I finally saw Coppola's Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (2000). Really, he was the Exec. Producer, but was running through his mind when he oversaw this film? This seems to be a pilot for TV series starring the underrated Adam Baldwin. Dr. Henry Jekyll is a plastic surgeon who goes to China for a honeymoon. While checking out a hospital, he is unwittingly forced to operate on a dying Triad member. The Triad dies, and the rest of the gang wants vengeance. They kidnap Jekyll's wife, and after stealing a kidney from Jekyll allow him to be with his wife before they die. Well as expected, Jekyll lives and is mentored by a doctor who introduces him to ancient Chinese herbs- especially those that can kill. Jekyll changes his name to Hyde, and goes on a vengeance spree against members of the Triad using Karate, Kung Fu and the herbs. I'm not making this up! Plot twist is that Henry Jekyll is the chosen White Tiger where it is written he is to protect the good Chinese people..... Aw Hell Pass!
11 Reviews
Interesting Attempt to do Something Different, but Falls Flat
Reviews_of_the_Dead12 March 2020
This was another movie that I've owned the DVD for roughly a decade. I picked it up and when I was trying to obtain as many of the versions of the Robert Louis Stevenson novel, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, as I could. I really had no idea what this was going to do so I came in blind, aside from having seen other versions and read the novel. The synopsis here is the Hong Kong marital arts version of Jekyll and Hyde that includes Triads, drug trafficking an illegal organ transplants.
Now I did alter the synopsis a bit as it really spoils a major plot, but to be honest, it really isn't that big a deal in the grand scheme of things. We start though with a monk talking to a hooded figure before switching to an altercation between the triads and other gangsters. It ends up with the leader of the other group being killed.
We then shift to the United States. Dr. Jekyll (Adam Baldwin) is performing his last surgery at the hospital and he's being given grief by his follow doctors. His plan is to go into plastic surgery and make more money. First he marries Mary Riley (Helene Joy), which I didn't realize her name until now paying homage to the film with Julia Roberts. They get married and go to Hong Kong for their honeymoon.
While there they meet Mr. Wong (Tseng Chang) who takes them on a tour of the harbor with his boat. Mary isn't feeling well and Mr. Wong reveals he's a doctor of Chinese medicine. He thinks that he can help her, but Dr. Jekyll doesn't trust it. They return to land and she goes back to the room to take a bath. Dr. Jekyll wants to go to the local hospital so he can write off their visit as business expense.
He's given a tour by Oliver (Aaron James Cash) and things take a turn when triads who were just in a gunfight show up. Ah Yee (Jason Chong) sees Dr. Jekyll and asks if he's a doctor. Dr. Jekyll confirms he is but that he doesn't work here. He is forced to help Ah's friend at gunpoint. The problem is there's nothing that can be done. Dr. Jekyll tries to escape by cutting Ah's face, but he can't get away and he's knocked out.
Dr. Jekyll wakes up as a prisoner of Ah. He realizes he's missing a kidney and taken outside of the boat. It is there that he sees Mary is tied to a nearby buoy. Dr. Jekyll goes to save her, but figures out that she has a bomb on her. It is too late and they're both hurt in the explosion. Mary passes away, but Mr. Wong took Dr. Jekyll in. He saves him with Chinese medicine and starts to teach him the properties of the different herbs. Dr. Jekyll uses this to become Mr. Hyde and goes about getting his revenge. There's a much bigger plot with the men that he's going up against and Mr. Wong is also hiding a secret.
Now if you know me, I give credit to movies that try to do something different. This one does that and I can appreciate some aspects to it for sure. The big thing that I dug was the fact that we have a doctor, Jekyll, who is trained in western medicine. He experiments with these herbs that give him superhuman strength and what not. I thought that was a pretty cool twist to this story that's been done over and over again. This is slightly problematic as it isn't all that feasible. I'll digress there though.
Going from that, the synopsis is misleading about this being the martial arts version of the story. I like that they took it to another country. That gives it another twist. The problem is that we really get a training montage of Dr. Jekyll and then we see Mr. Hyde fight once? In general, this movie's runtime of 105 minutes, I'd be surprised if there was more than 15 minutes of this aspect that it is pushing.
That's another problem with this movie is that it runs too long. I'm not going to lie, but I found this to be not all that interesting. I think there are some good things to play with here, but it doesn't work as well as they want. We have a few different storylines that don't really go anywhere and it seems like they're trying to do too much since they didn't fully flesh it out. I think they should have just stuck with Dr. Jekyll, Mr. Hyde and the triad angle with the cops trying to figure things out. There's more than this and it just bogs things down. The ending is also a bit meh and the 'superhero'-ish angle didn't work for me either.
Moving to this to the acting, I think Baldwin was miscast to be honest. I think they have him here as name recognition, but I'm sorry, I don't buy him as the doctor. This seems like a movie where they should have had someone smaller be Dr. Jekyll and use Baldwin as Mr. Hyde. He does physically fit there and for the revenge aspects of the movie. Steve Bastoni plays McAfee and I don't understand why this character is in the movie. This goes under one of the storylines that doesn't add much for me. I did think that Wong was good though in his role. I also thought the same about Chang who is the wise, old teacher. I did like seeing Kira Clavell in this movie as well as seeing Joy nude.
The effects weren't great either. We're in that phase was CGI was being used more and this is a TV movie so they don't have a lot of budget to work with. There's this weird effect when Mr. Hyde is there and it didn't make sense at first. It does in the end and I despised it. Partly because it doesn't look good and the other is that it is too ham-fisted in for what they're going for. The rest of the effects from what I could remember were fine including the blood. I know there were some eyes that look fake, but I did like what they do with Mr. Hyde's. The cinematography was fine aside from that.
The last thing to cover I will give the movie credit was for the soundtrack. They have selections that really fit that were in Hong Kong. They're really traditional and just gave it that eastern vibe for sure. Not a score I would listen to regularly, but I had no problems with how it fit into this movie at all.
Now with that said, this movie isn't very good. I was disappointed as I think there are some aspects that could have set this one apart for sure. I like moving it to a new location is one and what changes Dr. Jekyll is another. The problem though is that they bogged the story down with too much that doesn't add anything and I was bored. I don't buy Baldwin as Dr. Jekyll and I don't know why Bastoni is in this movie, but the rest of the cast fit for what was needed. There are some bad effects, but also some that are fine along with the cinematography. The soundtrack fit for what was needed. I can't recommend this one to you though. My rating would be below average for sure.
Now I did alter the synopsis a bit as it really spoils a major plot, but to be honest, it really isn't that big a deal in the grand scheme of things. We start though with a monk talking to a hooded figure before switching to an altercation between the triads and other gangsters. It ends up with the leader of the other group being killed.
We then shift to the United States. Dr. Jekyll (Adam Baldwin) is performing his last surgery at the hospital and he's being given grief by his follow doctors. His plan is to go into plastic surgery and make more money. First he marries Mary Riley (Helene Joy), which I didn't realize her name until now paying homage to the film with Julia Roberts. They get married and go to Hong Kong for their honeymoon.
While there they meet Mr. Wong (Tseng Chang) who takes them on a tour of the harbor with his boat. Mary isn't feeling well and Mr. Wong reveals he's a doctor of Chinese medicine. He thinks that he can help her, but Dr. Jekyll doesn't trust it. They return to land and she goes back to the room to take a bath. Dr. Jekyll wants to go to the local hospital so he can write off their visit as business expense.
He's given a tour by Oliver (Aaron James Cash) and things take a turn when triads who were just in a gunfight show up. Ah Yee (Jason Chong) sees Dr. Jekyll and asks if he's a doctor. Dr. Jekyll confirms he is but that he doesn't work here. He is forced to help Ah's friend at gunpoint. The problem is there's nothing that can be done. Dr. Jekyll tries to escape by cutting Ah's face, but he can't get away and he's knocked out.
Dr. Jekyll wakes up as a prisoner of Ah. He realizes he's missing a kidney and taken outside of the boat. It is there that he sees Mary is tied to a nearby buoy. Dr. Jekyll goes to save her, but figures out that she has a bomb on her. It is too late and they're both hurt in the explosion. Mary passes away, but Mr. Wong took Dr. Jekyll in. He saves him with Chinese medicine and starts to teach him the properties of the different herbs. Dr. Jekyll uses this to become Mr. Hyde and goes about getting his revenge. There's a much bigger plot with the men that he's going up against and Mr. Wong is also hiding a secret.
Now if you know me, I give credit to movies that try to do something different. This one does that and I can appreciate some aspects to it for sure. The big thing that I dug was the fact that we have a doctor, Jekyll, who is trained in western medicine. He experiments with these herbs that give him superhuman strength and what not. I thought that was a pretty cool twist to this story that's been done over and over again. This is slightly problematic as it isn't all that feasible. I'll digress there though.
Going from that, the synopsis is misleading about this being the martial arts version of the story. I like that they took it to another country. That gives it another twist. The problem is that we really get a training montage of Dr. Jekyll and then we see Mr. Hyde fight once? In general, this movie's runtime of 105 minutes, I'd be surprised if there was more than 15 minutes of this aspect that it is pushing.
That's another problem with this movie is that it runs too long. I'm not going to lie, but I found this to be not all that interesting. I think there are some good things to play with here, but it doesn't work as well as they want. We have a few different storylines that don't really go anywhere and it seems like they're trying to do too much since they didn't fully flesh it out. I think they should have just stuck with Dr. Jekyll, Mr. Hyde and the triad angle with the cops trying to figure things out. There's more than this and it just bogs things down. The ending is also a bit meh and the 'superhero'-ish angle didn't work for me either.
Moving to this to the acting, I think Baldwin was miscast to be honest. I think they have him here as name recognition, but I'm sorry, I don't buy him as the doctor. This seems like a movie where they should have had someone smaller be Dr. Jekyll and use Baldwin as Mr. Hyde. He does physically fit there and for the revenge aspects of the movie. Steve Bastoni plays McAfee and I don't understand why this character is in the movie. This goes under one of the storylines that doesn't add much for me. I did think that Wong was good though in his role. I also thought the same about Chang who is the wise, old teacher. I did like seeing Kira Clavell in this movie as well as seeing Joy nude.
The effects weren't great either. We're in that phase was CGI was being used more and this is a TV movie so they don't have a lot of budget to work with. There's this weird effect when Mr. Hyde is there and it didn't make sense at first. It does in the end and I despised it. Partly because it doesn't look good and the other is that it is too ham-fisted in for what they're going for. The rest of the effects from what I could remember were fine including the blood. I know there were some eyes that look fake, but I did like what they do with Mr. Hyde's. The cinematography was fine aside from that.
The last thing to cover I will give the movie credit was for the soundtrack. They have selections that really fit that were in Hong Kong. They're really traditional and just gave it that eastern vibe for sure. Not a score I would listen to regularly, but I had no problems with how it fit into this movie at all.
Now with that said, this movie isn't very good. I was disappointed as I think there are some aspects that could have set this one apart for sure. I like moving it to a new location is one and what changes Dr. Jekyll is another. The problem though is that they bogged the story down with too much that doesn't add anything and I was bored. I don't buy Baldwin as Dr. Jekyll and I don't know why Bastoni is in this movie, but the rest of the cast fit for what was needed. There are some bad effects, but also some that are fine along with the cinematography. The soundtrack fit for what was needed. I can't recommend this one to you though. My rating would be below average for sure.
Like 'Frankenstein, but not in a good way
kgowen-14 May 2008
I never can figure out how turkeys like this get green-lighted by movie studios. Are they that desperate to make money?
I just wasted two hours of my life watching this giant pile of fail. It looked as if Coppola took 3 different movies: a martial arts flick, an east-west cop/buddy pic, and the Jekyll-Hyde story, and tried to stitch them all together Frankenstein-style into one movie. Add some crappy dialogue, cheesy one-liners that fail miserably and hambone acting (everyone in this movie is pretty bad, an Adam Baldwin chews the scenery like a beaver on crack) and the result is a confused, unappealing mess.
Don't waste your time like I did. Watch a good movie instead.
I just wasted two hours of my life watching this giant pile of fail. It looked as if Coppola took 3 different movies: a martial arts flick, an east-west cop/buddy pic, and the Jekyll-Hyde story, and tried to stitch them all together Frankenstein-style into one movie. Add some crappy dialogue, cheesy one-liners that fail miserably and hambone acting (everyone in this movie is pretty bad, an Adam Baldwin chews the scenery like a beaver on crack) and the result is a confused, unappealing mess.
Don't waste your time like I did. Watch a good movie instead.
Doc Jekyll and Kung-Fu Hyde
SylvesterFox00717 August 2005
This is the loosest adaptation of anything I've ever seen. In fact, loose doesn't even begin to describe it. What Sci-Fi has done is taken the title of the Robert Louis Stevenson's novella in order to draw viewers in, and nothing else.
The TV movie follows Dr. Henry Jekyll, now a Beverly Hills plastic surgeon. The entire supporting cast of Stevenson's story, even in name, is nonexistent. Jekyll travels to China with his new bride for a honeymoon. There he encounters Chinese mobsters who maim the doctor, kill his wife, and leave him for revenge.
Up to this point, the movie had potential. An action-adventure vigilante retelling of "The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde" might have been worth seeing. Unfortunately, the movie never even tries to live up to its source material. Dr. Jekyll apprentices himself to a local medicine man and studies martial arts under the name "Edward Hyde." It looks like Sci-Fi had to throw both of those names in there somewhere in order to keep the title. Eventually, in the final third of the movie, Dr. Jekyll does make a medicine that gives him glowing eyes, sharp teeth, and a killer edge. But Stevenson's theme of the struggle between good and evil inside of every man is unexplored. If Sci-Fi was going to take the title, they should have at the very least tried to stay true to the theme. Under the influence of the medicine, Dr. Jekyll is aware, even more aware, of what he is doing. Mr. Hyde is all alias, no altar ego.
The acting performances are solid, but the movie is hard to enjoy when it begs to be compared to its classic source material. Before the halfway point of the movie, the "Based on the book by Robert Louis Stevenson" in the credits seems like a bold-faced lie. If you enjoy American-in-China-kung-fu-action movies, and you have nothing better to watch, try this on for size. If you're looking for an adaptation of "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde", avoid this, or you'll be sorely disappointed.
The TV movie follows Dr. Henry Jekyll, now a Beverly Hills plastic surgeon. The entire supporting cast of Stevenson's story, even in name, is nonexistent. Jekyll travels to China with his new bride for a honeymoon. There he encounters Chinese mobsters who maim the doctor, kill his wife, and leave him for revenge.
Up to this point, the movie had potential. An action-adventure vigilante retelling of "The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde" might have been worth seeing. Unfortunately, the movie never even tries to live up to its source material. Dr. Jekyll apprentices himself to a local medicine man and studies martial arts under the name "Edward Hyde." It looks like Sci-Fi had to throw both of those names in there somewhere in order to keep the title. Eventually, in the final third of the movie, Dr. Jekyll does make a medicine that gives him glowing eyes, sharp teeth, and a killer edge. But Stevenson's theme of the struggle between good and evil inside of every man is unexplored. If Sci-Fi was going to take the title, they should have at the very least tried to stay true to the theme. Under the influence of the medicine, Dr. Jekyll is aware, even more aware, of what he is doing. Mr. Hyde is all alias, no altar ego.
The acting performances are solid, but the movie is hard to enjoy when it begs to be compared to its classic source material. Before the halfway point of the movie, the "Based on the book by Robert Louis Stevenson" in the credits seems like a bold-faced lie. If you enjoy American-in-China-kung-fu-action movies, and you have nothing better to watch, try this on for size. If you're looking for an adaptation of "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde", avoid this, or you'll be sorely disappointed.
Reborn doctor fights drugs with Chinese wisdom
chembai19 December 2001
Ouch, this one sucks big time. Too many plot holes, atrocious acting (if you can call it acting in the first place), rotten one-liners, wisecracking Chicago cop, this film just has no saving grace except some lovely shots of Hong Kong. Take my word, skip it.
Classic plot that went missing amidst Hong Kong action...
Enchorde20 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Recap: Dr Jekyll has just married and he and his beautiful wife has left for Hong Kong on their honeymoon. Apparently random events mix them up with the triads and their organ theft trade. His wife dies but Jekyll is rescued by an old man proficient with the old Chinese medicine. He nurses Jekyll back to life, under the assumed name Edward Hyde, and later tells him that he is part of an ancient Chinese prophecy and battle between good and evil.
Comments: Dr Jekyll and Mr. Hyde vs. Hong Kong action clearly was a knockout victory for the Hong Kong action. The only thing that links this story with the original classic is the names Jekyll and Hyde. The result is almost laughable. Why they try to include the classic theme is beyond me, as it is actually a decent low budget Hong Kong action. If they only had left out the ridiculous names.
Adam Baldwin is a personal favorite since Firefly, and he brings some of the same elements here. He is action with an edge of humor. He is what a movie of this kind needs. Just wait until he gets out of the silly wig/hair extensions.
I'm not quite sure if this was intended as a pilot for a TV series that never materialized or what the writer and director planned. Because the end is one of the worst endings I ever seen. It's not what you might call an open ending that can continue, because the movie just isn't finished at the ending. It's like the production ran out of money three quarters into the movie and just shut down. It's ridiculous. My spontaneous reaction was basically "What the ?" Can't really recommend this to anyone. The end ruins it all, because the silly Jekyll/Hyde reference can be ignored. Otherwise it is decent Hong Kong action.
3/10
Comments: Dr Jekyll and Mr. Hyde vs. Hong Kong action clearly was a knockout victory for the Hong Kong action. The only thing that links this story with the original classic is the names Jekyll and Hyde. The result is almost laughable. Why they try to include the classic theme is beyond me, as it is actually a decent low budget Hong Kong action. If they only had left out the ridiculous names.
Adam Baldwin is a personal favorite since Firefly, and he brings some of the same elements here. He is action with an edge of humor. He is what a movie of this kind needs. Just wait until he gets out of the silly wig/hair extensions.
I'm not quite sure if this was intended as a pilot for a TV series that never materialized or what the writer and director planned. Because the end is one of the worst endings I ever seen. It's not what you might call an open ending that can continue, because the movie just isn't finished at the ending. It's like the production ran out of money three quarters into the movie and just shut down. It's ridiculous. My spontaneous reaction was basically "What the ?" Can't really recommend this to anyone. The end ruins it all, because the silly Jekyll/Hyde reference can be ignored. Otherwise it is decent Hong Kong action.
3/10
CROUCHING MISLEADING/HIDDEN STORY CHANGE
Mitch-3811 May 2002
This film has as much to do with the novel by Robert Louis Stevenson, of the same name, as the Pope has to do with "break dancing." I don't know where the producers scraped up the chutzpah to give it that title, but they have turned the term shameless into an Olympic event.
Those flaws aside, it's not bad. No, it's not GONE WITH THE WIND; but by no means is it a Pauly Shore vehicle, either. It has some good messages (i.e. Drugs bad, Mafia bad, Old people and orphans good, Chinese herbal medicine good, etc.) and a few good moments of action. If they had toned down the violence and had been honest with the title, this film could have made a pretty decent feature for adolescents. Unfortunately, of course, that's not the case. Also, the ending came up so fast and unexpected, I unintentionally laughed.
If you like your story pretty obvious, sprinkled with some so-so attempts at humor, then this is for you. Indulge, just don't tell your neighbors.
Not recommended, unless you've been burgled and that's the only movie they left...and it would be...*sigh*.
Those flaws aside, it's not bad. No, it's not GONE WITH THE WIND; but by no means is it a Pauly Shore vehicle, either. It has some good messages (i.e. Drugs bad, Mafia bad, Old people and orphans good, Chinese herbal medicine good, etc.) and a few good moments of action. If they had toned down the violence and had been honest with the title, this film could have made a pretty decent feature for adolescents. Unfortunately, of course, that's not the case. Also, the ending came up so fast and unexpected, I unintentionally laughed.
If you like your story pretty obvious, sprinkled with some so-so attempts at humor, then this is for you. Indulge, just don't tell your neighbors.
Not recommended, unless you've been burgled and that's the only movie they left...and it would be...*sigh*.
Not exactly good for fans of the original literature and movies, but not bad either
Payback101611 December 2009
Warning: Spoilers
It all starts as your typical Hong Kong supernatural movie, the bad guys known as "The Dragon" seek to kill a person who is known in legend as "the tiger" in fear that he or she may destroy them one day. Along the way they run into Dr. Jekyll and his wife while on vacation. They know of Jekyll's reputation of being a professional chemist and want him to produce their drugs. He of course says no and they blow up his wife while not only leaving him for dead but at the same time framing him for the crime. He is rescued by an ancient Chinese medicine man who teaches him martial arts and the secrets of the medicine. He uses this knowledge to construct a chemical that increases his strength speed as well as change his personality into the revenge hungry Mr. Hyde, who single-handily took out the Dragon gang. It later turns out that he is the Tiger that the gang prophesied about. to me this movie is OK, but that's only a matter of opinion. I still recommend those whom haven't seen it to watch it.
decent entertainment; possibly was intended as a pilot?
FieCrier29 May 2002
Perhaps this was a pilot for a TV series? The ending was left wide open for a sequel; it was an incredibly abrupt ending (not saying more so as not to spoil).
It was entertaining, but not great. The connection to the original story is pretty slight, but I enjoyed the new twist on it.
It was entertaining, but not great. The connection to the original story is pretty slight, but I enjoyed the new twist on it.
At least Coppola doesn't call it "Robert Louis Stevenson's Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde"
Tin Man-526 January 2002
When it comes to interpreting classic horror novels to the silver screen, Francis Ford Coppola is a funny one. Having already directed "Bram Stoker's Dracula" (a bad film) and co-produced "Mary Shelley's Frankenstein" (a good film), it seems only natural that he would try his luck with a version of Robert Louis Stevenson's "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde." Unfortunately, the only thing you'll find in common with Stevenson's mini-novel and this film is the title.
One can only imagine how this funny little film got into production. Coppola must have never even read the script. I imagine his agent gave him a call and said, "Hey, they need an executive producer for another Jekyll and Hyde picture. You've already done Dracula and Frankenstein. Another wouldn't hurt...we could sell them in a three-in-one DVD pack, because we're clever Hollywood marketers. What do you say?" Well, someone got fired over this deal, and I have a feeling that it was Coppola's agent (and quite possibly Adam Baldwin's as well).
Adam Baldwin, judging from his previous work (thankless but well-acted roles in "Independence Day" and "The Patriot"), was an ideal choice to play a young, charismatic Dr. Jekyll in Victorian London. Instead, this treatment gives us a Henry Jekyll who adopts a martial-artist crime fighter secret identity as Mr. Hyde, a being he mutates into (think the Incredible Hulk) after being revived from the dead by a mysterious herb while vacationing with his wife in Hong Kong. He then seeks out to avenge the death of his wife by transforming into Mr. Hyde, kind of like a really ugly caped crusader. Oh yeah, and I forgot to mention that he is the prophesized "White Dragon" or something to that effect, destined to save the world, yadda yadda yadda.
The makers have taken what would have been a mediocre martial artist movie and made it worse by adding the Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde theme, and loosly at that. My question is, who put this thing together? Judging from its low production values, I can only assume that it was originally a made-for-tv, would-be television pilot in the tradition of "Invisible Man," and, when it didn't find a distributor, was dumped on video as a feature film for the sake of Coppola's name. While some of the martial-arist fighting is indeed quite nice, for a cheap production like this, and Adam Baldwin shows potential as a would-be Jekyll and Hyde, I cannot recommend this film on any level. Gothic horror fans will find no Gothic horror, and martial artist fans won't find anything that hasn't already been done better.
To be fair, however, Coppola's previous efforts at Gothic horror have featured deceiving titles: "Bram Stoker's Dracula" had little to do with the Bram Stoker's novel, and "Mary Shelley's Frankenstein" was more an effective homage to it than a literal interpretation. At least he successfully leaves the "Robert Louis Stevenson" out of the title (it might be because he is tired of Stoker's ghost haunting him and he'd rather not take his chances).
Final verdict: C-
*1/2 out of ****
One can only imagine how this funny little film got into production. Coppola must have never even read the script. I imagine his agent gave him a call and said, "Hey, they need an executive producer for another Jekyll and Hyde picture. You've already done Dracula and Frankenstein. Another wouldn't hurt...we could sell them in a three-in-one DVD pack, because we're clever Hollywood marketers. What do you say?" Well, someone got fired over this deal, and I have a feeling that it was Coppola's agent (and quite possibly Adam Baldwin's as well).
Adam Baldwin, judging from his previous work (thankless but well-acted roles in "Independence Day" and "The Patriot"), was an ideal choice to play a young, charismatic Dr. Jekyll in Victorian London. Instead, this treatment gives us a Henry Jekyll who adopts a martial-artist crime fighter secret identity as Mr. Hyde, a being he mutates into (think the Incredible Hulk) after being revived from the dead by a mysterious herb while vacationing with his wife in Hong Kong. He then seeks out to avenge the death of his wife by transforming into Mr. Hyde, kind of like a really ugly caped crusader. Oh yeah, and I forgot to mention that he is the prophesized "White Dragon" or something to that effect, destined to save the world, yadda yadda yadda.
The makers have taken what would have been a mediocre martial artist movie and made it worse by adding the Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde theme, and loosly at that. My question is, who put this thing together? Judging from its low production values, I can only assume that it was originally a made-for-tv, would-be television pilot in the tradition of "Invisible Man," and, when it didn't find a distributor, was dumped on video as a feature film for the sake of Coppola's name. While some of the martial-arist fighting is indeed quite nice, for a cheap production like this, and Adam Baldwin shows potential as a would-be Jekyll and Hyde, I cannot recommend this film on any level. Gothic horror fans will find no Gothic horror, and martial artist fans won't find anything that hasn't already been done better.
To be fair, however, Coppola's previous efforts at Gothic horror have featured deceiving titles: "Bram Stoker's Dracula" had little to do with the Bram Stoker's novel, and "Mary Shelley's Frankenstein" was more an effective homage to it than a literal interpretation. At least he successfully leaves the "Robert Louis Stevenson" out of the title (it might be because he is tired of Stoker's ghost haunting him and he'd rather not take his chances).
Final verdict: C-
*1/2 out of ****
A classic tale of terror
jacobjohntaylor16 October 2015
This a very scary movie. It has great acting. It also has great special effects. It also has great story line. If you do not get scared off this movie then no movie will scary you. Doctor Jekyll's wife his murdered. He wants revenge. He find a chains drug that bring out his inner evil. The is a master masterpiece in terror and revenge. A great horror. Best one one of the best horror books ever. This a very scary movie. The 1912 version is better. The 1920 version is better. The 1932 version is also better. So is the 1941 version. But still this is a great movie. This movie is a must see. Adam Baldwin is a great actor. Steve B.a.s.t.o.n.i
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
