Onna kyûketsuki (1959) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A very confused vampire
sharptongue7 April 2013
Warning: Spoilers
They do things differently in Japan, even vampires. This one transforms by the full moon (perhaps his father was a werewolf), is unaffected by the holy cross (it is worn by a couple of his undead women) and is visible in mirrors. And his doesn't seem a big fan of blood either. In a scene where he and his incompetent evil dwarf create panic in a bar alley, he bites six women on the neck, but tosses them aside immediately.

The first two reviewers seem to have taken this cheapie too seriously. It is grand, silly fun. The vampire hams it up to the hilt, and seems to lack only a loud and villainous evil laugh. He's a snappy dresser too.

The story starts at a birthday party where everyone is on their best behaviour, after going to an exhibition, where a girl finds her mother as a topless model in a painting. But things go downhill after the birthday girl cuts her finger as well as the cake. But though rich, the family has strange stuff going on. Twenty years ago, mother wandered off during a holiday in Kyushu, entranced by a snappily-dressed painter.

Mother doesn't seem to have aged one day in that time, but her husband seems to have aged at least 40 years. I had to check several times who the characters were. Itsuko's mother looks more like her sister, and dad looks like granddad.

Due to the lack of English subtitles, a few details eluded me. For instance, why the vampire didn't bother to bite Itsuko or her mum, and why he dramatically showed his age at the end. But the rest of the story was pretty easy to follow. There is plenty of action, and the pace is brisk. The kabuki section mentioned in another review only lasts a couple of minutes and makes no real difference.

I found the menagerie of wacky characters delightful, even the bald mute muscleman who wielded a blunderbus ! This movie is measurably better than Black Cat Mansion. Relax and get carried along for this ride.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Watched for the second time...
email2amh1 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I picked up a subtitled copy of this film a few years back, and had forgotten ever watching it. I just watched it again (August 2008), and maybe it was somewhat forgettable after all. I know little or nothing about the history of Japanese horror, I just watch whatever old films become available.

I enjoyed the black & white photography, and the modern setting. There just wasn't enough story, and not quite enough classic horror trappings. I didn't mind that this particular vampire borrowed elements of both The Mummy and The Wolfman. The ending was yet another hokey fight scene, with a somewhat unsatisfying death sequence. Also, I did not understand why the moonlight aged the vampire at the end, but I think it had to do with him defiling the family curse.

Worth a look for hardcore classic horror fans, and most interesting due to its 1959 release.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A bit daffy but fun
ebeckstr-116 January 2023
An interesting example of Japanese Western-Gothic horror (the Bloodthirsty Trilogy of the early 70s being arguably the best and most famous example). It's a mashup of the vampire / werewolf legends, with a dude who vamps out under the full moon. It begins with some effectively creepy atmosphere, enters a period of mystery, and becomes an action-horror in the last section. The latter becomes rather silly, with some not very well choreographed or well directed fight/chase scenes. Nonetheless, with a good score and some of the weird, imaginatively illogical narrative sensibilities of a lot of Japanese horror, it is a fun watch.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Atypical Nakagawa
Watuma18 February 2003
You wouldn't know this film was made by Nobuo Nakagawa if the credits didn't say so. Apart from a brief flashback-within-a-flashback, the setting is contemporary, and the director seems at a loss to create tempo, suspense or atmosphere. The visual characteristics honed during his first three ghost films are almost completely absent - no lateral tracking shots, no lengthy takes, no dimming light levels. There's only one spooky sequence (a servant carrying a candle through a darkened house, responding to a summons from a room that's been unoccupied 20 years), and a small handful of innovatively-filmed shots (all involving mirrors). Particularly disappointing is the climax - far too drawn out and very clumsily edited.

Despite all these drawbacks, there are a few points worth noting. This was the first Japanese horror movie to be set in modern times. It was also the first film made in that country to feature a vampire as the protagonist, although this vampire is very different from the Western type. Finally, much of the film has the same rather tawdry look as the cheap monochrome shockers produced in Europe during the early sixties, such as Seddok and Lycanthropus, which is remarkable, considering it was made in 1958.

Vampire Woman is certainly an atypical entry in Nakagawa's filmography around this time.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed