"Babylon 5" The Illusion of Truth (TV Episode 1997) Poster

(TV Series)

(1997)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
A great follow-up to Season 2's " And Now for a Word"
planktonrules15 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Hmmm,...it's rather surprising to see that this is a rather poorly rated episode of the series. That's because while the ISN episodes might seem a tad distracting, they do fit into the overall plot of the series very well. Plus, after seeing Season 2's "And Now for a Word", it's a perfect follow-up episode.

In Season 2, a slimy team from the fictional ISN News (like today's CNN) come to the Babylon station trying to create ratings by digging for muck and trying to imply that having the station is a mistake. However, since this episode, a dictatorship has been created by President Clark and ISN was removed from their air because the network, though slanted, wanted to at least try to tell the truth---to a degree. And this was dealt with by having an ISN telecast in Season 3 interrupted by an attack by the Earth Gov troops on ISN! Since this dramatic takeover, the network had been down for months until it suddenly resumed broadcasting and said the whole "takeover" business was not true and the network had been lying due to "subversive elements". Then, they showed an obviously staged interview in which the same reporter that was on the air when the station was attacked said that he and some other malcontents had sabotaged the network! Now, the new ISN is attempting to sneak onto B-5 for a follow-up report. When they are caught, they convince the suddenly dumb Sheridan to allow this--even though they are obvious stooges for the government. And, not unexpectedly, the resulting report is a major "hatchet job" that seeks to discredit the station. But how all this is done is amazingly clever and seems not too unlike news broadcasts today! This and the manipulative power of the media are great topics for the series and make this one of the better episodes of the show. Insightful and well-made--don't underestimate this one!

FYI--A bit of trivia. If you are paying attention to the other news stories on ISN (aside from B-5), you might notice that some "evil malcontents" who are spreading sedition are mentioned. The names of the three listed on the screen are variations on the names of people actually on the legendary "black list" from the 1950s! This is a very clever way of paying homage to people like writer Dalton Trumbo and actor Zero Mostel who were temporarily banned from TV and film due to their political beliefs.
24 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A good idea, poorly executed
McLANGwich14 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
The idea of centralising an entire episode around coverage from ISN, is one that has successfully been carried out in previous episodes. It's a good idea, and if done well, as it was previously, can really add to the realism of the story.

In this episode it was poorly carried out. The news reporter was incredibly annoying, using a model of presentation that can only be described as mock-journalism. The melodramatic tone of his voice is completely unrealistic. The angle of the news station is best described as opinionated news, and is reminiscent of Fox news. Yet, the lack of subtlety is something even Glenn Beck would be embarrassed about.

The shot of the tortured prisoner confessing to his crimes is ludicrous. It's clear he has been tortured, so there's no incentive for the propagandist news to show this particular footage, given they want it to look like a wilful confession.

Then even more sloppiness by the cameraman and producer, as they try to suggest there is an inherent racism against humans on the space station culminating in humans living in poverty and being experimented upon, whilst aliens live in luxury, and dictating to the captain. Yet, we see several shots of humans walking past the captain whilst he is being remonstrated with by Mulari.

Then there's the psychiatrist. The writers can be forgiven for mistaking the Stockholm syndrome for the Helsinki syndrome. He is then asked by the news reporter whether this syndrome could lead to the Captain betraying his own people and the Dr offering scant evidence for it implies it's quite possible, perhaps probable.

Finally there's the footage of the captain and Dellenn's interview, which is very poorly edited to modify it's message. Any reliable footage would show both the interviewer and the interviewee in such a shot.

All in all, I feel with a bit more subtlety and a bit more accuracy, this could have been a very chilling episode, but it ended up being just quite annoying.
11 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Sheridan easily outsmarted
polite-4569218 May 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Sheridan, the figurehead "leader" of the effort to find a solution regarding the Vorlons and Shadows, is easily outsmarted. By a shady reporter. Ridiculous.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Welcome to MSNBC on steroids
Mischief81017 September 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Trust me: This is an episode worth skipping, unless you like it when a regime's propaganda is spread through heavy editing and biased reporting in a reputed documentary from a major news media outlet.

A reporter for Inter Stellar News and his crew arrive at Babylon 5, and proceed to find footage and then use heavily edited interviews to twist things so that they meet the ruling regime's narrative.

Sound familiar?

We all know that news media is biased one way or the other. This episode displays an interstellar network showing all of the qualities and integrity of the news agency owned and operated by some cheap dictatorship.

The final product--a broadcast of the putative documentary--displays nothing coming close to the truth of what Babylon 5 is, what has been, or what hopes to do.

It should make sentient viewers shake their heads at what our news media has become, and what it could become in the future.
7 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed