Code Breakers (TV Movie 2005) Poster

(2005 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
"Duty, Honor, Country." What is the penalty for cheating?
forhall10 December 2005
"Duty, Honor, Country" is inscribed in granite over an archway at West Point. A personal moral code, duty, and honor is the foundation of the military and my learned profession. (I am proud to be a criminal defense lawyer, and I take "duty and honor" very seriously.) This story takes place in 1950-51 and wends its way through the infamous West Point football player cheating scandal that ultimately wiped out the West Point football team with 90 athletes dismissed.

The cadet that finally blows the whistle on it is played by Zack Bryan, who was the oldest son in "Home Improvement" (billed there as Zachery Ty Bryan), and he does an excellent job in his role, as do all the other young actors enlisted for this movie. Bryan's character, on the swim team, wrestles with ratting out his roommate who lets him in on the secret that the football team is passing around questions from the examinations. Those who take it first write down the questions for others. Bryan's character is wrestles with his conscience and comes forward. His own father, however, chastises him, but not for following the code. Instead, it is for not following the "chain of command" and going to the Commandant, knowing that going to the Honor Committee likely would be futile because the football team had ringers on the Committee. His own father tells him that his military career will be ruined for following the honor code. He stands up to his father.

Also excellent, and typically understated is Scott Glenn as the team coach, a West Point graduate himself, whose son is slated to be the next season's starting quarterback. He finds his own son involved, and he has to wrestle with that conundrum as well, knowing that his own son would be kicked out, too. He's the coach. His team is destroyed. This is only partly developed because this movie is not supposed to be about football.

The cadets involved connive and plot to "stonewall" (was that word even used in 1950?) the investigation (One says that a leader "never, ever admits that he was wrong. Any man who does is not fit to lead." Sound familiar?), but the first one in to be interviewed didn't know the plan, so he named names. He is Bryan's roommate. He's obviously mad at Bryan when he figures out the source, but he realizes, as others come to do, that he should be more mad at himself for screwing up. Bryan ends up with a guard at his door for protection. Other than the Commandant, the guard, under orders not to talk to him knocks on the door and tells him "You saved West Point." This is an important point almost lost in the movie.

I give this a 7 because of the young actors and the honest attempt at the important message. Glenn has been better, but they all do a reasonably good job. The problem with the script, maybe though, is that it was written for ESPN, and not for wider release to general audiences. So, it spends more time on football issue and teams, and I think not enough on dealing with the important moral issues until all hell breaks loose, and the plot moves more to the characters and their problems. More should have been spent on what it took to come forward and what Bryan's character endured.

But, moral values are so lacking in this society today, at every level and in every corner, I applaud ESPN for taking this on and the message it ultimately conveys. Lives were not all totally ruined, but they paid a dear price for compromising "honor."

Moral values can be taught anywhere. This is a start.

Finally, for HDTV, the picture was not always of the highest quality for HD.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
weak on military and football details
Steve4612 March 2010
If the director and producer had bothered to have a military adviser or at least someone who was familiar with things military they would have avoided some horrible goofs like having Col Harkins wear his cavalry branch insignia upside down and his military ribbons arranged in a totally incorrect manner. My grand kids could also salute better than any of these actors. Another interesting goof to me were the football helmets. In this flick during the Army-Navy game, Navy wore the old leather-head type without face guards which were typical of the 1920-1940 football players. Army is shown wearing the more modern molded plastic variety. By 1950 all football teams were using the safer high impact plastic helmets. Other than that the movie was entertaining at best.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
This film is worth watching to see the evolution of intercollegiate athletics and ethical conduct over the past fifty years
lavatch11 December 2005
Premiering on ESPN, "Code Breakers" looks back to the shocking academic misconduct scandal at West Point that rocked the complaisant world of intercollegiate athletics in 1951.

G. Ross Parker deserves kudos for a teleplay based on careful research and for refusing to provide a simplistic portrayal of a complex controversy. The Army football team of the late 1940s and early 1950s was a national powerhouse under the leadership of the legendary coach Earl "Red" Blaik. His 1951 team was brought to its knees by the disclosure of varsity football cadets cheating on exams.

The film was successful in portraying the politics at West Point, including the major conflict between Col. Paul D. Harkins and Coach Blaik. Harkins resented the prominence and popular appeal of Blaik's successful football program, and it was Harkins' committee that uncovered the cheating, leading to the resignation of 90 cadets who violated the academy's honor code. It was clear that the players were guilty of academic misconduct. At the same time, the cadets had no legal representation or advocacy. And the academy's system of administering identical exams in multiple classes was part of the problem as well. The film makes it clear that this was a scandal just waiting to happen.

The actors in "Code Breakers" included an outstanding ensemble of young men playing the roles of the cadets. Their real-life counterparts were teenagers recruited from impoverished backgrounds that included minimal educational preparation. The pressures on these young men to succeed academically, militarily, and athletically had to be staggering. All of the young actors were outstanding, especially Corey Sevier in the role of Bob Blaik, the coach's son and one of the cadets ultimately forced to resign from West Point.

The only weak link in this film was in the casting of Scott Glenn as the charismatic Coach Blaik. Glenn's performance was far too subdued and understated. Blaik was the mentor of the influential Vince Lombardi, portrayed by Richard Zeppieri in a minor role in the film. The obsession with winning in collegiate and professional sports was in its embryonic stage in the Blaik era of college football. Unfortunately, Scott Glenn's performance was too understated and laid back; he needed a gung-ho exuberance and a more powerful aura in his characterization, especially in his voice.

Overall, this film still provided a thoughtful portrayal of the political infighting that rent the military academy asunder. As it turned out, most of the young men were able to rebound, a number of them even succeeding in careers in the military. Staunchly supported by Gen. Douglas MacArthur, Coach Blaik remained in his position as Army's football coach. The team fell on lean times in 1951-52, losing more games than than Blaik had lost in his previous seven seasons at Army. But Blaik's boys rebounded with enormously successful seasons in 1953-54. Following a number of Blaik's victories in big games, Gen. MacArthur would send him such effusive congratulatory telegrams that it appeared as though Blaik had just won great military victories in the Pacific.

When Blaik retired from coaching after the 1958 season, his football legacy did not end there. His protégé Vince Lombardi left to become an assistant coach with the New York Giants, prior to starting a dynasty and a career of mythical proportions at Green Bay. Sid Gilman, another one of Blaik's assistants, was one of the architects of the exciting, high-powered offenses in the early years of the AFL during his years at San Diego.

I am writing this review from Minnesota, and the last appearance of the University of Minnesota Golden Gophers in the Rose Bowl was in 1961, when led by a coach who is still a legend here in Minnesota. His name is Murray Warmath, and he was he yet other protégé of Earl "Red" Blaik.
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
loved it
jacquelyncody20 January 2006
I love movies like this, well-cast, well-acted, in the tradition of films like "School Ties" and "Dead Poets Society". What a great film, especially for an ESPN original. I had to pause my dvr and look up Zachary Bryan on the internet to make sure that he is, indeed, the same actor from "Home Improvement". He has done a number of other projects since that show as well, none of which I have seen. I am very impressed with the way he and his acting have matured. And Jake Busey...well, he always cracks me up. He seems to be cast according to his personality...loud and proud. I had never seen the other lead character in anything either, but I do like him as well. Hopefully they will run this movie again on ESPN...it is good stuff.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
rules are rules
wrlang24 September 2006
Code Breakers is a film about football, honor, and the military. A large group of West Point cadets devise a way to cheat on their academic tests to help keep the football team together, breaking the academy honor code. One cadet has the guts to come forward and that starts the chain of events that disgraced Army football and West Point in 1951. It's a lesson in how anything can be rationalized as for the greater good. Something we should always strive to prevent if we are to stay true to the codes we accept and expect to live by. The whole point of the academy is to weed out those that can't make the grade. We tend to falsely think that effort is worth as much as achievement. While great effort that falls short should not be considered bad, it is grounds for being let go. While sports does teach team work and leadership, it should never be an end unto itself. It is, after all, only a game. Living in Wisconsin, I was surprised that coach Vince Lombardi was part of the film. A very well made film that draws you into the characters and the promise of a military training program that teaches the right stuff.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
a movie worth viewing
dannysoo10 September 2006
Codebreakers was a stimulating review of the ethics of my time. I was going through high school in those years and appreciate getting full details of the football scandal and what led up to it. The peer pressure to conform had to be intense and the movie portrayed the situation well.

I liked the follow-up on the athlete's response, outlining how many regained their dignity and were able to re-enter the military and sports arenas in subsequent years.

I often wondered how the legendary Vince Lombardi got his start, and now I know more of his background.

All in all, it was fine entertainment.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Worth watching again and again!
Little-Mikey2 January 2012
The DVD is made by ESPN Home Entertainment. It was probably featured on ESPN. So those who are either indifferent or just plain not interested in sports, would likely pass on this movie, which would be a shame because this movie is much more than "just another movie with a sports related theme". While the movie has a sports related theme, namely Army football, the story is rooted in the keeping of the honor code, a code that must never be broken. Loyalty is also a code that must never be broken. The movie, which is based on a true story, is about a group of cadets at West Point who after operating a cheating ring so they could play football for the greatest team in the country and maintain their grade average, are forced to choose between honor (a cadet never cheats) and loyalty (a cadet never betrays the trust of his fellow cadets). A lot of research went into this movie and a lot of homework was done to make this movie as authentic as possible, successfully capturing West Point as it was in 1950, complete with haircuts, uniforms, etc. I had to give this movie an 8 only because Harkins' ribbons were worn out of order and his collar device was worn wrong. As a (Go Navy) retiree, I have seen ribbon infractions on high ranking officers. So maybe I shouldn't be too hard on the make up crew for allowing the uniform infractions on Harkins' uniform. This is an excellent movie that could be watched over and over again.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
very good morality tale
disdressed121 May 2007
i liked this movie.it's a movie about football,but it's much more than that.it's really about honor,truth,and loyalty .it is set in 1950,and chronicles the "Army"-the West Point football team.West point is the very esteemed military academy.as the movie begins,"army is coming off of 27 consecutive wins and hope to win the championship once again.along the way,many on the team will go through some trials that will test their morality and pledge to uphold the principle of honor at any cost.the backdrop to the story is the Korean War.i like the fact the the story has some depth to it.the very fine performances go along way in anchoring the story.Scott Glenn gives a nice understated,quietly intense performance as one of of the coaches.even though this is a morality tale,it doesn't hit you over the head,or preach to you.all in all a pretty good movie.for me "Code Breakers" is an 8/10
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
One of those cases when a re-hashed plot is still great
bellino-angelo201410 January 2024
My summary above refers to the fact that in February 2022 I saw THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE and it was about cadets fighting for honor at West Point ending with a trial and some cadets being expelled. On July 2023 I saw CODE BREAKERS and the concept is still the same. Now this doesn't necessarily mean that it's a bad movie, perhaps this is a rare case when a re-hashed plot still works.

This story is set in 1951 during the cheating scandal at West Point and its impact on the football team that was forced to dismiss its entire team. In 1950 the cadets football team was highly favored and yet it went to lose on another team. Then there was the scandal of 90 cadets that broke the Academy's Honor Code. From then on the movie follows cadet Brian Nolan who was brought to a ring of cheaters when he needed academic help to pass and also on coach Earl Blaik (Scott Glenn) and his relationship with his son Bob who was one of the cheaters.

The plot while 95% unoriginal is still good and the characters are written so well that you'll root for them until the very end (just like with LORDS OF DISCIPLINE). The main reason for seeing this is the acting: despite they are mostly unknowns (except for Glenn and Jake Busey) they are still good actors that should have had more chances after this.

If you have never seen THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE you'll find it original but if you saw that one as well it's still like a both modern and different take on the plot.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
End of Movie
lsmoak11 December 2005
I enjoyed the movie very much. It was very interesting, and I thought the young cadets were faced with some really tough issues. In their own mind, they knew it was wrong, but they were desperate to play on the team, graduate, etc. What they did was wrong, but I do not believe they deserved to be forced to resign from the academy. A failing grade or a suspension would have been more appropriate that what they had worked so hard to accomplish. However, I still enjoyed the movie and thought it brought out some real important issues. My only complaint is that at the end of the movie when the information of what eventually happened to the key characters was listed, I did not have time to read it, and I would still like to know what happened to the key cadets who had to resign.

Lynn Smoak
6 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed