Chasing Freedom (TV Movie 2004) Poster

(2004 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Tackling a Controversial Subject in Perilous Times - Successfully!
gradyharp20 September 2005
This taut and important film CHASING FREEDOM was apparently a made for television film in 2004. It is a shame it never made it into the theaters as it is a searing document about the problems of victims from foreign countries seeking asylum in the United States. The script by Barbara Samuels is a brave indictment against the Taliban's activities in Afghanistan as well as a penetrating examination of US bureaucratic bungling in dealing with those who get caught up in the quagmire of red tape in trying to find an escape hatch from their homeland cruelty. It is an honest look at a problem, unbiased, where none of the parties are blameless.

A member of a high profile New York law firm, Libby (Juliette Lewis) is told by her boss that despite her overtaxed workload as a securities lawyer she must by contract take on some pro bono work (as much to make her boss look good as to keep a law firm's reputation spotless). Libby begrudgingly takes on a pro bono case in the department closest to her office - the INS where kind and desperate Eric (Brian Markinson) pleads with her to represent a woman seeking asylum. Libby has a negative attitude toward the process, as much because she knows nothing about asylum cases in law as the fact that she is doing this under duress. Eric introduces her to her client Meena (Layla Alizada) who has fled Afghanistan to escape death because she dared to teach children in Kabul despite the Taliban's condemnation of schools. Gradually the harden Libby discovers the life story of Meena and softens to her cause, devoting herself to achieving the impossible - obtaining asylum for a woman who has no proof of identity and is 'detained' in a brusque INS center like a prisoner.

Though Meena arrived in the US in 2000, by the time her case is extended it is 2001 - and 9/11 has happened, an incident that placed Afghanistan in a bad light. The manner in which Libby works with Meena to gain her flight to freedom is a well-paced, gripping, startling tale - and this is based on a true story.

Juliette Lewis again demonstrates the scope of her talent by convincingly transforming the hard, workaholic lawyer into the compassionate believer in human rights and she is able to make this character development with being cloying or stereotyped. It is a fine performance in a role not of the usual Lewis type. Equally excellent is Layla Alizada, wholly believable as a woman who has endured atrocities only to enter a land that seems cold to her plea for asylum. The two actresses make a fine team. The remainder of the cast is superb and the direction by Don McBrearty is on target. There is a hauntingly beautiful music score by Jonathan Goldsmith the weaves Middle Eastern and Western music into a lush, additive and atmospheric score. This film deserves attention, especially today when our borders are even more blockaded. It is wise to remember the individuals caught up in the problem of seeking asylum. Grady Harp
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fairly Good
stacy-spear28 January 2004
This movie was a pretty good watch. Having been in Afghanistan, and Iraq this movie brought the situation out loud and clear to my wife. She needed to see this. The movie does seek show sympathy with the persons seeking asylum and doesn't show the INS in a good light. But, the process was and is necessary. I didn't see them as evil, I would have done the same.

Look at the movie for what it was intended, a drama, and don't take it as an affront to our immigration system. If you do, you will like it.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Above average made-for-TV movie
Pro Jury20 January 2004
Layla Alizada plays an Afgan who seeks to escape the clutches of the Taliban before the 9-11 terrorist attacks. She crosses the Afgan/Pakistan border, and flies to the USA. She arrives at the JFK airport and seeks political asylum without having a passport, entry visa, money, or any local contacts. If a federal judge orders her deported, it will mean certain death. Juliette Lewis plays a major league hot shot corporate lawyer who takes the case pro bono as a favor to her boss.

CHASING FREEDOM has many shining points. Although filmed in Canada, the Afgan scenes have high realism. The dramatic music sets the right tone but does not overpower. Layla Alizada does fine in her first major role. The entire film hinges upon the audience caring about Layla Alizada's character. Fortunately, the film succeeds in accomplishing this.

Unfortunately, Juliette Lewis is miscast. She does not have the gravitas to play a major league New York City lawyer. Also, emotional, stressed out New Yorkers speak very, very, very quickly. Juliette Lewis invariably speaks very slow. She never speaks fast no matter what urgent matter confronts her character. The courtroom scenes are the weakest moments of the film.

CHASING FREEDOM mistakenly regards the 9-11 terrorists as if they were Afgans, when in fact they were really Saudi nationals. However, CHASING FREEDOM does well to capture some of the brutality of the Taliban towards Afgan women. CHASING FREEDOM was produced by the COURT TV network. It is a barely passable view, which makes it above average for the made-for-TV genre.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I'm no expert on asylum law, but...
dimstar28 January 2004
I agree with the poster below that the INS makes the decisions that it needs to make based on the facts presented, and that in the movie, the asylum-seeking process is made much more difficult for the main character because of the fact that she'd disposed of her identification papers back in Afghanistan. However, I don't think this weakens the movie at all. I think it added an important dimension to it by showing that the asylum-seeking process is difficult, even for people who are deserving of asylum, because it's necessary to weed out terrorists and other potential bad apples. The movie didn't come across to me as liberally biased at all.

I agree that Lewis' character was a little over the top, but overall I thought the movie was very well done.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A gripping taste of reality that will grab your heart
pspmichael28 January 2004
Chasing Freedom couldn't have been better named. The story is about a woman from Afghanistan who fled the oppression of the Taliban, seeking a life of freedom in America. Layla Alizada plays Meena, a woman forced to leave college when the Taliban take over. Neighborhood women come to her, looking for a teacher to help them learn how to read and write. When the Taliban learn of this, Meena is beaten and her brother thrown in jail for allowing females in his home for the purposes of education. When the Taliban decides they want more from Meena she decides to try and escape. With all the checkpoints she must pass, she destroys her identity papers and escapes to America. Once in America Meena finds out it isn't that easy gaining freedom in America if you can't prove who you are. This movie based on true facts shows the due process one must go through when coming to America and how the government agencies protect the homeland yet allow the oppressed a chance at life. This movie is very well done. For those who care about people, prepare to feel anger and tears. This movie will grip your heart and move you in ways other movies only dream of.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good TV movie of important subject
SnoopyStyle11 September 2013
Libby (Juliette Lewis) is a busy corporate lawyer forced to take on more pro bono hours. She reluctantly takes on an asylum seeking Afghan woman.

Layla Alizada plays the refugee Meena who arrives pre 9-11. Then 9-11 happens. Juliette Lewis is now a veteran actress, and does a good job as the uncaring lawyer who grow to fight for this case.

This is a lower budget TV movie. It gets a bit slow at times. There is some good insightful look at Taliban regime, and the difficulties of the asylum system. It's nice to see Juliette Lewis doing good work, and not just the usual flaky characters.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Fair and balanced
GoodMoviesAreGreatFun19 January 2004
This topical film portrays a true story based on the life of an Afghanistan immigrant who arrived in the US without the proper papers. As a result, she must withstand the many trials and tribulations in the U.S. court system to win asylum in the United States. With the Taliban in control in her home country, she fears for her life should she be deported. The corporate lawyer assigned to this pro bono case is Juliette Lewis while Layla Alizad plays the young woman seeking asylum. Both actors gave performances with great bravada, each displaying fortitude in the face of adversity. Their work in this Court TV movie should be recognized and I hope that Court TV continues to make original films of such quality. The film is definitely worth a looksee. It's timely and about as well written as just about any other tv movie out there, well directed and well acted.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Excellent depiction of our flawed asylum policy
JSL263 March 2004
Court TV deserves some kudos for this film. Layla Alizada in her first major role as the desperate asylum applicant fleeing from Taliban-controlled Afghan really makes us care about her plight. The flashback scenes from her past hark back to those clandestinely filmed scenes of brutality toward women that were smuggled out of that country. Her acting is understated and moving. Juliette Lewis' performance as the securities lawyer who is a fish-out-of-water in the New York immigration courts is less convincing, but it doesn't undermine the power of the film too much.

It is a well-done depiction of the many hurdles that our immigration system places on those who manage to escape terrible oppression and make it here without their `papers.' I don't deny the difficulties facing immigration judges in presiding over such a system, but the Bush Administration's policy of automatic detention (read `jail') of asylum applicants (often lengthy) and its removal of sympathetic Board of Immigration Appeals members has made this situation worse.

Every member of Congress ought to see this film-but it is also a compelling story well told.
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Sorry Tear Jerker for dummies and sob sisters
jackjack-224 January 2004
This is a movie about a Afghan woman seeking asylum in the US before 9/11. The story is about an allegedly brutal legal system that she must navigate to get asylum. In fact, what it shows is a that it is an efficient legal system which prevents abuses of our immigration system which immigrants often abuse to avoid national quotas. The movie has only one purpose and that is to gain sympathy for illegal immigrants. It is an extremely liberal propaganda movie.

What the writers have done is take a true story which is atypical of the asylum process in which the Afghan woman is deserving of asylum but she is unable to satisfy the safeguards that have erected to prevent illegals from entering the country. She has no identification. She cannot prove who she is and cannot find anyone to vouch for her. For all the immigration officials know she could be a terrorist attempting to sneak into this country.

In each decision the INS makes the right decision based on the facts before it.

The Afghan woman, played superbly by Layla Alizada,gets representation by a pro-bono lawyer from a big law firm who mucks through the case. Unfortunately, the lawyer is played by Juliette Harris, who as usual does a miserable job of acting. She is a zany and serious acting is far beyond her capability.

This is a movie for dummies and sob sisters. It's only redeeming value is the acting of Layla Alizada.
3 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
More true to life than some realise
fstryjak15 August 2008
Enough has been said about the quality of the acting in this film so I won't add to that other than to say that it doesn't bother me if an actress portraying a New Yorker under stress doesn't talk very, very very fast - I'd rather be able to understand her lines! I just wanted to say that those who think that the inhumanity of the INS service or the lack of compassion of the officers and judges was overplayed have never been inside an immigration courtroom or had any dealings with the immigration service. In that respect the film was depressingly accurate. It saddens me that in the quest to 'protect' ourselves from those without legitimate requests for asylum, we have to treat everyone so appallingly, with representation that barely passes any reasonable competency test, as if the majority of asylees haven't suffered enough. Asylum seekers have, more often than not, barely escaped from their countries with their lives and the clothes on their back and they get treated like criminals. Some would say that it's shameful.

I'm just sorry that this film didn't make theatres and isn't required viewing for the general public.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Heartfelt, well acted, and fairly balanced
jmatrixrenegade19 January 2004
This was a fictionalized, but based on true events, account of a hard edged young corporate lawyer (Juliette Lewis, very good in an atypical role) taking the responsibility to defend an asylum seeker from Afghanistan. Movies like this at times too often focus on the star, but there are enough scenes about the asylum seeker's life back in Afghanistan and struggles in detention that it was overall a balanced account. The newcomer playing the asylum seeker was not very expressive at times, but was very good too.

A touching, heartfelt movie that has a predictable message, but is well put together and not just your average movie of the week sort of movie. We even have some sympathy for the government, in theory one of the heavies of the movie, suggesting the balance provided. The Taliban doesn't come off well though ... no shock there! For instance, a major plot point is the need for proof of identity, which on its face doesn't really seem to be that unjust for the government to be concerned about. Court TV did a good job with this one.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
a must see movie
bobkroner9 February 2011
This movie held my attention from beginning to end. It was entertaining and informative. It gave me the opportunity to see what the culture was like in Afganistan both before and after 9/11. It shows that the Taliban, which is a very small part of this Afgan population, are not only terrorists that threaten the free world; but, also terrorists to the Afgan people. The movie also shows the behind the scenes workings of the U.S. Department of Immigration, which operates under a different legal structure, laws and statutes than other parts of our Judicial system. If you have the chance to see this movie, you will come away both entertained and with a new perspective.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed