4 out of 4 people found the following comment useful :- True Spirit of A Unicorn, 21 November 2004
Author:
Cyberknight Masao Kawata from Brazil
Very few movies can truly capture the spirit of its subject. "The Last
Unicorn" literally changed my life, my way of seeing the world, of
understanding why people do what they do, and what is my role in it.
But, before that, there was "The Unicorn in The Garden". It is not an
ordinary movie, it is "sincere", like very few artworks turn out to be,
mainly nowadays. It's not that computer generated graphics and super
surround sounds are not a wonder to see and hear, but if you don't have
a good story to hold everything in place, all you get are some minutes
of entertainment that you will just forget after you watch the next
movie. The opposite is not true, though. If you have a good story, and
you know how to tell it, then it doesn't matter how your graphics look,
or that the sound doesn't shake your guts every time something explodes
on the screen, and the makers knew that. "The Unicorn in The Garden"
has a wonderful story, it is extremely well told, with a good "timing",
and even the graphics, that may seem "drafty", at first, have their
purpose, they enhance the focus on the story and not in the action (no,
it is not an excuse, it's easy to see that watching other U.P.A.
productions of the same time). A must-see to all Unicorn lovers...
3 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :- Why wasn't this nominated for an Academy Award?, 17 October 2000
Author:
Robert Reynolds (minniemato@hotmail.com) from Tucson AZ
The failure of AMPAS to nominate this cartoon for an Oscar is
unbelievable! Granted, it was a good year for animated shorts and a
good year particularly for UPA-Columbia, but this cartoon is simply
delightful! Written by James Thurber and animated in Thurber's artistic
style, it is his world come to life! If you like James Thurber, you'll
love this cartoon, probably as much as I do! Highly recommended.
Edit: Since I posted this particular comment, I discovered just why it
wasn't nominated for the Academy Award for Animated Short Subject-it
was never submitted to AMPAS for consideration, because Stephen
Bosustow was, for some reason, not pleased with the end results. I
think that it's a marvelous piece of work, but without submission for
consideration, the Academy could not nominate the short. I've since
watched it several times and it is still highly recommended.
2 out of 2 people found the following comment useful :- Ah, that war between man and woman...., 19 April 2007
Author:
theowinthrop from United States
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Unlike his close friend and fellow humorist Robert Benchley, James
Thurber was never able to become a movie personality and actor. There
talents were equally wonderful as writers and humorists, but Benchley
(despite some alcoholic problems) was basically photogenic. You look at
him in his films and see someone...well who was worthy to both listen
to the voice and watch the physical presence. Thurber was handicapped -
literally. He was a tall, thin man, who had been injured in his youth
accidentally - it resulted in him having worsening and worsening
eyesight until he finally went blind before his death in 1961. The
American public has tolerated many physical problems, and even once
gave a best supporting Oscar to Harold Russell, a genuine war hero and
double hand amputee. But it would have been more than it could expect
to support a film career for an exceptionable writer that everyone knew
could barely see the film set.
It is as a creative writer of comedy (THE SECRET LIFE OF WALTER MITTY,
THE BATTLE OF THE SEXES, MY WORLD AND WELCOME TO IT, THE WAR BETWEEN
MEN AND WOMEN) that Thurber left his mark on screen. And bless 'im for
it. But there is much that was never tried because Thurber wrote in so
many styles, from plays (THE MALE ANIMAL) to short stories (MITTY), to
essays comical ("THE MACBETH MURDER MYSTERY"), to serious historical
essays on crime ("A KIND OF GENIUS" - about Willie Stevens, one of the
defendants in the Hall - Mill Murder Case). One thing he liked was the
old form of the fable, a la Aesop. As he was a cartoonist of great
ability as well as writer, his fables frequently were accompanied by
the drawings of his imagination of his scenes. When he did a series on
the "THE LAST FLOWER" every event is a captioned cartoon.
Modern readers of the female sex will not be quite so fond of Thurber
as I happen to be - he being male, his views of women are generally
hostile (witness Mrs. Mitty, in the short story - a shrewish wife).
This is an unfortunate habit of his - like similar habits found in
other comic geniuses like W.C.Fields and Laurel & Hardy. Except Fields
and Stan & Ollie had some nice women (or understandable ones)
occasionally. I have to acknowledge this misogyny as a dark point
against Thurber. I can't, off hand, think of a similar female writer
with a serious comic grudge against males.
One of his best comic fables - in fact the one most people recall - is
"THE UNICORN IN THE GARDEN". It is a very clever and unexpected example
of the worm turning.
A husband has woken up on a week-day before his wife, and is making his
breakfast. As he eats the breakfast he looks outside the window at the
kitchen nook and sees a unicorn calmly in the garden, munching grass
and roses. The amazed husband goes out and looks at the beautiful
unicorn (Thurber's drawing is actually simple and lovely) in silence.
He gets excited and runs up-stairs to tell his wife.
In the cartoon we have already HEARD the wife, angrily wanting to know
about the noise she heard (a dropped egg earlier). Now the husband is
trying to show his wife the wonderful site of nature or whatever inside
their garden. But she is angry or mean, and dismisses the news with a
snide, "The unicorn is a mythical beast". It disheartens the husband
who goes down to the garden again. This time he feeds the unicorn a
lily, and he pats it's horn. He races upstairs again to tell the wife
what he has just done. And now she becomes threatening and says, "You
are a booby, and I'll have you put in a booby hatch." He angrily
replies, "We'll see about that!".
The conclusion of the film follows how the wife does try precisely what
she threatens. She calls a psychiatrist and the police and requests
they bring a straight jacket with them. Then she tells them what the
husband said, and how he must be crazy. But by now the actual unicorn
is gone, and the husband is just quietly napping under a tree. The wife
is considered insane and bundled into the jacket. Her fate is capped
off by the husband telling the doctor that everyone knows a unicorn is
a mythical beast. As the wife is taken away in protest, the husband
smiles at the reader.
The moral is given: Don't count your boobies before they are hatched.
This cartoon followed the basic drawings of Thurber in the original
version, and filled them out quite well. Gently told, and compactly, it
is a small marvel of a comic genius of the middle 20th Century.
Dark but clever, 15 June 2007
Author:
planktonrules from Bradenton, Florida
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
This story is based on a James Thurber story. It's told using very
simple Thurber-style drawings.
A man sees a unicorn in the garden. He tells his evil and cranky wife
and she tells him to get lost. Again he sees the unicorn and wakes her
once again. She tells him they are mythical creatures and tells him
again to get lost. Then, she gets out of bed and calls a psychiatrist
and the police to have him committed. When they arrive, they think
she's crazy. The beleaguered husband, when asked about the animal,
responds that "unicorns are mythical creatures" at which point they
shove a straight jacket on her and take her away as the film ends.
While this is a cute and moderately diverting cartoon, it definitely
has a dark edge to it, as both husband and wife are pretty sinister
people. Worth a look but younger kids will probably get nothing out of
it.
The Unicorn in the Garden is another excellent UPA animated short, 13 June 2007
Author:
tavm from Baton Rouge, La.
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
James Thurber's The Unicorn in the Garden, as animated by the artists
of UPA Studios, is a wonderfully humorous fable about the glories of
imagination and the follies of bitterness. The man here represents the
former and his wife, the latter. Whether we are meant to believe the
man really saw the unicorn or dreamt the whole thing in order to get
his wife committed should probably be up for someone else to consider
but it's obvious he wasn't happy for a long time with her around and
was very glad when she was sent away. Half of me wondered when the wife
talked to the psychiatrist whether the doctor himself had seen a
unicorn and wanted to protect himself when the husband made the
"mythical creature" remark and not reveal he had indeed seen one
before. Of course, all that is hearsay so I'll just say that UPA has
made another great animated short that should be a classic forever and
ever!
Own the rights?

Buy it at AmazonMore at IMDb Pro Discuss in Boards Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
The Unicorn in the Garden (1953) More at IMDb Pro »
4 out of 4 people found the following comment useful :-

True Spirit of A Unicorn, 21 November 2004
Author: Cyberknight Masao Kawata from Brazil
Very few movies can truly capture the spirit of its subject. "The Last Unicorn" literally changed my life, my way of seeing the world, of understanding why people do what they do, and what is my role in it. But, before that, there was "The Unicorn in The Garden". It is not an ordinary movie, it is "sincere", like very few artworks turn out to be, mainly nowadays. It's not that computer generated graphics and super surround sounds are not a wonder to see and hear, but if you don't have a good story to hold everything in place, all you get are some minutes of entertainment that you will just forget after you watch the next movie. The opposite is not true, though. If you have a good story, and you know how to tell it, then it doesn't matter how your graphics look, or that the sound doesn't shake your guts every time something explodes on the screen, and the makers knew that. "The Unicorn in The Garden" has a wonderful story, it is extremely well told, with a good "timing", and even the graphics, that may seem "drafty", at first, have their purpose, they enhance the focus on the story and not in the action (no, it is not an excuse, it's easy to see that watching other U.P.A. productions of the same time). A must-see to all Unicorn lovers...
3 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :-

Why wasn't this nominated for an Academy Award?, 17 October 2000
Author: Robert Reynolds (minniemato@hotmail.com) from Tucson AZ
The failure of AMPAS to nominate this cartoon for an Oscar is unbelievable! Granted, it was a good year for animated shorts and a good year particularly for UPA-Columbia, but this cartoon is simply delightful! Written by James Thurber and animated in Thurber's artistic style, it is his world come to life! If you like James Thurber, you'll love this cartoon, probably as much as I do! Highly recommended.
Edit: Since I posted this particular comment, I discovered just why it wasn't nominated for the Academy Award for Animated Short Subject-it was never submitted to AMPAS for consideration, because Stephen Bosustow was, for some reason, not pleased with the end results. I think that it's a marvelous piece of work, but without submission for consideration, the Academy could not nominate the short. I've since watched it several times and it is still highly recommended.
2 out of 2 people found the following comment useful :-

Ah, that war between man and woman...., 19 April 2007
Author: theowinthrop from United States
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
Unlike his close friend and fellow humorist Robert Benchley, James Thurber was never able to become a movie personality and actor. There talents were equally wonderful as writers and humorists, but Benchley (despite some alcoholic problems) was basically photogenic. You look at him in his films and see someone...well who was worthy to both listen to the voice and watch the physical presence. Thurber was handicapped - literally. He was a tall, thin man, who had been injured in his youth accidentally - it resulted in him having worsening and worsening eyesight until he finally went blind before his death in 1961. The American public has tolerated many physical problems, and even once gave a best supporting Oscar to Harold Russell, a genuine war hero and double hand amputee. But it would have been more than it could expect to support a film career for an exceptionable writer that everyone knew could barely see the film set.
It is as a creative writer of comedy (THE SECRET LIFE OF WALTER MITTY, THE BATTLE OF THE SEXES, MY WORLD AND WELCOME TO IT, THE WAR BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN) that Thurber left his mark on screen. And bless 'im for it. But there is much that was never tried because Thurber wrote in so many styles, from plays (THE MALE ANIMAL) to short stories (MITTY), to essays comical ("THE MACBETH MURDER MYSTERY"), to serious historical essays on crime ("A KIND OF GENIUS" - about Willie Stevens, one of the defendants in the Hall - Mill Murder Case). One thing he liked was the old form of the fable, a la Aesop. As he was a cartoonist of great ability as well as writer, his fables frequently were accompanied by the drawings of his imagination of his scenes. When he did a series on the "THE LAST FLOWER" every event is a captioned cartoon.
Modern readers of the female sex will not be quite so fond of Thurber as I happen to be - he being male, his views of women are generally hostile (witness Mrs. Mitty, in the short story - a shrewish wife). This is an unfortunate habit of his - like similar habits found in other comic geniuses like W.C.Fields and Laurel & Hardy. Except Fields and Stan & Ollie had some nice women (or understandable ones) occasionally. I have to acknowledge this misogyny as a dark point against Thurber. I can't, off hand, think of a similar female writer with a serious comic grudge against males.
One of his best comic fables - in fact the one most people recall - is "THE UNICORN IN THE GARDEN". It is a very clever and unexpected example of the worm turning.
A husband has woken up on a week-day before his wife, and is making his breakfast. As he eats the breakfast he looks outside the window at the kitchen nook and sees a unicorn calmly in the garden, munching grass and roses. The amazed husband goes out and looks at the beautiful unicorn (Thurber's drawing is actually simple and lovely) in silence. He gets excited and runs up-stairs to tell his wife.
In the cartoon we have already HEARD the wife, angrily wanting to know about the noise she heard (a dropped egg earlier). Now the husband is trying to show his wife the wonderful site of nature or whatever inside their garden. But she is angry or mean, and dismisses the news with a snide, "The unicorn is a mythical beast". It disheartens the husband who goes down to the garden again. This time he feeds the unicorn a lily, and he pats it's horn. He races upstairs again to tell the wife what he has just done. And now she becomes threatening and says, "You are a booby, and I'll have you put in a booby hatch." He angrily replies, "We'll see about that!".
The conclusion of the film follows how the wife does try precisely what she threatens. She calls a psychiatrist and the police and requests they bring a straight jacket with them. Then she tells them what the husband said, and how he must be crazy. But by now the actual unicorn is gone, and the husband is just quietly napping under a tree. The wife is considered insane and bundled into the jacket. Her fate is capped off by the husband telling the doctor that everyone knows a unicorn is a mythical beast. As the wife is taken away in protest, the husband smiles at the reader.
The moral is given: Don't count your boobies before they are hatched.
This cartoon followed the basic drawings of Thurber in the original version, and filled them out quite well. Gently told, and compactly, it is a small marvel of a comic genius of the middle 20th Century.
Dark but clever, 15 June 2007

Author: planktonrules from Bradenton, Florida
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
This story is based on a James Thurber story. It's told using very simple Thurber-style drawings.
A man sees a unicorn in the garden. He tells his evil and cranky wife and she tells him to get lost. Again he sees the unicorn and wakes her once again. She tells him they are mythical creatures and tells him again to get lost. Then, she gets out of bed and calls a psychiatrist and the police to have him committed. When they arrive, they think she's crazy. The beleaguered husband, when asked about the animal, responds that "unicorns are mythical creatures" at which point they shove a straight jacket on her and take her away as the film ends.
While this is a cute and moderately diverting cartoon, it definitely has a dark edge to it, as both husband and wife are pretty sinister people. Worth a look but younger kids will probably get nothing out of it.
The Unicorn in the Garden is another excellent UPA animated short, 13 June 2007

Author: tavm from Baton Rouge, La.
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
James Thurber's The Unicorn in the Garden, as animated by the artists of UPA Studios, is a wonderfully humorous fable about the glories of imagination and the follies of bitterness. The man here represents the former and his wife, the latter. Whether we are meant to believe the man really saw the unicorn or dreamt the whole thing in order to get his wife committed should probably be up for someone else to consider but it's obvious he wasn't happy for a long time with her around and was very glad when she was sent away. Half of me wondered when the wife talked to the psychiatrist whether the doctor himself had seen a unicorn and wanted to protect himself when the husband made the "mythical creature" remark and not reveal he had indeed seen one before. Of course, all that is hearsay so I'll just say that UPA has made another great animated short that should be a classic forever and ever!
Add another comment
Related Links