In ascolto (2006) User Reviews

Not bad for a Hollywood-style thriller

[rasecz · 7/10 · 16 December 2006]

Those who enjoy Hollywood thrillers, a la the recent Manchurian Candidate, should not be disappointed. Refreshingly we find the US NSA and its American corporate partners in the role of bad guys. The saving grace for the American side is that the hero is a conscientious NSA staff in the role of master saboteur of a new Big Brother spying technology called Tumbleweeds that can listen to conversations even when cell phones are not in use (but ON of course). Clearly a potential concern of the moment. To some all this may appear far-fetched, even conspiratorial, but it is within the realm of the possible, especially considering the increasing collaboration of phone companies with the NSA. Would you rely on Nokia, Samsung and other phone manufacturers to protect your privacy?

Lighten up ...... it's only science fiction ...... or is it ?

[merklekranz · 6/10 · 2 April 2010]

Like something out of the pages of "The National Enquirer", "The Listening" is entertaining, as long as you don't let facts get in the way of a good story. After all, the best science fiction, is believable science fiction. Michael Parks goes up against the government's National Security Agency and a private corporation supplier, trying to save an innocent Italian woman from their abusive silencing techniques. Though the movie has it's flaws in the logic department, the intriguing subject matter overcomes any glitches in the story. If you are one of those people who is paranoid about "big brother" listening, this is a film you might want to avoid, because it will definitely strike a nerve. - MERK

Great Topic, so-so Execution

[ebiros2 · 5/10 · 1 July 2012]

The story revolves around NSA's covert global listening espionage system called Echelon. It encompasses absolutely every communication system available, phones, internet, and other position tracking system including your passports and drivers license equipped with smart chips. When they make human implant chips mandatory, I'm sure it will be part of this system to profile your every movement.

The movie's topic is great. It's really a conspiracy theory, that's not a theory but reality. One phone company when asked "How much do you cooperate with NSA in divulging traffic information through your network ?", their answer was "Cooperate ? They're right inside us. They come into our building and set up their surveillance devices within our buildings. Two floors out of our 6 story communication hub is completely taken over by their machines.". The implication is that if your computer is equipped with microphones or cameras, they can use that to monitor your speech, and motion. Ditto for all phone systems. One anti-virus software company was reportedly approached by the NSA to build a backdoor to the software so they can monitor everything that goes on within the computer.

This information can as it is indicated at the end of this movie, bring billions in revenue to corporations working with NSA, and give NSA total tyranny over the world population.

What's even more disturbing is that NSA has no obligation to obtain congressional over site to perform these so called intelligence gathering operation. They basically have carte blanche to do whatever they please.

More movies like this should be made to bring these criminal activities that infringes on privacy, and information that will benefit only the insiders to light.

However, the movie's execution was bit weak, and the story seem to drag on without focus. I wished that they could have done better in this area.

So it's a good movie with intriguing plot, but story could have been better fleshed out.

Interesting factoids about spying, mediocre acting, "yeah, right" plot parts

[v_imdb-126 · 6/10 · 21 October 2006]

The movie gives out lots of interesting factoids about the Echelon spying system that the plot revolves around, which a subsequent web search proved to be largely accurate (or, at least, largely accurate according to one of the various hypotheses about the system).

I found the acting to be fairly weak and unconvincing, especially the lead bad guy, but others as well. At points the acting had me thinking I was watching some kind of B movie, although there were enough decent actors to keep me wondering.

At several point plot issues had me going "Yeah, right." While you can let them slide on technology issues (although one piece of technology that plays a major role in the plot, which supposedly dates back half a century, is particularly questionable), it was often the characters' reactions to the situations they were in that had me wondering "Who would actually do that if they were in such a situation?"

Overall, though, the movie kept me entertained but the draw backs only allow me to give it a Luke warm recommendation, although I'd recommend it more strongly to conspiracy theorists and others who dig this kind of thing.

From OK to worse

[R-Ronteltap · 6/10 · 29 August 2006]

OK, so I'm a bit of a fan of spy movies. And this one started out pretty good by detailing the NSA and its day to day operations. The phone listening devices are pretty accurate but NO WAY THAT: 01 A civvy gets to roam around the NSA and give orders within the sanctuary. 02 A lowly listening operator gets to do more or less the same. 03 A lowly operator gets to the witness in Italy _before_ the NSA. 04 A super counterspy forgets to prevent counter attacks by his primary target (Tumbleweed). 05 A radio signal _explodes_ all listening equipment. 06 An NSA / CIA targeted counter-spy-group waits patiently for 'the-man-with-guns' to arrive on the mountain to kill them. 07 'The man' arrives slowly on-foot through the snow, in stead of by helicopter. 08 A fleeing wounded group stays ahead of well-funded government assassins that long (consider imaging satellites).

Contrary to the above, I did enjoy this movie a bit, but I am waiting for a more intelligent version of it.

Pretty Bad

[fakeusername · 4/10 · 25 August 2006]

This movie was pretty bad.

As a thriller, it would've been bad even if the technology were right; Michael Parks is terrible in this -- completely emotionless -- and any sort of sympathy that they try to drum up for him and his ex-girlfriend is completely lost.

From a technological standpoint, this movie requires more than a leap of faith. It requires a lobotomy. Some of the technology, it gets right. Most of it, it gets wrong, wrong, wrong. That bit at the end, the bit with the super-duper signal that deafened the girl and blew up all of the computing hardware, is one of the stupidest things I've ever seen in a movie. Ever. I stopped the film at this point. I can't believe that a technology adviser for a movie would let the scriptwriters get away with this ridiculous junk. Have you ever accidentally turned your headphones all the way up? Did you have a seizure? Did blood leak from your ears while your stereo exploded in your face? Come on.

Anyway, there's a lot more that I could say, but the gist of it is: Not Worth Your Time.

Fantastic Film

[hoxenfelt · 9/10 · 12 June 2006]

This is an absolutely fantastic film.

It's a very clever spy thriller....the kind that few make any longer. The fact that the technology is accurate made it even more absorbing.

The direction and acting were superb. The was fast-paced, enthralling and full of suspense. And the cinematography was absolutely beautiful. The attention to detail was spectacular.

Reports are that it was exceptionally well received at the New York Film Festival.

Its truly a moving film and a come-together bonding experience for the whole audience.

Really a superb bit of film.

Interesting but just not that great

[mongoose__49 · 1/10 · 1 September 2006]

A mediocre spy flick, not worth the last hour, this movie could have been a lot better with better editing, to liven it up and make it a good chunk shorter. It takes a nose dives and stalls somewhere in the middle, despite its realistic plot line.

Michael Parks did a great job as an actor, there were other good performances from some others in the cast, however I had trouble finding the character of Francesca believable because her emotions sometimes conflicted with the scene she was in.

As far as this one goes, i would avoid it and watch something like SpyGame, its a little more far-fetched but at least it wont put you to sleep (yes i think the government has the Tech to screen every phone call) As to you crackpots out there rating this movie a 10, how can this movie be everything that every other movie is not, and worth a perfect score?

a stunning visual trip

[bathshebathree · 10/10 · 31 August 2006]

I saw this beautifully shot film recently.... to be honest I was expecting to watch a good thriller, pass a couple of hours and that's about it. What I discovered was an incredibly fascinating story where, wonder of wonders, I actually felt I was learning something valuable without being preached to...

But the biggest surprise was how moving, honest and sensitive the performances were .... and most of all - how visually stunning the film was.. I was taken on a journey through all the atmospheric 'landscapes', both literal and metaphorical.

Great stuff! A quiet but powerful film. The Listening is undoubtedly one of the best movie surprises of 2006.

This sucked!!

[yossi86 · 1/10 · 3 September 2006]

OK!!

First of all the film just kept going!! I thought he would have shot himself in the communications shack in the mountains, but then it kept going!!! And is the women( i forgot her name the movie sucked so bad) def, of not??? Anyway the plot was very choppy, there was almost no action, and the character development was nil. Basicaly I guessed the whole movie, and pretty much was right on every time.

What i'm trying to say is that if you want a good movie, with twists and turns, one that will keep you on the edge of you're seat, with intense action.....don't rent this. If you want a movie that is predictable, not developed properly, has very little locations and basically leaves you wondering why you just shelled out 5 bucks for a piece of crap, then rent it, otherwise save you're money and get a beer.

WARNING THIS MOVIE IS A WASTE OF TIME.

One more for the commode

[geminate7 · 3/10 · 13 September 2006]

The premise that almost anything was possible in this movie just goes against all known physics and electronics. In other words it isn't happening, can't happen and isn't going to happen. The most hilarious part of the 'movie' was the over-modulating scene and what happens to the girl - this is totally and completely impossible. Also do you know how much it hurts to get your eardrums blown out and how long that pain lasts especially at high altitude - completely ridiculous movie from start to finish. I suppose the most irritating part was that the movie was unapologetically lumbering and dull. I really find it hard to understand how this made it anywhere, let alone a movie theater.

Everything you say will be taken down and held in evidence against everyone

[robert-temple-1 · 9/10 · 16 December 2012]

This is a remarkable film about hair-raising (fictional?) abuses of the notorious eavesdropping system called 'ECHELON', which is operated by the National Security Agency (NSA) of the United States, with a major listening post in the north of England. The French title of the film is LE PROJET ÉCHELON ('The Echelon Project'), and THE LISTENING is the title of the English language DVD. Although the film is an Italian production, it was apparently shot in English (perhaps the Italians got a dubbed version in their language, as they do not seem to mind dubbing in Italy). It is the first and only feature film directed by Giacomo Martelli, and perhaps after exposing Echelon, 'he can never work again' in the international film scene? Most recently (2010-2012), he has directed an Italian TV series entitled 'ANTIMAFIA SQUAD – PALERMO TODAY'. So he is clearly not afraid to make enemies of the most dangerous people in the world, that is obvious. (For those visiting Palermo, if you wish to see the Mafia Headquarters, it is an enormous building in a low-lying and rather deserted section of the old part of town disguised by heavily sheeted scaffolding all around it so that from the outside it appears to be a derelict building, and the lights inside at night cannot be seen from the street. Indoors, there are Renaissance paintings on the walls and plenty of luxurious features, even an appallingly bad-taste restaurant of extreme high prices nearby where the girlfriends can be taken, dripping in diamonds.) This excellent film makes a full-frontal attack on the way multi-national corporations are becoming increasingly enmeshed in the security apparatus of America, as well as other states of course. Since this film came out, much more has been revealed in the media about private contractors with private armies paid for by the American taxpayers, who are unaccountable both financially and in terms of lines of command, and which have run out of control in the most alarming manner. Some of the combat duties in Iraq, for instance, were out-sourced to private companies, and that caused a scandal, but one which was quickly suppressed. There is nothing remotely implausible about the story of this film, and it may well be an under-representation of the problem. The Echelon system, which has been well known for a long time and has doubtless been superseded now by far more sophisticated systems evolved from it, monitors all worldwide telephone and other electronic communications using banks of super-computers. When key words are spotted, or key voices are recognised, the system automatically alerts the human operators. The reason the system is called 'Echelon' is that it does this in ascending steps of a hierarchy of alert. If someone mentions 'terrorist attack', that might be a level one alert triggering a more intense automated scrutiny, but if someone mentions 'terrorist attack next week', that might jump to level four, and require a human listener. The supposed justification for this monster eavesdropping system is 'protection against attack', which goes to show that paranoia is the ruling political principle these days, and any scepticism expressed about 'the terrorist threat' has now itself become 'a threat'. It's like trying to make a joke at airport check-in that you don't have a bomb in your bag: you will immediately be hauled off and interviewed for hours, so don't be tempted to have a sense of humour anymore because it has become 'politically incorrect', and there might as well be a sign on the current White House lawn which says: 'jokers will be persecuted', and even thinking of stepping on the grass has now become a hate crime. One day, when airport systems are fitted with 'thought detectors', and don't forget we are already being photographed naked by devices which see through our clothes, we will all be in danger of arrest if we think of the wrong political party when boarding a plane. It is already dangerous to suggest that a large proportion of the world's politicians might be psychopaths, since there is nothing a psychopath hates more than being identified as what he is. Psychopaths can manipulate the LIBOR rate, lie to Parliament and take a nation to war, pass a Patriot Act which no one in Congress has read, and order every conversation in the world to be listened to, and no one will do anything about it. Banks can launder billions of dollars of drug and terrorist money a year and just received a slap on the wrist when exposed. The lunatics took over the asylum so long ago that there are few people alive who are old enough to remember a sane world (if such a thing ever existed, of course). This film has a brilliant central performance by the actor Michael Parks, who plays a very low-key, aging and depressed expert who has worked for the NSA for 30 years. He is a traditionalist who believed in 'serving his country'. But when arrogant corporate toadies invade his premises with instant high security clearances and start threatening his bosses and himself and saying 'don't you know that I can have you fired?', he cracks. When he sees that they are trying to kill an innocent woman in Italy because she accidentally came across something which might threaten a $400 million deal, he goes rogue, flies to Italy to save her, and tries to expose the new system called 'Tumbleweed' and the way in which everyone in the world is threatened by psychopathic corporate people. The entire film is done in a very under-stated style, with no hyperbole, and without unnecessary and silly Bourne-style action sequences. See it and tremble. Much of it is shot in the deep snow on the top of Mont Blanc, at 11,000 feet, which does have a chase sequence over the crags. The suspense throughout is very intense. This film is really worthwhile.