The book translated fairly well to TV, but there were elements that were changed too much to feel like as cohesive a story as the novel. For instance, Trembler was not in the film.
Piper was an alright Lockheart; Her acting was good for the most part, but she didn't portray the composure that Sally is given in the book.
Mr. Berry was by far my favourite actor, he really brought to life the sheer dumb muscle that he has in the book. The fights with him, while short, were very well and convincingly done - he came across brilliantly.
Generally speaking, the acting and casting was good, though I didn't like JJ Feild as Garland. His acting was fine, but he just didn't seem lively and... innocent, I suppose, enough to play him. I only disliked the acting of Mrs. Reeves. She wasn't callous enough, and her lines were delivered more as if she was trying to remember them properly than deliver them with any conviction.
As for the plot, it was good enough if you have acute knowledge of the text, but bits were skipped, and, in my opinion, not nearly enough significance or back-story was given to the Ruby, nor was Sally's character or relationship with her father. As I mentioned before, the lack of Trembler was disappointing, though to be fair he isn't an essential plot-driving character. The ending though seemed awfully rushed, such as the talk in which Sally learns everything about her past, was very brief, and Sally knew far more than she did in the book. The same goes for her talk with Ah Ling.
As a whole, it just felt far too rushed, and bits that were given fine and detailed description in the book were sometimes skipped altogether. Some scene continuity was inexplicably changed as well. The chief culprit of this is when Sally is talking to Frederick in the shop about whether he takes her seriously, and Rosa burst in. In the book, it is Tremlber who bursts in, and with news of Adelaide being kidnapped. This could have been done as Jim bursting in, which would have felt far more plot-driving and fluid than Rosa, as they could just as easily have kept talking after Rosa came and went.
Also, the atmosphere didn't make me think of the 1800s; it all seemed a bit too pristine and tidy. And there was the odd technical error in scenery: a gravel road with tyre-worn tracks clearly visible, because the centre was grassy while the edges had no plantlife. I considered that this could have been the doing of horse-drawn carriages, but then the road would certainly not have appeared so clean and fresh.
It's worth a watch if you enjoyed the novel, but it just didn't capture the novel for me. Too much was overlooked to make it really good for a fan of the book. Another thirty to ninety minutes would have greatly improved the potential as a film; far too much was skipped, and the rest was too rushed to make much sense if you don't know the book. Perhaps making short series would have been able to feel more cohesive.
Piper was an alright Lockheart; Her acting was good for the most part, but she didn't portray the composure that Sally is given in the book.
Mr. Berry was by far my favourite actor, he really brought to life the sheer dumb muscle that he has in the book. The fights with him, while short, were very well and convincingly done - he came across brilliantly.
Generally speaking, the acting and casting was good, though I didn't like JJ Feild as Garland. His acting was fine, but he just didn't seem lively and... innocent, I suppose, enough to play him. I only disliked the acting of Mrs. Reeves. She wasn't callous enough, and her lines were delivered more as if she was trying to remember them properly than deliver them with any conviction.
As for the plot, it was good enough if you have acute knowledge of the text, but bits were skipped, and, in my opinion, not nearly enough significance or back-story was given to the Ruby, nor was Sally's character or relationship with her father. As I mentioned before, the lack of Trembler was disappointing, though to be fair he isn't an essential plot-driving character. The ending though seemed awfully rushed, such as the talk in which Sally learns everything about her past, was very brief, and Sally knew far more than she did in the book. The same goes for her talk with Ah Ling.
As a whole, it just felt far too rushed, and bits that were given fine and detailed description in the book were sometimes skipped altogether. Some scene continuity was inexplicably changed as well. The chief culprit of this is when Sally is talking to Frederick in the shop about whether he takes her seriously, and Rosa burst in. In the book, it is Tremlber who bursts in, and with news of Adelaide being kidnapped. This could have been done as Jim bursting in, which would have felt far more plot-driving and fluid than Rosa, as they could just as easily have kept talking after Rosa came and went.
Also, the atmosphere didn't make me think of the 1800s; it all seemed a bit too pristine and tidy. And there was the odd technical error in scenery: a gravel road with tyre-worn tracks clearly visible, because the centre was grassy while the edges had no plantlife. I considered that this could have been the doing of horse-drawn carriages, but then the road would certainly not have appeared so clean and fresh.
It's worth a watch if you enjoyed the novel, but it just didn't capture the novel for me. Too much was overlooked to make it really good for a fan of the book. Another thirty to ninety minutes would have greatly improved the potential as a film; far too much was skipped, and the rest was too rushed to make much sense if you don't know the book. Perhaps making short series would have been able to feel more cohesive.