"The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson" The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and Doctor Watson: King of Blackmailers (TV Episode 1980) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Sherlock Holmes does battle with a capitalist who victimizes the poor
hte-trasme18 October 2009
Now, I'll acknowledge that my title is something if a cheap reference where this production is concerned, and henceforth I'll stay away from inventing political implications for it.

As a Sherlock Holmes aficionado I'd long heard the series of Soviet TV films that "The King of Blackmailers" belongs to praised as one of the best versions of Holmes put on film. Now, thanks to the magic of the internet, I've had a chance to view one of the films, and I can't say I think people were exaggerating very much.

Vasili Livanov might not be the very greatest Sherlock Holmes I have ever seen, but he is legitimately excellent in the role. He makes a very good-humored and genial but also quiet and in-command Holmes, and harnesses a huge amount of screen presence. It's just an excellent and absorbing performance, and one that very subtly but thoroughly humanizes Holmes. For all Liavnov does for Holmes, though, I can't say I have seen a better Watson than Vitali Solomin. He injects a certain vitality and enthusiasm into the role so that we can really understand how this Watson has turned his cases with Holmes into a series of widely popular magazine stories -- especially in the scene where he returns to Baker Street to describe Milverton's house to Holmes.

The two of them have an excellent chemistry together as well, and this, along with the writing, infuses most of their scenes together with a wit and humor that's quite wonderful and also serves as relief from the tension of the rest of the story.

The adaptation, which inserts Sherlock's brother Mycroft Holmes into a version of Arthur Conan Doyle's "The Adventure of Charles Augustus Milverton" works very well, and keeps the suspense and adventure in a story that, in fact, revolves more around Holmes almost being implicated in a crime than solving one.

The direction is also to be commended -- frequently spooky, tense, and unsettling, with uneasy stillness used to great effect. The whole thing looks, gorgeous too, with very lavish sets and location work. I admire how seamlessly the Victorian England of Sherlock Holmes' world was creating in the Soviet Union using all Russian-speaking actors, and I'll be watching as many English-subtitled entries in the Lenfilm Holmes series with Valili Livanov as I can locate.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very solid adaption of the well-known story
blumdeluxe21 January 2018
Warning: Spoilers
"Priklyuchaniya Sherloka Kholmsa i doktora Vatsona: Korol shantazha" tells the story of Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson who are investigating the case of a well-known blackmailer that threathens to expose the erotic adventures of young ladies to their noble husbands.

In my opinion, this is a very solid adaption of the novel, especially considering the fact that it was produced for television. It creates a very decent atmosphere, just like you wish for in a Sherlock Holmes film. Further it convinces through great acting and choice of actors and an overall very professional production. There are no big surprises or plot-twists which is a bit sad in regard to the tension, that is nonetheless built up. Definetly one of the strongest adaptions I know, even though the following title of the series is even stronger in my eyes.

All in all Sherlock Holmes fans will love this title and have a lot of fun with it. It sets just the right mood for the adventures it depicts and shines through its acting and scenery.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Another superb entry in the Russian Sherlock Holmes saga
chaos-rampant26 December 2008
This third episode, following The Acquaintance and Bloody Signature, finds Sherlock Holmes turning into a thief to sneak into the mansion of a professional blackmailer and retrieve certain scandalous documents for a duchess about to be married. Mycroft Holmes, acting as the intermediate between the duchess and his brother Sherlock, is introduced for the first time in the series. The heist staged by Holmes and Watson doesn't go exactly as planned however and they become the targets of unsuspecting Lestrade's search. In the end a peculiar letter signed with the monogram "M" arrives at 221 Baker Street and while I'm not sure, I believe it heralds the appearance of Holmes' arch nemesis, the diabolic Professor Moriarty, in one of the consequent entries.

The style and quality is consistent with the previous two movies. Filmed in rich colours, heavy on reds, blacks and browns, with a dark, baroque ambiance, although perhaps a bit too dark for visibility's sake in places (some day-for-night filming takes place too). Vasili Livanov and Vitali Solomin once again make for a terrific duo, in their respective roles as Holmes and Watson, undoubtedly making a strong candidate for the finest Holmes-Watson pair in the characters' history.

Overall, King of Blackmailers is an engrossing murder mystery, pleasing to the eye and not without a couple of funny moments either.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The King of Blackmailers....well, we all gotta make a living
gridoon202424 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I mistakenly watched this episode, which is actually the first of a trilogy, after "Hunting A Tiger", which is the third. This one is much better, mainly because Sherlock Holmes is there all the time! (he is offscreen for at least half of the other one). Both Holmes and Watson are very well-cast, and the King of Blackmailers is appropriately slimy, but the pacing is again too painstaking for my taste: the break-in sequence goes on too long, and when the story finally gets a little exciting with Holmes and Watson in danger of being considered murder suspects....the episode just ends with a setup for the next one! **1/2 out of 4.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed