Made in Secret: The Story of the East Van Porn Collective (2005) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
"We must become the change we wish to see in the world." - Ghandi
CIMC3 November 2005
Warning: Spoilers
What happens when you want to make a documentary about an anarcho-feminist pornography collective but can't seem to find a subject? If you're the makers of Made In Secret you go out and start your own just so you can film it. The result isn't exactly a documentary. After all, it's far more contrived than than Nanook of the North. Yet it's too factual to be called a feature film. It's somewhere between in a previously unrecognized gray area. Though the genre may be uncertain, the entertainment isn't. The film isn't perfect, but it's quite good.

The film opens with Monster reading a delightful performance piece. Lamenting the current state of porn, she longs for "a story so far from dumb that I'll sit in the wet spot after I cum, just to see how it ends." Clearly it's time for a "grassroots pervert revolution." This becomes the launching point for the EVPC. The film leaps forward a few years to Godfrey documenting Hugh Jorgen finishing of the editing on the EVPC's latest cinematic triumph. A short bike ride later and the entire collective is seated in front of a TV to watch a little porn of its own making. It's a good time watching the group try to front nonchalant while watching themselves act out their fantasies. Some make it through with only blushing while other being made to squirm.

Where things really get moving is with the production of the next film, JD Superstar's BikeSexual, a "pansexual romp" that means to put the ass in Critical Mass. The structure of the group is likely as interesting, if less erotic, than any product it produces. With rotating facilitators, directors and crew the group is certainly recognizable as an anarchist collective. They require consensus decision making, a process for which the films makes an excellent case, and they have rules for on-set behavior that were developed from a remarkably insightful critique of the critiquing of pornstar's bodies. The members are dedicated to helping each other make films that they would find truly erotic instead of "shot after shot, of slot after slot." If that means two straight men like Mr. Pants and Professor University have to do a scene in the bottom of a skate park's halfpipe then they'll certainly go for it. It "fundamentally challenges parts of myself," Prof. University says of the experience.

The making of BikeSexual ends up including an impressive array of on-location shoots. In the shower, garage (for the "lesbian bike repair scene") and forest the collective toils until finally hitting a ferry to shoot a little "guerilla porn." Their enthusiasm is infectious and it helps the rather amateur camera work and low quality video seem intimate rather than cheap. Where the films fails is in some of the contrived drama around the filming of the documentary itself. Though the filmmakers openly acknowledge that the film isn't entirely factual, some parts feel made up when they shouldn't.

All of this could be little more than an entertaining yarn were it not for the group's dedication to wrestling control of porn away from corporate control. Quality, community- based grassroots erotica. It's a novel idea made more compelling by the demand that it be watchable for reasons beyond the skin. That doesn't sound like too shabby a "revolution to watch with one fist in the air and one in" the crotch.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
When disappointment turns to admiration
charly117 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I was fascinated by the maturity level of these people - that they could disagree strongly, nearly fight with each other and yet keep their calm and poise. I was struck by the honesty of these people, with each other and with the camera. I was struck by how odd, yet interesting, that a lesbian would want a "gay men" scene and a "straight" scene - seemed like the reasoning of a person who is not so selfish as to want to exclude the rest of the "collective".

*************SPOILERS******************

The next night, we watched the DVD extras and I was angry when they revealed that it was scripted, not quite real. I completely understood the couple that called them "fakers" on the street. At first, I felt that way, as well. I think I was hurt that all of the stripped down feelings they had as a reasonable group were a sham. But, as I listened to their explanations of what they had done and I chatted with my husband about it, I began to really admire what these people created.

Using Geores Braque's definition, "art is meant to disturb". What they created is art. It disturbed me. I suppose that the base reason I am most disquieted about the film is that only someone viewing the extras can be sure it was a fictional piece. Many people, like me, will leave the film thinking it was all factual. With the age of DVDs, perhaps it is a moot point since most people watch the extras, but there are still bound to be those who took it at face value and still believe it was "real" - so I am still a bit miffed about that, but not much.

************END OF SPOILERS********************************

I hope that people will actually give this movie a chance to work it's magic. The spell it casts is worthwhile. There is genius in this work!
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This is what whiny Canadians look like naked
HAL9000-423 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
A movie about pr0n with virtually no nudity, at least as much as I saw during the first 60 minutes of the film. I had to walk out because it was getting too tiresome. I knew that things were going to go bad when only a few minutes in the producer of the "documentary" about the making of the pr0n films causes a panic during a screening of one of their films. He is reduced to shooting only reaction shots of the actors while they view their completed pr0n film for the first time. This is very creepy.

It's sad to see them put years into the project and still have nothing better than a one-camera setup. Why not splurge and get a second HD camera guys? It's not Dogma-95 style by design but it just about comes out that way.

The film is basically a bunch of talking heads talking about how they were transformed by this filming experience. But to me they all seem like a bunch of bohemians having a last hurrah at university and dabbling in bisexuality. Grow up and get a real job people. Enough with the phony names already, why use a handle like "Hugh Jorgen" when your face is going to be all over this film at every festival. Do you really think you are going to be anonymous. Just one more pretension that irks at me. Spending months shooting pr0n that only 7 other people will ever see is the height of narcissism. No wonder the terrorists want to kill us.
5 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
completely boring and annoying
abrahamdrimmer11 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
this movie was unbelievably terrible. don't waste your time. as a wise man once told me, "you can't reinvent the bone", but apparently tacky-ass-ed anarchy-kids never listen to wise old people (their parents). follow along the cast and watch the exploits of: bicycle riding emotional eunuch.boring vanilla gay girl ugly chick a bunch of other people who I forget(power Dyke?) watch as they adorably assemble a stupid porn that no one would ever want to watch. good luck with your boring life. I give it a two because it was funny to watch the whimsical gypsy punks in my class wet their wool panties and then go and dry them off with an accordion lesson book.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed