30 reviews
I laughed hard several times watching this show. The way Mickey and co. interact with the other characters from all the Disney Animated Classics is just hilarious.
The cartoons are also pretty good, but the whole concept of running the venue "House of Mouse" is what makes this show great.
The reason it does not get full ratings from me is because the setting of the show limits itself to only that place. If the makers of the show put in some more episodes with extraordinary events which take the whole setting and crew to unexpected residents.
It was just a thought, because everything else is great.
The cartoons are also pretty good, but the whole concept of running the venue "House of Mouse" is what makes this show great.
The reason it does not get full ratings from me is because the setting of the show limits itself to only that place. If the makers of the show put in some more episodes with extraordinary events which take the whole setting and crew to unexpected residents.
It was just a thought, because everything else is great.
- Boricanator
- Aug 28, 2009
- Permalink
This show is in general terrific, I like it very much. What I loved most about the show was its concept, resurrecting all those Disney gems and expanding on those that never made it to film it was very original. House of Mouse comes very VERY close to capturing the spirit of the original cartoons and almost succeeds. But as another reviewer says, it doesn't quite, as the cartoons done under Disney's supervision are truly brilliant and cannot possibly be surpassed. That aside, the animation is absolutely great, the theme tune is catchy, the humour is funny and memorable and the story lines are fresh. Mickey(marvellously voiced by Wayne Allwine) is the most ideal character for the role of the host, and is joined by his friends Donald, Goofy and Minnie. Of course they could have expanded more on its show's concept, I would have loved to have seen more on the guests. I loved the guest appearances from the likes of Pete, Snow White, Ariel, Jafar, Jiminy Cricket, Lumiere, Captain Hook, Timon, Cinderella, Piglet and Cruella DeVil. But what made the show was the cartoons themselves, they showed my old favourites and ones I'd never seen prior to watching this show. All in all, great show. 9/10 Bethany Cox
- TheLittleSongbird
- Dec 28, 2009
- Permalink
First of all, this is one of my all-time favorite Disney animated shows. Although my only quip is that I kind of wish that the Mickey Mouse Works shorts and the featurettes from the '30s, '40s and '50s would've been dropped as intervals for what took place during the club scenes/segments, and that the latter were the bigger focus, and emphasized more. Since that's mainly what many people prefer to see a lot more for the aforementioned apparent reasons and some of us could care less about that. But I think the series is a lot better than the direct-to-video/DVD movies. Anyway, this isn't the first time various Disney characters have been shown together, from not only the shorts, but the full-length features. That title would go to 1938's Mickey's Polo Team. But this cartoon marks the first time this many characters have been assembled in this convention by that point a few years ago. Who knows when and if we'll ever see anything like this again in the future. But should another project that involves the crossover of this many Disney characters ever be made, I hope it'll be better and they get more screen time with nothing to interfere with that and them the next time around. But the show's most defining (and I think best) as well as signature, and probably most memorable moment/highlight is the part in the episode "Ask Von Drake", in which the professor duck performs a song naming the clientele there whom we've gotten to know over the decades. I wish that Disney didn't come up with and stick to that 65 episode rule, and that this one lasted longer. I too believe it had potential and limitless possibilities, if given the opportunity to grow more, so much more could've been done I agree, not all Disney shows even made it that far to 65 and this is one of them.
What else I love about it: The theme song "Rockin' At The House Of Mouse", which is performed by rockabilly singer/swing revivalist Brian Setzer is great and among my favorites. I've seen all the episodes except "Clarabelle's Christmas List", "Pete's Christmas Caper" and "Mickey And The Culture Clash". Though there are a few flaws, notably with some certain Mickey Mouse Works shorts, but I don't think that there are too many of those within them. As for the plots of what happened in the club, I'll save my critiques for individual episodes which are what would take for me to cover them. The concept of the show may be somewhat odd, I guess I agree to a certain extent, but it's still great for playing the game of "spot and point out the Disney characters". For the previous reviewers who aren't feeling this show and wrote that Looney Tunes are better, I'm partial to both and it's cool if y'all prefer one over the other more, but don't hate on Disney just because it isn't quite as wacky as the Warners/Looney Tunes stuff. Disney had wacky moments, albeit to lesser degree, on rare occasions. But the great thing about both of them is that they have there own unique qualities of what they're typically known for and that's just fine. So I don't mind nor do I see what's wrong with not being as wacky. On another quip, I wish more characters from various t.v. series made appearances and were included. I'm guessing or speculating here, but while some with then original characters who hadn't already been established yet could've appeared (e.g. the Gummi Bears cast), others that had established characters mixed with those who came along later (e.g. the Chip 'N' Dale Rescue Rangers cast), perhaps just would've been somewhat too difficult, complicated and confusing, considering the continuity or should I say alternate universes involving the previously established featurette/full-length feature characters. Or the writers simply wanted to focus almost exclusively on characters from the films. That's only my hypothesis.
Despite some of the flaws of effort that had been put into this series, I say that it's still worth checking out and shouldn't be passed. As it provides great entertainment with the jokes of characters making references to their renowned quotes, catch phrases and such for example. Master of ceremonies Mickey and doorman Donald make a great team as co-owners of the hotspot. Maitre d' Minnie makes sure things are going in tip-top form. Head waiter Goofy is at times clumsy as ever with the food deliveries. As for the others' responsibilities at the club, I'll just let y'all check it out and find out for yourselves, if y'all can. One more thing: No one ever seems to have mentioned this but me elsewhere, but it's apparent that the main reason why this show was created was to commemorate and nearly coincide with the 100th anniversary of Walt Disney's birth. And I think this was a great and the perfect way to honor him.
What else I love about it: The theme song "Rockin' At The House Of Mouse", which is performed by rockabilly singer/swing revivalist Brian Setzer is great and among my favorites. I've seen all the episodes except "Clarabelle's Christmas List", "Pete's Christmas Caper" and "Mickey And The Culture Clash". Though there are a few flaws, notably with some certain Mickey Mouse Works shorts, but I don't think that there are too many of those within them. As for the plots of what happened in the club, I'll save my critiques for individual episodes which are what would take for me to cover them. The concept of the show may be somewhat odd, I guess I agree to a certain extent, but it's still great for playing the game of "spot and point out the Disney characters". For the previous reviewers who aren't feeling this show and wrote that Looney Tunes are better, I'm partial to both and it's cool if y'all prefer one over the other more, but don't hate on Disney just because it isn't quite as wacky as the Warners/Looney Tunes stuff. Disney had wacky moments, albeit to lesser degree, on rare occasions. But the great thing about both of them is that they have there own unique qualities of what they're typically known for and that's just fine. So I don't mind nor do I see what's wrong with not being as wacky. On another quip, I wish more characters from various t.v. series made appearances and were included. I'm guessing or speculating here, but while some with then original characters who hadn't already been established yet could've appeared (e.g. the Gummi Bears cast), others that had established characters mixed with those who came along later (e.g. the Chip 'N' Dale Rescue Rangers cast), perhaps just would've been somewhat too difficult, complicated and confusing, considering the continuity or should I say alternate universes involving the previously established featurette/full-length feature characters. Or the writers simply wanted to focus almost exclusively on characters from the films. That's only my hypothesis.
Despite some of the flaws of effort that had been put into this series, I say that it's still worth checking out and shouldn't be passed. As it provides great entertainment with the jokes of characters making references to their renowned quotes, catch phrases and such for example. Master of ceremonies Mickey and doorman Donald make a great team as co-owners of the hotspot. Maitre d' Minnie makes sure things are going in tip-top form. Head waiter Goofy is at times clumsy as ever with the food deliveries. As for the others' responsibilities at the club, I'll just let y'all check it out and find out for yourselves, if y'all can. One more thing: No one ever seems to have mentioned this but me elsewhere, but it's apparent that the main reason why this show was created was to commemorate and nearly coincide with the 100th anniversary of Walt Disney's birth. And I think this was a great and the perfect way to honor him.
The show's premise, Mickey Mouse running a dinner theater nightclub, sounds pretty bizarre at first, but it ultimately comes together to create something really fun and unique.
At this time Disney had found success bringing their classic characters into the modern age with "Duck Tales" and "Goof Troop" in the early 90s and continued that success on the small screen with TV Shows based on their movies (Aladdin, Hercules, The Little Mermaid, etc). "House of Mouse" feels like a very natural evolution from these previous programs. The show essentially takes place in the same universe as "A Goofy Movie" and "Quack Pack," with characters appearing very similar to those iterations. Max, Huey, Duey, and Luey appear to be the same ages they were on those programs, and overall designs remain consistent to that era.
The club's audience is made up of classic Disney movie characters (the princesses, Alice in Wonderland, Fantasia, Lion King, etc). This is where "House" deviates from previous shows utilizing Goofy and Donald. Those shows mostly took place in fairly grounded suburban settings that had few if any meta connections to the larger history of Disney animation. (The notable exception being "Bonkers," which shares a very similar world to "House of Mouse"). Since "House of Mouse" features characters from Disney films that clearly take place in a different continuity, it makes it feel like a nightclub that exists in the Toontown from "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?" where all the cartoons co-exist together as working actors. As a kid it's always fun to see characters from different franchises interact, this show does that pretty seamlessly, often just as cutaway jokes, but sometimes they become more involved in the main storyline.
The show's actual plot is basically the same as the "The Larry Sanders Show," with Mickey and crew dealing with behind the scenes hijinks while trying to keep the show going, with varying degrees of success and the expected comedic outcomes.
The "shows" being performed at the House of Mouse are Disney animated shorts, Mostly from "Mickey Mouse Works," but they do often delve into the more classic catalog especially if it relates to the main story (i.e. a Goofy short about road rage from the '50s is shown when Max tries to get his driver's licence.) I don't want to make it sound like the nightclub elements are just wraparound segments or bumpers. I'm not sure how much original animation is in each episode, but they feel like full episodes.
Trying to decode the behind the scenes politics that led to this show's creation is an interesting rabbit hole to go down, but if you're a kid this is all you need to know: It's funny. The animation looks good. The world it sets up will spark your imagination, and you'll get to see A LOT of characters to recognize and like.
For adults, it's a bizarre relic of the era that brought us Space Jam and Gangsta Popeye.
At this time Disney had found success bringing their classic characters into the modern age with "Duck Tales" and "Goof Troop" in the early 90s and continued that success on the small screen with TV Shows based on their movies (Aladdin, Hercules, The Little Mermaid, etc). "House of Mouse" feels like a very natural evolution from these previous programs. The show essentially takes place in the same universe as "A Goofy Movie" and "Quack Pack," with characters appearing very similar to those iterations. Max, Huey, Duey, and Luey appear to be the same ages they were on those programs, and overall designs remain consistent to that era.
The club's audience is made up of classic Disney movie characters (the princesses, Alice in Wonderland, Fantasia, Lion King, etc). This is where "House" deviates from previous shows utilizing Goofy and Donald. Those shows mostly took place in fairly grounded suburban settings that had few if any meta connections to the larger history of Disney animation. (The notable exception being "Bonkers," which shares a very similar world to "House of Mouse"). Since "House of Mouse" features characters from Disney films that clearly take place in a different continuity, it makes it feel like a nightclub that exists in the Toontown from "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?" where all the cartoons co-exist together as working actors. As a kid it's always fun to see characters from different franchises interact, this show does that pretty seamlessly, often just as cutaway jokes, but sometimes they become more involved in the main storyline.
The show's actual plot is basically the same as the "The Larry Sanders Show," with Mickey and crew dealing with behind the scenes hijinks while trying to keep the show going, with varying degrees of success and the expected comedic outcomes.
The "shows" being performed at the House of Mouse are Disney animated shorts, Mostly from "Mickey Mouse Works," but they do often delve into the more classic catalog especially if it relates to the main story (i.e. a Goofy short about road rage from the '50s is shown when Max tries to get his driver's licence.) I don't want to make it sound like the nightclub elements are just wraparound segments or bumpers. I'm not sure how much original animation is in each episode, but they feel like full episodes.
Trying to decode the behind the scenes politics that led to this show's creation is an interesting rabbit hole to go down, but if you're a kid this is all you need to know: It's funny. The animation looks good. The world it sets up will spark your imagination, and you'll get to see A LOT of characters to recognize and like.
For adults, it's a bizarre relic of the era that brought us Space Jam and Gangsta Popeye.
- ecmelton-186-105049
- May 23, 2019
- Permalink
- mitsubishizero
- Dec 10, 2018
- Permalink
'The House of Mouse' was a fun idea. It allowed a new generation of kids to get to know the characters of Mickey, Donald etc., while also being an opportunity for Disney to air new Mickey Mouse cartoons.
It's also nice how characters from other Disney films are the guests at the theatre, and the interaction between them and Mickey etc. all is always one of the highlights of each episode.
I remember enjoying this show when I was a kid because it was so different from other shows on TV at the time. You'd also see a character in the background and go "oh, I like them. What film are they in?" and then go and rent the video.
I enjoyed this show.
It's also nice how characters from other Disney films are the guests at the theatre, and the interaction between them and Mickey etc. all is always one of the highlights of each episode.
I remember enjoying this show when I was a kid because it was so different from other shows on TV at the time. You'd also see a character in the background and go "oh, I like them. What film are they in?" and then go and rent the video.
I enjoyed this show.
I love this show! It's great. I bet that those people that do voices for Disney characters are happy about it too. Almost every main Disney character I can think of appears (or has appeared) sometime in this show.
The jokes are pretty funny, and the cartoons they play within the show itself are great too. The animation is neat, and so are the stories.
I recommend this show to any Disney fan. :)
The jokes are pretty funny, and the cartoons they play within the show itself are great too. The animation is neat, and so are the stories.
I recommend this show to any Disney fan. :)
It was so good Disney wanted to cancel it.
This was a Disney show that I respected. It was a chilled, humors, spontaneous family show that featured various Disney characters from the mouse to Aladdin to Scar.
After a year Disney was like "this show is great. CANCEL IT...For Hannah Montana and Waverley Place."
Verdict: The rest is history.
This was a Disney show that I respected. It was a chilled, humors, spontaneous family show that featured various Disney characters from the mouse to Aladdin to Scar.
After a year Disney was like "this show is great. CANCEL IT...For Hannah Montana and Waverley Place."
Verdict: The rest is history.
- ThunderKing6
- Nov 12, 2020
- Permalink
Now this is what i call art a huge masterpiece til 2003 with Wayne Allwine as Mickey Mouse til 2009 and Russi Taylor as Minnie Mouse til 2019 with lots of famous characters from every single movie.
- arielsiere
- Mar 10, 2022
- Permalink
Everything about this show is nostalgic and amazing the concept of the show is unique and I'd recommend it for anyone who grew up loving Disney the episodes are funny and pretty unique its saddening this show isn't on Disney plus unlike other shows.
- momo-68114
- Apr 15, 2022
- Permalink
I know that for The Aristocats appear in House of Mouse, I notice almost every single Aristocats characters appeared, but why haven't the kittens Marie, Berlioz, Toulouse been included?
- zachryhendricken
- Sep 30, 2021
- Permalink
"House of Mouse" was a good show. I really thought it was cool how they made new Mickey Mouse cartoons, and showed classic ones. I loved the Disneyland tie-ins (Pirates of the Caribbean, Autopia, etc.). Anyways, it's time they bring back a new Mickey Mouse show. There were some problems with it, though. The theme as a dinner theater that shows cartoons is a bit odd. The writers of the show obviously weren't very original, as they named the city "Main Street," which is obviously a rip off of Disney parks. But, all-in-all, it was a pretty good show. It revived Mickey. Kids today probably have never seen any older Mickey cartoons, so they don't really "know" Mickey Mouse. This show created a new generation of Disney fans.
This will sound unrelated when I first mention this, but there's a reason why I briefly provide this fact: before I ever saw this cartoon, I had slipped in a bathtub and banged my forehead against its rim.
I was alright, but I would spend the next couple of days or so lying groggily on a couch with the TV on with an ice pack on my head. During the first day of doing so, Toon Disney just happened to be showing a 9-hour marathon of a cartoon I have never seen before called "House of Mouse". Since nothing else was on and I couldn't move, I watched it.
For the first couple of hours or so, I couldn't help thinking, "Is this a hallucination brought on by my accident or am I *really* watching this?" Hence the reason I mention my injury.
I got that thought wandering through my mind simply because the show seemed so... strange. Not bad, mind you, it was certainly fun to watch. Just... strange.
It basically strikes me as being a sort of combination of Mouse Works and "Cartoon Planet" from the Cartoon Network during the mid-'90s. Its cartoons, more often than not, are brand new ones with surprisingly fresh gag ideas and genuinely funny moments. But for some odd reason, the whole thing still left me hollow.
Part of that reason, I think, is because the show is advertised as "so many Disney cartoon stars in one place!", yet that concept only turns out to be fancy window-dressing for what is otherwise an essentially yet-another-run-of-the-mill cartoon anthology, although the cartoons it features are done very well. The idea is not explored anywhere near as much as it could have been, which is a genuine shame.
Also, this cartoon has one speed: fast-forward. It whizzes by to such a degree that a lot of the images simply do not "read" (for those of you who aren't familiar with the term, we in the animation industry use the word to refer to how easily the human eye can register what's being shown on the screen) too terribly well. It's not as bad a problem as it was in the atrocious "Cool World" (a film still guaranteed to give first-time viewers a massive headache and nausea from mental overload--and no, I don't mean that jokingly, I'm being serious), but it's still a bit much.
Even so, the show is better than many of the cartoons currently being offered elsewhere. It's a disappointment that its main idea isn't explored more thoroughly, though--I personally think that they should dive into the other characters' interacting and all much more thoroughly and effectively and not focus so much on the actual cartoon shorts, otherwise everything else comes across as gimmicky filler. Also, some new cartoon shorts starring the actual characters *in* the audience as opposed to merely Mickey, Donald, Goofy, etc. would be a refreshing change of pace and much more entertaining.
As it currently is, "House of Mouse" is sort of like eating a large cheap sweet roll when you aren't able at that moment to enjoy a full breakfast--it isn't particularly tasty, isn't particularly healthy or satisfying, but it just sort of temporarily fills you up a bit for the time being until you get to eat the real thing.
I was alright, but I would spend the next couple of days or so lying groggily on a couch with the TV on with an ice pack on my head. During the first day of doing so, Toon Disney just happened to be showing a 9-hour marathon of a cartoon I have never seen before called "House of Mouse". Since nothing else was on and I couldn't move, I watched it.
For the first couple of hours or so, I couldn't help thinking, "Is this a hallucination brought on by my accident or am I *really* watching this?" Hence the reason I mention my injury.
I got that thought wandering through my mind simply because the show seemed so... strange. Not bad, mind you, it was certainly fun to watch. Just... strange.
It basically strikes me as being a sort of combination of Mouse Works and "Cartoon Planet" from the Cartoon Network during the mid-'90s. Its cartoons, more often than not, are brand new ones with surprisingly fresh gag ideas and genuinely funny moments. But for some odd reason, the whole thing still left me hollow.
Part of that reason, I think, is because the show is advertised as "so many Disney cartoon stars in one place!", yet that concept only turns out to be fancy window-dressing for what is otherwise an essentially yet-another-run-of-the-mill cartoon anthology, although the cartoons it features are done very well. The idea is not explored anywhere near as much as it could have been, which is a genuine shame.
Also, this cartoon has one speed: fast-forward. It whizzes by to such a degree that a lot of the images simply do not "read" (for those of you who aren't familiar with the term, we in the animation industry use the word to refer to how easily the human eye can register what's being shown on the screen) too terribly well. It's not as bad a problem as it was in the atrocious "Cool World" (a film still guaranteed to give first-time viewers a massive headache and nausea from mental overload--and no, I don't mean that jokingly, I'm being serious), but it's still a bit much.
Even so, the show is better than many of the cartoons currently being offered elsewhere. It's a disappointment that its main idea isn't explored more thoroughly, though--I personally think that they should dive into the other characters' interacting and all much more thoroughly and effectively and not focus so much on the actual cartoon shorts, otherwise everything else comes across as gimmicky filler. Also, some new cartoon shorts starring the actual characters *in* the audience as opposed to merely Mickey, Donald, Goofy, etc. would be a refreshing change of pace and much more entertaining.
As it currently is, "House of Mouse" is sort of like eating a large cheap sweet roll when you aren't able at that moment to enjoy a full breakfast--it isn't particularly tasty, isn't particularly healthy or satisfying, but it just sort of temporarily fills you up a bit for the time being until you get to eat the real thing.
- San Franciscan
- Sep 2, 2002
- Permalink
This is one of the best cartoon shows Disney has made! (But nothing can top the Disney Afternoon shows) It's so much fun watching all the characters together. The jokes are hilarious and the new cartoons are great. The ones with Donald and baby Shelby are soooo funny! What a great show and revival of classic, lovable Disney Characters!
I think it's a very funny show bringing back all the classic characters, making them the crew of a lively nightclub, and making all the memorable new Disney stars the audience.
Mickey hosts the show, Minnie keeps everything backstage running smoothly, Pluto... I forget his job... Donald is the greeter, Daisy seats people, Goofy is headwaiter, Gus is the chef, Max (one of the newer characters, but still...) parks cars, Clarabell works with "word on the street", and Horace runs the cartoons.
Before the "House of Mouse", I never heard of characters like Clarabell and Horace. And when I heard that they were around before (though the other comments posted here) I was quite surprised. And I agree that it was great of Disney Studios to bring them back.
And, of course, let's not forget the new member of the Disney family, the spunky, enthusiastic talking microphone, Mike! Something I really wish is that they'd give this guy his own big break.
I love hearing lines like "Hit it, Horace!" and find it hilarious when Horace pulls out a sludge hammer or a boxing glove extender thing to, literally, well, HIT IT!
The things I don't like about the show aren't the crew's fault. Those characters I don't like are just who they are to make the show interesting. I don't like Mortimer Mouse at all. He's a jerk and a snobbish pig! And, Pete, lay off trying to shut down the House of Mouse! Though, I do wish PJ would make an appearance some time.
Well, over all, I give this show 2 ears up! (Pardon the quote from the episode "The Mouse who came to Dinner")
Mickey hosts the show, Minnie keeps everything backstage running smoothly, Pluto... I forget his job... Donald is the greeter, Daisy seats people, Goofy is headwaiter, Gus is the chef, Max (one of the newer characters, but still...) parks cars, Clarabell works with "word on the street", and Horace runs the cartoons.
Before the "House of Mouse", I never heard of characters like Clarabell and Horace. And when I heard that they were around before (though the other comments posted here) I was quite surprised. And I agree that it was great of Disney Studios to bring them back.
And, of course, let's not forget the new member of the Disney family, the spunky, enthusiastic talking microphone, Mike! Something I really wish is that they'd give this guy his own big break.
I love hearing lines like "Hit it, Horace!" and find it hilarious when Horace pulls out a sludge hammer or a boxing glove extender thing to, literally, well, HIT IT!
The things I don't like about the show aren't the crew's fault. Those characters I don't like are just who they are to make the show interesting. I don't like Mortimer Mouse at all. He's a jerk and a snobbish pig! And, Pete, lay off trying to shut down the House of Mouse! Though, I do wish PJ would make an appearance some time.
Well, over all, I give this show 2 ears up! (Pardon the quote from the episode "The Mouse who came to Dinner")
- DanMat6288
- Aug 18, 2003
- Permalink
The previous reviewer appears not to have seen the show, and based their opinion on descriptions of the show. There are many new shorts, and the House of Mouse scenes are very funny and smart. When I first heard about this new incarnation of "Mouseworks" I was concerned it would just be a commercial for Disney movies on videos, but the writers and animators have really made the premise work!
First off, this might be a good time to mention that in general, i hate disney. It is probably because of the bad taste left i my mouth from when, not too long ago, they showed the old Disney crap from the '70s.
I avoided this for a long time, but found it is a lot funnier than one would think. I would have to say that this is definately MUCH better than the original, and if you still don't like disney because of the old 1950-90 crap, you should give this a try.
I avoided this for a long time, but found it is a lot funnier than one would think. I would have to say that this is definately MUCH better than the original, and if you still don't like disney because of the old 1950-90 crap, you should give this a try.
- busterbunny1983
- Oct 29, 2003
- Permalink
This new show is not just a rehash of Mickey Mouseworks, as I had previously thought. It has new shorts and it is also a great premise, all the wonderful characters in one room, what could go wrong. Nothing does go wrong. For the first time ever the cartoons border on reality, one episode mentioned the fact that there would be many broken bones suffered in that short. There are some great one-liners and some handy references to modern culture, splashing pumpkins. I wasn't quite ready for Mouseworks to go, but I will be destroyed if this little beauty leaves the air. Donald is still the best character, with Goofy not too far behind. We all love Disney, so succumb to this cartoons advances. Depending on your age it is actually better than "The Simpsons."
- brinksnirvana
- Jun 17, 2001
- Permalink
This show is great. It brings every Disney characters together in one big show. The show has ended now, I think. And if it did, it was probably just showing for Walt Disney's 100th bithday. Well, I think it was great, and I hope they would continue this show and add more of the new chareters (example: Atlantis, Emperor's New Groove, and whatever other disney movies there are in the future).
- wesjordao557
- Feb 16, 2002
- Permalink