The Gerson Miracle (2004) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Tremendous Introduction About the Option of Natural Healing
drakkar9112 January 2014
Let's begin with the fact this was ORIGINALLY RELEASED in 2004 - and made available on DVD in 2009 (according to most major online retailers). The film is therefore 10 years old. That doesn't change the history of Dr. Max Gerson discovering a natural alternative healing approach to treat cancer patients back in the late 1920's.

This documentary does exactly what it suggests - 1. Introduce the viewer to Max Gerson, learn about his struggle to bring his story forward. 2. Learn about the toxins we are subject to in every day life and the food we eat. 3. Ultimately learn there may be an alternative form of healing vs. big pharmaceutical medicine as the only means of treatment. How anyone could review that they learned nothing means they were not listening, didn't watch the film, or were close minded to learning about a holistic approach.

For every disease and every treatment, one can read stories of people who had 100% success and 100% failure. I'm sure the same can be said of natural treatments as well. Whether you believe in mind over body or not is not necessarily relevant to this film (though many would believe the mind is more powerful than we give it credit).

I would tend to agree that if the Gerson Therapy was attempted in the United States there would be efforts by large drug companies and government to discredit or stop it. Don't take my word for it, see "Farmageddon" and you'll see exactly how the government can intervene in the lives of 'free' citizens. Like it or not, pharmaceutical companies are in business to make a profit. Without a never ending need to supply drugs, their revenue dries up.

The DVD is an opportunity to learn about Max Gerson, and his treatment - it's not intended to diagnose, treat or cure you. There are books and many other means to gather more information. Just like any good documentary, this one is opens your eyes to something we typically don't see on the evening news. While I agree the narrator may not be the most upbeat, that doesn't take away from the content, but you can certainly take a star off your rating if you feel that strongly. I would have liked a touch more statistical information to show that maybe not everyone that attempted the therapy succeeded? In general, for me the best documentaries are those that are not afraid to show there are often 2 sides to every story. Primarily for this reason, I gave it 4 stars vs. 5. In the end, each individual needs to decide the best action to follow for their own well-being.

I will indeed be one of many having viewed this program to seek out more information. There are many documentary films that will confirm some of the statements in this one - that the food we eat has the potential to heal us or make us very ill. In 2008, "The Beautiful Truth: The World's Simplest Cure for Cancer" was released that some viewers may find more 'lively' and speaks to some of the genetically modified foods.
12 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Good lord
pstposter17 July 2023
People, if you want to try natural therapy along with medical cancer treatments, by all means. . . But do yourself and your loved ones a favor and make sure you get your regular checkups and treatments. Just because a natural diet may have been made in good faith effort, it is in no way a conclusive evidence it works against cancer. Considering lives wrecked by coffee enema therapies and raw cow livers (now discontinued, thank god) there is more evidence than not this diet will cause you to lose precious time in your fight against cancer. Gershon may not be a quack but his research evidence on his methods were haphazard, lacking, and at best anecdotal.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Dangerous propaganda
krader-imdb27 March 2024
I'll be honest: I have not personally watched this movie. I did, however, listen to the entire review by the God Awful Movie team. I am also a science enthusiast who reads a lot of stories, both books (such as "The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer") and blogs (such as "Science Based Medicine"), about medicine. Max Gerson is a crank who I wouldn't let treat a hangnail. This movie goes on and on about "chemicals" hurting people seemingly without any awareness that the carrots, coffee, and other foods the recommend are, wait for it, made of chemicals!

Did you know that Dihydrogen-Monoxide can kill you? Yet you consume vast quantities of it every day. Yes, that is a silly, gotcha, example since H2O is just water. Yet too much or too little can kill you. That's true for every other chemical and element (e.g., oxygen) your body needs to survive. Context and dose is important. There are thousands of chemicals and trace elements your body requires in minute quantities but too much can cause illness and death.

The only positive review as I write this is by @drakkar91 (8/10 stars) and their review headline uses the meaningless term "natural healing". Guess what? Cyanide is natural. Hemlock is natural. Arsenic is natural. But I wouldn't recommend ingesting any of those in an attempt to cure what ails you.

Beyond the medically dangerous propaganda espoused by this film it is simply awful in terms of its cinematic qualities: acting, directing, dialog, story, etc.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed