Brothers Three: An American Gothic (2007) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Poor Production Values Keep This Film Grounded
gradyharp5 May 2008
Paul Kampf is new to the game of writing and directing and has obviously been influenced by some filmmakers who tamper with the story and use flashbacks and flash forwards to enhance the richness of the theme line. In the case of BROTHERS THREE: AN American Gothic these borrowed techniques serve to confuse rather than enhance the appreciation of the film: the viewer is left with a feeling that too much is being taken for granted as far as additive information and too little attention is paid to character development and direction. The result is a bumpy ride of a movie that is in need of some postproduction surgery to make it appeal.

In a desolate forest cabin we meet New York lawyer Peter (Patrick Wilson) who has been summoned to this childhood 'home' by his brothers - the older Rick (Neal McDonough) and the younger, mentally challenged Norman (Scott Michael Campbell). Rick is sullen and angry, Norman is pitifully confused and abused, and Peter tries to make sense of the reunion. The boys' father (John Heard) is dead, leaving a will dividing his meager belongs among the three brothers. Through a series of confusing time changes in the guise of artistic flashbacks we discover that their mother is dead and that funeral attendance did not include the entire family, that Norman was the product of a drunken liaison with Loren (Melora Walters) who died at the hands of the father, and about other evidences of extreme family dysfunction. We also slowly discover the dark truths of the death of the alcoholic father, an incident that was brutal, but when the truth is revealed it unites the three brothers.

All of this is played out in the filthy cabin where most of the time is spent in imbibing beer and in fights both real and playful. At times we are not sure whether we are in the present or the remembered past, and instead of adding to the drama, this somewhat amateurish manipulation leaves the audience confused. The acting level of Wilson, McDonough, Campbell and Heard has some fine moments and some extended moments that seem like tired adlibing. Tighter control from the writer/director would have helped - especially in the editing room. Grady Harp
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The cabin in the woods
jotix10017 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Three brothers, as different as night and day, are reunited when Pete, the one that has left the place where he grew up, is summoned. The reason is to make him aware that their brutish father, has left him the seedy cabin that has seen better days. Rick, the older brother, has stayed behind and takes care of the younger sibling, Norman, who appears to be slow. Rick and Pete fight, while Norman looks, unable to do much. Rick and Norman live in extreme poverty, which doesn't prevent them for drinking the beer they have put on a stream nearby to keep cool.

The mysterious disappearance of the father, and a revelation prove to much for Pete. Rick, is the key to unravel the enigma about a low life father that was a drunk, a thief, and a womanizer. This older man that should have known better was instrumental in the way his sons turned out. The horrifying ending leaves the viewer stunned.

Paul Kampf, who wrote the screenplay of "Brothers Three: An American Gothic" was making his directorial debut. His use of the flashbacks does not add anything to the narrative, in fact, one could say it muddles the story. There is not too much logic in the way these children turned out, but then again, who can assure how the sons of a man that shows no redeeming qualities will go through life. For a moment we thought the film was based on a theatrical play because of the single set and the acting, but evidently this was a work made directly for the screen.

What Mr. Kampf accomplished was to gather a first rate cast, but alas, they have not much to say. Patrick Wilson continues to wow audiences with his intelligent take of the confused son that comes back to his birthplace to find it in ruins. Neal McDonough is terrific as Rick, who carries a heavy burden in his soul; he gives a fine performance. Scott Michael Campbell is also good as Norman. John Heard is always reliable to deliver, as he does with his take of the horrible father he was.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A great cast does not guarantee a great film...
kpeterson3215 February 2008
I wanted to love this movie so much. I adore Patrick Wilson and Neil McDonough, so I just knew this film would be fantastic. The premise has a great hook, the writer/director's theatre background promised rich dialogue and deep, heartfelt interaction between the characters.

I knew as soon as the movie began that it was going to be a disappointment. The flashbacks (and flash forwards) were disjointed and never fully resolved. The film itself had an overall bipolar feeling, where the brothers that were yelling and arguing and ready to come to blows suddenly found themselves laughing their guts out over beer and a makeshift football game. All of the transitions were left out.

The concept and the acting were pretty good. Not fantastic, but not terrible either. Neil McDonough's Rick looked bored at times where boredom was not called for, and I wondered if the actor was bored with his lines or if the script was in desperate need of some fine-tuning. Even Patrick Wilson, who stands out in everything he does, looked out of place here. No actor can ever be in only good movies, and I hope this is his worst, because even this is not awful.

I think the real problem with the movie was the editing. The slow motion dissolves were too slow and looked amateur. The cuts to other scenes had no general connection. It came across as very choppy, which one could argue showed the mindset of the characters, but, to me, just looked like sloppy work that could have been greatly improved by a more experienced artist.

Overall, I can't recommend it, but I won't tell anyone to avoid it either. It was just "okay."
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
an exercise
Vincentiu24 September 2013
a film with great potential and interesting subject. but nothing more. and it is not easy to define the error because all seems be only a crazy trip. the flash - backs, the dialogs, the fear of director to introduce a form of order, impression of improvisation, good intentions of actors and the gray atmosphere, the middle way between theater play and film, influences as spider web are pieces who makes the film almost confuse, an experiment with a too long title and nice intentions. the character of Scott Michael Campbell has a lot of resources to be the key of story but it remains only a bizarre accident. Patrick Wilson is prey of a sketch, not really inspired. a film who gives after its end only ash of impressions. a complicated exercise without result.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed