Hiroshima (2005 TV Movie) User Reviews

A humane presentation of the fateful day.

[dy158 · 7/10 · 9 June 2006]

Being once a former History student, history-relating subjects are often of interest to me. Especially if it's something which I had learnt in my past History classes. The fall of Japan in WWII was one of those things I learnt.

Imagine my surprise when I saw this on air here last year. Given it was also a good time to refresh somehow some of the events I had learnt from my History textbook, this show viewed the atomic bomb dropping on Hiroshima through the eyes of those who had survived to tell their story. Whatever I had understood in the History class was through the events in the textbook, this is more raw and humane for a change.

It's always scary to understand about the after-effects of the atomic bomb that often it's only those who experienced, and survived to tell the tale, will give a very different perspective. Even more terrifying, hearing from the survivors themselves. Yeah, often it's being discussed normally close to the WWII's anniversary that whether it is justified to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to finally force Japan to end WWII in the Pacific region, but then, this is still a topic which is very touchy even till now.

Given I also remembered my father once went to Japan for business for some time and he did went to the memorial centre in Hiroshima and when he brought back the brochure, I almost felt sick. At the contents, that is. When it showed the images and the graphics in the brochure, I cannot really bear to see it after one look.

Often, the horrors of war remains in those who had went through it. It's always never nice.

If you are one of those who want to know how the whole thing went before WWII finally ended in the Pacific, this is recommended.

Well done docudrama

[kamas716 · 9/10 · 8 April 2012]

I thought this was a very well done docudrama about the dropping of the bomb on Hiroshima. It mixed historical footage, survivor interviews and dramatic re-enactments to bring the story to light. It left out almost all of the moralistic arguments used to frame today's arguments and just told the story of what happened, mostly through the eyes of the people involved (of which there are precious few left). Whether you think the decision to drop the bombs was right or wrong, this is an excellent movie to help understand the event. If you don't know much about the circumstances surrounding the dropping of the A-bomb on Hiroshima, this should be one of the first sources you visit to add to your knowledge base.

Great Style, easy on the Substance

[gring0 · 7/10 · 19 February 2006]

Have just watched the film with an eye to my history class and found it very good dramatically. I was kicking myself for losing another film of the same name that was more of a film and which demanded more from their actors; to see Truman in this version portrayed by a man twice his size with no physical or vocal similarity was a big disappointment whereas the older film's resemblances to him and the other two of the Big Three was uncanny. To compare the lack of concern in this regard to the care the BBC took with its Dunkirk where Churchill and Lord Halifax were lovingly portrayed is further frustrating. The graphics are outstanding as one would expect from the BBC; if you've seen its Auschwitz, Colosseum or Pompeii titles you'll know what high quality to expect. One quibble would be the lack of any mention of Japanese atrocities. Living and working in China with family who suffered from Japanese barbarism, I was dismayed to see Japanese bestiality whitewashed to portray them as the victims. Maybe one day someone will do a BBC-type Rape of Nanking to redress the balance. In the meantime, without bothering to fully explain why the Americans (and the British and Commonwealth who took on the Japanese too, a fact ignored by the British broadcasting Corp.)truly hated the Japanese is disingenuous. No real mention made too of the bomb in the context of the start of the Cold War, or how Nagasaki was probably more a warning to Stalin who had just invaded Japan with an eye to joint-occupation a la Germany makes this a rather one-dimensional analysis. Great value must be placed on the interviews of so many witnesses, particularly Tibbets and the last man to have actually have touched Little Boy. www.tracesofevil.blogspot.com

Fair and impartial!

[yossarian100 · 10/10 · 6 March 2006]

The message of this fairly well made documentary is its gift. No finger pointing. No demanding of apologies. No assignment of blame. Just a dramatic portrayal of events. Very dramatic. Some of the scenes, personal and intimate scenes, are very painful to watch but are there to illustrate a horror which is hard to imagine otherwise. I came away with the feeling that dropping the atomic bombs was a terrible thing, so terrible it is beyond comprehension, but, still, a necessary thing. However, this documentary is all about the sadness, the almost unbearable sadness, of it all. If you're trying to gain a better understanding of these events, I highly recommend this.

Did the Japanese have Compassion?

[anthony_retford · 9/10 · 18 October 2009]

There was a comment in this film about the compassion and the Japanese. I realize that many people died in the two blasts and that many died subsequently. In all of my readings I have never seen any instance of Japanese compassion. It is though the nation was born without it. I have viewed the Japanese people of that time as automatons to their Emporer, willing to die but not live. I am slightly older than the use of these two bombs and nothing will convince me that millions of Japanese would have been enlisted to fight any invasion, including school girls. The leaders of Japan seemed to view their citizens as fodder. We can imagine the reaction around the world if Truman had not used these bombs. He would have been castigated. I thought the puny power of these bombs compared to today's H-bombs should have been mentioned. Now the circle of death reaches out over 20 miles.

A well made documentary with glaring shortcomings of bias

[azizmatrix · 6/10 · 7 May 2016]

Although this is a well made documentary incorporating archive footage, interviews and 'dramatizations', it seems to me to be yet another example of the victors re-writing history. If I was a bomb- obsessed war-monger that wanted to conduct the ultimate experiment in nuclear technology and military power, even when it was not necessary, I would make a film like this to justify my actions and help make an entire nation feel much better about committing mass murder. This has been the official line since the bombs were dropped and they have successfully convinced most people that they were absolutely necessary. Otherwise, the idea of murdering close to 200,000 civilians is just impossible to confront. I think this is encapsulated by the poor, tight-lipped pilot who stubbornly refuses to have any emotion or doubt about his actions. This film seems to be for people like him.

It's almost certain that these bombs were unnecessary. Thousands of tonnes of bombs had already been dropped, the Soviets had become involved and Japan was beaten. Weeks earlier, on July 12, 1945, Hirohito revealed that he was ready to end the war as long as the monarchy be granted immunity from war crimes - The US only accepted these conditions after dropping two atomic bombs on the country. One bomb was unnecessary, the second was borderline sadistic. Truman and others kept bumping up estimates of lives saved to a million, while military documents suggested 46,000 as a worst case scenario. There is virtually no mention of these circumstances in the film which demonstrates clear bias. If you come away thinking it was necessary, then the film has successfully deceived you, but it has failed as a documentary.

The Horror, the pain and the suffering of Hiroshima!

[Rawal_Afzal · 10/10 · 13 September 2015]

I had very recently picked up a lot of interest in the Indo-Pak history of wars and after extensive reading about them I turned to the two world wars. I really wanted to know the kind of horror the people of Japan went through on those days. I first came across this documentary film in 2008 or so on a forum, but those were just short clips available on YouTube. So I decided to find its full version.

I got done with it just an hour ago and I am still get over it. I can still feel the impact of what I have watched. A brilliant initiative by the BBC one must admit. Greatly detailed to the extent of almost making one cry hearing the accounts of the survivors. The most horrible being the woman who had to let her daughter die and the "creature" that the doctor saw on his way back to Hiroshima.

This documentary film deserves full marks not only for the way the pain, suffering and horror is depicted but also for being quite impartial - we should remember that the film ends with this question being posed and with that Japanese doctor implying that it wasn't needed.

All in all, I pray to the Almighty that no people on the face of earth are made to go through anything even remotely similar to this again. May the world be protected from wars in general.

Although it may years to complete and I know I am waiting for something years and years away, I am eagerly waiting for my favourite film- maker James Cameron to complete and release his film on the nuclear bombings of Japan. That man knows the secret to making masterpieces and I can confirm that it will be a once in a lifetime affair. Here I wait.......

Overall an excellent documentary. Gave clear testimonies and facts as to what took place on the dreadful day. Any one even slightly interested, this is a must-watch.

[hailey-richardson73 · 10/10 · 17 March 2015]

Hiroshima: BBC History of World War II is a documentary about the atomic bomb drop on Hiroshima during World War II. What is great about this particular documentary is that it tells the story through both sides, including eye witness testimonies of the Americans and the Japanese. The documentary is told in sequential order, starting with what was going on before the bomb dropping, the events that led up to it, followed by the immediate outcome and the future outcome. It begins by showing how the Americans tested the bomb and were triumphant, and it tells through an eye witness account President Truman's reaction to this. He gave Japan the choice to surrender, but Japan refused. The lead up to the bomb dropping was very interesting when looked at through both perspectives (the Americans and the Japanese) because while America was confident in their imminent victory after their success in creating the bomb, Japan was still preparing for an all- out invasion. After the atomic bomb was created, tested, and proved ready to use successfully, the documentary gives us insight into the minds of the chosen crew who were to man the planes that were to drop the bomb on Hiroshima. At the same time that these men were preparing to drop the "bomb to end the war", Japan was continuing to prepare for an invasion, not knowing what was to come. There were a few selected stories told by the people who actually lived through the bomb dropping about what their lives were like, and what the day was like before it occurred. All of them said that the only thing they can really remember about that day before it happened was that it was one of the most beautiful days. As the Japanese began their day just like any other, three American planes flew closer and closer to their destination. The documentary continues on by showing pictures and footage of the bombing afterwards. The same people who were describing perfect skies and perfect days began to tell a story about sadness and death. The entire documentary in itself is very sad, but the most disheartening part is being shown the pictures of the aftermath and the affects it had on people during that time. America cheered greatly for their victory, but Japan mourned heavily for their loss. Something interesting is that they interviewed actual people who were alive during this time to witness the horrific event. They took views from both the Americans who were responsible for dropping the bomb, and the Japanese who were unlucky enough to experience the impact. I feel this brings a sense of actuality to something that seems like a dream when compared to the pictures of present-day Hiroshima. It is one thing to read about the facts in a history book, but to look at the faces of those who lived while their loved- ones perished is very sobering to see. This documentary is a meaningful and powerful way to describe the attack on Hiroshima through both sides of the assault. The only negative aspect I can think of is that, while doing the reenactments of certain events that took place, the Japanese reenactments were completely in Japanese with no American subtitles so it was difficult to follow at those certain times. Other than that, an amazing documentary that should not be avoided.

One of the best (and saddest) documentaries i've ever watched

[jvbeckerpires · 10/10 · 7 November 2022]

"Hiroshima" is in my opinion one of the best documentaries of all time. It is really sad movie to watch, but at the same time I think that is necessary, to remind us of the destruction power of nuclear or atomic bombs, and the reason to never use them again. The throwing of the bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was truly a crime against the humanity. It was a event that have changed world history forever. We will never forget all the destruction caused by the bombs in these cities. Now in 2022, At the middle of the russo-ukrainian war and the tension between North and South Korea, all that I want is that something like this would never happen again. All that I want, and I think that most of the people of the whole world want it too, is the world peace. No bombs, no destruction, no more death, no more killing ourselves, no more wars. Just peace.

Sadly, this film misses the mark.

[dauphindave · 2/10 · 22 October 2013]

The makers of this film had the opportunity to tell the story of this tragic event in history. Instead, it is another attempt to ignore the truth and try to justify the killing of tens of thousands of innocent civilians. There is not enough room here to outline all the misinformation in the film. The key point would be the American government's ignoring the Japanese attempt to surrender in the month before the bombs were dropped. The bomb was developed in order to attack the Germans. When the Germans surrendered before the bomb was ready, well, it had to be used to justify the 2 billion dollars spent. A sad and tragic story, and this film tries to justify the first use of weapons of mass destruction.

Propagandist garbage

[shanayneigh · 1/10 · 23 December 2018]

This "documentary" follows the American propaganda to the letter. About how the Americans were apparently wringing their hands in anxiety over whether to drop the bomb or not, how they implored Japan to surrender, how the bomb would be an alternative to an invasion of Japan which would spare up to a million lives.

Not a mention about how Japan actually were discussing surrender, which American cryptographers had picked up. Not a mention of Ellis Zacharias who managed to muddle the American message to the point that neither the Japanese nor the American media knew which was the official US line.

The tired old propaganda about how the bomb saved lives in the end, is of course nonsense. First of all, the calculated number of casualties resulting from an invasion of Japan magically rose from an estimated 31 000 by Marshall on 18 June 1945, to 500 000 battle casualties after the bomb was dropped. Nowadays people even like to use figures in the millions. A more blatant attempt to try and justify the mass murder of a hundred thousand with a single bomb could hardly be conjured up. Furthermore, the bomb and an invasion were not mutually exclusive. Truman never presented the bomb as an alternative to invasion until after the war.

Carefully toeing the American propaganda line, the "documentary" makes no mention of how the final discussions in the Japanese leadership went before finally surrendering. In short, they scarcely mentioned the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The main concern of the Japanese leadership was the invasion of Manchuria by the Soviet Union and the collapse of the Kwantung army. But God forbid that the Soviet Union should receive any credit in World War 2.

And it's quite unsettling to listen to these old men casually describing and justifying their mass murder.

If you really want to learn anything about the process of the development of the nuclear program, the decision to drop the bombs, and the aftermath, give this garbage a pass and read "Hiroshima Nagasaki" by Paul Ham instead. If you're interested in eyewitness accounts of the immediate aftermath, read "Hiroshima" by John Hersey.