The Rose Seller (1998) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A portrait of the misery in the streets of Colombia
Brahms12 January 1999
This is a movie that shows the life of a little girl who sells flowers in the streets of Medellin, Colombia. The violence, the drugs, the misery, are his partners every day.

The movie is good, made with kids of the streets, there are no real actors here. The pain in the eyes of the kids is real.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The sewers of society...
rainking_es11 February 2007
Victor Gaviria went into a suicide project with this "La vendedora de rosas": he tried to create a fiction using some kids that live in the streets of Medellín, he used them as actors, and that's quite a risky task since they're not boy scouts precisely. These are children that were born right in the sewer, most of them haven't a father or a mother, they steal, they kill, they prostitute... Their only escape is to sniff some glue, maybe because that way they can forget about the fact that no one gives a sh*t about them. The movie is so brutal and shocking, and it becomes more terrifying when you realize that fiction can never be compare to reality.

OK, the kids probe that they were worth the confidence Gaviria put on them. They played themselves, but that ain't as easy as it might look. Just try and play yourselves in front of a camera... Ridiculous, aren't you? And that's the biggest achievement of the Colombian director: he managed to get those kids acting very naturally, just like there wasn't no cameras in front of them.

"La Vendedora de Rosas" is a song to discouragement, to the horror of seeing young boys living in the tips of society, breathing the cruelty of the urban jungle. No moral, no principles, 'cause nobody has teach them such things. That's the way things are in our planet Earth, and that's the way Gaviria shows it.

*My rate: 8/10
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A True Eye Opener
sal1085119 May 2013
This film is by no means easy to watch. It depicts the true side of 3rd world poverty in the streets of Colombia. Most of the actors used on the film came from the streets of Medellin. It is a very raw and eye opening film. Most of the acting was not really acting at all but a day in the everyday life of these people. At least 8 of the actors were murdered shortly after the films release and the lead actress in prison for murder. For a glimpse of the true life in the streets of Medellin look no further. I gave this film an 8 out of 10 due mostly to the accuracy of the story it depicts. It is definitely not a film for the lighthearted.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
This film follows the lives of several street children living in Colombia with an emphasis on two girls Monica and Judy.
moviemomom11 June 2005
This is not a movie to entertain, it is meant to open the viewer's eyes to the "invisible" world of homeless children in Latin America. This is more a documentary than a film but the plot, based loosely on Han Christian Anderson's "The Match Stick Girl," is strong and compelling. Painful to watch at times, it is meant to be disturbing. Which is why I can say it I liked it and I recommend it, even though it haunted me and robbed me of sleep and I don't believe I will ever see it again.

These young people survive in the streets with no supervision and no one to provide for them, yet they are still going through the same tumultuous problems of the average teen; boyfriend-girlfriend troubles, gossip, friendship betrayal, and so on...and they cope with all their problems by sniffing glue. With the effects of the glue showing itself in these children one scene after the other it can seem to be too much as the plot begins to come together.

It is my understanding that the majority of the children were not actors but real street kids, and although the plot was scripted by the filmmaker the children were just being themselves, showing us a voyeuristic peek into their lives. And on a more disturbing note; none of these children have survived the street.

This incredible film is a must see for anyone interested in film as more than entertainment.
16 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
one word: realistic
maorojas20 July 2003
Some people in Colombia didn't like this movie because it shows the sad reality of the children in the streets, and because there are no professional actors playing the roles of these children but actually homeless kids. Make no mistake, this is a powerful film and no trained actor would touch your heart the way these kids do. The story is, of course, dark, violent and lacking a happy ending, but that's the kind of life the youth endures in the harsh Colombian streets.
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A window into the lives of Colombia's street girls.
cineman217 October 2002
La Vendedora de Rosas is a companion piece to Victor Gaviria's 1990 Rodrigo D:no futuro, about the lives of street boys from Medellin,Colombia. Vendedora focuses on girls equally affected by poverty, ignorance, abuse and neglect. It earns a place next to Mira Nair's Salaam Bombay and Hector Babenco's Pixote, excellent urban youth films in the tradition of Bunuel's Los Olvidados. Vendedora does not shy away from depicting the effects of drugs, violence, and family dysfunction while allowing for brief moments of tenderness and solidarity, even joy. Gaviria has enlisted street kids in enacting events from their daily lives, during 48 hours preceding Christmas. The film refuses to cheapen their plight with plot contrivances or stylistic flourishes. The spanish spoken is specific to the youth of Medellin, a welcome challenge to most native speakers. The fate of the characters evolves naturally from earlier scenes, without being predictable. I recommend La Vendedora de Rosas to anybody who considers film a window to the world of folks we wouldn't otherwise be able to access and an opportunity to understand it.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
amazed and melancholy
corrinne-113 February 2006
i came upon this film @ the library and comparing the film to the summary given, i was literally taken aback. We are immediately thrown into the fast paced, distracting and intense urban climate in which these children survive. I had some difficulty reading the subtitles and absorbing the story, for the children speak quickly and move swiftly (minus the glue huffing). At times I was questioning whether this film could be part documentary , part true story. the child actors are comfortable around and maturely aware of the camera, their deft improv dialog feels habitual and routine, as if they have and do live this lifestyle. Reminiscent of "CHildren Underground", this film will call to your heart and your curiosity. It amazes me how the children narrowly escape havoc or ruin with every step.

Bravo to this powerful film.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A hard-core portrait of life in the streets of Medellin
andrescaicedo1 August 2000
If you get offended easily I don't recommend this movie. If you like your movies with happy endings, you shouldn't watch this film. In the tradition of "Pixote" and "Kids", "La vendedora de Rosas" shows the reality and (hallucinations) of children, who grow up in the street, survive in the street and die in the streets. It features an array of indigent pre-pubescent kids doing an insane amount of drugs, prostituting themselves and living with/killing each other. The movie features no real actors. All the kids are playing themselves. Today, Colombian media reported that one of the actresses featured in the movie was found dead. She is the second actor who has died since the movie was released. I like the movie because it presents reality as is. It doesn't pretend to give us solutions or even explain why those kids have live the way they do. It's unflinching and more real than anything committed to film before or since.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The hard life for homeless kids in the streets of Medellín
laperamala19 November 2007
The way Gaviria works with his natural actors and actresses, made it possible to recreate, with real life homeless kids, the way of living in the street for those who life didn't give a chance. This film has the power to show the crudeness of the Medellín streets and its habitants without taking position, or judging, but also without having innocents, because, in a way, we are all part of it. Gaviria's most important characteristic is how he manage to enter deeply into the world of the ones who are placed aside, without contaminating their version of life, getting this people to talk and "confess" the things they have had to pass through, with the most sincere and professional investigation.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A Pointless Exercise
albert-wayne26 July 2005
Classic Colombian film, and as such, filled with an inherent arrogance. The film which was nothing but gold to critics is one of the most pointless film proposals I've ever seen.

This 1998 film starts off with the now boring Pulp Fiction Original idea of setting up several stories within the same context and the same characters, however, being this a film made in my country, Colombia, the whole story is pointless beyond shoving down the audience throat the fact that we live in a vicious place.

What's the conclusion of the film, violence, the whole film can be summed up with that single word. The only attempt to explore a characters mind is to the main character, with one of the most repeated ideas ever, the mother ghost, plus, we are remembered over, and over, and over that she misses her mother, we get it, move on, tell me more, but besides the abusive use of this idea, there's really nothing else deep going on. The other characters are basically just cartoons of a very serious issue, the product of ignored poverty.

A bunch of "puff the magic dragon" kids is not art, it's not anything. The film only manages to create a scary context, but it remains as such, the film is all context, no story here, the film does not teach me anything, imagine the film as Natural Born Killers, only with a Mickey and Mallory that never philosophize, or learn anything, or do anything but get high and bully other people, with almost every line being loaded with profanity.

Colombian filmmakers have made this "works of arts" for decades now, I'm sick of it. I'm a Colombian filmmaker myself, and it burns me to see that the only stories done here are about poor drug addicts, and hookers, and hit men. There's more to this country than that, and even if you want to do a story about poor people, you can give it meaning, an important message, something, I can see that the situation is bad by just looking up at the statistics, which is what this film basically does, show the statistics only with actors.

Rodrigo D:No Futuro had the same problems, it's no trick to show poor people cursing and doing bad stuff. I would like to propose examples of movies that have used similar characters and story lines and really accomplished something. The most clear example is Amores Perros(the Mexican Pulp Fiction), the film is not only technically superior, but also develops it's characters with much more maturity, and the film says something at the end(of every storyline).

Gangs of New York is(believe it or not) similar, a look at the most miserable places of a city, and yet look at it, the film has a huge point to it. Taxi Driver, another film that explores urban decadence, and boy does it make a strong statement.

Point is La Vendedora De Rosas only works as a gratuitous look at violence and urban decadence, a film that constructs an world with empty people inside, and if that was the point of the film, the shame on the makers, to say poor people are empty. Bottom line, this film only works for the sick curiosity of those who don't know squad about my country.

A much more objective and accurate view was ironically made by a US writer director, the guy who made Maria Full of Grace, that film really does capture the essence of my country, not Vendedora De Rosas. Now, some might call me elitist, and argue that since I'm Colombian but not poor, I can't give my view, well as I said before, I'm a filmmaker, and have studied the behavior of poor people here, and it's nowhere near the mental masturbation of Victor Gaviria(maker of Vendedora...).

For all of those who though that this film was a very realistic approach, it's a blatant cartoon that is based on it's shock factor from the vicious people shown in the film, in order to impress simple minded audiences.

A must-miss, trust me.
12 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"¿Para que zapatos si no hay comida?".
M_Knox16 September 1998
The movie does not show the whole country's way of living, but it shows the part some people would like to hide.

It is loaded with a lot of coursing and everything that could be considered as an unhealthy way of living, but in between all that descriptive stuff, it shows us the human side of those people.

One thing I liked a lot was the use of natural actors. The director and producer did the tough job of working with real life characters, so, everyone in the movie is just doing what he/she does in his regular life.

It tells us the story of Monica (a homeless teenage girl) who every day is fighting for her life in the scenario of an unsane capitalist world. It shows how her friends, who are mostly preteen prostitutes, muggers and hitmen are also human beings who deserve to live. Violence taking place everywhere, alcoholism, and drug addiction are just a small part of what living in the streets really means. Meanwhile, Monica takes care of Andrea, a cute little run away from home girl who is saved from many dangers because of Monica's astonishing maternal instinct.

As it is said by Seth in "City of Angels" : "Some things are real whether you believe in them or not".

The quote in the title is said by a child (one of Monica's friends) while he is inhaling some cheap glue with which homeless kids use to get high. It means : "Why should I want any shoes, if anyway I have no food?"
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Prepare a tissue and face reality with fantasy
freya-politologa17 April 2016
"La vendedora de rosas" (the rose seller) is a story inspired by Hans-Christian Andersen's "The little match girl". I cried because of the end but is the harsh reality of a country where children in slums suffer the most. So, if based in Andersen's, the end is predictable, but very good adapted to Colombian reality and not exclusive from this country. Any child in any slum might have the same fate, but also faces that fate with imagination, and that's where the fairy tale gets in.

This movie used natural actors, same as the "Slumdog millionaire", and I think Victor Gaviria used the fairy tale adaptation to make it more universal and more poetic. Once you leave the screen, you feel lucky you can pay a movie ticket, but also you believe you can do something better for your own children, and those children outside the theater begging for a meal.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Unflinching observation of abandoned youth
YellowManReanimated15 November 2021
From the original Edison shorts, through to Dziga Vertov's Man With a Movie Camera, onto Italian Neo-realism and beyond, there has been a long-standing fascination with cinema's ability to represent reality. Naturally, special effects and highly-stylised cinematography have their place but the way in which cinema has been able to reveal and represent the finer details of everyday experience is something which has always enriched the artform.

La Vendedora de Rosas is an exponent of this quality. It films the barrios of Medellín, Colombia, in a manner which makes you feel as if you have experienced them directly. The film is, for the most part, completely non-judgemental, it merely gives us an extended glimpse of a reality which is likely very different to our own. It unflinchingly shows domestic violence, child-prostitution, street gang violence, juvenile delinquency, drug-taking and more. The camera is used as an open gaze: after each fight, verbal insult, or sexual advance made towards a minor, the film simply continues onto the next scene. The message clearly communicated is that what we are witnessing is simply normal life for the characters involved. They may be children but their lives are anything but innocent.

The film's value doesn't just lie in its verisimilitude, although it is worth noting that all of the actors were non-professionals and lived lives very similar to those represented in the film, it also strikes a chord because of how naturalistic and touching the central performances are, particularly Lady Tabares, who plays Mónica the eponymous rose seller. She is a young girl who left her family home seemingly due to not being able to come to terms with the death of her grandmother. Her grandmother appears to be the only person in her life who played a genuinely nurturing role and she is represented as a figure of angelic, redemptive quality in the short and subtle fantasy scenes which occur in the film and act as a departure from its generally more naturalistic style. The fact that Mónica feels that her life requires redemption tells us a great deal about her character: she is living the life that she feels forced to live, she has not chosen to enter a world of drug-taking and delinquency (who would?) she has fallen into it. Sadly, it seems very unlikely that she will be able to escape it.

The film does, unfortunately, verge on melodrama in the final act, which is a misjudgement in my view, but, for the most part, its unblinking representation of a world which offers constant threat and very little hope is one which is as eye-opening as it is stark. This is a film which, as much as any other, is able to capture the reality of the world that many inhabit. It's not just engaging cinema, it's a cultural and social education.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
I liked this movie.
sbekam26 September 2002
I enjoyed this movie and I think it was well done for us who don't really know what is happening outside our world. It reminded me of Mira Nair's movie Salaam Bombay and likewise depicted the lives of small children living in the street. I do recommend it to others.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
natural, refreshing, heart-breaking
beto-98 October 1998
A heart-breaking urban tale that makes optimal use of natural actors and improvisation, together with very basic photography,but doesn´t have any of the technical troubles of the director´s previous release, "Rodrigo D". It renders a very authentic look to city-living in Colombia, without misleading morals or boring social commentary. However, it´s lyricism sets it apart from any pretensions of "real" cinema.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A cheap exploitation of a hard reality in Bogotá streets.
Elias Riman9 November 1999
I did not like this movie because it shows in a cheap way, the suffering of the homeless, and the children who have to work in the worst circumstances to survive day by day. It would have been the best colombian movie in years, if it had left some space for personal recovery of us, the viewers.
3 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed