Love Object (2003) Poster

(2003)

User Reviews

Review this title
50 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Exquisitely depressing
martynuk28 April 2004
This film is very well written, directed, acted and executed. It contains some great humor. It works on multiple levels and has a lot of symbols (if Parigi was Lynch's pupil the master would be proud of him). However the film is very depressing, probably the most depressing I have seen in a while. And I being a big fan of dark comedies, do not get depressed easily.

I left the film in a very bad mood, a dire need of a strong drink and desire to see a silly comedy, action, romance - anything to get rid of the aftertaste...

I would recommend it to an emotionally stable connoisseur, though...
25 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Much Love!
ghoulieguru8 December 2004
This movie goes into a little visited horror neighborhood: the realm of the creepy living mannequin. Up to this point, the best examples of this type of thriller would be Woody from "Fear" and "Pin" but Robert Parigi manages to deliver a more complex story than either of those films.

This creepy flick has a wonderfully depraved sensibility and seems to be marching to the tune of Roman Polanski's "Repulsion". Acting is solid throughout, and even Rip Torn seems restrained from his normal cartoonish antics. Rather than going for jump scares, this movie goes for a slow build of dread and suspense. There are a couple of good cringes in the movie, and it's definitely worth a watch.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Some people are just made for each other.. ..
Lady_Targaryen30 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
''Love Object '' starts looking an average movie, showing the weird and lonely Kenneth Winslow, a technical writer, who starts having a bizarre obsession by Nikki, a rubber sex doll that he ordered, while developing a crush in his assistant Lisa. Kenneth goes to the point of talking, arguing and even feeling "stalked" by Nikki, and that's when the bizarre things starts to happen in his behavior.

The cool thing about this movie ,is the end,that is totally unexpected and the total opposite that you could believe that would happen. That's why I give this movie the nice vote of 7, because the plot itself, is very simple and nothing special.

The good message present, is that many people who look 'normal' or calm, like Kenneth, can have bad intentions behind their acts and even act like maniacs,while others can make us have false judgments about them, but are good people, like Kenneth's landlord, who tries to help Lisa from Kenneth's sick ideas of transforming her into Nikki.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Oh you beautiful doll!
lastliberal15 May 2009
Oh, Kenneth, Kenneth, Kenneth (Desmond Harrington). What a loser. Hiding in the closet to listen to your neighbor have sex when the new girl (Melissa Sagemiller) is just as lonely as you. Step up there, boy, and get some action.

Kenneth decides to try something different. A $10,000 plastic doll. Yep, they are real (On sale at http://ultradolls.com/).

Kenneth's relationship with the doll reflects his real feeling for Lisa (Sagemiller), and soon he has enough nerve to make a move. But, as things progress with Lisa, he starts imagining that his doll is jealous and, after a bad night with Lisa, he takes a drastic and horrible step.

This is when things gets really weird, and exciting at the same time. He snaps completely and just when we think he is toast, he manages to have heaven intervene and save him. I can't say more than that without giving away the plot, but it certainly was well done.

Rip Torn was great as his boss, and Udo Kier played an excellent role.

Looking for more from first time writer/director Robert Parigi.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fake blonde's are the best blonde's
Dr. Gore16 July 2004
Warning: Spoilers
*SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*

Why can't they write instruction manuals for relationships? This is the dilemma poor Kenneth, (Desmond Harrington), is in. Kenneth has a hard time connecting with people. His boss wants a three volume instruction manual cranked out ASAP. He gives a hot blonde, (Melissa Sagemiller), to Kenneth to help him work faster. Soon Kenneth is dreaming about what to do to his blonde co-worker with the help of a plastic Love Object he buys over the internet. "Nikki", the fake blonde, teaches Kenneth how to treat a woman right. But she is a jealous Love Object. Kenneth gets torn between his fake and real blonde. "Nikki" does not like to be pushed aside...

Kenneth says that everything is easy if you just read the instructions. It's too bad for him that no one wrote an instruction manual on how to be Kenneth. "Love Object" shows how easily blonde's can make you insane. Kenneth slips away from reality as his Love Object starts to dominate his mind. But perhaps having a fake blonde is the best kind to have. Oh Nikki. They may call you fake but you're real to Kenneth.

"Love Object" was great. At last! Someone made a horror movie for me! Obsession, depravity, and blonde's, blonde's, blonde's! All horror freaks should see this movie. You may notice a bit of yourself in Kenneth and his twisted ways. Hopefully you won't see too much. As for me, I found it so refreshing to see a horror flick go all the way. "Love Object" is the real deal.

One last thing, I was very distracted by the use of an obvious body double for Sagemiller. There are many scenes where her breast is exposed so that we can see her tattoo. You never see her face and her naked breast in the same scene. How can Sagemiller be my Love Object if I am denied the pleasure of voyeuristically leering over her naked flesh? Hmmmm...Come to think of it, maybe it's healthier if I don't see all the Sagemiller I can. Oh well. She does have a pretty smile though. Very pretty. Mmmmm...
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
HARD TO FALL FOR 'LOVE OBJECT'
rcavellero14 February 2004
Love object is an above average horror thriller and although I'm quite sure it's not destined to become a horror classic. It does fall into the catagory with some of the new impressive horror classics such as May, Session 9, etc. Sexy Desmond Harrington of Wrong Turn fame stars as a young man whom decides to order a life like sex doll named Nikki. After getting a crush on a fellow co-worker played by the usually horrid Mellisa Sagemiller of Soul Survivors taking her performance skills a step up and becoming a real actress. All is fine and dandy as he practices out on the love doll what he plans to do with Sagemiller. But things go horrifically wrong when the doll begins to show it's jealous side supposedly. Or at least he feels that way and it wants to lash out at the young woman. Harrington does a fine job stretching his acting chops as you completely identify and feel for his charachter while being equally appaled by his actions at the same time. The film takes it's concept with a twisted humourous realism that left people laughing for the first half and than cringing in a bsolute fear as the film settled into it's unpredictable and disturbing final act. Kudos to all involved with this long dormant progect. The director does a fine job executing his concepts and directing the film suspensefully. However in the end it needed a bit of fine tuning and although the body count and blood letting is low I can't help that it showed a little too much and things changed a bit too drasticlaly too fast to make it totally believable. All in all theres no way to give the film more praise than to say that it makes it a hard case to fall for this 'love object'. although the film is definatly memorable and thought provoking, it's those kinds of thoughts I'd rather have not eneter my mind.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
What a Doll!
Son_of_Mansfield21 February 2006
Warning: Spoilers
In the tradition of Roman Polanski's Repulsion comes this odd little gem. Desmond Harrington buys a sex doll, gives her a little too much thought, and then becomes her sex slave. His only hope is the woman he loves, Melissa Sagemiller, who would make a far nicer sex doll in his opinion. What starts out as an eccentric romance slowly dissolves into a movie about the creation of a serial killer. The movie does such a good job of making Desmond Harrington and Melissa Sagemiller likable, that the scene where they fight is sad, because it is obvious that one must die. Your liking of this movie will depend on your willingness to accept the "abnormal" behavior and pay attention to the people. This is not for everyone, but the ones who do like it will defend it to the embalming table.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
High Potential, Low Return
ringles13 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
!!SPOLIERS AHEAD!! Love Object is a promising movie with an interesting premise that, for numerous reasons, ultimately fails to satisfy. Desmond Harrington plays a handsome, intelligent – yet socially inept -- young man named Kenneth who buys a realistic sex doll named Nikki. His boss assigns a beautiful young temp named Lisa (Melissa Sagemiller) to help Kenneth, a technical writer, on his latest assignment. While Kenneth may be completely clueless and somewhat crazy, he is sane enough to find himself attracted to the impossibly cute Lisa. Complications arise when Kenneth starts to believe that Nikki (the doll) is becoming jealous of the time he's spending with Lisa. This portion of the film is by no means flawless, but at least it's not afraid to explore the themes of objectification and unconventional sexual interests. Though the dialogue and its delivery are clumsy at times – and I suspect the directing has something to do with the awkwardness in this case – this part of the film is the most interesting and enjoyable, at least from a movie watching perspective. The last act of the film, however, gradually spirals out of control and becomes a more-or-less standard horror/suspense flick. A chain of events – set off by Lisa's unrealistic overreaction upon discovering Nikki -- that eventually leads to Lisa's being held captive while Kenneth prepares to turn her into a true love object seemed to be an easier way of resolving the storyline. That is, it was easier to write off Kenneth as a mere psycho than it was to develop him as a more complex young man with severe – but not completely hopeless -- emotional problems. The climactic twist – and you knew there would be one – came off as a strained (and thoroughly exhausted) example of contemporary cinema's obsession with irony and cynicism.

Love Object is a difficult little film to review because, despite all of the aforementioned shortcomings, it does boast many positive characteristics, too. The mood of the film is genuinely creepy, and Kenneth's growing obsession with Nikki is well played. Desmond Harrington may be a bit too conventionally attractive for the role of Kenneth, but he gives a solid performance nonetheless. Melissa Sagemiller is well cast as the comely but uncomfortable new girl on the job, and she receives some bravery points for taking on a role that requires her to be more-or-less bound, gagged, and extremely distressed for nearly a quarter of the film. And while he wasn't given much to do, Udo Kier's presence somehow always makes a movie more enjoyable. Ultimately the film's shortcomings are too glaring to overlook, especially the development of Kenneth into a cookie-cutter psycho instead of one of the more memorably complex characters in recent films.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A fantastic subject
BrandtSponseller12 March 2005
Kenneth (Desmond Harrington) works as a technical writer--he creates user's manuals. He's good at his job but he has trouble emotionally connecting with others. At about the same time that Kenneth's boss, Novak (Rip Torn), hires an attractive temp assistant for him, Lisa (Melissa Sagemiller), Kenneth becomes obsessed with a lifelike sex doll named "Nikki". He gradually makes the doll appear as close as he can to Lisa. But when Lisa begins showing interest in him, it leads to complications and possibly disastrous consequences.

Writer/director Robert Parigi's Love Object is an exploration of various kinds of objectification, but in the wrapper of a psychological thriller/horror film. Although it is sourced in an actual object called "The Real Doll" (an expensive, life-like sex doll available via mail order/on the Internet), and it has filmic thematic precursors, from the good (Private Parts, 1972) to the not so good (Der Mann nebenan, aka A Demon in My View, 1991), as well as attitudinal/emotional precursors, ranging from Psycho (1960) to Boxing Helena (1993) to Office Space (1999), Parigi is much more tightly focused on objectification, not only when it comes to sex, but also as it imbues working life and to a small extent, private life, as well.

The first half hour of the film shows us Kenneth at his job. The office is bland and conformist, with white-collar employees sitting in similar cubicles as they crank out their soul-squelching work and desperately try to find anything to provide a spark of color or entertainment and help them get through their days. We can tell that Kenneth has been at it for a while, because he has the blankest look on his face. Parigi is showing us how this kind of work objectifies employees. They're just cogs in a wheel, alienated and alienating, chipping away at mostly meaningless crap, existing only insofar as they continue to feed the right objects to their fellow workers and the administrative machinery. (Can you tell I've worked one of those jobs before?) Once Lisa arrives, she's objectified as a tool to help production, only useful and existent as long as she fulfills that function. When she puts a kink into it by having an emotional outburst, she's threatened with exile. Emotions aren't allowed.

So it's no surprise, being socialized into such a work environment, that Kenneth fetishizes a literal object, "Nikki", which he often relates to via a user's manual on his computer. And it's no surprise that he transfers that conceptualization to Lisa. As the film progresses, Kenneth tries to make Lisa and Nikki more alike, sometimes working on one, sometimes the other. Long before they begin to unify, Kenneth shows signs that his alienation is leading to a loss of his rational faculties. He begins to believe that Nikki is alive, interacting with him and eventually threatening him. He later begins to conflate Lisa and Nikki while he's with Lisa. Obviously, this is a recipe for disaster, and what a delicious disaster Parigi gives us in the final section of the film.

Although relatively slow in the beginning, the pacing and suspense gradually intensify until the climax. The change is appropriate, as the film takes place during Kenneth's break with sanity. It's only slight quirks at the beginning, but by the end he's a full-blown psycho. That's not something that happens in the blink of an eye.

Parigi also works his theme of objectification into the residents of the apartment where Kenneth dwells. Even though they live together, sometimes right next door to each other, they think of one another more as functions. One person is the manager, another the cop. Kenneth, known as the "degenerate" to the cop, watches the manager (Udo Kier) fondling a woman in the hall, objectifying them as porno material (and there are also later scenes in a porno shop, a locale where objectification has long been an issue). The manager is shown at one point playing with dolls of his own--small porcelain figurines that he makes dance a waltz.

Of course, one need not think about these issues much to enjoy the film. Parigi has done a remarkable job making an independent, low budget artwork. It was shot on Super 16 and looks great. The production design is excellent (a real standout is when Kenneth is awarded an office of his own), and Parigi's direction is impeccable. You can easily enjoy the film from the thriller/horror aspect alone. On that end, the film is full of increasing tension, it's occasionally and effectively visceral, and it has a nicely surprising ending. Don't miss this one.
30 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Entertaining horror/thriller
slayrrr66614 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
"Love Object" is a nice thriller/horror film.

**SPOILERS**

Kenneth Winslow, (Desmond Harrington) a technical writer at a large firm, is assigned to a special project that no one else wants. His assistant, Lisa Bellmer, (Melissa Sagemiller) causes him to become behind in his work, and a visit to a friend to get his head on straight puts him in connection with a company that makes life-size sex dolls. When it arrives, it changes him around and he manages to get back the spark in his work. As Kenneth and Lisa start to form a friendship outside of the office, he gets the paranoid feeling that the doll at home is jealous of his relationship with Lisa. Starting an actual relationship with her, she finds out about the doll, and it all comes crashing down.

The Good News: This is actually a better film than it's roots give it. While on the surface it appears more like a drama, it actually manages to shift styles quite competently. It manages to change from several different styles with ease, and while one of them is on display, there are still qualities and examples of the others woven in together. When the tone becomes all-out horror later on, it becomes a more straight-forward horror tale and it gets some great moments in. A thrilling parking garage scene gets some good scares in, mainly due to it's placing in the film. The angles and shadows work just as well as the placing, but it still gives off some good creeps and jumps. A lot of what goes on in the third part is mainly due to the old-school use of sound effects and off-screen noises used to add creepiness and uncertainty as to what is happening. Those are really effective methods used to invoke a sense of unease in viewers, and the fact that they are put into a modern film is a nice change of pace to see. When the violence arrives, it's enough to satisfy the more traditional horror fans, with a mostly excellent torture sequence that is pretty short but gets the point across about it's intentions.

The Bad News: There is a lot of dramatic moments and themes in here, and for the more hard-core horror fans that like it straight, this can turn into a pretty dull film. There is really not a whole lot going on in the beginning and middle of the film. The horror comes in at the end, which means that it needs a large amount of patience to get there. It's possible, as the story is pretty clever and there are some individual moments in there worthy of keeping interest in the film, but it takes a while to set everything up and get to those moments.

The Final Verdict: If it can make a tighter first half, this might be a better film. It falls much clearer into the thriller category than out-right horror, it still gets enough gruesome moments for most horror fans. If you like more dramatic moments mixed with your horror, then give this one a rental. Those that prefer a faster pace with more obvious horror might want to exercise caution with this one.

Rated R: Doll and human Nudity, Violence, Language and continuous off-screen sex sounds
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
So much potential, so much waste.
n-106333 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This film had so much potential - a good premise, great actors, a decent budget, but it fails because of the script.

The film is not sure what it wants to be - horror? comedy? drama? romance? It tries to do it all and doesn't do any of them well. It fails completely in that regard.

The film could've shown how society is becoming more and more isolated, people working jobs in cubicles to go home to their tiny box apartments with their potted plants and their pets, but the film skims through that issue rather than drive it home. Lisa made a comment that she could disappear and no one would know, but it was an off-hand comment that was not explored further.

The film could've spent more time exploring this existential crisis rather than have a man arguing with a doll. Show Lisa as a loner too, a sad cat lady. Show Kenneth as someone who becomes more and more lonely as his gamer friends move away in pursuit of jobs/money, leaving his only contact with them is through online gaming. Show how both Kenneth and Lisa get birthday or Christmas calls on their answering machines from their parents. Show them eating lunch alone in their cubicles.

Make it sad. Make it depressing, psychological, so that when Kenneth starts arguing with the doll, he has been pushed to the limit and has lost touch with reality rather than he's playing a role-playing game.

Make it more psychological. The turning point in the film was when Lisa discovers a photo of the doll wearing her clothes. It's too cheap. Make it something more subtle, such as Kenneth becoming more aggravated as Lisa is a real human being with flaws. She menstruates, she snores, she has to shave her legs, she's not always in the mood for sex, etc. Make her moody, depressive, suicidal even. Make it human vs doll, reality vs fantasy. That's where the turning point should be. Make Kenneth become irritated and irritable to the point where she leaves him.

This movie goes for cheap shortcuts rather than build-up and payoff - Lisa learns about the doll, the building super walks into the room and gets killed, etc.

Instead of being deep, disturbing, philosophical, existential, psychological and depressing, it ends up being cheesy - cubicle worker buys doll, dates cubicle girl, she learns about doll, things goes bad, he kills cubicle girl (indirectly, but still).

I can't recommend it to anyone, but it has the potential for a remake if done right.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Loneliness, Obsession, Horror – A Potential Cult-Movie
claudio_carvalho19 August 2006
In Los Angeles, the loneliness and efficient technical writer Kenneth Winslow (Desmond Harrington) is challenged to write three long technical manuals in a very short period. His boss Novak (Rip Torn) assigns the temporary typist Lisa Bellmer (Melissa Sagemiller) to help him in the task. In the office, Kenneth's colleagues show him an expensive rubber sex doll called "Nikki" in Internet, and Kenneth decides to buy it. When Nikki is delivered, the snoopy manager of his building becomes curious with the huge package. Kenneth reads Nikki's manual and uses the image of Lisa to give a sort of "personality" to the doll and he starts practicing kink sex and becomes obsessed with Nikki. Meanwhile, Lisa feels out of place in the office, Kenneth helps her and they get close to each other, having a love affair and the disturbed Kenneth gets rid off the doll. When Lisa finds Nikki's brochure in the volume one of the manual, the world of the twisted Kenneth falls apart and Kenneth becomes completely deranged with tragic consequences.

"Love Object" is an excellent weird tale of loneliness, obsession and horror, with a great screenplay and direction and a potential cult-movie. The dark story has a touch of David Lynch inclusive with some bizarre characters, like Kenneth and the owner of the sex shop. Desmond Harrington has a stunning performance developing perfectly his deranged and scary character. The extremely gorgeous Melissa Sagemiller is also great in the role of the insecure temporary employee that feels uncomfortable in the company with her colleagues. The surprising conclusion is a plus in this highly recommended movie. My vote is eight.

Title (Brazil): "Olhos da Morte" ("Eyes of the Death")
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Strange, but good horror movie.
danny020613 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I enjoyed the first half of the film. However, I was disappointed that Lisa got killed in the end. Overall, if you like horror movies, it was a good film. Definitely worth taking a look at!

Nikki the doll was really creepy at times especially where she is attacking Kenneth or running after him. The man in the porn shop was creepy, too. Desmond Harrington portrayed Kenneth. His character was a lunatic.

Rip Torn did a great job with his part as Kenneth's boss. Melissa Sagemiller portrayed the beautiful Lisa. She is as talented as she is beautiful. Hubba hubba! Finally, Udo Kier did a great job portraying Kenneth's landlord.

Robert Parigi did a wonderful job writing and directing this film.

I went to school in Beaumont, Texas with Robert Parigi. I remember even as a child he was really into horror movies. Congratulations Robert on all of your success!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Falsely Advertised Exploitative Cheap Horror Flick
AlanTES10 May 2003
I saw this movie at its New York premier at the TriBeCa FIlm Festival, and I have inserted the description of the movie from the festival's website:

"Insecure technical writer Kenneth (Desmond Harrington) learns so much about women from his silicone sex doll Nikki, whom he ordered over the Internet, that he gets noticed by flesh-and-blood co-worker Lisa (Melissa Sagemiller). It seems like the start of a beautiful thing, but first he must throw off the guilt with which Nikki is invading his subconscious. Parigi's bizarre love triangle examines the horrors of relationships and the changing nature of love in modern times with inspired creepiness."

Based on this description, I eagerly expected to see an intelligent and mature story about a man's journey into alternative sexual identities and how he adapts to them. And for the first 2/3 of this movie we see excellent acting by Harrington and Sagemiller, and some fine cameos by Rip Torn. This portion of the movie is a quirky black comedy about budding romance. The portrayal of the "RealDoll" which has been shown on HBO's Real Sex and The Howard Stern Show was both surreal and delightfully bizarre.

Then comes the last 1/3 of the movie, which inexplicably turns into a murderous gore-fest which inspired much of the audience to exit the theater. I should have joined them. Perhaps the film festival organizers dropped the ball in how they advertised this movie, but the filmakers dropped the ball by turning what was an intelligent dark romantic comedy into a cheap idiotic slasher flick.

One other thing, I'm sick and tired of movies that portray anyone who engages in consensual alternative sex as either a serial killer or a victim of a serial killer.

Despite the disappointing final act, I must say that both Harrington and Sagemiller should become superstars, and truly dominated the screen. Hopefully, they will be shown in roles which truly merit their talent.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Some people are just made for each other."
Backlash00713 April 2008
Love Object is a truly unique piece of horror. It's an unsettling film about a lonely guy who takes an unnatural liking to a "real doll." It's basically an ultra-realistic blow up doll...and very creepy I might add. But, when Kenneth falls in love with the new girl at work the doll does not take the news so well. I really don't want to go into the plot details here because the movie is kind of a slow burn that only works once (I've went back and watched it again and it's just not as interesting the second time). The ending is still fantastic though. What makes it work so well are the performances of Desmond Harrington and Melissa Sagemiller. Harrington is one brave actor; not at all afraid to just go for it. I can't imagine too many actors tackling this role. And Sagemiller is really putting herself out there as well. Rip Torn and Udo Kier put in some fun character work too. I recommend viewing Love Object at least once to see there are still good movies being made that don't get a wide theatrical release. A word of warning to the director though: people HATE alarm clocks and the sound that they make. I take away some points for the use of alarm clocks.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Surprisingly funny and insightful movie, but pretty disturbing in the long run
mlraymond1 November 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This film was much better than I had expected it to be, both in the overall storyline and presentation, and in the acting and conception of its main character. There were moments that made me laugh out loud, like when he was watching The English Patient with the doll sitting next to him on the couch. I also found it sort of touching when he rigged up the harness so he could dance with her.

But the total effect was pretty creepy, and his growing madness was uncomfortable to watch. I think the actor did a good job in showing that insanity, without overdoing it. The fact that the film was willing to explore some pretty uncomfortable territory, and that the main character was surprisingly well written and played, make this one a movie I'd recommend. It's uneven, but still better than what you might expect.

I was reminded often of such workplace satires as Office Space, and I loved all the Hitchcock references. The film is at its strongest when dealing with topical issues like sexual harassment and workplace politics, as well as the often difficult paths of relationships between men and women in the modern world.

A little too uncomfortable to truly enjoy, but worth seeing at least once.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
OK psychological thriller/horror/drama mix.
poolandrews22 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Love Object starts like any other ordinary day for technical manual writer Kenneth Winsow (Desmond Harrington) until he finds a photo of a highly realistic sex doll on his desk put there as a joke by one of his colleagues (Brad Henke), however since Kenneth is a bit of a nerd & shy around the opposite sex he becomes fascinated with the doll & goes online & orders one who he models on his new assistant Lisa Bellmer (Melissa Sagemiller). Kenneth's whole life revolves around the sex doll & he becomes infatuated with it but at the same time he starts to develop a relationship with the real Lisa, unfortunately it seems that life-like sex dolls can get just as jealous as the real thing...

Written & directed Robert Parigi Love Object is another one of those films that has a cult following & a certain reputation but when finally watched it rather disappoints, well it disappointed anyway. The script starts off really well, the scenes involving Kenneth & the sinister looking doll are actually quite creepy at times & pretty effective as he begins to lose his grip on reality but towards the end when he dumps the doll & turns his attention to the real Lisa the film looses it's originality & doesn't engage as much although I must say that I liked the ending where the bad guy actually comes out on top for a change. The film also lacks any sub-plots & not much else really happens so besides an effective first hour or so it's nothing to write home about. There is also a bizarre theme running through the film with certain seedy character's having prominent birth marks & it's never explained why. The character's are alright although Kenneth is given virtually no background whatsoever so it's a bit hard to connect with the guy, I mean he likes having sex with dolls modelled on someone he works with & he likes a bit of bondage as well which are obviously everyday normal activities everyone of us can relate to easily, can't we? The film has an OK pace & moves along reasonably enough but I felt it might have worked a little better if it had been shorter.

Director Parigi does OK & there's a nice clean static look to the cinematography but it doesn't really have any visual flair & is a bit flat. I'm not sure whether this was intended as a straight horror but I don't think it was because it's not scary, there's a certain strange atmosphere to it but it won't give you nightmares. There's no gore or violence worth speaking about.

With a supposed budget of about $1,000,000 & apparently shot in just 18 days Love Object is well made & has decent production values but ultimately forgettable. The acting is pretty good, it's always nice to see Udo Kier & I have to say I thought Sagemiller was a total babe & is easy on the eyes.

Love Object wants to be a cult film but I'm not having it at all, it's an OK watch but I didn't think it was anything special & I doubt I'd ever want to see it again. Maybe I'm missing something but I thought it was a bit too predictable & it left me distinctly unmoved, worth a watch if your after something a bit different but don't expect a masterpiece.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"I'm not Lisa..My name is Nikki"
Buddy-519 April 2005
"Love Object" draws its inspiration from two well-known sources, one a literary classic, the other a classic of twentieth century pop culture: first, the Greek myth "Pygmalion," in which a sculptor carves "the perfect woman" out of stone only to discover that it isn't all that easy to love an inanimate object that can't love you back; and, second, the "Twilight Zone" episode entitled "Living Doll," with Telly Savalas as an abusive stepfather who is haunted and eventually done in by a little girl's Talky Tina doll, whose anthropomorphic capabilities go far beyond mere conversation.

In "Love Object," Kenneth is a psychopathic loner who orders a customized, anatomically correct companion named Nikki off the internet. When the shy, introverted young man falls for Lisa, a pretty blond co-worker, he begins to project all of the unsuspecting girl's qualities and traits onto the doll, treating Nikki as if she were Lisa and Lisa as if she were Nikki. Eventually he gets the two so completely mixed up in his head that it seems as if the mannequin herself, driven by paranoia and jealousy, is beginning to act out her anger in fits of potentially homicidal rage.

As twisted low budget horror films go, "Love Object" works fairly well for the first hour or so, even though it feels as if we have seen this basic storyline a few too many times before (often with a ventriloquist's dummy as the nemesis). In addition to the creepy atmosphere, writer/director Robert Parigi provides a few highly effective moments of dark humor to keep us unnerved and off balance. Unfortunately - as is the wont of so many horror movies these days - the film's tone turns so ugly and sadistic in the final half hour that the movie loses us completely and we find ourselves simply wishing that the whole bloody ordeal would get over as quickly as possible. More's the pity, since Desmond Harrington delivers an effectively understated account of a man teetering on the brink of insanity, while Melissa Sagemiller is warm and winning as the flesh-and-blood dream girl who becomes, first, his love interest and, later, his victim. Rip Torn provides some subtle humor as the boss more concerned with workplace propriety and avoiding sexual harassment lawsuits than with cultivating a case of young love blossoming in his very own office.

The movie also does an effective job making the case that the modern corporate world sees its workers more as dispensable automatons and robots - or dolls, if you prefer - than valued human beings. What a shame that the movie undercuts all its various virtues in the end by going whole hog over-the-top. Where's Rod Serling when we need him?
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
I expected a comedy
pecadillo25 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
That's possibly the worst frame of mind to watch this movie with.

The cable company's description (paraphrased): "Guy thinks his love doll has become jealous"

What conclusions could be drawn from that? It's vague enough to cover just about any kind of film. I'm hip, I'm aware of Real Dolls and their like, as well as their obsessive owners, the webpages said owners make for their "girls" -- and the websites of Doll "surgeons" -- people whose job is to fix the often grotesque injuries inflicted on these silicone surrogates. And I find the whole scene indescribably hilarious and creepy.

'Of course', I thought to myself after reading the description. 'Doll fixation is ripe for comedy. This movie is a comedy: it's a love triangle consisting of a socially-clumsy guy, his Doll(which is strangely aware/alive-like), and the living, breathing girl of his dreams/"the other woman".'

Stupid, stupid me.

"Love Object" is not a comedy. It is, at best, a series of scenes strung together in such a way as to lend fantastic support to the claim that some people just aren't fit to be with, well, /other people/.

The film does have some funny moments -- mostly about the guy and his especially quiet "girlfriend" -- but is in all other aspects a suspense/horror film -- and I'd have liked it a lot more if it had been able to be more than one of those at a time. At any given point in the movie, there is the feeling that it is either trying to be funny, or trying to be upsetting -- and, aside from a few moments where things fall into place perfectly, it does neither particularly well.

Notes:

  • If Gunther van Hagen's "Body Worlds" exhibit made you uncomfortable, you may not want to watch this movie. Or maybe you would.


  • That Nikki is such a creepy, creepy looking doll only serves to show how utterly pathetic the male lead is. Even for a fake woman, she looks AWFUL.


5/10: It was better than the average schlock, and had some good scenes.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Even women sex dolls don't like to be two-timed...
The_Void18 December 2006
Love Object received an incognito release a few years back, and this is unfortunate as what we have here is a film that takes a very basic idea (albeit one that I've not seen used before) and crafts and inventive and somewhat frightening little film out of it. The only film really similar to this that I can think of is Lucky McKee's oddball gem 'May', which seems to be gaining more and more fans all the time; and this makes Love Object's releasing all the more unfortunate, as this is a film that could definitely win itself a dedicated cult following. The film focuses on Kenneth Winslow - he's an everyday guy with an everyday sort of job at a place that prints instruction manuals. His life takes a turn one day when his co-workers introduce him to Nikki - a lifelike doll on sale on the internet for a whopping $10,000. He decides to buy the doll, and after becoming acquainted with it - quickly falls in love. However, he's also starting to get on with his lovely female co-worker...and this 'upsets' his $10,000 plastic love object, leading to the emergence of a strange love triangle.

Going into this film; I was worried that the plot might not be able to stretch the running time - but there's enough else going on to ensure that Love Object doesn't become boring. The production values are high considering that this obviously wasn't a big budget film, and the acting is also rather good. The central performance is delivered by a shy looking Desmond Harrington, and he has good chemistry with his female co-star, Melissa Sagemiller. To the cult fan, however, the most interesting performance in the movie comes from Udo Kier - and while he's not really given the opportunity to make a big mark on the film, it's always good to see him. Rip Torn also plays a part, and along with Kier; makes the movie more memorable. Director Robert Parigi gets the audience into the film because the people in it are largely very realistic; the leads aren't overly good/bad looking and they don't have unlikely jobs, so the film is easy to get on with for normal people who have never spent any time with a sex doll. The film seems like it should have a point...but if there is one, I couldn't detect it. "Don't have sex with a rubber doll" is about the best I can do on that front. However, the film is interesting throughout and ends with a good twist...so Love Object definitely comes recommended.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good Plot, Not So Good Ending
sxygrl1022 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I enjoyed the movie, although there were parts of it (especially towards the end) that did not make sense. The movie starts out with a pretty logical "flow" and the characters are believable. Things started to get a bit unbelievable for me when the doll arrived. The doll did not look like it was a $10,000.00 doll. Lisa's character greatly over-reacted when she found out about "Nikki" the doll. The ending was the least believable for me. Overall, an entertaining movie. I enjoy scary movies and being "creeped out", this movie did not do that. If anything it's well worth watching for it's "weirdness". However, if you're looking to be scared - look elsewhere. Now if you're looking for a bizarre, somewhat dark comedy - this is it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The ending makes up for a pretty dumb movie
gustheaffen6 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Acting was okay, story was a little slow overall but the ending made up for it to some degree. If you want to find out for yourself stop reading and watch the movie. I've seen far worse in the horror genre.

Otherwise this was a story about a lonely asocial guy becomes obsessed with his sex doll and can't play well with others so he goes on a crazy delusional rampage to turn his live GF into a sex doll and things go haywire in his favor. Funny how life can turn out.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Love Object
metaball27 September 2004
My skepticism was expecting a gender reversal of Child's Play.

After seeing the flick it struck me as somewhere near the realm of Secretary, ReAnimator & American Psycho. It throws a humorous light on professional / emotional duality & the creepy perversions generated by repressed emotions.

Shot in 18 days & under a million $ this film is an excellent example of how a quality story, well executed, can easily be more entertaining than a star studded formulaic attempt at a blockbuster for a fraction of the cost. Film studios could make & market hundreds of films like this for the cost of a single Waterworld or Matrix Sequel. Introducing a fresh crowd of talent to the public & a higher grade of story to bored audiences.

A visually tasteful & cleverly executed film.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pleeeease!
foreverkraze29 August 2004
This movie ranks down there with the worst. The shame of it all is the premise is a great idea. Desmond Harrington's acting is really good at portrays the socially inept Kenneth. I think what bothers me the most is that in today's techno/cyber world; people often come to believe non-truths in order to keep themselves from dealing with what's real. If they get to a point when they have the confidence to "step out" into reality, they can't deal with it. Now, that's a sad social commentary on today's society. It seems like there where hints of American Psycho meet Dead Mate (in that the objects of their affections aren't alive). I would suggest a much better film, PIN, unless of course you are merely seeing this film for the ordinary Melissa Sagemiller. She was an okay actress just not an overwhelming beauty worthy of affection. What was with the whacko birthmarks and deformities with the love-lusted?
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Really dumb
phenomynouss16 July 2023
I thought I'd have nothing to say about this film. I bought it for some reason almost 15 years ago and never got around to watching it until now. I was expecting some manner of psychological horror and that's almost what I got for the first ten minutes or so.

As it went on, it started to take on a much goofier, weirder tone, evoking all the sorts of extremely low budget cringe-inducing goofiness of something like "The Room", except that unlike The Room, this film apparently was trying to be funny? At least that's what some of the reviews are strongly suggesting.

There's nothing funny about this movie. The only things even remotely humorous about the film are Udo Kier and the fact that the $10,750 sex doll Kenneth orders looks like it was made out of cloth or papier mâché.

All of which lead to a really ugly ending that put me in a really bad mood and really topped off a dull film with a bad ending just to make it regrettable instead of forgettable.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed