The Return of Josey Wales (1980) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Unwanted Return
zeppo-224 March 2006
Only the names have been changed to protect the not so innocent in this film. Well, actually, it's just the names that give it a tenuous connection to the original Josey Wales starring Clint Eastwood. Sadly, Micheal Parks is no substitute for Eastwood either as actor or director and neither is any of the rest of the cast close to the characters in the first film.

At least you can't accuse anyone of trying to cash in on the original film's success as this was made ten years later. Exactly why they bothered is another question altogether. Filmed very cheaply, a couple of saloons and some outside shooting in a small town make up the locations. With a shootout in the open as the closing finale.

Little spent on the sound recording either or perhaps they were trying for the naturalistic dialogue as done by the likes of Marlon Brando or Mickey Rourke. All of which may be how ordinary people do actually speak in real life but just comes across as mumbling on the big screen.

Apart from the grisly comeuppance of the villain at the end, there is nothing to distinguish this from any of the countless 'oaters' or horse operas of the fifties that were churned out by the film studios of the time.

For dedicated western fans or people with too much time on their hands only.
27 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Good story but screen play and production very weak
tangherder2 July 2003
The book was excellent as a followup to Josie Wales. The money for this sequel movie must have been lacking because it was done very cheaply to the point that I'm not sure anyone would recognize it as a sequel if they hadn't read the book. Michael Parks would have made a good lead character as was Clint Eastwood but there didn't seem to be any money for the production and cut much of the story line out along with bad flim and sound from the version I saw. Potential for a great sequel but it wasn't realized here.
23 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Decent rare low budget b-western!
b_kite9 February 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Are movie starts as a band of Mexican soldiers led by the evil Captain Jesus Escabedo (Everett Sifuentes) enter into a small town and wreck the place including the bar were they kill the bartender and murder the local girl Rose (the bar girl from the first movie this time played by Suzie Humphreys), and kidnap Tenspot (Robert Magruder), but before she dies she tells Chato (Rafael Campos) to go get Josey Wales (Michael Parks) and tell him what has happened, he does and soon the two embark on a journey to rescue the kidnapped Tenspot and stop the evil Escabedo.

I had known that this low budget sequel to the Clint Eastwood classic had existed for quite some time but had never been able to find it. The only thing I could ever find was the original 1987 VHS release from Magnum Entertainment on Amazon which runs rather high in cost, and a nearly 3 minute scene were Chato goes to find Josey on youtube. This movie seems to be very obscure with mostly nothing being available about it on the internet, even tho I did manage to find a unfavorable review on it that TV Guide had done. Then someone finally uploaded the full film to youtube to watch. The movie itself is a decent b western which has the usual stock plots and characters. The acting ranges as usual from good to bad, the main characters do a good job including Parks who while isn't Clint Eastwood still plays the part with a nice dose of cool, he also isn't bad behind the camera either. The worst part of the movie however is its wide range of technical issues including murky photography which is terrible during scenes shot at night, but, during daytime shots isn't bad, and what seems to be natural dialogue style which in most cases comes off as mumbling, which is the biggest problem with a lot of the supporting cast, you know the usual issues found with these types of movies. Can it be compared with the original no of course not, but, it is a decent b western with some nice action pieces, a good title song, and the bad guys comeuppance at the end is nice. Plus, I've seen far far worst in the realm of low budget b westerns. While the movie probably isn't in the public domain, its perfect for someone like Mills Creek Entertainment to put in there low budget b western movie sets.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Forgotten for good reasons
Wizard-820 May 2019
Given my love of the western genre, I had wanted to see this movie for years, but it apparently never got any kind of release in my country (Canada). But thanks to YouTube, I watched it today, and it didn't take me long to figure out why no Canadian distributor apparently wanted to touch it. Even if you are a lover of westerns, you'll greatly dislike this movie, even more so if you don't care for the genre. It goes wrong in just about any way you can think of. While you'll (sort of) understand what the title figure is trying to do, the journey to that point is incredibly muddled. Maybe the original script made more sense, but under Michael Parks' direction, things happen out of nowhere, and other things make no sense at all, and this constantly happens from the start to the end. The action sequences and even the scenes of dialogue seem to have been edited with a very limited amount of available footage, and have no zip as well as coherence. The movie plods on scene after scene with almost no energy. Also, the movie has a really cheap feeling, seemingly filmed on whatever abandoned buildings and countryside the production could get its hands on. And while the movie was made in the mid 1980s, it has a weird look and feel of a production from the mid 1970s. Don't expect this movie to get a release on DVD or Blu-Ray any time soon.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not Nearly as Good as Its Predecessor
Uriah4328 June 2023
Having finally retired after several years of fighting, the outlaw "Josey Wales" (Michael Parks) is alarmed to hear that two of his friends have been killed in Mexico while another one named "Ten Spot" (Robert Magruder) has been abducted and is soon to be hanged by a corrupt government official named "Captain Jesus Escabedo" (Everett Sifuentes). So, to rectify this situation, Josey and two colleagues head south to free Ten Spot and kill everyone who had a hand in the death of his other two friends. Now, rather than reveal any more, I will just say that this movie had a pretty good plot to work from, but the low budget behind it seriously impacted the overall product. The lighting wasn't that good and the sound could have used some improvement as well. Along with that, although the actor chosen to play the part of Josey Wales didn't perform too badly, he wasn't quite able to really capture the on-screen presence or the magnetism of his notable predecessor. At least, I didn't think so. Be that as it may, I can't say that I was very impressed with this film, and I have rated it accordingly. Below average.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
It's the absolute definition of pointless
r96sk28 January 2022
An odd thing.

Following 10 years on from the release of 'The Outlaw Josey Wales', it's difficult to see why 'The Return of Josey Wales' even exists - especially without the involvement of the original's star, Clint Eastwood. It was hardly going to be a moneymaker, either.

I found this 1986 flick to be extremely slow and uninteresting, none of the actors or characters stick out even minutely. Michael Parks is an OK cast on paper, but as Josey Wales he just doesn't fit what we've previously seen from the character. Rafael Campos, in his final film role, would be the one I'd name as the standout if asked, but that's just via a process of elimination.

It's the absolute definition of pointless, and to make it even less enjoyable they continue the irritating chewing tobacco spitting thing from the first film. There are also some ultra amateur swoosh-like transitions used, which cheapen the whole thing further. No hate from me at all, but this is a very poor release from the 80s.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not a Wale of a Western
zardoz-1315 April 2017
Warning: Spoilers
The people who produced "The Return of Josey Wales" should have changed the hero's name. "Return" went straight to video in 1986 without any theatrical release, while "The Outlaw Josey Wales" was released in 1976. Ten years is a long time to delay a sequel, though "Star Trek" fans weathered decades before their cult NBC-TV show finally reached the big-screen. Reportedly, Clint Eastwood had considered making Forrest Carter's second Josey Wales novel "The Vengeance Trail of Josey Wales" into a movie. Nothing, however, came of the project. Anyway, only the fictional characters from the original show up in "The Return of Josey Wales." None of the original cast members reprised their roles, and Clint Eastwood had nothing to do with the low-budget oater. Interestingly, Forrest Carter—the author of both "Josey Wales" western novels—received screen credit for story and screenplay, but the producers changed the ending and staged scenes in different settings. Several characters from the original novel reappeared in the second novel in an early chapter. Nevertheless, "The Return of Josey Wales" is at best generic from fade-in to fade out compared not only with the original movie as well as Carter's novel. Producer/Second Unit Director R.O. Taylor received credit as "writer: special scenes." "The Outlaw Josey Wales" qualified as an indisputable magnum opus, while "The Return of Josey Wales" amounts to little more than a drab, saddle-sore, horse opera. According to IMDb.COM, the film was lensed on location at the Alamo Village, in Brackettville, Texas, where John Wayne filmed "The Alamo" in 1960. A large percentage of the cinematography is done in what is designated as master shots. Master shots are typically long shots where actors are shown from head to toe in their environment. Star/director Michael Parks, who gives himself several close-ups, should have realized that he was setting himself up for a fiasco because the original "Josey Wales" overshadows his lackluster, threadbare sagebrusher. Had the protagonist's name been altered, "The Return of Josey Wales" wouldn't have been at such a wholesale disadvantage compared to its prestigious predecessor. The Internet Movie Database doesn't list a release date, but I remember seeing a trailer at a drive-in movie theater. Like an earlier reviewer, I obtained a VHS copy through Amazon so I could say I have seen it. The picture quality is mediocre, and the film was probably cropped to accommodate the standard 1:33.1 screen ratio.

Unless you schedule repeated viewers, you're going to feel like you're watching a conventional TV western, despite the somewhat brutal events in the prologue. Tame, lame, with none of the same from the original, "The Return of Josey Wales" ranks as an uninspired sequel. Repeated viewings of the Eastwood original allow you to appreciate its perfection. Eastwood did a marvelous job of condensing the entire Civil War in the prologue after Union sympathizers slaughtered his wife and son, and later he joined Bloody Bill Anderson. "Return" doesn't raise the stakes significantly, breaks no new ground, and doesn't leave you wanting more. Character actor Michael Parks—an outstanding thespian in his own right—replaced Clint Eastwood. Indeed, some resemblance appears between the two actors, and Parks looks authentic in his black sombrero, white shirt, and dark britches. Apart from preserving Josey's tobacco spitting routine, however, Park's Josey Wales isn't as interesting as Eastwood's character. He has no love interest in this film. Parks packs one revolver in a standard, low-slung holster, like a prime-time, TV cowboy, and wields an occasional Winchester. Eastwood's Josey Wales armed himself to the teeth with as many as four revolvers. Eastwood knew how to make an entrance, whereas Parks ambles into and out of scenes without a trace of charisma. He mumbles most of his dialogue, some of which is serviceable.

As director, Parks delivers little that would make you want to scrutinize this movie more than once. I've seen it several times for the purpose of writing this review. Worse, you'll have to wait patiently about 20 minutes for the first gunfight. The shoot'em up scene is fairly minor. Rafael Campos is the only other recognizable cast member. Campos gives the best performance in what amounted to his last film. Everybody else, even in speaking parts, looks and sounds like amateurs. Some of the male extras wear atrocious hats that resemble party favors instead of Stetsons. Basically, like Clint Eastwood's "The Outlaw Josey Wales, "The Return of Josey Wales" has an savage opening scene involving an atrocity. The hero's extended family of friends suffers at the hands of the wicked villains. "The Return of Josey Wales" doesn't deliver an eye-for-an-eye western with an icy-cool looking hero dispensing justice. Parks can be heroic, and he does handle himself acceptably in the first shoot-out. Appropriately enough, the baddies—Mexican Rurales who scalp Apaches for the bounty on their heads--are thoroughgoing dastards.

These Rurales rape a defiant saloon hostess, Rose (Suzie Humphreys of "Deep in the Heart"), and beat a powerless bartender, Charlie (Charles McCoy of "Executive Action"), to a pulp, while a one-armed Mexican peon, Pablo (Paco Vela of "The Job"), witnesses this dreadful behavior. Later, Paco relays his information to Josey Wales. Predictably, Wales hits the trail, but with considerably less gusto compared to its precedecessor. Furthermore, one of Josey's friends, a tin-horn gambler named Ten-Spot (Robert Magruder of "Five Days from Home") is taken by the Mexican Rurales commander, Jesus Escabedo (Everett Sifuentes of "Selena"), and Josey tracks them down with the help of his other Mexican vaquero, Chato (Rafael Campos of "The Appaloosa"), but he gets himself shot-up, even Ten-Spot catches a bullet in the finale. Josey leaves Escabedo buried up to his neck in the ground as he rides off with his friends. In Carter's novel, Wales repeatedly shot Escabedo during a shoot-out in a canyon and killed him. Furthermore, in Carter's novel, real-life Apache chieftain Geronimo had a peripheral role.

Josey Wales shouldn't have returned in this grubby little western.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed