Jacquou le croquant (TV Mini Series 1969– ) Poster

(1969– )

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Great series about French history, liberty and justice
eskeland23 December 2008
I stumbled upon this series by accident, and originally didn't expect much of it: I generally don't like social drama or history pieces, and since I'm not French I didn't really expect to identify much with the context. And certainly, the time investment (6 movies of around 1.5h each!) didn't do much to increase its appeal.

But once I started on the first DVD, I found it difficult to stop watching. The story of Jacquou Féral ('Jacquou le Croquant', which I understand translates roughly as 'Jacquou the Wretch') starts in 1819, after the defeat of Napoleon Bonaparte, in the Restoration period where French nobles attempted to regain the privileges that the French Revolution had taken from them.

Jacquou's parents are tenant farmers, who owe half of their produce to the cruel Count de Nansac who owns their land, and are frequently robbed of more than they owe. Not having any legal means of defending his family against the frequent abuses, Jacquou's father rebels against the Count, and pays dearly for it. Being robbed of his father, the story focuses on young Jacquou (8 years old in the first four movies; 20 in the last two) as he tries to survive in a world that offers him no justice, and where he waits for an opportunity for vengeance against the Count.

The story is intriguing in much the same way as The Grapes of Wrath: it offers a touching social commentary of a fascinating period in time, and provides a valuable insight about the origins, spirit and convictions of a people. Having seen it, I felt a new appreciation for this part of French history.

More importantly, the story is also well told. While the whole story arc takes up over 9.5 hours, it doesn't feel slow or needlessly drawn out (which ironically is a criticism often levelled against the 2007 remake, which tells the whole story in under 2.5 hours...). To a large extent, this is due to the excellent acting from both Jacquous, Eric Damain (Jacquou as a child) and Daniel Le Roy (as an adult), but also the entire cast around them, especially Jacquou's mother (played by Simone Rieutor, who has great chemistry with Eric Damain) and Henri Nassiet as the kind vicar Bonal. There is scarcely a weak moment to be found in the series, which is quite an accomplishment given its length and the number of characters involved. It is precisely the strength of the performances and the depth of the story that distinguishes this rendition favourably from its more superficial 2007 remake.

Of course, the package isn't perfect. For one, the visuals look a little dated after almost 40 years, and the whole experience is certainly less slick and less pretty than its modern remake. And it is also clear that both the author of the original novel (Eugène Le Roy) and the director of this series (Stellio Lorenzi) firmly subscribe to the politics behind the struggle against privilege, and are willing to turn a blind eye to the less equitable or noble aspects of it.

But all in all, I'd recommend this series for anyone who has even an inkling of interest in French history, and especially where the roots of the French sense of solidarity lie. Or more generally, anyone who's willing to spend some time on a well told story.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Absolutely outstanding
searchanddestroy-12 December 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I remember this mini series when it was aired, back in 1970. I was only a child. Actually I remember most the title and the fact that my parents and grandparents were stuck to the watching of all episodes. It is the most popular, famous french TV series of all time.

So, I recently bought the DVD set to view the whole TV show - again.

Only one word to describe this: TERRIFIC.

I don't remember being so glued to a TV show, except maybe RICH MAN, POOR MAN, aired a decade later.

EVERYTHING here is accurate: each word, each move, each shot is accurate at the most. Nothing superfluous here, nothing unnecessary stuff, as we may find in an ordinary movie made for the big screen. I have not seen the movie, released in 2007. And I don't think I will.

I have rarely seen - at the same time - such poignant and thrilling story. Some scenes made almost me weep. A sad tale where you may desire a happy ending. And I usually hate happy ending in films.

I can't even imagine that anyone alive may not like such a masterpiece.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed