Zbrodnia i kara (2000) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Beautiful!
planktonrules18 September 2009
I agree with Breravin (despite their receiving a lot of 'not helpfuls')--the film is quite lovely but I wish the plot had been developed more. However, it's obvious that this was meant as an art film--not a traditional narrative. So, I am willing to cut it some slack.

If there was a plot, I didn't notice. All I saw were tons of drawings that felt depressing to watch. However, I must also add that the animation was exquisite and I'd love to know how they made it. It's like a work of art coming to life and the sepia tones worked great with the animation.

By the way, I've seen other films by Dumala--such as SCIANY and KRANZ KAFKA. All are gorgeous...and all are very depressing.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
he obviously spent so much time, why not develop the plot?
Breravin17 April 2002
Probably the most noteworthy aspect of this film is the fact that you will not see animation like this anywhere else. Who else scratches on plaster to animate? This is a truly unique work.

Most scenes were very well laid out, some were not so great. Many of the backgrounds were quite beautiful. I will say that it lacked in plot however. I know this was based on Crime and Punishment, but the story seems to drag on and on.

He also seems to have a thing with flies, keyholes, and clocks; you'll notice if you watch his other work...

All in all, pretty impressive, it's too bad that his work is so hard to get a hold of.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fever-Dreamed Dostoevsky
Cineanalyst26 September 2019
This is some assiduous animation. Although Piotr Dumala has applied the same technique to other films of his, this time it also befits the picture's subject. Dumala carves his images into painted plaster, then destroys those images by creating new ones over them. In Fyodor Dostoevsky's novel "Crime and Punishment," Raskolnikov seeks to better humanity and create anew by murdering the pawnbroker with an axe. Both carving and destroying and recreating. The dream-like, non-linear narrative construction is also strangely appropriate for a book that places a lot of significance in dreams--or, more specifically, fever dreams and nightmares. Dumala also made a Kafka picture, which would also be apt for such an incubus. The paintings themselves are striking, textured compositions, too.

It's probably true that this animated short film will make little sense to a spectator unfamiliar with the source prose. It's a rewarding experience for me, however, since I've been reviewing a bunch of "Crime and Punishment" movies since reading the book. This one cuts down Dostoevsky's story to three main characters--Raskolnikov, Sonya and Svidrigaïlov--along with the two murder victims. And most of the plot here revolves around one key scene from the novel: that of Raskolnikov's confession to Sonya, as eavesdropped on by Svidrigaïlov. Thus, after alluding to the crime at the beginning, the picture only visits the murders in detail after he has already confessed them, and Sonya and Svidrigaïlov appear beside the crime scene that they weren't actually involved in. This is because we are seeing the crime as confessed and not as it happens in a traditional, linear narrative framework and because the perspective, or narrator, of that confession is shifting between the three characters, two of whom suture themselves into the scene as spectators after the fact (not unlike us movie viewers). Ultimately, however, the entire construction is part of the novel as dreamed by Dumala.

This explains the fascination with objects, which is quite reflective of an arduous animation process consumed by materials. So the picture focuses on the pocket watch he pawns, on the stairs he climbs, the streets he wanders, the keyhole from which Svidrigaïlov peeks in on a private moment, as well as, in various ways, the red of the blood. Less clear is the obsession with insects, which others inform is an eccentric trademark in Dumala's oeuvre--probably too wrapped in symbolism to have any concrete meaning. For me, I'll choose to consider it as stemming from a quotation from the novel, of Raskolnikov refusing he committed a crime: "That I killed a vile and noxious insect, an old pawnbroker woman, of use to no one!"

Another odd, if minor, aspect of this adaptation is that it's one of the few I've seen to not include the painters in another flat when Raskolnikov goes to murder the pawnbroker. And this is the only version I've seen that was actually painted! A lost opportunity, I suppose--painted without painters.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Dostoevsky-inspired dream Warning: Spoilers
I see this more like an artistic work inspired by Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment rather than an adaptation proper, akin to a painting or a musical piece.

I do have to agree with the review claiming that viewers without familiarity with the source material will be very confused by several scenes from this short, which also uses a couple of visuals metaphors from the novel; the plot is narrated in broad strokes, focusing only on a couple of story elements, and it does it a rather surreal manner.

That being said, it's a very beautiful film, very dream-like and gorgeously animated, being perhaps the best film from Dumala. I highly recommend it, as long you have some familiarity with the original text, otherwise this would result in a very puzzling watching experience.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Another forgettable Dumala adaptation
Horst_In_Translation28 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
"Zbrodnia i kara" is a half-hour short film from 2000, so this one is over 15 years old. As with other works by Polish filmmaker Piotr Dumala, he adapted a famous story once again and gives us his take on it. This time it is "Crime and Punishment" by Fyodor Dostoevsky and it's not even the only time he used a work by the Russian writer. Unfortunately, I must say having seen some of Dumala's works, it is the problem again that people who don't know the base material will have no clue what is going on and the atmosphere alone cannot make up for it, especially in a film that runs for half an hour. It should not be a must that you know the work a film is based on to enjoy, but for Dumala, this is true unfortunately. So maybe people who know and like "Crime and Punishment" will have a good time with this one. I for sure did not and I give it a thumbs down. Dragged quite a bit and 4 stars is still generous.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed