The Exonerated (2005 TV Movie) User Reviews

Convincing, at least for me

[slinger1999 · 7/10 · 18 April 2008]

I knew before this film that the justice system in the U.S. is far from perfect. and having watched it only reinforced that in my mind. As far as I know, everything that is said in the film is from a transcript of some kind. They are actual words, not inventions of a filmmaker with an agenda. While the filmmaker probably does have an agenda, that doesn't make the ideas and content of the film any less valid.

For me, this film could stand as the entire argument against the death penalty. Punishments are supposed to be about justice. Justice is not a system where six innocent people can be sentenced to die because of purposeful deceit or accidental human error. In reality there have been many more people exonerated from death row, but that doesn't make the argument any stronger. It should only take one death of an innocent to convince any rational person that this punishment is not morally sound.

A Staggering Film That Should Be Required Viewing

[gradyharp · 10/10 · 14 March 2006]

The truth is tough, the truth must be faced, and the truth is what THE EXONERATED is all about. A project started by writers Jessica Blank and Erik Jensen in 2000 when, in response to a lecture on capital punishment, the couple was moved by the telephone voice of one of the many innocent people on death row who had been falsely convicted of murders they did not in truth commit. This lead to a commitment on the part of Blank and Jensen to interview six such imprisoned people who had spent years of their lives on Death Row only to be eventually exonerated and released. The result of this research was a play that not only was on Broadway but also traveled the country. Now director Bob Balaban has transformed this play into one of the most searingly powerful dramas about our penal system that has ever been produced.

Each of the six condemned people on death row is portrayed by a gifted actor and the script is taken 100% from interviews and testimony and court records of these exonerated victims. They each tell their story of the incident that resulted in their wrongful arrest and conviction, their experience while confined to Death Row, their thoughts of living in threat of execution, and their manner of dealing with the world once released. These different people are portrayed by Brian Dennehy, Delroy Lindo, Susan Sarandon, Danny Glover, Aidan Quinn, and David Brown, Jr. Adding some significant reenacted dialogue from spouses and police and jury are such fine actors as Lee Turgesen, Bobby Cannavale, Laurence Luckinbill with a host of others in minor roles.

At the end of the film each of these actors who have been creating the characters are faded into the actual exonerated victims who speak directly to us about their response. The overwhelming message is one against capital punishment, racism, against railroading innocent people into the prison system without the fairness of well-guided appeals, against all the flaws that besiege our penal system. The effect is shattering and staggering. This is NOT a docudrama, but a sensitively written, produced, directed and acted film. It is a film that every citizen of the world should see. Highly Recommended. Grady Harp

...liberty and justice for none

[blanche-2 · 24 July 2011]

Unlike some people who have reviewed this title, I found nothing surprising about "The Exonerated." It's an indictment against the death penalty and also for our justice system. In light of some recent jury verdicts, it does seem that there are a few things very goofed up in our system, which is supposed to be the greatest. If it is the greatest, that's pretty sad.

Exonerated tells the stories of six innocent people who received the death penalty. The dialogue comes from the words of the real-life accused. The characters are played by: Brian Dennehy, Susan Sarandon, Aiden Quinn, Danny Glover, Delroy Lindo, with peripheral characters played by Bobby Cannavale, Dennis Burkley, and Chris Bauer, among others. Directed by Bob Balaban, the material was originally a play.

The shocking thing here is, after these people were exonerated, how long it took them to be released. And to think, these are the stories of six people - how many more people have stories like this, and how many died on death row, despite their innocence. It's a staggering thought, and their stories are compelling and sad, stories of wasted years and frustration.

One of the major problems is that many of these people were interrogated for hours and hours and did not ask for a lawyer. And the police are something else in regard to this civil right - if a person asks for an attorney in order to avoid interrogation for hours upon hours, it's assumed he or she is guilty. The public assumes it (well why would you need a lawyer if you didn't have anything to hide?) and the police assume it. First of all, when the police say 'anything you say can and will be used against you,' they mean it. If you talk without an attorney, your words will be twisted to convict you. Secondly, why would someone want to be interrogated for 16 hours or until they are so beaten down and exhausted that they confess?

At the end of the film, we are introduced to the real people. Human beings, victims of police in a hurry to make a case, bad lawyering or no lawyering, bad juries, or being the wrong color. It's a sobering thought.

I know I'm in the minority, but I was bored senseless

[saberlee44 · 1/10 · 4 May 2006]

I know I would have had far more appreciation for this in play form. I didn't know it had been a play until I started watching it and it became immediately obvious to me. Some of my favorite actors were in this film; their work was excellent, and the stories important. That said, I found it painfully boring to watch. Maybe I wasn't in the mood to watch a showcase for actors delivering mostly monologues against a black background. It was so slow and it hurt my brain to try and remember each story as it switched from one to the other. I had the same pain when reading Winesberg, Ohio. I'm not here to say it was a bad film; not true. I rented it because of the cast, because I wanted to be absorbed in something. This was the first film I ever rented that I could not finish watching. Many of you will love it; for me, just excruciating to watch. I would have preferred a documentary just telling me the story and not letting me have to painfully wait for each detail so that the actors could "feel the moment."

If ever there was a film that provided food for thought...

[b4peace-1 · 10/10 · 3 February 2006]

I've just watched this film and I myself write to two inmates in American prisons, one on Death Row (DR) (and he did not commit murder), so this topic of justice v. injustice is one very close to my heart & sensibilities.

What can one say when one hears that someone has spent up to 21 yrs of his/her life for a crime he/she did not commit, and the only way they finally get off DR was from DNA exoneration.

This is a film that all policemen, the judiciary, and school kids should have to see as a matter of course, but actually I reckon all Americans should see - to realise how many innocent lives have been totally ruined or, worse, lost at the electric chair for a crime they never committed. Why, also, does the law not act, when new evidence comes to light, ie why are people not released when they are found to be innocent. What is wrong with people not standing up for the truth? Is it so hard to do? How can these people sleep at night knowing that they have done nothing with evidence that could mean an innocent person could be released? This is totally beyond my understanding! This world is weird and mad! Films such as this one prove it. But this film was also so gentle in its delivery, so lacking in anger, which everyone had every right to be. (I would certainly have been had I been in their shoes.) It was great to see such fine actors taking on a film like this. It certainly added authenticity. An important film for the world to see: that not everyone who goes to prison is guilty! 10/10, from NSW, Australia

"The true stories of 6 exonerated survivors of death row." Stories are told through gritty real life-like interviews.

[beijingyank100 · 9/10 · 13 March 2006]

This film places the audience as observer to personal interviews with ex-cons whose death row convictions were overturned, therefore they have been released from prison. They describe the circumstances leading to arrest and conviction, and their states of life and mind before they were arrested. It is a biting commentary on the tragic state of racial and socioeconomic policeable inequality and abuse, which then highlights severe failures of the US legal system. It is maddening in its portrayal of police prejudice and ineptitude. There is no riveting plot, instead there is riveting dialog which makes you sit up and listen - then makes you think again about the death penalty. Less involving than traditional story-teller movies like Dead Man Walking or The Life of David Gale, it is no-less impactful and thought- provoking. The stories are tragic. It is a stage-production which is well brought to the big screen, and deserves the larger exposure derived from theatrical/DVD distribution. A fantastic piece of cinematic art.

Innocence

[achancey-1 · 8 January 2007]

I'm appalled that anyone would be offended by this movie. It's simply a movie that discusses one topic of the death penalty: INNOCENCE. Regardless of whether or not you are pro or anti death penalty you should be against innocent people being sent to death row and worse to their deaths. I'm in law school and have studied the death penalty in depth. The system in America is flawed and this movie makes that point perfectly. I don't see how anyone can be offended by the truth unless the truth is something you don't want to hear. If you want your eyes opened to some of the major problems with the death penalty, then this movie is right for you. It simply tells the truth about what affect the death penalty can have on innocent people wrongly accused and convicted.

Unfortunately, only 6 of the dozens of stories that could be told

[WriteforGod · 10/10 · 6 August 2007]

Six riveting stories that are mesmerizing in the simplicity of the presentation and the power of the language. Innocent people--minorities and the poor, always--aren't always treated fairly by our justice system. Jesse Tafero, husband of Sunny Jacobs (played by Susan Sarandon in the film) was executed even though the evidence shows someone else committed the murder he was executed for. If it's liberal to want justice for everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for counsel, then, yes, this is a liberal film. I would also recommend "Dead Man Walking" and the neglected "Last Dance" for fictional films based on true cases. "The Exonerated" is actually a very moving, very well presented film that should make you angry as hell.

Heavy and heartbreaking

[HotToastyRag · 9/10 · 17 October 2021]

There's an announcement at the start of this tv-movie, but it bears repeating here: every word of dialogue in this movie was taken from interviews, police and court records. Which means that not only are the six stories true, but they're told in as close to a documentary style as possible. In an added truthful layer, the end of the movie shows a small interview with each of the real people. The screenplay, comprised entirely of facts, hit home the message that in the end, the truth will set you free.

In case you haven't figured it out by the synopsis, this is a very upsetting movie. Even though the synopsis tells you that all six people in the story eventually become exonerated, the stories of their arrests, court trials, and time in prison, are heartbreaking. Brian Dennehy's character was wrongfully imprisoned for murdering his parents. Aidan Quinn's character was permanently brutalized while in jail. David Brown Jr.'s character was convicted even though the description of the man who really committed the murder was a white man with long red hair. Delroy Lindo's character also didn't match the description of the real criminal, but he was convicted by an all-white Southern jury despite having an alibi. Susan Sarandon's character was accused of killing a police officer, even though her only crime was incredibly bad judgment. Danny Glover's character was a teenager at the time of the crime he didn't commit, and from police bullying he gave a false confession.

Director Bob Balaban chose a distinctive style for his movie, one that purposely focuses on words rather than theatrics. There are no sets, but instead every actor sits in a little chair and talks to the camera as if they're in an interview. Sometimes ancillary characters like policemen or judges are brought into the little black room, but they perform their "lines" in the same style.

Again, in case you couldn't tell from the synopsis, this movie takes a very strong stance against the death penalty. If you already agree with that message, you'll really take this movie to heart and use it as an argument the next time you clash with someone of the opposing view. If you do believe in the death penalty, it's not a guarantee that this movie will change your mind, but it'll try its very best. I watched this in a group of people with varied opinions, and those who started off believing in capital punishment still did at the end of the movie - but they were not unmoved by the stories and the real people behind them. This is a very emotional movie with some fantastic acting. It's not really possible to enjoy it, but it'll tug on your heart and really make you think. Law and order were established with the very best of intentions, but there have been some absolutely horrifying mistakes and deliberate cruelties done throughout the years. Make sure you have a box of Kleenex in the house before you press 'play'.

A powerful film about the miss-use of the death penalty in the U.S.

[runamokprods · 16 September 2011]

Intelligent, mostly well acted filming of the stage play, as 6 people exonerated from death row tell their true stories, mostly as monologues, against a black background.

A powerful argument against the death penalty, it feels a bit stuck between embracing it's theatricality of approach, and trying to work as a more cinematic piece both in the way its shot, the occasional awkward 'flashbacks' and in the 'size' of the performances, which range from understated and small to quite theatrical and presentational.

But whatever questions one might have about the stylistic choices, there's no question that these are powerful, important true stories in that every rarer thing, a dramatized American film that head on addresses an issue with passion and intelligence.