This is a 10-minute short film from Danmark that won writer and director Anders Thomas Jensen an Academy Award. It was his third consecutive nomination (although he was only in his 20s back then) and finally he took home the prize. After that, he worked on some of the most famous Danish films in recent years, but also on internationally successful projects such as "The Duchess". This year he has another pretty known film coming out: "Men & Chicken" starring Mads Mikkelsen who is among Denmark's acting elite right now. Speaking about that, so is Ulrich Thomsen and he plays the central character in this short film. While in a pub, he realizes that he forgot to vote and hurries to get his vote in on time. Unfortunately, on the way he meets all kinds of racist taxi drivers and when he finally sits in a car with an Arab or Turkish driver, even this one makes such remarks, about Asians this time. That restaurant, Pearl Harbor, Winter Games reference was possibly the funniest part of the film. Of course, it was also offensive, but somehow it was also entertaining. So, will our hero make it in time to vote? See for yourself. I can only say that this is a pretty good short film with an interesting twist at the end. It's the society and the people we interact with that shape us. Thumbs up for this short movie. Recommended.
12 Reviews
Election Night is a Worthy Film, Despite Not Being Outstanding In Any Way. Its Simple, Short and Gets Across Its Point, And That's It.
sashank_kini-124 July 2012
Warning: Spoilers
A young man named Peter enters a bar and finds a morose friend drinking in the presence of a barman. He has sent 2000 blanket to Albania and he enthusiastically avers this to his friend, who takes it indifferently. In the next few shots, Peter and his friend argue over the latter's refusal to drink anything Mexican and Peter doesn't stop here – he even accuses the barman for 'initiating' racism by keeping such customers. His friend says that the barman has voted for the socialists, and this reminds Peter that he himself has forgotten to vote. The chap frantically calls for a cab to take him to the booth, and encounters an acrimonious driver (who looks Mexican) who can't stop railing blacks, Turks and Arabs.
After a heated exchange, he gets out and takes another cab, this time with an opinionated German who seemingly believes in white supremacy. The third driver seems alright (he is an Arab) until he notices a joint previously selling kebabs being replaced by a sushi store. Peter finds it far easier to run it down to the booth without listening to all the racist remarks, not directed at him but at a different race. He reaches the place just to be stopped by a lady (who is black) disallowing him from entering. In an effort to change her mind, Peter tells her he is voting for 'her people'. The tables turn on him as not only is he called a racist, but he is also punched by a white man who uses a derogatory word while 'defending' the lady. Finally, the worn down man reenters the bar to quaff up a Carlsberg instead of the Mexican drink.
Election Night isn't anywhere as great as the delightful Lunch Date or the wicked Black Rider. It doesn't have two themes running concurrently as in Lunch Date where we assume we are watching a movie about racism only to be smacked in the head at the end or in Black Rider where the title itself can be interpreted in two ways. It's more simple and straightforward, but there is enough humor to make it a worthwhile short. I do wish it were about a minute or two longer and the scenes with the cab drivers more extended. Good moments: the song choice (it starts with Ella Fitzgerald), some crisp dialogs and some humor. Bloopers (though I usually don't mention them): during the scene in the first cab, while we see the camera panning the driver's face and also see the back of the rear view mirror, we can't see Peter sitting behind even though he is clearly in the center space in the shots including both the characters.
We live in a very funny world: on own hand, my father thinks says the whole of Pakistan should be eradicated from earth while on the other he can't help watching an Indian comedy show that mainly features Pakistanis! So I know there's nothing in Election Night that seems ridiculous. But it didn't have anything outstanding either. My Rating: 6.3 out of 10
After a heated exchange, he gets out and takes another cab, this time with an opinionated German who seemingly believes in white supremacy. The third driver seems alright (he is an Arab) until he notices a joint previously selling kebabs being replaced by a sushi store. Peter finds it far easier to run it down to the booth without listening to all the racist remarks, not directed at him but at a different race. He reaches the place just to be stopped by a lady (who is black) disallowing him from entering. In an effort to change her mind, Peter tells her he is voting for 'her people'. The tables turn on him as not only is he called a racist, but he is also punched by a white man who uses a derogatory word while 'defending' the lady. Finally, the worn down man reenters the bar to quaff up a Carlsberg instead of the Mexican drink.
Election Night isn't anywhere as great as the delightful Lunch Date or the wicked Black Rider. It doesn't have two themes running concurrently as in Lunch Date where we assume we are watching a movie about racism only to be smacked in the head at the end or in Black Rider where the title itself can be interpreted in two ways. It's more simple and straightforward, but there is enough humor to make it a worthwhile short. I do wish it were about a minute or two longer and the scenes with the cab drivers more extended. Good moments: the song choice (it starts with Ella Fitzgerald), some crisp dialogs and some humor. Bloopers (though I usually don't mention them): during the scene in the first cab, while we see the camera panning the driver's face and also see the back of the rear view mirror, we can't see Peter sitting behind even though he is clearly in the center space in the shots including both the characters.
We live in a very funny world: on own hand, my father thinks says the whole of Pakistan should be eradicated from earth while on the other he can't help watching an Indian comedy show that mainly features Pakistanis! So I know there's nothing in Election Night that seems ridiculous. But it didn't have anything outstanding either. My Rating: 6.3 out of 10
Clever without being preachy but it ended on a slightly sour note
planktonrules23 February 2008
Warning: Spoilers
ELECTION NIGHT is a clever film about racism. The film begins with a man meeting a friend at a bar. When the friend says on off-hand racist remark, the first man confronts him instead of sitting silently. While almost impossible to believe, the first man then realizes that the election is being held and he forgot to vote--and runs to the polls before they close. On the way, again and again, he gets in cabs where the drivers are total racist pigs and are amazed that he's offended--as if everyone of "us" is in agreement about "them". This is an interesting idea and didn't come off as too preachy.
When he finally did arrive at the polling station, there was a very ironic little twist that made the film and made me think of the saying "no good deed goes unpunished". The only sour note to the film was the very last scene in the bar--it was really impossible to believe that this one incident at the poll could change such a good man so quickly. Still, it was a very clever and interesting film.
By the way, this film is part of the CINEMA 16: European Shorts DVD. On this DVD are 16 shorts. Most aren't great, though because it contains THE MAN WITHOUT A HEAD, COPY SHOP, RABBIT and WASP, it's an amazing DVD for lovers of short films and well worth buying.
When he finally did arrive at the polling station, there was a very ironic little twist that made the film and made me think of the saying "no good deed goes unpunished". The only sour note to the film was the very last scene in the bar--it was really impossible to believe that this one incident at the poll could change such a good man so quickly. Still, it was a very clever and interesting film.
By the way, this film is part of the CINEMA 16: European Shorts DVD. On this DVD are 16 shorts. Most aren't great, though because it contains THE MAN WITHOUT A HEAD, COPY SHOP, RABBIT and WASP, it's an amazing DVD for lovers of short films and well worth buying.
A darkly comic short that makes interesting points on a complex issue
bob the moo30 July 2004
It is election night in Denmark and the polls are close to closing. With a busy day behind him sending off blankets to war-torn countries, Peter has completely forgotten to vote and, being a very socially conscious citizen he sets out to try and get to the polls before they close. However he abandons his first taxi after he encounters racist views that he does not want to hear but then he doesn't have a great deal of luck trying anything else.
This is a great little short film that deals with a complex and difficult issue racism, or rather the way we have of looking at people differently on the basis of their skin colour or ethnic origin. In a way I'm sure this film is more meaningful in Denmark than it is in other places because many films will capture the spirit of the nation as well as wider issues (many good British plays etc are very much set in the British experience) but I still got something from this despite not being a Dane! The film starts us off with a clear cut case of racism few of us would support the taxi driver's views. However it then gets progressively more subtle and wide spread until Peter himself reveals himself to see others differently ('I doing it for you people' he tells the black employee). At this point we realize the point of the film what is racism? What is acceptable forms of it and don't we all, regardless of colour, treat people a bit differently based on colour, dress, class etc?
The film does not propose to answer these questions or offer solutions but rather just challenges us and leaves us to make our own minds up. In this way I appreciated it it ends with a comic moment as Peter just slumps into accepting the world for what it is, but this is a mature way to leave it, not banging a drum but simply putting this situation out there and letting us see it for the complex issue that it is.
A great short that is simple but very well written. The cast deliver their characters well but it is the steps down in behaviour that compares and contrasts 'racist' behaviour where it succeeds in showing us how complex the issue is and how wide spread it is, even if we don't see it we all do view others differently depending on their jobs, their race, their accent, their intelligence, their colour, their class, their clothes etc. That the film offers no solutions to this is not a failing it is responsible and respectful.
This is a great little short film that deals with a complex and difficult issue racism, or rather the way we have of looking at people differently on the basis of their skin colour or ethnic origin. In a way I'm sure this film is more meaningful in Denmark than it is in other places because many films will capture the spirit of the nation as well as wider issues (many good British plays etc are very much set in the British experience) but I still got something from this despite not being a Dane! The film starts us off with a clear cut case of racism few of us would support the taxi driver's views. However it then gets progressively more subtle and wide spread until Peter himself reveals himself to see others differently ('I doing it for you people' he tells the black employee). At this point we realize the point of the film what is racism? What is acceptable forms of it and don't we all, regardless of colour, treat people a bit differently based on colour, dress, class etc?
The film does not propose to answer these questions or offer solutions but rather just challenges us and leaves us to make our own minds up. In this way I appreciated it it ends with a comic moment as Peter just slumps into accepting the world for what it is, but this is a mature way to leave it, not banging a drum but simply putting this situation out there and letting us see it for the complex issue that it is.
A great short that is simple but very well written. The cast deliver their characters well but it is the steps down in behaviour that compares and contrasts 'racist' behaviour where it succeeds in showing us how complex the issue is and how wide spread it is, even if we don't see it we all do view others differently depending on their jobs, their race, their accent, their intelligence, their colour, their class, their clothes etc. That the film offers no solutions to this is not a failing it is responsible and respectful.
The third time is the time of luck...
Mulle-322 March 1999
The Oscar-winning Danish short-film of Kim Magnusson and Anders Thomas Jensen is their third short-film to be nominated to an Oscar. It is, as always, an ironic film about a very heavy subject. The Danish mentality is the keyword in this fantastic short-film. Don´t miss it for anything in the world.
once a warning, it's now reality
lee_eisenberg3 December 2017
Anders Thomas Jensen's Oscar-winning "Valgaften" ("Election Night" in English) is about prejudices and how people will often vote based on these. Well, sure enough it came true. The current president of the US ran an entire campaign pandering to everyone's prejudices, and now those sorts of people are making inroads in Europe's governments. Could this in fact be the end of civilization as we know it?
I haven't seen any of the other movies that got nominated for Best Live Action Short Film that year. They'd be hard-pressed to make as good a point as this one made. It might not be the greatest short of all time, but I recommend it as a warning of what can happen when people's base instincts manifest themselves. Worth seeing.
I haven't seen any of the other movies that got nominated for Best Live Action Short Film that year. They'd be hard-pressed to make as good a point as this one made. It might not be the greatest short of all time, but I recommend it as a warning of what can happen when people's base instincts manifest themselves. Worth seeing.
The kind of comedy that draws a sharp laugh with a short gasp and a bubble of blood at the corner of the mouth
llltdesq6 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This short won the Academy Award for Live Action Short. There will be spoilers ahead:
This short concerns a man named Peter, an aid worker for a relief organization who realizes that he's forgotten to vote on election night. This is after he chastises two friends in a bar over what he takes to be racist comments, because, in my view, he's an overly sensitive clod. With the polls closing in 20 minutes he races out to vote, hopping in a cab.
The cab driver is absolutely and with no apologies a racist and his comments definitely offend Peter, who argues with the driver and then demands he stop the cab because he no longer wishes to stay and listen to those kinds of remarks-even though he's losing precious time.
Peter then encounters a few other drivers, all of whom make remarks he deems (with some justice in most cases) as objectionable, one of them a spectacularly funny rant by a foreign driver about kebab being replaced by a sushi place and the Japanese! Mr. Sensitivity finally reaches the polling place and tries to get in but is told he's too late by a black poll worker. He pleads for her to let him come in and makes a remark that, had he heard someone else say it, he would have called them a racist, which is just what the poll worker says he is and he's accosted by a man who says something outrageous in challenging him on his behavior and then punches him.
The short ends with Peter making his way back to the bar and sitting down with the two he called "racist" in the beginning.. I take the ending as an indication that he's been given food for thought and maybe he won't be quite so quick to judge in the future.
This short is well worth tracking down. Most recommended.
This short concerns a man named Peter, an aid worker for a relief organization who realizes that he's forgotten to vote on election night. This is after he chastises two friends in a bar over what he takes to be racist comments, because, in my view, he's an overly sensitive clod. With the polls closing in 20 minutes he races out to vote, hopping in a cab.
The cab driver is absolutely and with no apologies a racist and his comments definitely offend Peter, who argues with the driver and then demands he stop the cab because he no longer wishes to stay and listen to those kinds of remarks-even though he's losing precious time.
Peter then encounters a few other drivers, all of whom make remarks he deems (with some justice in most cases) as objectionable, one of them a spectacularly funny rant by a foreign driver about kebab being replaced by a sushi place and the Japanese! Mr. Sensitivity finally reaches the polling place and tries to get in but is told he's too late by a black poll worker. He pleads for her to let him come in and makes a remark that, had he heard someone else say it, he would have called them a racist, which is just what the poll worker says he is and he's accosted by a man who says something outrageous in challenging him on his behavior and then punches him.
The short ends with Peter making his way back to the bar and sitting down with the two he called "racist" in the beginning.. I take the ending as an indication that he's been given food for thought and maybe he won't be quite so quick to judge in the future.
This short is well worth tracking down. Most recommended.
Maybe ahead of its time.
Valjean_dk24 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I just re-watched this great short film. And I have a new interpretation of it. I'll admit to being a bit of a Anders Thomas Jensen fanboy, as I love his humor.
A year or two ago, I ran into the new term "virtue signaling". For the uninitiated: "Virtue signaling is the expression or promotion of viewpoints that are especially valued within a society, especially when this is done primarily to enhance the social standing of the speaker." This is often seen when a person labels and shames someone else for "wrongthink". Being racist, sexist, homophobic etc. Often for things that are completely innocent, or rather mild.
I see the main character as virtue signaling. Already early on, he labels his friend a racist, because he doesn't want to drink Mexican beer. Thus attempting to shame his friend, and showing how virtuous he himself is. He continues in this vein, though with more reason, as he refuses cab-rides, because he finds the opinions of various cabdrivers objectionable. Thus he ends up traveling by foot, and fails to complete his original goal, of getting his vote cast, before polling closes.
In an ironic twist, and perhaps a bit of karma, he himself gets labeled a racist, and physically assaulted.
My possible interpretations are that people who are busy labeling and judging others, maybe should spend some time examining themselves.
That being quick to judge people, and take offense, may well condemn people unfairly, for no reason, or for being verbally clumsy. And miss examining a persons actual opinions and intentions.
In the end, the main character asks for the local beer brand, rather than the Mexican beer. Does that mean that he actually wanted the local beer all along, and he learned that pretending to like something else, to signal his virtue as tolerant and multicultural, really wasn't worthwhile?
Or is it the more sinister interpretation, that he becomes jaded, gives up on his ideals, and tries to fit in?
Virtue signaling as a concept may be new, but the underlying mechanism is age-old. Pretending to be something you are not, to gain status.
To quote Tycho Brahe: "non haberi sed esse" A notion that can be found in many variations, and far back in time.
A year or two ago, I ran into the new term "virtue signaling". For the uninitiated: "Virtue signaling is the expression or promotion of viewpoints that are especially valued within a society, especially when this is done primarily to enhance the social standing of the speaker." This is often seen when a person labels and shames someone else for "wrongthink". Being racist, sexist, homophobic etc. Often for things that are completely innocent, or rather mild.
I see the main character as virtue signaling. Already early on, he labels his friend a racist, because he doesn't want to drink Mexican beer. Thus attempting to shame his friend, and showing how virtuous he himself is. He continues in this vein, though with more reason, as he refuses cab-rides, because he finds the opinions of various cabdrivers objectionable. Thus he ends up traveling by foot, and fails to complete his original goal, of getting his vote cast, before polling closes.
In an ironic twist, and perhaps a bit of karma, he himself gets labeled a racist, and physically assaulted.
My possible interpretations are that people who are busy labeling and judging others, maybe should spend some time examining themselves.
That being quick to judge people, and take offense, may well condemn people unfairly, for no reason, or for being verbally clumsy. And miss examining a persons actual opinions and intentions.
In the end, the main character asks for the local beer brand, rather than the Mexican beer. Does that mean that he actually wanted the local beer all along, and he learned that pretending to like something else, to signal his virtue as tolerant and multicultural, really wasn't worthwhile?
Or is it the more sinister interpretation, that he becomes jaded, gives up on his ideals, and tries to fit in?
Virtue signaling as a concept may be new, but the underlying mechanism is age-old. Pretending to be something you are not, to gain status.
To quote Tycho Brahe: "non haberi sed esse" A notion that can be found in many variations, and far back in time.
a challenging, provocative work
LunarPoise10 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I enjoyed Election Night the first time I saw it and laughed out loud at times. It is a film I recommend to people and that I have watched again. However, a sober re-viewing of this film made my laughter stick in my throat. It is a provocative piece, with a message that perhaps the filmmakers themselves did not intend, and for that reason I recommend viewing, but do not endorse the message in Election Night.
An Aid Agency worker, Peter, leaves a bar to try and reach the polling station to vote. His castigation of his friend and the barman in the opening scene reveal his humanitarian, multicultural leanings. His condemnation of racists is clear and concise.
What follows is his quest to vote in the election, and like all quest tales, the valiant hero faces a series of ever-more difficult challenges to achieve his goal. Utlimately, as befits a tale based on a protagonist out to accomplish a mission, the final test is to identify and overcome a weakness in his own character. For Peter, it is the revelation that he is just as capable of racist sentiments as the next man. And this is where the film starts to veer off-course. Peter is punished for his weakness by a punch in the nose, delivered by a character who reveals the complexity of attitudes to race by his confused comments. I do not doubt that the reasons for taking the narrative in this direction are to do with fulfilling the structural demands of cinematic storytelling, and are not the result of the filmmakers wish to make an anti-liberal statement.
However, the effect is one and the same. Humbled, defeated, Peter returns to the bar and symbolically, through his apathetic lies and rejection of foreign beer, 'converts' to the other side. Sure, this pathetic wretch toasting his Danishness at the end is funny, but it means the end note of the film is, 'Don't try to be tolerant, it isn't worth it and the recipients don't appreciate it anyway.'
I don't think this is reading too much into the film. The co-opting of Peter to the racist side at the end means the film endorses (I am sure unintentionally) the views of Peter's bar friend at the beginning - that attempting to understand and sympathize with other cultures and peoples just isn't worth the bother.
This is a film well worth watching, especially in culture studies classes as a primer for discussion. But try to think, as you watch, who you are laughing with, and who you are laughing at. And at what point do you cross the line?
An Aid Agency worker, Peter, leaves a bar to try and reach the polling station to vote. His castigation of his friend and the barman in the opening scene reveal his humanitarian, multicultural leanings. His condemnation of racists is clear and concise.
What follows is his quest to vote in the election, and like all quest tales, the valiant hero faces a series of ever-more difficult challenges to achieve his goal. Utlimately, as befits a tale based on a protagonist out to accomplish a mission, the final test is to identify and overcome a weakness in his own character. For Peter, it is the revelation that he is just as capable of racist sentiments as the next man. And this is where the film starts to veer off-course. Peter is punished for his weakness by a punch in the nose, delivered by a character who reveals the complexity of attitudes to race by his confused comments. I do not doubt that the reasons for taking the narrative in this direction are to do with fulfilling the structural demands of cinematic storytelling, and are not the result of the filmmakers wish to make an anti-liberal statement.
However, the effect is one and the same. Humbled, defeated, Peter returns to the bar and symbolically, through his apathetic lies and rejection of foreign beer, 'converts' to the other side. Sure, this pathetic wretch toasting his Danishness at the end is funny, but it means the end note of the film is, 'Don't try to be tolerant, it isn't worth it and the recipients don't appreciate it anyway.'
I don't think this is reading too much into the film. The co-opting of Peter to the racist side at the end means the film endorses (I am sure unintentionally) the views of Peter's bar friend at the beginning - that attempting to understand and sympathize with other cultures and peoples just isn't worth the bother.
This is a film well worth watching, especially in culture studies classes as a primer for discussion. But try to think, as you watch, who you are laughing with, and who you are laughing at. And at what point do you cross the line?
Short Humerous movie about racism at multiple levels
vskov23 February 1999
A man has forgotten to vote, 10 minutes before closing the polls, he takes a cab but The Taxi-driver turn him on with racist comments, he change to others cabs - but the same situation occurs.
Humorous short movie, that indicate that intolerance is found at many levels.
Humorous short movie, that indicate that intolerance is found at many levels.
Racism, it never changes
mmuggi18 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Two years since Anders Thomas Jensen's debut with Ernst & Lyset, he is behind another short film. I know there has been a short film between the two, but I still have it to my advantage.
Here he shows qualities with several actors, including a couple of really solid perfomances from Ulrich Thomsen and the always glorious Ole Thestrup (Rest in Peace).
As always in Anders Thomas Jensen's film, he has a comment on almost everything, this time it goes beyond the democratic election. For racism does not really go far beyond democracy, and is racism only for white fat men in a pub. The answer comes in this humorous short film.
Here he shows qualities with several actors, including a couple of really solid perfomances from Ulrich Thomsen and the always glorious Ole Thestrup (Rest in Peace).
As always in Anders Thomas Jensen's film, he has a comment on almost everything, this time it goes beyond the democratic election. For racism does not really go far beyond democracy, and is racism only for white fat men in a pub. The answer comes in this humorous short film.
great simplicity
Kirpianuscus1 May 2021
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
