Qui perd gagne! (2003) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Slick and engaging, but stretches credibility to the limit
gridoon202427 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
"Qui Perd Gagne" is a slickly packaged, lightweight caper movie that will appeal especially to those members of the audience interested in mathematics, gambling, luck, e.t.c. And the female lead is Elsa Zylberstein, whom I would gladly watch doing anything for an indeterminate amount of time: though not "conventionally" beautiful, she is soooooo hot she burns! But this film is not quite as clever as it appears to be: first of all it cheats by placing a key scene (the first chess match...) out of chronological order without any warning. But even if you can accept that as part of the "tricks of the trade", the gullibility with which certain characters, who really should know better, allow themselves to be duped and exposed is hard to buy. Watch this movie but don't think too hard about it. **1/2 out of 4.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Deceits within deceits--how does someone win the lottery twice?
Red-12515 April 2005
Qui perd gagne! (2004) (Loser Takes All) was co-written and directed by Laurent Bénégui. I saw it at the 2005 Cinefranco Festival in Toronto. (www.cinefranco.com)

This film tells the story of Jacques Loriot (Thierry Lhermitte) who is a compulsive gambler with a memory like a computer. A man has won the national lottery twice--essentially impossible. It's the job of Angèle (the intriguing Elsa Zylberstein) to find out how this is possible. She enlists Jacques to help in the investigation.

This is the kind of movie where nothing can be taken for granted--and no one is what he or she seems to be. The two leads are attractive, the supporting players are excellent, and the whole thing probably makes sense, although you'll need a pencil and paper--and a great memory--to sort it out after the movie's over.

Not a great film, but entertaining and definitely worth seeing.
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed