(2003)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Post-Eco Disaster Gem
Creeg15 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
For those who found the above comment somewhat unhelpful (it jumps the gun a bit and discusses the points raised by the film as opposed to the film itself), and since there's no plot outline to speak of, I'll elaborate further. Tag 26 (translated as Day 26) is former Playstation artist Andreas Samland's third film, an under-budgeted 7000 Euro project for his film-making course. I don't see this film as a sci-fi; although it does contain sci-fi elements, I think it's more of an observation of the differences between scientific reason and human togetherness.

The short film follows two unnamed characters as they travel a visually undisturbed post-apocalyptic country, following the static on their car radio for signs of life. Wearing gas masks and burdened by their cumbersome rubber suits, they hardly ever speak and communicate mostly through hand gestures. Along the way, the two find a farm, and search it whilst they quietly pillage any useful materials. Inside is a deceased couple, and one of the main characters takes some of their photographs to keep in a makeshift scrapbook he has made of events since this unseen and unspoken of biological disaster. On his exit from the house, he tears his suit. Measures are taken by his colleague to try and remedy the potential infection, but it is too late. The man disrobes his mask and suit and goes quietly out to the trees to suffer a slow death.

I thought this movie was excellent. It has been said that this runs like an introduction to a much longer film, but Samland has said that "that would just make it longer and not better". I was constantly questioning what biological event had occurred (something in the air, I reckon) and why the two main characters were prepared for this disaster with their suits, masks and equipment, but these questions soon pale once they reach the farm. The deceased couple, peaceful in their bed, serve as a sinister contrast to the terrible act that has left them that way, and the mementos taken incorporate a sadly human element to a world looked at with such a clinical eye. This human element is really drawn out by the scene of the two characters at the end, facing each other underneath the tree.

I caught this film at a very late hour on TV, and was surprised by its quality. The acting is superb considering the limitations of the suits/masks, it has many beautifully composed shots, and the events in the film throw up many social questions. It is similar in theme and style to Andrei Tarkovsky's Stalker, but falls short of the impact that film had on me. Definitely worth checking out if you can.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Simple but very effective short film
bob the moo6 February 2006
Biological war has broken out and we join the story as two survivors wearing heavy biological suits as their car breaks down on the road. Needing petrol they head towards a nearby farm house. To say more than this would spoil things but really there isn't a lot more plot than this. Using the "last men alive" theme really well, the film starts with a general air of foreboding that is only increased as the audience realise that death is in the air itself – not a bullet to be dodged, an explosion to escape or a man to evade but a virus that is everywhere. This aspect is helped by the silent, dark presence of the suited men.

With almost no dialogue at all the majority of the 18 minutes are silent. This means that the sound effects feel much louder, so a car horn, the rustle of papers etc all elevate the tension because they make the silence sound more silent. The air of doom and death carries this film for the majority and, although nothing really happens, I found myself quite gripped by it. When the "action" comes it is simple but emotionally quite intense due to the urgent body language of the two men in suits – I felt their fear and panic, which is not that easy to produce when wearing a black suit and mask (ask whoever the ham was inside Vader in Star Wars III). The conclusion is a simple but effective one that says a lot about humanity and, although I saw it coming a few minutes beforehand, it still worked really well and I was personally quite satisfied by it.

Overall a simple and effective short that plays on its strengths to cancel out any possible weaknesses it may have had due to the limited budget. Samland's story may have been simple but as director he really brings it alive and produces something tense, engaging and affirming and makes it look easy – which it clearly wasn't. Nothing to hype up or start running looking for but for me it was a surprising enjoyable short that made a great find on late night television.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Life Affirming Commentary On Human Nature
colparker13 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
One of the most "human", life-affirming films I've ever seen. I can't believe it was shown in so many horror and sci-fi film fests and seems to have resonated with so many genre fans. I even read one interview where the guy suggested the film would have been a great "beginning" for a longer film. HUH???

Maybe I just interpreted it the wrong way, but I viewed it as a comment about human nature...and that at our deepest core we're social creatures who have a need to connect with one another. The whole plot: searching for other people, taking photos of the deceased and looking through their things, and especially the ending. The entire point was that life is nothing if we don't have someone to share it with.

That anyone would refer to this film as being about biological warfare (or anything along those lines) needs to go back to school and take a Lit class. It's just a wonderful, amazingly well-crafted, powerful metaphor about what it is to be human.

All that and not a single line of dialogue until the very end. Tag 26 should have won an Oscar.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Atmospheric yes, captivating no
Horst_In_Translation16 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
"Tag 26" or "Day 26" is a German 18-minute short film from 2003, so this one will have its 15th anniversary next year. With the awards recognition it received, it is definitely the most known work by Andreas Samland and he has not made a new film for a while now, also never managed to get past the short film genre. The actors aren't well-known either and it seems one of them stopped acting too now. This is the story of two men living on Earth after an apocalyptic event made the atmosphere highly toxic, so if you breathe you die basically. As a consequence, these two men are moving around in heavy impenetrable uniforms for most of the film. The 2 criticisms I have are that the plot is not always easy to understand, especially when we see one guy without the uniform in the second half of the movie. And also, honestly as human as it may be, the other guy's decision at the very end surprised me too as honestly 26 days of isolation are a really short duration for the decision to commit suicide and that all is lost, even if he may hate solitude and the idea of being on is own from now on. What I liked the most here was the atmospheric take. This was a little film that looked and sounded exactly the way it should for us to at least slightly feel the desperation of the two men's surroundings. But yes, this also makes it a bit style over substance as script is king in my opinion, but in these slightly under 20 minutes, it is at best a servant to the king. The awards attention may have been a bit exaggerated in my opinion. I'm giving this one a thumbs-down. Don't watch.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed