The Lost World (TV Series 1999–2002) Poster

(1999–2002)

User Reviews

Review this title
49 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Entertaining
grantss25 December 2019
Early 20th century. A band of scientists and adventurers set out from England for an uncharted area of the Amazon basin. Their aim: to search for and explore a mythical lost world. After their hot air balloon crashes, they become more than observers of the world, they become participants in it.

Based on a novel by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, an entertaining TV series. Decent action and plenty of adventure. Also some interesting relationship-based drama.

The plots for each episode do get a bit ridiculous at times though. This is particularly so in Season 3. Season 3 also suffers from having Veronica / Jennifer O'Dell away for several episodes on end and she was always my main reason for watching...
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Could Have Been Great
kcterrell-250465 January 2019
This show owes as much to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle as Seinfeld does to Dick Van Dyke. The set-up is the same as Doyle's story, but after that it breaks down into a series of episodes of supernatural adventures and predictable storylines. If this had been made as a single season 26 episode show, it could have been one of the classic TV shows of all time. But it gets a bit stale after season one and completely becomes farcical in season three. Then, of course, is the fact that the show got defunded after the third season, ending suddenly with a "To Be Continued" episode. The set-up is interesting and the interaction of the characters is excellent. Except for one major exception. The romance between Broxton and Margarite and between Veronica and Malone is completely unbelievable. Two couples stuck in a jungle paradise, madly in love with one another, yet never able to consummate any kind of love relationship is just maddening. The special effects are very good for its time, and Challenger's inventions deserve merit. But the plots are pretty much repeats of one another. The show deserved a better set of writers, and should have been condensed into a sterling series. Worth watching a few episodes to pass the time, but don't commit to the series or you will be sorely disappointed.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Spectacularly fun adventure that fizzles out into disappointment
LumosX5 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This show is insane, I love it to bits. Whilst the pilot loosely follows the plot of the book, the show quickly goes in overdrive and becomes shamelessly ridiculous. Whilst the South American plateau hosting the eponymous Lost World features the ape-men and dinosaurs from the book, it now also features african Zulus, Japanese samurai, ROMAN LIZARDMEN (they've allegedly evolved from dinosaurs), Celtic druids lost in time for 2000 years, maori, Camelot from Arthurian legend, Atlantean remnants, magical seductresses who come out of the forest looking for men, underground ninjas... and even VAMPIRES. Who drink blood and have a gothic vampire mansion. Did I mention that time-travellers from the future also make an appearance? Indeed, right after the episode with the pyramid and the egyptian Pharaoh I thought to myself: "the one thing we haven't seen are Cimmerian barbarians", and lo and behold, the next episode opens with savage leather- and fur-clad barbarian mountain-men. I love it. I love it to bits.

Someone more cynical would perhaps roll his eyes, noting that Veronica-one of the two main female characters original to the show, a young blonde inspired by Tarzan who traipses around the deadly jungle in little more than a bra and miniskirt-seems to find an excuse to get herself submerged in water every other episode, whether it's to save a drowning Indian girl, evade a T-Rex, accidentally get trapped down a well, have a "cat-fight" in a convenient puddle of mud, or simply have a water pipe burst in her face. In the episode with the giant bees, Veronica also slathers herself with copious amounts of honey (and so does everyone else, to a more limited extent) so as to conceal her scent. But I would posit, young sir or madam, that this is nothing to smirk about, it's just the hardships that a life in the primeval jungle can force you to go through.

Veronica's action exploits sometimes become ridiculous when she's occasionally able to beat up several (ape-)men larger and stronger than her-without ever ruining her manicure, let it be noted!-but every once in a while the hunter, Lord Roxton, is able to punch someone in the face and send him flying a metre away, so I guess this is just the 90s adventure TV dramatic choreography in play.

It is of course delightfully refreshing, from a modern perspective, to see a cast of characters unashamed about spreading civilisation and the values of the British Empire amongst dangerous savages, sometimes at gunpoint if need be. The character interactions are engrossing, and whilst the show rarely even tries to take itself seriously (the Camelot episode being a great example of this), some of the more serious and character-driven plots are very, very solid. The entire first season screams of good ideas put into good-if incoherent-use; though alas, quite frequently the plot moves forward after ape-men or dinousaurs randomly jump out of the forest for no particular reason, hardly a creative decision.

Naturally, the CGI is dated and quite lacking by modern standards, but this is something I'm more than willing to overlook when the sum total is so interesting. I also have to say I love the mattes. They're a mixed bag, but I enjoy them greatly; set design is serviceable albeit usually limited. "Is this Camelot?" asks one of our characters when led "to Camelot". "No, it's just the king's hunting camp, Camelot itself is many days away." Also, "Is this your civilisation," they ask the Pharaoh Ramses. "One pyramid and a dozen men?" "No, this is just our place of worship, our civilisation is many days away." All right, show, I see what you did there. Very clever indeed. (But why was the Pharaoh's sister being crowned in the place of worship in front of a dozen dudes instead of in her capital city? We'll never know...)

As for acting, it's solid enough. Michael Sinelnikoff is quite brilliant as the mild-mannered Summerlee, and with a pipe in his mouth and a revolver in hand, with a carefree smile on his face, he truly looks like the most based grandpa ever. Rachel Blakely is fantastic, alluring, and captivating as the duplicitous Marguerite, and though her Australian accent makes itself more than obvious in some cases despite her character being American, Marguerite is a wonderful addition to the cast and makes for a sublimely soapily-operatic "will they, won't they" interaction with Will Snow's John Roxton. Roxton himself is very well embodied by Mr Snow, and his confident manner as the group's expert hunter, tracker, and pugilist is right on the spot. The expedition leader, "the visionary" George Challenger is similarly well-played by Peter McCauley, who certainly looks the part of the unorthodox natural explorer, and usually looks a little too excited for whatever's going on. Ned Malone, the American reporter and protagonist of the original novel is (mostly) played by David Orth, who does a serviceable job of being the everyman. The aforementioned Veronica, lovely in all regards, is played by Jennifer O'Dell. Veronica is somewhat of a native of the plateau (born to American parents currently MIA), is Malone's romantic interest, and does admirably with what she's given as the lonesome but hardened young woman searching for her lost parents, though I'm afraid I was never quite convinced when she'd start snarling, trying to be intimidating.

Season 2 doesn't fail to disappoint, with the very first episode featuring Roxton falling into a river and emerging with a different haircut, Marguerite forgetting about her leg wound, an Age of Discovery shanty town, the party manning a rowboat and having the two women row whilst Challenger captains it up and Malone is the coxswain, and a plesiosaur getting incinerated by a single oil lantern. Aside from much-improved CGI, the rest of the second season gives us amazons (a hilarious and remarkably well-handled implementation of the idea, which would certainly look different-probably worse-if made now, 20 years later), samurai, more time travel (with a blatant continuity error), XVI century ghosts, werewolves, a fire-breathing dragon, Challenger stating that magic doesn't exist when he himself used sorcery in the previous episode, even more magical men and women coming out of the forest to seduce somebody, more holes conveniently opening up under our heroes, golems and nuclear power, and even SPACE ALIENS. The writing in season 2 appears to go downhill, however, what with some retcons of season 1 (ape-men are now partly-civilised "troglodytes" for no reason), as well as an unwillingness to develop the characters further than what even the first episodes of season 1 achieved; and of course, more and more absurd plots that don't seem to serve a specific purpose.

Unfortunately season 2 becomes rather uninspired at times, piling unlikely premise after unlikely premise upon the viewer, and learning that Malone's actor leaves the show midway through season 3, whilst the plot doubles down on bizarre and random shenanigans, I never had the motivation to begin season 3. It's quite the shame, really.

When this show first aired, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle must have spun in his grave fast enough to generate enough power for a small household, and undoubtedly his spinning became even more rapid every time the "Based on a story by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle" credit appears on screen in an episode that has zero relation to the original lost world book. On the other hand, I certainly enjoyed the ride, at least until the end of season 2. The premise is perfect; with a coherent and focused story that kept the new characters but also reduced the ridiculous contrivances to a minimum, you could really make a Lost World adaptation for the ages. The fact we'll probably never see one is truly a loss for all of us... as is the fact that any future adaptation wouldn't feature Rachel Blakely, and that her acting career hasn't been more prominent. I did say she's captivating, didn't I?

In short, this is popcorn. It's not a roast beef steak with a side of vegetables, brown sauce, and green salad, and you shouldn't approach it looking for what it isn't. It might be popcorn, but very delicious popcorn it is; or it might be cheese, but I really like cheese if I have to be honest. I thoroughly recommend giving this series a shot. It's good fun... at least until it wears out its welcome.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cheesy, at Times, But an Exciting, Guilty Pleasure!
cariart10 February 2004
It is easy, perhaps TOO easy, to heap abuse on this series, very loosely adapted from Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's fantasy novel. Certainly, Doyle would not have recognized much of it; then again, would he have recognized a majority of the 'Sherlock Holmes' features over the years? And what would he have made of Steven Spielberg's "borrowing" his title for the second "Jurassic Park" film? Ultimately, any production's success or failure shouldn't be judged solely by the fidelity to the original work, but whether or not audiences accept it. Many marvelous adaptations, from the theatrical WAR OF THE WORLDS to television's "The Third Man" have carried over little of the original source material, but have won a place in our hearts, nonetheless.

And this New Line-produced series, filmed in Australia, even at it's most absurd, was always an enjoyable thrill ride, with a very ingratiating cast!

A spin off of a 1998 TV-movie, the series follows the adventures of an early 20th century party of explorers, stranded on a mysterious plateau in South America where multi-dimensional 'rifts' have allowed animals and cultures from past and future to co-exist. Led by brilliant Professor George Challenger (the wonderful Peter McCauley), a bearded, wild-haired scientist who thrives on facing the unknown, the party consists of handsome big game hunter Lord John Roxton (Australian actor/model Will Snow), mysterious benefactress Marguerite Krux (beautiful Australian actress Rachel Blakely), American journalist Ned Malone (Canadian actor David Orth), and elderly scientist, Professor Arthur Summerlee (Michael Sinelnikoff, whose character would 'die' by season's end). The TV-movie introduced a new character to the mix, blond 'native girl', Veronica, whose scientist parents had disappeared eleven years earlier. Portrayed by "Beverly Hills 90210" alumni Jennifer O'Dell, the voluptuous 'savage', scantily dressed, raised the level of sex appeal for the program immediately, and quickly became a fan favorite.

Working out of Veronica's huge tree house (a split-level that Tarzan would have been envious of), the characters would, each week, encounter everything from dinosaurs (created through CGI, and, while not quite 'realistic', still vastly superior to the stop-motion models, puppets, or rear-screen projected lizards of previous "Lost World" adaptations), to sophisticated cultures practicing human sacrifice, to demons and wizards, to nearly any kind of bizarre civilization one might imagine. Glimpses of each character's past allowed the cast to 'grow', and become more interesting, each season, and provided enjoyable subplots; Lord Roxton falls in love with the greedy, but lovely Marguerite, but her past includes espionage and other unsavory activities, so she only gradually accepts his advances; Veronica, drawn to Ned, must deal with his moodiness (WWI had left him emotionally fragile) and his sense of wanderlust. It is a tribute to the writers and talented cast that the subplots never sank into mini-soap operas!

Australian tax laws nearly sabotaged the series' third season; Canadian Orth and American O'Dell were forced to limit their appearances because of their being non-Australians. So Ned Malone was often away on a 'identity-crisis'-fueled quest, and Veronica, whisked away by a runaway balloon, returned later in the season with a pendant her mother had left for her with a distant tribe, and new responsibilities as 'Protector' of the plateau. A new character was introduced, a wise-cracking girl named Finn, from a hundred years in the future, who was transported back to the plateau by a Challenger invention. Portrayed by 24-year old Australian actress Lara Cox, she was a survivor of a radiation-poisoned Earth, and was quickly 'adopted' by the scientist, who made it his mission to prevent her future world from happening.

Despite very respectable ratings, "The Lost World" was canceled after the third season (with a cliffhanger ending to end ALL cliffhanger endings!), because of spiraling production costs. The cast and crew have remained loyal to the series since cancellation, however, and there is still a slight, if dwindling, hope that the show may reappear, either in series format, or as TV-movies.

"The Lost World" may never please Doyle 'purists', but it was certainly a most enjoyable 'guilty pleasure'. I join with it's many other fans in hoping it will return!
60 out of 68 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great show in limbo Warning: Spoilers
Show ended in cliff hanger. 'To be continued' after Season 3. Why? And will they make a remake or have a conclusion.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Gilligan's Island on Land
aramis-112-80488017 October 2022
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle published THE LOST WORLD in 1912. Professor Challenger leads a scientist named Summerlee, a hunter and sportsman Sir John Roxton and a reporter named Malone on an expedition to a South American plateau where prehistoric creatures live. Fine.

The story has been filmed a number of times, either badly done, much changed, or both.

This version has been "updated" to the 1920s. The alterations include adding a greedy and unscrupulous (if ultimately good-hearted) woman who is on a cockamamie jewel hunt, and also running away from some secret, who funds the mission.

They get stranded on the plateau and like the Pilgrims had Squanto these guys meet up with Veronica (Jennifer O'Dell, the only US American in the regular cast), a beautiful blonde female Tarzan-type (equipped with a halter top) who grew up on the plateau, speaks perfect English, and is on a quest for her parents, lost eleven years before).

In every episode as the five stranded castaways look for a way off their "island" and Veronica looks for her folks, the meet up with all manner of people. Not only lizard people evolved from the dinosaurs, but ancient Egyptian-type people, medieval-type people, Gypsy-type people, Indian-type people. Conquistodor-type people, time travelers . . . You name it. They also meet up with old friends who are simply passing by, etc. And they have dream and psycedelic interludes where they all dress and act like they're in an 18th century court . . . To fill another episode they'll throw anything against the wall to see if it'x stick.

And they plagiarize everything, even "The Time Tunnel" (the bee episode).

In the second season, Veronica's costume is tweaked and looks even better. In the third season, they add another blonde who is so waifish she makes buff, cut Veronica look HUGE.

The authors make no concession for contemporary dialogue. Even Veronica, born and reared on the plateau, snorts and huffslike a 1990s female and knows some very un-1920s expressions.

Americans likely will be unfamiliar with any of the actors in this Australian production. But that lends an air of verisimilitude.

Totally crazy but enjoyable as we wonder if they'll ever get off the island and if Veroronica's haltar top will ever burst.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great entertainment
tlauco2 March 2016
The trailers had me hooked before it came to The Horror Channel and has just left us on a real cliffhanger. Having been a viewer of Neighbours some time ago, Rachel Blakely was instantly recognisable and being joined by other cast members such as Alan Dale and Laura Vazquez, it made me feel it was going to be worth watching. I was right. From start to finish this has been a 'must watch' program. I can honestly say that this is one of my favourite programs ever. As important as each character is, not one takes over and gets all the airtime, though they struggle to truly survive without each other (the exception being Veronica).Is there more to come?
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The kitchen sink approach
Leofwine_draca28 September 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Review of Season One:

I started off hating THE LOST WORLD, an ultra cheap and cheerful adaptation of the classic Sir Arthur Conan Doyle lost world novel, but halfway through the first season I realised I was enjoying it after all. It turns out to be a campy, action-packed adventure series clearly modelled on XENA: WARRIOR SUCCESS and made by an enthusiastic Australian cast and crew. The characters and plot have little to do with the original book; instead, this is an adventure-of-the-week format as a small group of adventurers (and a random Sheena-style character) are trapped in a prehistoric plateau.

The characters are underwritten with the exception of Marguerite, played to the hilt by Rachel Blakely as a proto feminist, and very good she is too. Seeing what they come up with each time is a lot of fun: this packs in Moreau-style experiments, Burroughs-style ape man attacks, the usual JURASSIC PARK-inspired bad CGI dinosaur attacks, random Arthurian and Egyptian societies, sacrifice, tribal warfare, time travel and even a Fulci tribute at one point. The kitchen sink approach, then, but somehow it works.

Review of Season Two:

Season 2 carries on the same trend as the first, with some increasingly relaxed and cheesy episodes as the writers feel more confident about putting random spins on the premise. The characters remain single-dimensional, although there's a lot of romance from the Marguerite and Roxton characters; thankfully the former remains her usual defiant self. Various stories include dreams of returning home, evil clothing, possession a la THE EVIL DEAD, a skeleton fight tribute straight out of JASON AND THE ARGONAUTS, killer plants, and even an exploding airship cliffhanger climax. It's occasionally really cheesy - the acting in the episode where they turn into animals is really bad, for example - but overall, fun.

Review of Season Three:

The third and final season feels increasingly outlandish so it's little surprise that it was cancelled - on a cliffhanger, no less. This is very much an episodic plot-of-the-week show by now, at the same time flirting with on/off romantic guff between Roxton and Marguerite and introducing a few new characters in a bid to keep it fresh. The writers seem willing to throw any idea they can think of into the fray, so there are episodes based on time travel, ouija boards, blue ghosts, Jekyll and Hyde, Jack the Ripper, WW1, westerns, ice ages, the Chinese Tong, you name it. It's all rather ridiculous by this point, and we can only imagine how things would have devolved from here.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
So Cheesy, It's Great...
fearfulofspiders3 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I use to watch this show in the morning -- back when it was airing in syndication -- and it was just a great time. The acting is okay here and there, but most of the times it's really hammy. The special effects in the first season are laughable, while the later episodes tend to use the same CG templates over and over again. The stories only go linear near the season finales and premieres, otherwise, the typical episode is danger-predicament-next time on... etc. The writing is okay, though is probably the helping hand that makes it so ridiculously fun to watch.

Overall, The Lost World (TV series) is a good show to watch when you're waking up, and can get engaging when the story follows a linear time line. It's sad that that production had to close due to costs, leaving us with unanswered questions, which would be nice of the studios to give the fans a bit of closure. I recommend it only if one wouldn't get heartbroken over an incomplete story.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Very enjoyable
Gringoen20 January 2022
When you get passed the horrible intro this series is quite nice... It has beautiful women and good action. The audio could be better and the special effects arent awesome though. Watching this in 2022 with aspect ratio 4:3 was a bit challenging, but i got use to it. If you are fed up with todays woke entertainment you should give this a try.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Rare lack of talent on all fronts
keld-720 December 2023
I kept looking for some indications that this was a joke, but I just can't find if. Must be my mistake. I am sure the writers loved those terrible adventure movies from the 60's but they didn't manage to convey any of that love to this series, which has a completely uninspired script and plot and musical score. The dialog if just idiotic, the scenery is no doubt borrowed from some old movie studio, who made Jules Verne stuff back in those days and the pace of the series is so off, it at times just seems like a trailer for something that shouldn't have been made. Watch and dispair at your own leisure.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Masterpiece.
black-pony5 June 2010
I started to watch it when i was a child and i will never regret about this.Now i am 20 years old and it still helps me with my life.It is great TV show,which grows up with you.If you disagree with me,you should pay more attention to the characters( and excellent cast) and you will understand that it is great TV series about people ,which shows us that people can change(Challenger and his humanity),fist opinion can be wrong(miss Krux),when you truly love a human nothing cannot break this love(miss Krux and lord Roxton),the most valuable thing is the family(Veronika)Forget about special effects-they are not important,just watch it and learn the main sense of our lives and you will find it.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cheesy, but entertaining
solid-rock80013 May 2021
This show is often pretty cheesy, with iffy special effects, somewhat frequent eyeroll-worthy subplots or moments, & actors who can't keep their accents straight. That said, it's also pretty entertaining, and good if you want something light, interesting, and fun.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Indy like and rather enjoyable
Jules-11330 November 2000
I actually enjoy this series. I was hesitant at first because, frankly it didn't seem like it would be any good. However I watched an episode and got hooked. It's a great mixture of humor, adventure and mystery. The show is a cross between Indiana Jones, Earth 2 and any show where the characters are trying to find a way home(too many to list). I think the actors do a good job at keeping the show light and there is the odd line that is pretty funny. All in all it's not bad and if you like Indiana Jones, and can put up with seeing a fake dinosaur once and a while then I recommend that you give it a chance.
23 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
the lost world season fourth and fifth
Lorenzo-83113 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
pity that they discontinued the series in 2002, but all are struggling to fourth and fifth season in the third season 22 To be continued http://www.petitiononline.com/LoveTLW/petition.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3IffsGEZUU we deserve a happy ending final should convince TNT television network BBC and others to produce the fourth season of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's The Lost World. It is unfair that they have canceled we deserve a final truth with a happy ending revealedthe salvation of everyone involved save the lost world that I saw in original sin, which interrupted the series in 2002, but all are fighting for the fourth and fifth season
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Overall, an enjoyable Sci-Fi meets 1920 explorers to dimensional nexus Lost World.
gadfeal7 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The basic premise of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle of turn of 20th Century explorers who accidentally cross a dimensional rift into a world with a mix of prehistoric animal life, and reality-suspended enclaves of civilizations out-of-time, time travelers, mutants, and extra-terrestrials.

The setting is different. Instead of Dark Africa (ie. Sub-Saharan forestland), it is in the Amazon jungle. Given the reference to a high-elevation plateau, a real world location would be either in the Guyanan Highlands in Venezuela, or the Andean Highlands in Western Bolivia.

The series was filmed in Australia and the Aussie actors did an admirable job in adopting RP accents, although certain scenes when one Professor Challenge cries out, his Aussie pronunciation becomes detectable.

Unlike the closest cultural framework, Star Trek, the difference is that this "crew" is VERY White, and the human groups they meet are mostly White with blonds. Given that this was made in 1999 Australia, before the massive waves of regional immigration that now has 1 in 4 Australians born in a foreign country, it probably wasn't easy to get a more diverse casting twenty years ago.

Each week, there is a a self-contained episode, or dual episode, story. First dealing with prehistoric predators, or natural phenomena, the storylines tended to contact with various humans, humanoids, with no common theme except most have some totalitarian governance, and non-scientific belief systems. Aztec, 15th Century Spanish colonizers, Indigenous Americans, Extra-terrestrials, Amazonians (all White and baring mid-riff), Reptilian humanoids, parasitic clones, man-eating vegetation, cannibals, evil time-travelers... It truly is a once a week "adventure" fantasy for a teenager or pre-schooler - although there are a few adult sexual innuendoes that would escape children.

Over some 60 episodes in 3 seasons, the production values are good with only the CGI dinosaurs showing that it was made decades ago. The actors were mostly competent with five lead characters: two British professors, an adventurer nobleman descended from pirates, an American investigative reporter, a complex but intrepid woman who funds the expedition, and a White woman whose was abandoned in the jungle at age 11 - but, somehow, speaks perfect English, is cultured, and always well-coiffed and sports a mid-riff baring leather haltertop and skirt.

Reality is suspended, so there is no point in criticizing that such scantily clad females would be eaten alive by insects in a jungle, that modern hair salons are not available in the era... It's a "sanitized", "Caucasian-centric" world where people are often impossibly attractive.

One season would have been enough for me as all the characters are two-dimensional - save for "Marguerite", the beautiful, ruthless, apparently narcissistic sociopath with a secret past, hateful parents, and unexplained grasp for precious stones. However, over the series, she does evolve from being completely self-centered and obnoxious, to falling in love with the hunky Lord adventurer, and comes to form a family for the first time in her life. Without this character (a sort of Dr. Smith of Lost in Space foil to the do-gooder heroes others), I would stop watching.

The actress in question is Rachel Blakely, an Australian-American binational who has had a career in Austalian TV and some movies. She is now in her 50's.

One non-Australian cast is the reporter, played by a Canadian actor, David Orth, who moved to Australia for the series, and met his wife there. He moved from acting in the mid naughts into directing, and like Rachel Blakely, he looks very young for his age today.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Favourite Show
SnowLeopard8510 May 2003
I have watched this show right from season 1 to season 3 and I absolutely love the show. It's a one of a kind series and I can't think of anything I'd rather watch on TV than TLW. I think Conan Doyle would enjoy this adaption since it adds so much more to the plateau and the actors are all excellent. And another thing I am a frequent poster at the Lost World message board and it's my favourite place on the net because everyone is fantastic there and I am hoping that Season Four of the Lost World becomes a reality!
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Disappointed 😞😞 by end
garywilcox-6357114 November 2022
It was a good show but disappointed the end of it.i hope it will continue because I would to see how it all ended. Just it's the way left off and it said would continue but it's just drops off and you never find out what happens or if they make it back or stay you don't know where it ends up it leaves so much that the journey doesn't and don't anything after that what happens to everyone did they go back to there time when left or stay together as a family. Did everyone went to the different place and you don't know if the live or die. So much left out.i would love to see what happens but the ending makes it not worth watching.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
It's Not THAT Bad
Jude771431 August 2018
I was lucky enough to discover this series during a repeat episode from its third season. The writing was immensely improved in the second and third seasons compared to the sluggish, corny, and mostly humorless first one. The banter between the characters is much more natural in the later two seasons and O'Dell's acting improves dramatically - seriously, it's an instant improvement between the last episode of S1 and the first of S2. But by the time I finished watching the third season repeats, I didn't care either way. I now watch the first season with as much enjoyment as the others because the characters are so endearing. If you judged the series by an episode you saw from the first season, give it another shot with a later season's episode before throwing in the towel for good.

It's not for everyone but for sci-fi lovers like me who are willing to suspend reality in order to become immersed in a good story, it's quite enjoyable. Who cares if they fire too many bullets in a world where gunpowder is in short supply? Who cares if the dinosaurs look fake? Who cares if the land seems too vast for the amount of literal space it might take up geographically? It's a mystical plateau... with dinosaurs. I think you've pretty much steamrolled over the confines of reality right there. And, as a side note, if I saw a dinosaur coming at me, you can bet your a** I'd fire as many bullets as humanly possible - to hell with the rations.

Relax, free your over-analytical mind and enjoy the fun.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A "Don't Miss" TV Show
Beckers-11 June 2003
If you are looking for a show that is pure Sir Arthur Conan Doyle then this may *not* be the show for you. However, if you enjoy elements of ACD's "The Lost World" along with a wonderful, fresh new twist on the story you will love this series!

Many wonderful elements make up TLW. There is fantasy and adventure: dinosaurs, mysteries, exciting near escapes and heroics galore - but also comedic moments and dramatic elements that come from crisp scripts and clever direction.

What's more, there truly *are* a wonderful cast of characters -- some of which are the true "lost" of the plateau they are trapped on. Not only is the Challenger Expedition fighting the elements, strange occurrences and the general dangers of the world surrounding them but they are also learning, as the months pass, to live with one another and become a family.

Wonderful friendships and romances have developed over the last few years that are very appealing to both young and old alike.

Kudos to all cast members: Peter McCauly (Professor Challenger), Rachel Blakely (Marguerite Krux - a character not in the book but mysterious and lovely -- a favorite!), William Snow (Lord John Roxton), Jennifer O'Dell (Veronica - Another new character but a welcome addition), David Orth (Edward "Ned" Malone), Michael Sinelnikoff (Professor Summerlee - Season One) and Lara Cox (Finn- a young woman from our world's potential future - New character in season 3).

Sit back, watch a few episodes -- and become enthralled. It's great fun, holds your interests, and you will grow to the this show and its characters -- whether you want too or not (but you WILL want to!).
22 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Entertaining Adventure
marionsteiman27 September 2023
I just finished Season 1,2,& 3 . The last episode "Heart of the Storm" just ended with "to be continued". So where is the episode that concludes the story line. Shouldn't you have at least given one last episode to satisfy our curiosity. Shame on you! I enjoyed this series to much. It had all the makings of adventure and a fun loving cast that ended to abruptly. Just consider the time line and end this story line with just one more episode to satisfy the viewers. We need to know what happened to Summerlee if he ever came back. Did Malone ever make it out to London? Was Marguette killed? So many questions and so little answers.

Marion Steiman.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I LOVE this series
BigBish196612 May 2006
Is there anything this series DOESN'T offer- Drama, comedy, handsome heros, science, great looking jungle women, monsters, UFO's , cool effects, a fair amount of cheeziness ( I love a show that doesn't take itself too seriously) ,zombies, vortexes, time travel,gunplay, explosions, lots of that great hitting noises from the opening credits to the closing credits; I mean come on! Whats not to like? This show is like every Saturday morning cartoon I've ever seen rolled into 42 minutes. Only the bad guys get killed and the good guys never even bruise. Love, hate, that 'Moonlighting' relationship development between the characters. I could go on for hours.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Ned Malone makes it even better
mikewilson76218 November 2011
This series is basically about a group of people who manage to get lost in a prehistoric land.It's based on the novel by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. The plot deviates from the original book ,but remains faithful in parts.

Love this TV series. It's full off excitement and adventure.You connect with the characters too.

If you love monsters and dinosaurs then this is for you.It has a similar feel to Jason and the Argonauts.It has most of the mythical beasts that these type of films have.

You can forgive the small errors of this series because it's still great fun to watch.

P.S NED MALONE(David Orth) MUST HAVE THE BEST SHAPED BACKSIDE IN HISTORY.THIS ALONE MAKES IT WORTHWHILE WATCHING THE WHOLE SERIES!!!
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A fun, cheesy show
gtc8329 August 2004
The best thing about this show was the chemistry between the characters. Everyone was energetic in their roles, and it really drew me in and made me feel a part of their "family". The action was usually a bit on the silly side, though always entertaining. It struck a nice balance there. The special effects were good for a TV show, though still not too realistic, which added to the wonderful cheesiness of it. The writing was always creative. They would take just about any idea that popped into their heads and make an episode out of it, meaning that it never got bogged down in a handful of similar plots like so many other action/adventure shows. The fact that it never took itself very seriously was key to its charm.

All in all, a wonderful bit of escapism that was always a hoot. I'm glad it's available on DVD.
26 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It grows on you...
etheral_prey26 January 2002
I have to admit when I first say this, I wasn't highly amused, however over time, and with new stories and action sequences and time, it grows on you and you start to enjoy the show and the characters. It has it's moments and then it doesn't, but isn't every show like that? But give it a chance, it's a good show with great potential.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed