The Snow Queen (TV Movie 2005) Poster

(2005 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Snow Queen for the Graphic Novel generation.
carinorisagallo3 January 2006
Every generation of directors and children's TV programmers seems destined to try their hand at Hans Christian Anderson's Snow Queen, this version is one of the best.

Filmed with a mixture of animation and live acting, it manages to capture the spirit of early eastern-European animations and graphic novels, the unreal backdrops suggest a stage performance, and the jerky motion, marionettes. Combined with a wonderful score written by Paul K. Joyce (and performed by the Royal Philharmonic), this is certainly an adaptation children will love, and continue to be entertained by for years to come.

Although some parts of the story which are skimmed over could have had more time spent on them (and it's possible some adults will be expecting Disney and fail to see past the computer imagery), it's good to remember that this is a story to be enjoyed, not studied, and its for kids who probably wouldn't want it to drag on.

All in all this is a very worthy production, there are far worse ways to spend an hour of the holiday period.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A Low Budget TV Adaptation (and it shows)
prohias21 December 2005
The Snow Queen is one of Hans Christian Andersen's best fairy tales. However, there has only been a few adaptations of it, and most are mediocre and childish. This is no exception.

The best thing about this TV special is the musical score; which is so beautiful and mystical it could have come from a classical music piece. I can't say the same for the rest.

This made-for-TV special looks like it was made by a group of college film students. I'm not too sure how much of this is 'real', because it looks like every shot has been superimposed over an Adobe photo edit. Even worse, the motion capture has a weird, jerky style of action that really detracts from any 'magic'. This is proof that CGI can give authentic looking dinosaurs, and encourage some of the shoddiest special effects ever shot.

The character development is so weak that neither sympathy, nor an understanding of personalities is felt. The story mainly skims and summarizes the plot of Andersen's fairy tale, giving the feel of headline news when compared to the original book.

I would normally give an adaptation like this a three, but considering that this is a one hour TV special, a 'major motion picture' style cannot be expected. This gets a four.
11 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
On the level of a (really) bad Saturday morning cartoon.
escoles27 December 2008
This is a confused and confusing adaptation, wherein stylish minimalism substitutes for story and meaningless special effects replace plot elements until the story is more or less completely gone.

A key plot event, for example, entails utterly unexplained and un-anticipatable magical powers being deployed, where Andersen's original invokes more poignant and symbolically instructive natural cycles.

The writers of this adaptation transform a story with powerful symbolic resonance into a bad Saturday morning cartoon.

Instead of this I strongly recommend you seek out some version of the 1959 Lev Atmotov / Nikolai Fyodorov adaptation, which preserves the symbolic power of Andersen's material.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Charming Version of the Tale
Girl_Friday_21 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I happened on to this last night on TV while babysitting my niece. It was a wonderful movie with strong performances. The supporting adult roles in particular, but Sydney White (Gerda) gives a very well rounded performance as well. The whole imagery of the movie makes you feel as if you are watching painted pictures instead of a movie, which took a few minutes for me to get used to, but I found it perfect as I sat and watched. My only complaint is that I feel it could (and perhaps should) have been longer. I felt as if some parts went by much to quickly. Overall a charming movie that made me fall in love with a childhood that I had forgotten.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A disappointing waste of an hour
vbressi6 August 2008
A Few years ago I saw the Snow Queen on Hallmark, I was absolutely blown away with the story and magic of that adaptation. Thinking that it was the same movie I was disappointed to find I had gotten another telling of the story. Yet I was willing to give it a chance, as I usually love anything made by the BBC. I have to say though I agree that the score of this movie was beautiful, I may have to find a copy somewhere. I was terribly unhappy with the CG animation and acting, you could just tell that the actors were filmed on a blue screen. It felt extremely fake.It was just horrible, it hesitated and you knew from the moment you began that it wasn't real snow. It just felt cheep. The BBC didn't have a winner with this film. It felt rushed as well, even though it was quit close to the original story. If you want to really experience the Snow Queen, please by all means read the story. If your interested in seeing a film that is well made and acted, I recommend the one done on Hallmark,which can be found on Amazon. Steer clear of this film, unless you feel the need to waste an hour. However, if you like classical music do get a CD of this movie the music it's self is really the only good thing in this movie.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
In keeping with the author's original vision
thecrookes2 September 2007
We thought it was smashing! The style was apt. The atmosphere mystical. A work of creative genius. A modern reworking with a message that is still relevant. I,m surprised to read comments that decry this work as a television special when it is clearly a piece of work that stands on its own and needs no justification from me as to its existence.A charming tale.I think you need to watch out for this guy Gibbs as a director as he has vision, imagination and creativity and should not be buried under a weight of ill informed criticism, which hangs like an albatross around the necks of so many burgeoning British film directors with talent!
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Diverting to children, disappointing to adults
sunnysusan1213 February 2007
I really wanted to like this movie, especially when I saw that Patrick Stewart was in the cast as the voice of the raven since I'm a long-time Patrick Stewart fan. I realize I'm a snob when it comes to "The Snow Queen." This was one of my all-time favorite children's stories. I also realize that anytime you read a story and create your own image of things, a movie will have a hard time living up to your creation. That being said, I really enjoyed "The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch & the Wardrobe" but, alas, I cannot say the same for this movie.

The CG effects were cool but distractingly obvious. It was sort of like watching somebody's first attempt at a video production using CG. Gerda's mother was played by an actress (Juliet Stevenson) I had seen before but couldn't remember where. To give a gauge as to how emotionally engaging the movie was, I spent most of the movie trying to figure out where I had seen her before.

I would say that, for young children not familiar with the original story, this would be a good 'pop it in the VCR for an hour so I can get some cleaning done' movie. But if it wins any awards, I'd be shocked.
5 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
An hour of your time that you can't get back
vcrabjohns1 January 2014
Starting from the beginning I wasn't sure if I could actually sit through the entire film. The special effects were bad, the dialogue was worse. The film failed to capture my attention. The plot, while probably better in other versions, did not come through properly. The acting needs works. The scenes looked like something I would see in a high school play and the green screen wasn't any better. The songs were, for the most part, unnecessary and didn't add anything to the film.

I would advise people, of all ages, to avoid this film. There are so many more things you can do with an hour.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Waste of Production
BatBanks11 February 2014
Warning: Spoilers
An another version of the Snow Queen is disappoint. The plot is thin; it should been longer. Everything is done in computer (it look too computer game-type) instead of a real outdoor and indoor setting. There too many song in every scenes with either the young girl or somebody. There is no character developed; the Snow Queen did nothing and had no dialogue; They never explains her full detail or relationship with Kay when she took him to her place. Why the actors agreed to be in the film in the first place? That was a waste of money and production, I hope they should do a better job in another adaptation of The Snow Queen soon.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I wish I had a flying sleigh pulled by swans.
El Cine8 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
(mild spoiler in last paragraph)

I first heard this tale many years ago as a radio narration with music, and I don't remember too many details. After watching this British production I looked up a summary of the tale on the internet. The original book was different in significant ways, not all of them for the better. I'm glad the filmmakers dropped the Christian preaching, but as it is the movie needs work in the basics of how to present the story.

Fortunately this show has captivating visual artistry and production values, which will pull you in during the first part of the program. There is a bold, even experimental look to the film. The backgrounds resemble pop-up books, the live action looks jerky like claymation, and there are one or two abstract interludes that seem unconnected to the story but add further classiness. The look may have confused some viewers, but the stylized settings and special effects are meant to be weird; the filmmakers likely believed this would fit in with an unreal "fairy tale" tone, and I do indeed think it evokes magic. The visuals benefit greatly from Paul K. Joyce's provocative classical score, which has both old-fashioned and modern, almost minimalist, elements. I wasn't crazy about the simplistic songs, though.

Unfortunately the story unfolds in a haphazard, stilted way over a short running time of 56 minutes, undermining the interest that the visual design initially inspires. Important plot events are rushed through; some scenes and characters with potential are quickly left behind. Some exciting set pieces from the arctic section would've benefited from more time -- e.g. Gerda hops across icebergs on a river full of leaping killer whales; then she passes through a crystal cave that makes sudden loud noises. But instead these obstacles are only seen in brief flashforwards. Then a fearsome threat from the Snow Queen's polar bears is built up, but dispensed with in seconds as Gerda's reindeer just jumps at them with his antlers and makes them disappear.

Perfunctory characters include the two arctic women -- who are they and what are they doing each living by themselves out in the frozen north? Likewise the talking raven who gives Gerda tips on her journey is just "there", some sort of Good Samaritan bird. And very little is said about the title character, the Snow Queen. Though crucial to the plot, she is never fleshed out as a character. She is just some sort of witch whom some loyal swans pull around in a sleigh, a woman whose very reason for being is too vague. Is she the devil? What does she want with a boy? Is she trying to trap his soul or something, cause she gets malicious delight out of it? And what's with the creepy sensual overtones when she bends over the supine boy as if to kiss him? A feature-length treatment could've been a better way to address all these problems.

Even the action scenes that the filmmakers add are done hastily. The coach robbery scene is quite incoherent; my guess is that some rival gang appears and fights off the first gang, though they all look identical. The climax shows the heroine and villain having a quick duel and shooting blasts of energy at each other a la Dark City. But my favorite was the silly Tomb Raider moment with Gerda running and leaping across a big chasm as if she was Lara Croft! A more unsettling bit of violence, one that will probably terrify many children (and adults), was the very scary part when the wind blasts a piece of the evil mirror into Kay's eye, leaving it a bloody mess. The next day his eye looks all right and shows no sign of injury, though.

After finishing the show, one particularly awkward question remains. At least, I am pretty sure I finished it -- I watched this during a pledge drive on PBS, so the show occasionally took a break in the PBS phone bank studio where some staff tried to get viewers to call and donate. One such break came after the heroine returned home and the camera flew over the countryside, culminating in a big zoom-out into outer space where a piece of mirror floated in front of a view of the globe. I presumed the program ended here (to be followed by some credits), so I turned the TV off. But therefore the story ended with Gerda breaking her promise to the bandit girl! You may remember that she persuaded the friendless bandit girl to help her escape from the bandit camp, and promised her that she'd come back soon to play and do other friend stuff. For a show that promoted Gerda's moral uprightness and purity of heart, it is surprising that she'd lie to and ditch the bandit girl like that! So much for "A friends' promise is never broken"!
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
CRAP- I'd rather be scrubbing the toilet as it would of been more productive.
nicoleabetts5 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Waste of time, boring. I could have told a story that would of been more entertaining than this.

-The coloring was hard on the eyes. -The special effects had promise, however they missed the mark at making it look good. -The packaging and write up on the DVD were very deceptive (in the write up it says she pierced his heart in the movie it was his eye) - it appears as if the movie starts in the middle, giving us no clue as to the beginning - he is pierced by a splinter of mirror, in the write up it says a splinter of ice -movie made us not want to read any of the authors writings in conclusion I would rate the movie with negative stars the 6.5 rating on your site was very deceiving
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed