can happen to him . One does wonder however that in the 21st Century how this view of religion would portrayed today in the shadow of Jihadism and nightly news of mass murder in Iraq , Syria and Afghanistan carried out by men of God . This is probably the only story in the shows history both classic and Nuwho that addresses religion in depth and will probably remain so within in our lifetime

The cast are somewhat stagy but that was the nature of nearly all television in the 1960s with very rare exceptions like CATHY COME HOME . The regulars are all on top form with the Doctor being more angry than normal especially against Barbara . In the NuWho episode Fathers Day we say the tenth Doctor losing his temper against for saving her father and that's the only time the new show has seen the same type of character interaction as seen here . The story rightly belongs to Jacquline Hill as Barbara as she takes centre stage which is a nice change since she's usually underwritten compared to William Russell's Chesterton who as always gets to portray the physical hero . Of the guest cast John Ringham gets to over act slightly in a Shakespearian manner as high priest Tloxtol but this is more than made up for as Keith Pyott as Autloc the high priest of knowledge who gives the impression that he knows all along that Barbara isn't Yetaxa but his sense of universal human decency doesn't get in the way of religious belief

In short this is early DOCTOR WHO that was made by television professionals who saw the show as just another job . It says a lot about industry professionals back in the day that they didn't care much about how it looked 50 years later and how it would be analysed - they just got their job done and made the best product they could . As it stands this is 1960s television drama that might seem peculiar to an audience nowadays but that's a bit like CASABLANCA being compared to a Michael Bay production and complaining Michael Curtiz should have put more action in his movie
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Aztecs
ametaphysicalshark9 July 2008
"The Aztecs" has an unbelievably good reputation amongst Doctor Who fans. It is praised for quality characterization, thrilling drama, and other things. I have seen "The Aztecs" nearly fifteen times since its initial video release and have always wondered what everyone saw in it. It's certainly not bad by any means but I find the characters flat and one-dimensional, the companions used rather predictably, and outside of the wonderful visual qualities- the sets and costuming especially, really just a solid but completely unremarkable Doctor Who story.

John Lucarotti's "Marco Polo" is an absolutely excellent Doctor Who story. It is wonderfully well-written with a group of interesting and varied supporting characters. Still, its strength primarily lies in its characters and dialogue, not in its plot or the quality of the drama (which in "Marco Polo" is only dramatic due to the characters, the novelization of the same story is really very boring due to the same characters being poorly-written). Take excellent characterization and dialogue out of a John Lucarotti script and you end up with something like "The Aztecs": watchable, entertaining for the most part, but completely forgettable and to be honest, at just four parts in length, not very tightly-woven at all.

In fact, I find "The Aztecs" begins to drag quite a bit in its latter half as it moves toward its inevitable, obvious, and unbelievably predictable conclusion. The villain gets more cookie-cutter villain-ish than he already was and the emphasis on the actual plot becomes stronger. The first two episodes weren't great by any means but they were really rather good, fun episodes as we discovered the situation at hand. The rest of the story is really just 'above average'.

I'm sure I come off as hating "The Aztecs". I really don't. I just find it to be one of my biggest disagreements with Doctor Who fandom, and a solid but completely unremarkable tale from start to finish. Wonderful design, solid direction, and excellent acting. The rest I don't think is especially worth discussing at length.

Episode 1: 7/10, Episode 2: 7/10, Episode 3: 6/10, Episode 4: 6/10.

Average: 6.5/10
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Review for the whole serial
laurawanco1 April 2021
Well it took most of season 1, but it seems like they're finally starting to have some fun with the concept of this show. This story may be on the predictable side (and oddly similar to the Road to El Dorado, even down the sacrifice guy's warrior friend being dressed like a cheetah), but against what's come before it it's really entertaining. They're starting to explore the more interesting side of time travel, like if you have the chance to save an entire civilization like the Aztecs isn't it at least worth trying? Barbara is quickly becoming my favorite character from this era of the show, the more she deals with these situations the better adjusted to them she becomes. She's good at keeping her calm and picks up on things really quick. Her history teacher side shows here which is nice to see and in the last episode and here she's given a high social standing and goes with it immediately, she really likes having power I guess and I respect that. Beyond her though the Doctor is a lot more likable here, he only ever lashed out when Susan was in danger and apologized for it after, I'm glad he's actually undergoing character growth. His relationship with Cameca is pretty sweet, they both genuinely enjoy the other's company and I'm a bit disappointed he didn't ask her to join them. As for little things there's a bit where Susan questions regeneration which is pretty funny with context and at this point I think Ian just loves stupid outfits. Also for their "chosen warrior" Ixta sure has an awful hard time defeating a science teacher, no wonder the Aztecs fell.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
But you can't rewrite history! Not one line!
wetmars25 August 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The arrival of the TARDIS in 15th century Mexico leads the crew to the doomed Aztec people, a mixture of high culture and brutal savagery. Matters are further complicated when Barbara is mistaken for a god and the Doctor becomes engaged to be married.

Review of four parts -

Ah yes, the first ever episode that introduces the concept of changing history. Jacqueline Hill's favorite serial. Anyways, this episode is just great! The message about rewriting history is memorable, historically accurate, hyper realistic acting, this episode has to be one of the greatest stories not gonna lie, loved the fighting. Just a really great story! Well done!

10/10
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Aztecs: Episode 1 - An excellent historical adventure, brilliantly written and acted
A_Kind_Of_CineMagic5 July 2014
The Aztecs - Review of all 4 parts:

This is a 4 part adventure beginning with The Temple of Evil. It is a pure historical adventure with the TARDIS crew arriving in a tomb in 15th Century Mexico during the time of the Aztecs. The TARDIS becomes trapped inside the tomb with the crew outside the tomb's inaccessible sliding door. Barbara is taken to be the reincarnation of their goddess Yataxa by the high priest of knowledge Autloc but is doubted and proclaimed a false God by the high priest of sacrifice Tlotoxl. Barbara tries to influence against human sacrifice despite the Doctor's insistence that this is meddling in the past which cannot be done, and they all try to find a way to get to the TARDIS before the Aztecs turn on them.

This is a top notch adventure, brilliantly scripted by John Lucarotti, following on from his previous great historical adventure 'Marco Polo'. It is beautifully acted with an interesting plot that includes very strong material about whether the time travellers can or should interfere with historical events.

Doctor Who is a time travel adventure not just another space adventure. The time travel aspect made it far more unique at the time and is still a central part of what the programme is. So great historical adventures like this show the value of exploring the time travel aspect of the show. Considering morality and possible outcomes of interference in history is a tremendous concept to bring to audiences and this story does it wonderfully. It really demonstrates how axeing historical stories a few years later was a big mistake. If done seriously and intelligently like this, Marco Polo, The Massacre, The Crusade etc they were a great addition to the series. They provided variety, moral dilemmas and great drama. When turned into lightweight comedy or executed badly they flopped a bit but they needed more thought, not axeing. Rather like the whole show in 1989!

William Russell and Jacqueline Hill as Barbara and Ian are two of the finest companions the Doctor ever had and they are superb here as is William Hartnell as The Doctor.

Carole Ann Ford as Susan has one of her best performances here too. Autloc and a female elder Cameca are fantastic too.

Tremendous adventure across all four episodes.

My Ratings: Episodes 1 & 2 - 10/10, Episodes 3 & 4 - 9.5/10.

Overall - 9.75/10.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Prime Doctor Who Historical
timdalton00715 February 2020
Warning: Spoilers
(Note: A review of the entire serial known as The Aztecs)

The so-called pure historical, where the TARDIS travels back in time and gets the TARDIS crew involved without aliens or other sci-fi elements, is one of the things that sets the Hartnell era apart from the rest of Doctor Who. While Marco Polo gets the credit for starting this Whovian subgenre, it's not until a couple of stories down the line that it hits its stride. With The Aztecs, broadcast across May and June 1964, it most certainly did that.

That's in part due to a smart set of scripts by John Lucarotti. Having written the aforementioned Marco Polo, which as I noted in my review was more travelogue and didn't feature the main cast perhaps as strong as it should have, The Aztecs feel like him learning lessons from that experience. Here, for example, the plot is far more contained. Instead of wandering for weeks on end, everything takes place around a single Aztec city and temple. The time scale is smaller, across the space of a few days at most. Tying in with that, the story also has four episodes instead of seven, meaning that it's far tighter than Marco Polo was.

All of which serves the story well. For just six stories into Who's run, it's already tackling one of the biggest questions a time travel series can face: Can you change history? Should you try to? Set against a backdrop of a civilization that's at once immensely cultured, yet superstitious and obsessed with human sacrifice, it explores those themes by putting the history teacher Barbara (and Jacqueline Hill for that matter) at the center of events. Her push to change history, to save the Aztec people from their own worst excesses pushes the story forward, creating conflict on all fronts. The result is an engaging drama of hope and fear, and the conflict between past and future with Hill's performance lying at the heart of the serial.

There's also an intriguing subtext that runs through the story as well. In some ways, it's hard not to see a commentary on colonialism. Barbara is, after all, a European stepping into a native culture and working to change it to her own ends. As benevolent as her intentions are, the results of her attempted intervention on clearly on display throughout as it leads to deceit, suspicion, and bloodshed. It's fascinating to think that Lucarotti was writing this at a time when Britain's colonies were gaining independence still, effectively critiquing an era that was just ending.

If that makes the story sound stagey or talky, there's more to it than that. There's an adventure story element to this as well, something which allows the story to be a showcase for the other Earthly companion Ian. With Ian facing down the warrior Ixta multiple times across the four episodes, the story sees him getting involved in numerous scrapes from hand to hand combat to getting trapped inside a temple corridor. It's a chance for the series first man of action to shine in some well-staged fight scenes for the era (even if William Russell is being doubled for a good portion of the climactic fight).

The set design and costumes are equally strong, working to the series' strengths at the time. While the science fiction stories would see them trying to break both the budget and the walls of the set, the historicals are just as much a showcase for their ingenuity. After all, recreating an Aztec city is no mean feat, especially on the sort of budget we're talking about at this point in the series history. True, it may look primitive by the standards of Who's 21st-century regeneration, but it remains engaging and immensely watchable.

Because, being part historical drama, part adventure story, The Aztecs has something to offer for everyone. True, it lacks aliens or the more overt genre trappings, but it offers something else in spades. That would be a compelling human story of hopes for change played out against the fate of a civilization. The result? One of the standout stories of the series, from this era or any other.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Temple of Evil
guswhovian15 May 2020
The TARDIS arrives in early 16th century Mexico. The travelers are soon cut off from the TARDIS, but Barbara is mistaken for the reincarnation of the goddess Yetaxa.

The Aztecs has a deservedly high reputation among Doctor Who fans, and "The Temple of Evil" is a fantastic opening episode. As the only one of John Lucarotti's three episodes for the series to survive, it's a treat. His writing is great, and the main cast are all on top form. Keith Pyott gives a touching performance as Autloc and John Ringham a suitably Shakespearean one as Tlotoxl. Then there's Barry Newberry's sumptuous set design, Daphne Dare's excellent costumes and Richard Rodney Bennett's exquisite incidental music.

However, the direction is terrible and there's a really bad fight scene. The camera work is incredibly bad; the camera actually bumps into a piece of scenery towards the end of the episode and the director seems to have trouble keeping the actors in frame occasionally.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Insipid Who
Leofwine_draca14 November 2014
Review of the Complete Story:

I'm not really a fan of the William Hartnell Dr Who stories, finding them incredibly dated and dull compared to the much more entertaining later adventures of Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker. THE AZTECS is a case in point, a cheap and distinctly un-cheerful story that's spoilt by boring characterisation and a badly-written story.

The tale sees Hartnell and his companions finding themselves caught up in some Aztec political plots when they accidentally arrive inside a temple complex. What could have been an exciting and exotic adventure quickly turns to stodge thanks to a lack of incident and a back-and-forth style of narrative that fails to really go anywhere. The characters are one-dimensional in the extreme and the story lacks the kind of danger and fear factor of the best Who stories.

It's not totally without merit, as despite the faults of his era, Hartnell was still a more than adequate Who, and the BBC writers deserve credit for delivering something out of the ordinary in setting at least. But when you think of classic era Who you want Cybermen and Daleks, not characters wandering aimlessly through cardboard sets as they do here.
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
No Easy Answers
JamesHitchcock21 July 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Although "Doctor Who" is normally thought of as science fiction, the original idea behind the programme was to educate children not only about science but also about history, which explains why during the First Doctor era stories set during the earth's past were quite common. Four of the eight stories in the first series ("An Unearthly Child", set in the Stone Age, "Marco Polo", "The Aztecs" and "Reign of Terror", about the French Revolution) were of this nature. There is, however, a problem with stories of this type. There would be no sense of tension or drama if the Doctor could overcome his more primitive foes using advanced technology or escape from any danger by hopping into the Tardis.

The early convention was therefore that in stories set in the past the only science fiction element would be the time-travel theme itself; no space-age weapons or other devices would be permitted. This convention did not, however, survive. In later serials such as "The Time Warrior", "The Masque of Mandragora", "Horror of Fang Rock" and "The Mark of the Rani" the Doctor finds himself confronting evil aliens who have somehow travelled back in time. In such stories the Doctor cannot simply use the Tardis to escape because to do so would mean abandoning the Earth to whatever dreadful fate the aliens have in mind for it.

In "The Aztecs" the Doctor and his companions Susan, Ian and Barbara arrive in the Aztec Empire in present-day Mexico at some time during the fifteenth century, before the Spanish conquest. Barbara is mistaken for the goddess Yetaxa, and accepts the role because she hopes to persuade the Aztecs to give up human sacrifice. The scriptwriter John Lucarotti, who also wrote the script for the now-missing "Marco Polo", obviously anticipated questions about "why doesn't the Doctor use the Tardis to escape?", because the Tardis is trapped inside a tomb, and much of the plot deals with attempts to retrieve it.

Lucarotti's script stresses the duality of Aztec culture. In reality, the Aztecs of this period were ruled by a single monarch known as the Tlatoani, literally "Great Speaker" but normally rendered in English as "Emperor", who also acted as High Priest. In this story, however, there are two co-rulers, the wise and philosophical Autloc, High Priest of Knowledge, and the brutal and sadistic Tlotoxl, High Priest of Sacrifice, representing respectively the good and evil sides of their civilisation. Barbara, a schoolteacher in her day job, is highly knowledgeable about the Aztecs, and takes the view that there was much that was good about their civilisation. She believes that if she can persuade them to abandon the evil elements, of which human sacrifice is the most obvious example, the Spaniards would permit their society to survive. One point that is never made (possibly because it would have been too controversial) is that the Spanish invasion of Mexico was motivated more by a desire for wealth and power than it was by humanitarian concern for sacrificial victims, so in the long run it would have availed the Aztecs little if they had taken Barbara's advice.

Barbara finds, however, that her well-intentioned efforts at reform do not go down well with local people- not even with potential sacrificial victims, who regard it as an honour to die for their gods- and that such efforts are putting her, and her companions, in danger. Her efforts do not go down well with the Doctor either. He takes the view that it is futile to try and change history, although he tends to come across as a pompous, grumpy old cynic who doesn't care whether humans sacrifice one another or not and a much less attractive character than the idealistic Barbara. I must admit that although William Hartnell was the creator of the role of Doctor Who, his is not my favourite incarnation and couldn't help feeling that if the Second, Third, Fourth or Fifth Doctors had found themselves in this situation they might have admitted their powerlessness to change the future but would at least have admitted that there was a moral dilemma. The First Doctor never seemed to concern himself too much with morality.

Moral issues are, however, very much at the heart of this story, which is what gives it its power. Lucarotti is also brave enough to admit that there can be difficult questions to which there are no easy answers. It is a story which ends with the bad guys still in control- indeed, the bad guys' control is strengthened because they only person Barbara converts to her way of thinking is Autoc who promptly resigns his position to become a hermit, leaving the gleefully bloodthirsty Tlotoxl (a great performance from John Ringham) as sole ruler. This is one of the best First Doctor adventures.

A goof. Lucarotti clearly noticed that a lot of Aztec names contain the letter "x" (Tlotoxl, Yetaxa, Ixta) but in Nahuatl, the Aztec language, this consonant is not pronounced as "ks" (the pronunciation used here) but like the English "sh". So "Yetaxa" should be pronounced "Yetasha", not "Yetaksa".
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Excellent four-part* 'historical' adventure
jamesrupert201416 February 2024
The TARDIS rematerilises inside an Aztec tomb and when Barbara (Jacqueline Hill), who conveniently is somewhat of an expert on the ancient Mesoamerican culture, steps out of the supposedly sealed chamber, she is immediately proclaimed the reincarnation of the Goddess Yetaxa, with the Doctor (William Hartnell) and Ian (William Russel) as her loyal servants and Susan (Carole Ann Ford) as her handmaiden. Barbara's soon attempts to change Aztec culture by eliminating human sacrifices, which puts her at odds with an increasingly suspicious and resentful Tlotoxl, High Priest of Sacrifice, (John Ringham) as well as with the Doctor who repeatedly warns her not to try to change history. As this is a TV program, that the Aztecs speak English (sounding almost Shakespearian) is excusable, the costumes and make-up are fun (whether they are 'realistic' is another question), and the sets and scenery, though not convincing, serve to backdrop the tale. Hartnell's Doctor is as tetchy as always and his exchanges with Barbera about accepting and respecting other cultures or about the futility of trying to alter history are well written and foreshadow current debates about the merits of 'presentism' (in which past actions are judged by present rather than contemporary standards). The clash of beliefs is nicely illustrated when Barbara uses her divine status to stop a human sacrifice only to learn that the intended 'victim' is furious with her for taking away the great honour that was to be bestowed on him. All in all, an intelligent, well-made (for the budget) historical outing with great performances by Hill and Ringham and an enlightened message about context, judgement and acceptance. *Score and comments pertain to the 4-part serial referred to as 'The Aztecs'.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed