"Deadwood" Boy-the-Earth-Talks-To (TV Episode 2005) Poster

(TV Series)

(2005)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
where is the credit for Francis Ford Coppola?
A_Different_Drummer22 March 2015
Before I start this review -- a review themed on the nature of beginnings and endings -- I suggest that if you are watching on DVD go back to the 47:00 mark and notice the way the writers worked a suicide so delicately into an episode about .. a wedding. This is an unforgettable scene, high art, and one of the most memorable scenes in TV I have ever seen.

I have said in past reviews that moreso than other series DEADWOOD best resembles an ongoing Broadway play disguised as a western disguised as a TV show.

And here is proof.

In TV, even in top shows, there are very few endings. There are climaxes. There are resolutions. But the endings are generally left to the imagination of the viewer, and the time they would have otherwise taken spent on commercial breaks.

So here, a showcase of writing and acting, is an episode which is really one very long ending.

And a missing credit to Francis Ford Coppola for perfecting the technique (in Godfather 1 2 and 3) matching simultaneous scenes that reach their conclusions in perfect sync.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Deadwood Spurred The Trip To South Dakota
biznichemarketing20 November 2007
After watching the first season via DVD over a one week period and falling in love with the characters as well as the scenery, I couldn't help but plan a trip to the town of Deadwood. Deadwood is a place that holds many ghosts and is definitely a place you should visit as it contains much history. The trip came after watching season two, again all at once on DVD. Going to the town and seeing the actual burial sites of Wild Bill, Calamity Jane and Sheriff Bullock is something to hold in the memory bank forever. I haven't seen the third series yet, but am much anticipating its arrival. Walking through the town streets, sitting in the bars and even watching mock ups of the show really brought this movie to light and even drove me to look into further history of the area. Great series and dreading the day it becomes extinct!
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Season 2
IPyaarCinema25 May 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Review By Kamal K

The second season of Deadwood was just as strong as the first, with powerful performances from Ian McShane, Timothy Oliphant, Robin Weigert, Molly Parker, and Powers Boothe. All the new characters mixed into the formula successfully. The season had so many interesting subplots. And character development progressed in a very interesting way. There's lots to love about this season.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Pretentious
wiseguy2331 August 2021
I'd be more predisposed to like this show more if the fans of it didn't sound like they weren't praising themselves for liking this show. It's fine. The dialogue is not Shakespeare. It's stylized, often to ridiculous lengths. Sometimes it's exquisite and sometimes unnecessary and bizarrely stilted. And Milch is not funny. Every show there are at least five thudding attempts at humor. You have a lot interesting themes. The destructive force of capitalism. The chaotic and merciless nature of death. The dehumanizing structure that civilization imposes on groups. There's nothing profound about a suicide at a wedding. Sorry, It also wasn't subtle. The camera held the shot for a decent duration.

I was not entertained. Politicking and squabbling over land rights is not scintillating story telling material.
1 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Season 2: Continues with great characters and story-telling
bob the moo1 May 2011
In the first season of this show we were introduced to the various characters in the fledging town of Deadwood all vying to have power in the chaos, with most cards held by saloon owner Swearengen. In season 2 this continues but the bigger picture is that the growth of the Government sees a neighbouring state move to annex the town as part of its expansion into new territories, potentially making Deadwood's big fish into much smaller fish in a bigger pond. While a Government official and a representative of a large mining concern both arrive in town, smaller rivalries and sickness see Swearengen removed from the picture at a critical time.

Having slept on it for years I very much enjoyed Deadwood's first season when I finally got around to watching it. The town was very well created in terms of physical creation and the characters who populated it, while the various plots were all engaging whether they were larger (power struggles and the plague) or smaller (the relationships between characters). With so many simmering tensions and backroom plots and manipulations, season 2 took me aback at first because of how sudden and violent the relationship is between Swearengen and Bullock and it does rather dominate the first two episodes in a way that I wasn't sure worked. It still engaged me but at the same time it felt out of place for everything that had gone before in terms of tone and approach of the show. Once this is done though the politics (small and big P) come back into it, although with the smaller plots and characters and the season is back on familiar ground and headed towards being every bit as good as the first season.

The struggle for power against external influences is key and sees alliances formed in unlikely places, while others hedge their bets by siding with those yet to play their hands and all of this goes on while the characters continue to play out their lives as who they are – whether it be causing a spectacle on a new bicycle or engaging in rather precise and deadly sexual appetites. All of this forms an engaging tapestry of a tale and there is very little here that doesn't work in a way that either directly contributes to progressing the plot or alternatively enriches it by adding characterisation or understanding of context to the viewer. I make it sound so very serious but it is a very colourful and lively affair – albeit one that does require you to pay attention. A perfect example is the minor character of EB Farnum. He does play a part by being in the service of Swearengen but as well as this he is a great character in his simple nature – he wants so desperately to be as smart and as cunning and as involved as Swearengen but he is simply not and never will be – he knows it and he knows everyone else knows it. His turn of phrase and his embarrassment is often very funny but it also includes moments where he engages with his hired help (a VERY simple man) in the manner Swearengen does with him – he is a great character and so richly written (and performed) for such a minor one.

In terms of the main performances, the show still belongs to McShane even though it is very much an ensemble affair, although in fairness it is to the show's credit that it doesn't suffer to have him silent and confined to his bed for a few episodes. He is great though and continues to be very watchable whether scheming or raging. Olyphant Bullock changes subtly as his moral standing is exposed as convenient when it suits him (which OK is still the majority of issues) and he brings out the pragmatic nature of his character. Parker works well as the widow Garret. When I saw that Dillahunt had been cast as a whole new character (despite his death in season 1) I was put off because I know his face from a lot of shows and thought that his double casting was an unnecessary distraction. Fortunately he is great in his new character and makes him such a good performance that I quickly forgot his previous one. As with season one the ensemble cast throws up too many good characters and performances to list them all – from Malcomson's Trixie to Brown's Dan and (of course) Sanderson on great form.

The second season of Deadwood builds somewhat in terms of subject matter and conflicts but ultimately it retains the same strengths that made me fall for it from the start – great characters and great story-telling. I look forward to watching the third season very soon and the only thing about it that slightly sticks in my throat is the knowledge that it is also the final season. Season two is great drama through – engaging, funny, moving, complex and has strength in almost every aspect of its production.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Better than the first season
Red_Identity16 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I can totally see why this show was cancelled. It's just so hard to get into at times because it feels like its main goal is to not give audiences the usual climactic satisfactions most other shows thrive on. Also because it's not nearly as plot-driven as you'd expect a western show to be. In this way, it's completely unpredictable, and yet just like Season 1, it ends on notes that should have been obvious in retrospect. It's an easier show to admire than love, but I pretty much loved it this season. I do think the first 8 episodes are stronger as a cohesive whole than the last four, and the episodes 5-7 unit are pretty much amazing. It manages to be more engaging on a character level, and gives us a lot of great performances. It was a lot of fun to see Sarah Paulson and Anna Gunn in something a decade old, and the former especially delivers some stunning work. I'm just so glad my baby Joannie wasn't killed, I was sure she would
9 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed