Heimat 3: A Chronicle of Endings and Beginnings (TV Mini Series 2004– ) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Outstanding
Fpi23 February 2006
Although the last episode in particular is absolutely sublime, this was a slight disappointment after the incredible Heimat 1 and Heimat 2. I felt it was more difficult to connect to the characters here. They're not as interesting, but this could be exclusively because Heimat 3 describes a period of time that's closer to us. There also seems to be less focus on capturing the big picture: This feels more like a conventional drama than the others. Overall, however, if you get a chance to see it, there's no reason to hesitate. And the soundtrack by Nikos Mamangakis is, again, excellent.

Those who are unfamiliar with the Heimat series, should start out with number 1 or 2.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Interweaving high soap opera with a changing western Europe
tim-764-29185619 May 2011
I need to point out that I've not seen Heimat 1, nor 2.

However, I would say that with much recent changing history in Germany; the fall of the Wall, monetary unification and US military bases withdrawing, this hardly seems to matter, as it's all fairly fresh in the mind. We (us Brits) also view it all as slight outsiders as real people (well, fictionalised actors) are affected by those changes and that gives us a freshness, a keenness as another country's scenarios are new to us.

I thought it would plod, be very proper and maybe a bit righteous. However, it was fresh, breezy and superbly presented with a vibrant colour and excellent sound. Acting too, is first rate.

I found myself being swept along with the various characters involved, their almost normal activities keeping it real, but also compelling, as we can relate to their family and business issues. Then, a change of scene, location, and new people the story branches off and you enjoy that route. Cleverly, though, the sub-plots seem to relate or interlink with characters manifesting themselves just as you'd nearly forgotten them.

If I recall, I viewed all of it just over a year ago, over one week. Though it changed its pace from thriller to intense drama, it was never boring. I wasn't riveted to all of it 100%, possibly one can't, with so much going on and human nature warms us to threads that hold particular interest to each of us differently.

Naturally, I'd like to see the original, first and critically most acclaimed box set. This, the second and my third part are collector's items and expensive ones at that. Ones to show off to any knowing and adventurous movie/DVD collector. You'll be comforted in knowing that you're almost unique owning one, let alone having watched it all and even more than that, been thoroughly and decently entertained by it. Now, that IS a talking point...
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Heimat 3, all 6 parts
JoelOYoung3 October 2004
I went to the German movie premier last weekend. It was a wonderful experience to be able to see all 6 of the series during a 2 day sitting at the ProWinz Kino in Simmern, Germany. Although the series was originally sponsored by the German TV group, the original heimat 1 and 2 did not fit into typical programming slots. Heimat 3 production came under pressure to confirm more into regular TV slots, as German TV is becoming more Americanized and working on more similar schedules than they have in the past.

The series was more than I had ever expected,and are a beautiful tribute to artistry, and talents of the filmmaker, Edgar Rietz. If you have seen Heimat 1 or 2, you will definitely want to see 3, but each part of 3 is a film in itself; a work of art, that is enjoyable on it's own. The acting, photography, and story line are all excellent, and I am sure he will win many awards. This film will only reinforce the feelings you have about the quality of film that comes from Edgar Rietz. It is a must. For Heimat fans the photo book that has been published to coincide with the release of Heimat 3 will also be a must too, and is well worth the investment for real fans. They will not be disappointed, as they will not be disappointed with Heimat 3.
18 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I love this
anthonylinden28 October 2005
A story as brilliantly told as the first Heimat...I did not think that would be possible, but this truly is a masterpiece...I want it on DVD!! I was 19, and at university as a fresher when the Berlin Wall fell - an event that, looking back, none of us ever thought would happen. The euphoria is captured as I remembered at the time. Then the football World Cup in 1990, Gunnar's marriage breakdown, Hartmut's clumsy attempts to usurp his father, through to the deaths of Anton and Ernst, the cancer suffered by Clarissa - all of these events can be related somehow to all our own experiences of the 1990s. That is why Heimat 3 ranks so highly - the director managed to get me to feel nostalgic for events that occurred so recently. In the years to come, these feelings will grow stronger and Heimat 3 will become even more poignant for me.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not as emotionally strong as the previous Heimat cycles, but still a compelling conclusion
MaxBorg8917 December 2006
Heimat: A Chronicle of Germany (1984), the first entry in Edgar Reitz's trilogy (although at the time he had no idea that was gonna happen), did not need a sequel. The Second Heimat: Chronicle of a Youth (1992), on the other hand, demanded one, because of its brilliant, ironic epilogue: having finally made love to Clarissa Lichtblau (Salome Kammer), Hermann Simon (Henry Arnold) realized he couldn't keep running away for ever and decided to return to Schabbach after a decade-long absence. During those ten years he'd been through a lot (including a failed marriage), yet when he came home his old friend Glasisch (Kurt Wagner), the village fool and narrator of the first Heimat series, greeted him by saying: "You haven't changed at all, little Hermann". Such a conclusion almost screams "Go on with the story, please", and with Heimat 3: Chronicle of a Turning Point, he returns to familiar ground for the third and last time.

The story begins in November 1989, in Berlin, where Hermann is busy with a concert. During the night, he learns of the destruction of the wall that had been separating the two parts of Germany, and while trying to find out more he runs into Clarissa, 29 years after the night they spent together in Amsterdam. The two decide to settle down and buy a house in the countryside. Coincidentally, said building isn't that far away from Schabbach, where Hermann's brothers Anton and Ernst have to deal with some problems, which will affect the whole community, as well as Hermann's life too.

As with the previous Heimat entries, Reitz handles the project incredibly well from a technical point of view, with beautiful cinematography (though there are less black and white segments this time), controlled editing and great music. In terms of plot and character development, though, Heimat 3 isn't as flawless as its predecessors. It may have to do with the fact that covering a ten-year period (1989-1999) in only six episodes isn't an easy task. There are huge chronological gaps between events, meaning that after the superbly executed first episode, the series'quality shifts: some people (mostly those the audience will relate to, like Russian immigrant Galina or East Berlin-based construction worker Gunnar) disappear inexplicably, while others come out of nowhere. The characters we're left with are largely annoying (Anton's son Hartmut and particularly Hermann's daughter Lulu), and it looks like the director's lost his interest in the leading couple as well (except for the eerie, Kubrick-inspired concert sequences). Fortunately, he redeems himself with the stunning final chapter (aptly titled Farewell to Schabbach), a touching and, in pure Heimat tradition, ambiguous goodbye to a universe that has struck and moved lovers of film and television alike throughout the years.

On the whole, an underachievement compared to Heimat 1 and 2 (blame the dodgy middle section for that), but worth seeing as a completion of Reitz's powerful German saga.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
ONE major flaw of the Heimat trilogy......
didier-205 April 2006
I've posted this comment on Heimat 3 after sitting through all the Heimats over the past 3 months. It is of course excellent cinema, perhaps there is no need to explain why, considering it's fame. I have one major criticism of the director's vision, The whole work is cleansed of minorities.

I began to find this troubling about 2/3s of the way through Heimat 2. It struck me as an outrage that the bohemian "salon" & it's circle of bright young things in Munich in which Herman lived whilst a student was completely devoid of any gay representation. Unthinkable, considering it's exactly the sort of situation in which gay people would have been welcomed & to which they would have gravitated. I found this absence unforgivable by the end of Heimat 2. I got annoyed by the repeated variations of heterosexual love that were being depicted.

There was a great injustice in this exclusion. I felt the same in Heimat 3 about ethnic minorities. Here, the film moves firmly into the familiar contemporary life of big cities. Berlin is a city of ethnic variation. As the film's main theme came to the fore like a great wave; namely the aim to reclaim back from fascism the right of Germans to consider what it means to be German and to celebrate that relationship of people to place, the absence of racial representation struck me as inherently suspect, even sinister. There were 2 very very brief images of black Americans as iconic emblems of 'other', of 'not us' therefore acceptable, even exotic, liberating. There was also a very brief image of a group of Indian boys silently working in a sweat shop. This last image is suspect, because Germans traditionally envied the idea of Britain's colonial empire & this image evokes a German simulation of a Raj they never had. At the very least the image feeds into the existence of that National envy.

White ethnicity is covered. The proximity to the former USSR & former Eastern Europe provides characters who show us this European condition of multiple boundaries & how they contribute to ideas of national identity. But somehow it still portrays a localised preoccupation with notions of racial purity & belonging. That kind of thinking which is fundamentally blind to 'difference' is a cul de sac. I felt the director was somehow giving permission to think like this over & above questioning thinking of this kind.

All the people who are given place in the story are essentially good people. They are liberal, kind, intelligent, angry feeling people. But they are all white & heterosexual & the patriarchal flows through their lives. Even the revolution of the sixties depicted the fury of the establishment liberal but failed to portray any minority. I found this unacceptable. It's the one tremendous flaw in this work & for me these absences are as huge as the trilogy itself. It distorts reality, and raises questions about subliminal fascism in what the director selects when posing this very big idea. Is the frustration of the Liberal German really it's failure to abandon a mental "homeland" that consists of traditional heterosexual whiteness ?
0 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Stays mostly uninteresting
Horst_In_Translation6 November 2019
Warning: Spoilers
"Heimat 3 - Chronik einer Zeitenwende" or "Heimat 3: A Chronicle of Endings and Beginnings" is as the title suggests the third entry to Edgar Reitz' Heimat trilogy. Well, it was a trilogy back then, now it is a quadrology you could say because he added a fourth chapter that is a really long movie and not a mini-series for the first time. But lets ignore that one and talk about this third installment here. It consists of six episodes (less than for the previous) and each of these episode runs between 90 minutes and 2 hours approximately, so if you are really hardcore you can actually watch the entire thing on one day. I am not sure if this is a good idea though. And that has to do with the quality overall, or lack thereof I could also say. It is extremely slow from beginning to end and even when something crucial happens, it feels somewhat lethargic even. Now this would not be a problem in fact if this had turned out to be a convincing character study with memorable protagonists, but it just isn't. I kept wondering why these people/characters deserved their own movie, their own story put on screen. I mean the fact that they are as normal as we are. And maybe as boring just isn't good enough of an explanation admittedly. I was also missing real depth here. Yes I never had the impression to watch actors, but real characters, but this does not mean I cared what these characters were doing or what would happen to them. Slightly memorable moments like the ones in the last episode that show us a father growing closer to his daughter (now that would have been super awkward if it wasn't a father-daughter story) are far from frequent enough for this to become an interesting project. Even for a 2-hour movie, they would have been too rare, but for like 11 hours it was just like watching paint sry at times. Highly disappointing. I am surprised many people actually like this series. But it is all about the general approach and atmosphere I guess. Maybe it helps if you actually come from "Schabbach" yourself, but I use the " because this place does not really exist and is fictitious, but there are many in Germany where the situation is a bit similar, so I as somebody from the big city struggled with making a connection location-wise.

I also realized that I really hated the accent the more often I heard it, which I was not aware of before. So the good news is that I think this is not worse than Heimat 1 and 2, but this is just because those were also already fairly disappointing admittedly. The fourth was better and I enjoyed it at the big screen in a local theater here a while ago. Each of these take us into different eras in time, but what could have worked really well as a contemporary statement on Germany and what it was like at that point in terms of history, society etc. felt really falt from this perspective too. This one here starts in 1989, so of course the Fall of the Berlin Wall is a big subject. Well, not really. I mean we witness the characters living during these stormy days, but it is never about what happens really and their personal lives and interactions with each other get all the focus, so that it feels the story could have taken place during a completely different time. Or country maybe even. Such a disappointment. I mean I obviously did not expect a big GDR-themed movie here and I can see that where they lived, it wasn't too big of a subject as it was here in Berlin for example, but i still wished they could have elaborated better on the historic background. Okay, that would be all then. Each and every episode here gets a thumbs-down from me as well as the entire thing obviously. I don't think I will ever watch again, although I have a feeling that this could be a project that is easier to appreciate when getting older. I don't know. It just dragged too much and had way too many lengths for me to think that I could ever like it. I give it a negative recommendation. Watch something else instead. There are many many far superior projects from the 2000s here in terms of German filmmaking. Oh yeah and as almost always with Reitz, you won't really find any famous German actors here like big name stars, but mostly "his group of actors" that has also starred partially in previous Heimat installments.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Heimat 3
tieman6415 December 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Some trivia: with "Heimat", probably the most ambitious project in post-war German film history, Edgar Reitz became one of Stanley Kubrick's favourite film directors. As Kubrick was fond of both scope and minutiae, it comes as no surprise that the attention to detail and the amazing narrative breadth of Reitz's almost 1000 minute long film roused Kubrick's admiration. He saw all of it in his private movie theatre and hung his favourite film still from the film (of Maria's coffin on the rainy street in Schabbach) over his office desk. Kubrick even contacted Reitz in the 80s to ask him about his set designer Franz Bauer, whom he considered for "Aryan Papers" (Kubrick's unmade Holocaust project).

When, years later, Kubrick had finished the filming of "Eyes Wide Shut", he expressed the wish that all dubbed versions of his film in the most important European countries be supervised by his favourite film directors: in France by Patrice Chareau, in Spain by Carlos Saura, in Italy by Bernardo Bertolucci, and in Germany by Edgar Reitz. At that time Reitz was busy preparing "Heimat 3", yet after Kubrick's untimely death he bent to Kubrick's wishes.

The final "Heimat" film was released several years after Kubrick's death. With its release, and a now combined length of 53 hours and 25 minutes, the trilogy became one of the longest series of feature length films in the history of cinema.

The first "Heimat" film, subtitled "A Chronicle of Germany", takes the form of a family saga set in the fictional South Western village of Schabbach in the years prior to World War 2. The film traces the lives of families, farmers, mayors, tradesmen, shop owners, politicians and soldiers, but primarily focuses on the fortunes of the Simon clan, who pull themselves out of the humiliating defeat of World War 1 and witness the rise of Hitler and the entry of their country, not only into the Second World War, but Germany's post-war economic boom.

Being a backwater town, Germany's conflicts and larger historical events are only glimpsed in fragments by the villagers. The gossip of neighbours, messages on radios, the appearance of Nazi armbands, allusions to the Final Solution and a subtle scene in which a boy on a bicycle observes a concentration camp being constructed, all hint at unseen horrors.

The film is largely shot in black and white, though colour sequences do increasingly pop up, most notably during Germany's first colour television broadcast, which our humble villagers witness with great fascination. Spielberg would borrow similar techniques in "Schindler's List".

"Heimat 2" and "Heimat 3" are equally epic. While "Heimat 1" moves from the small town life of 1919 to the social unrest of the 60s and 70s and finally to the relative stability of the 1980s, "Heimat 2" largely takes place in the late 60s and 70s, whilst "Heimat 3" centres on the late 80s and 90s and the fall of the Berlin Wall. Unsurprisingly, "Heimat 3" focuses on a composer-conductor rebuilding a dream house whilst the Berlin Wall comes crumbling down, a gesture which epitomises the overriding theme of the entire trilogy. With the word "Heimat" meaning "homeland", and with the trilogy packed with shots of abandoned factories, discarded US bases, apartments and crumbling walls, the chapters, and the final episodes in particular, are all about collapse, abandonment and rebuilding, Reitz primarily concerned with the idea of rebuilding homes and reclaiming Germany (and the German identity) from nationalistic ideology (and later the threats of Globalization).

What's most interesting about the trilogy, though, is watching how the Simon clan changes over the decades, humble villagers becoming industrialists, aviators, arrogant playboys etc. Unsurprisingly, these characters are also used as entry points into other topics, like one character's narrative symbolising an influx of Russian immigrants, another the effects on reunification on East Germany and others the effects of Western capitalism on German heritage.

Like "The Wire", the "Heimat" trilogy is ultimately one of those rare projects which captures the scope of Balzac and Dickens. It serves up the vast universes expected of great 19th century novels, with its Balzac-like focuses on inheritance, complex character juggling, money flow, boardroom dealings and the way the world changes (and stays the same) with time. Where the "Heimat" trilogy differs from such fare, though, is in its mythical scope, Reitz paying attention not only to his characters, but the very heartbeat of the earth. For all the drama on display, he is always inserting moments where natural phenomena (earthquares, storms, eclipses) utterly dwarf his cast, lending the series a unique tone, a strange blend of realism, documentary, social comedy, melodrama, mysticism, and German Romanticism.

9.5/10 - "Heimat 1"

8.9/10 - "Heimat 2", "Heimat 3"

A work of extraordinary ambition. "Heimat 1" and "Heimat 2" are the best of the trilogy, though the scope of "2" necessitates that its themes be handled in a somewhat superficial manner (notice the lack of minorities etc). "Heimat 3" ends strongly, but is hampered by its short length.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed