The Mugger (1958) Poster

(1958)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Watch it for all the little details and fun scenes...not half bad!
secondtake2 October 2013
The Mugger (1958)

A weak and low budget flick, but with some genuine looks at the era that a slicker movie wouldn't reveal. In fact, Hollywood is often gauged at having reached its true nadir around 1958, so an honest movie with all kind of flaws has a leg up on the competition.

The story is simple. A mugger has been successful snatching purses from pretty young women in this very small town for some 10 or 11 muggings. And every time he bothers to leave his trademark--a slash with a knife on the woman's face. We naturally hear the testimony from a few of these women, and the acting varies wonderfully (from mediocre to middling, but in many different ways).

Chief investigator, in a twist, is a police psychiatrist. This is the best actor of the bunch, Kent Smith. He played key roles in two classic horror films more than a decade earlier, in "Cat People" and as a doctor in "Spiral Staircase." He's great in those, and in this one too, despite the surrounding cast. As a shrink he's asked to create a profile of the mugger, and decides on some interesting details, including that the man is tormented and when he is caught he's going to be relieved. You'll see if that's true.

Meanwhile some small town details come through, and it's fun to watch even as you wait for some better drama to develop. The muggings themselves even seem a bit routine to watch. One of them is a

The photography is vivid throughout. There is a smattering of dramatic scenes--gambling with a violent end, a steamy sauna scene, a diner scenario with a dizzy blonde, a big dance hall bash, and so on. It's never dull on that level. And Smith is in most of the movie, holding it up. There are a couple of subplots--other crime matters, a young girl who's too shy to meet a boy, that kind of thing. More curious than gripping, but good stuff for the details.

The city is an unknown, and is usually suggested as a medium to small city place. This makes it weird that so many women are walking alone down dark streets when a known mugger is on the loose. But by the end of the movie we are taken up specifically to 236th Street at the D Train stop. Seems like the Bronx to me (that location has been renamed Tim Hendrick Place, if I'm right about this). Anyway, the locations don't quite jive with the small town feel of the rest of it. The final scene is at a ferry dock going to New Jersey, and I think it's a midtown ferry to Weehawken. There were never ferries from the Bronx to New Jersey (mostly because that part of New Jersey is the Palisades park and cliffs), so the final cab ride must take them down the Hudson somewhere (even though the cab seems to be driving north).

Anyway, you can see how the minutia meant more than the overall plot. I enjoyed it despite everything.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Poor Ed McBain adaptation, wrenched away from his 87th Precinct
bmacv4 August 2003
Police psychiatrist Kent Smith is an easy-going, amiable guy, ready to take time from his pursuit of a sunglassed mugger to act as unofficial therapist to easy-going, amiable hack driver James Franciscus (whose wife's sister, living with them, has become withdrawn and hostile). But the mugger has struck 11 times in eight weeks, grabbing women's purses and leaving a superficial knife scar along their jawlines. With the help of his fiancée, policewoman Nan Martin, Kent follows up a number of leads, all of them dead ends. Then the mugger strikes once more, but this time leaves his victim dead - Franciscus' sister-in-law, whom an autopsy reveals to have been three months pregnant....

Part of the pleasure of Ed McBain's seemingly endless series of police procedurals set in the 87th Precinct is that he takes the bizarre and the pathological and makes them mundane - part of the warp and weft of living in a city. The second of his novels to be filmed, The Mugger leeches much of the familiarity away; it ill-advisedly dispenses with the quirky cops of the 87th to center on Smith, a character so four-square that McBain would never have written him.

And though his books may seem garrulous and absent-minded, underneath the disgressions clockwork plots tick away. But in The Mugger, the red herrings really stink. Few adaptations of McBain's series, for the movies or for television, have been quite successful in fidelity to the author's nameless city and the cops who police it, but The Mugger must count among the weakest of them - an inferior follow-up to the same year's Cop Hater.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Taken out of context
sol-kay18 August 2004
****SPOILERS**** A number of women have been attacked in the city over the last two months where they were mugged of their handbags and had their left cheek slashed by the mugger. Dr. Pete Graham, Kent Smith, a police psychiatrist, after interviewing a number of the mugging victims thinks that the reasons for the muggings is not money but for some kind of sexual gratification on the part of the mugger. Even when we see the mugger in action he looks more like a secret service agent, with his sunglasses and tailored cloths, then your average mugger.

Were introduced early in the movie to Eddie, James Franciscus, a cabbie who's a friend of Dr. Graham and his family his wife Molly, Dolores Sutton, and her younger sister Jeannie, Sandra Church who's having an on and off again affair with Eddie's next door neighbor Grecco, George Maharis. We see right away that there's some connection with the mugger and Eddie's family members, especially Jeannie but just what kind of connection is it?

The mugging of women continue and later in the movie there's a break in the case when it's found out that a certain criminal Skippy Randolph, Arthur Storch, was released from jail in Chicago on July 29. Skippy committed the same crimes that are happening here in town and the crimes just began on July 29. After being arrested and checked out it's found out that Skippy was not involved in the muggings so who can the mugger be?

"The Mugger" is one of those films with a double-plot to it which you don't notice until the very end of the movie. Dr. Graham and the police track down the mugger later in the film but before they do Jeannie becomes a victim but unlike the other mugging victims she ends up being murdered. The film is extremely complicated for a run of the mill crime movie with a surprise ending that exposes the killer of Jeannie but not before the mugger responsible for the earlier crimes was apprehended.

It turns out that Jeannie's killer took advantage of the muggings for cover to kill her and then have him, the mugger, blamed for her death. Unknown to him he was seen with Jeannie the night that she was killed by an undercover policewoman Claire Thownsond, Nan Martin, who was at the dance club shadowing her.

What really floored me was how the killer just went to pieces when he was confronted by Dr. Graham and Policewoman Thownsond with his whereabouts the night of Jeannie's death. I was also surprised how irresponsible both of them, Grahm & Thownsond, were by risking their lives with the killer in a position to where he could have easily have killed them! When all they had to do was have him arrested later at his home where they and the police knew where he lived.

The ending of the movie was a bit off the wall with the killer being chased by the police as he was chasing a ferry and jumps to his death as he missed his ride and gets chopped to ribbons by the ship's propellers. All right the killer wasn't all there and was desperate trying to escape from the police but why risk, and lose, his life trying to get to the ferry! Even if the killer made it he would have been arrested by the police on the other side of the river who were waiting for him?
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The police shrink
jotix1004 August 2012
Warning: Spoilers
A series of muggings in New York by a sadist man who not content in stealing the women's purses, he leaves a signature slash on their left cheek. As this story begins, a woman who was victimized by the stranger is taken to see police psychiatrist, Dr. Peter Marshall. He recognizes his m.o. because Katherine Elio shows signs that are repeated by the other women before her.

Dr. Marshall is friendly with taxi driver Eddie Baxter, who sometimes takes him home. Eddie wants the doctor to speak to his sister-in-law Jeannie, who is going through a bad moment. As it happens, Jeannie is a friend of an undercover police woman, Claire, posing as a dancer in one of those clubs where women were paid to dance. Claire was romantically involved with Dr. Marshall. When Jeannie is found dead, the thought was she was murdered by the mugger as well. Marshall enlists Claire to help him arrest the mugger.

There are two plots in this film. One being the mugger himself as he goes attacking women, and the second one is a murder involving a pregnant girl. The film is based on a novel by Evan Hunter who wrote about cops and criminals, and adapted for the screen by Henry Kane. The picture was under the direction of William Berke, a veteran of Hollywood with a lot of movies under his belt. This is essentially a B movie which was shown on a classic cable channel recently. "The Mugger" is not one of the best of its kind, or for that matter a good adaptation of an Evan Hunter work. The identity of the mugger comes out of nowhere, to the viewer's complete surprise.

Kent Smith, a handsome actor is seen as Dr. Marshall. Mr. Smith was an actor that had it all but never achieved star status. He always delivered and was a welcome presence in any venture that required his presence. A young James Franciscus appears as Eddie Baxter. Also in minor roles one can spot George Maharis and Renee Taylor. Nan Martin played Claire.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Entertaining B
BILLYBOY-1016 December 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Police shrink Kent Smith thinks that the mugger who is terrorizing women only by snatching their purses then slashing them on the cheek is sex-o psychotic. His pal, the very young James Franciscus plays a cabbie who asks Kent to come see his pregnant wife's sister who seems troubled. She works as a "hostess" in a local dance hall but is moody and troubled. Kent has a talk with her but can't get her to spill anything. Meanwhile the mugger/slasher keeps striking and Kents girl-friend, a cop too, sets out to set herself up as bait. The mugger attacks her but he gets away when her back-up is waylaid by a drunken sailor. Now, the mugger has struck again only this time he's killed his victim. And the victim turns out to be the cabbie's wife's troubled dance hall sister AND she was 3 months pregnant. The plot really thickens now.

Seems Kent's gal pal cop once followed the killed dance hall victim to the end of a subway line where she saw the girl meet up with a guy, so they decide to follow up by going to canvass the neighborhood at the end of the line. Low and behold, gal cop spots the guy the victim met the night she followed her and....it turns out to be the cabbie! Yep. Seems cabbie Franciscus and his wife's sister were playing hanky panky, he got her knocked up so he had to wipe her out and make it look like the mugger done it.

The cabbie makes a run for it, tries to jump off a nearby wharf onto a ferry but misses and gets cuisine-arted to shreds by the ferry's propellers.

Oh, and previously they also capture the mugger/slasher who turns out to be an upper-class, mild-mannered, milk-toasty, hen-pecked gentleman who is relieved to finally be apprehended just like shrink cop Kent figured he would. I actually enjoyed the film. It was easy to follow, had the nice twist ending and was quite simple and totally unpretentious.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Shall We Go Quietly?!"...
azathothpwiggins7 August 2021
THE MUGGER is about a prolific purse snatcher who always leaves his female victims with a signature wound.

The police are baffled.

Enter police psychiatrist, Dr. Pete Graham (Kent Smith), who attempts to discern the motivations behind the crimes, while the title maniac strikes again and again, causing the same injury.

What message is this person sending through this terrible trademark?

Death ensues.

This is an enjoyable crime thriller. In spite of it's being fairly predictable, the final confrontation / revelation is exciting and worth the wait. Kent is very good in his role, but it's Nan Martin who is the most interesting, as Graham's fiancee, Policewoman Claire Townsend.

Co-stars the ever-dependable James Franciscus...
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Berke's Last Film Has Its Moments
boblipton2 July 2023
There's a guy going around attacking women late at night, slashing their faces and their handbags. Police psychiatrist Kent Smith catches the case.

It's based on an Evan Hunter novel, his second 87th Precinct novel writen under his Ed McBain pen name. It's a slow procedural, but Kent Smith's calm presence and the expanding circle of characters and the suddenness of the clue revealing whodunnit make it less than a perfect mystery. Still, the shooting in actual New York City locations makes it worthwhile, as does the cast, including Dick O'Neill, James Franciscus, and Renee Taylor.

William Berke's last directorial effort is obviously a cheap affair, and half the characters sound like they've taken elocution lessons from Sheldon Leonard, but there are visual sparks in the movie, particularly the sequence that starts in a Turkish bath and ends with Smith and suspect Arthur Storch running from a crap game. Berke's career wasn't going anywhere in particular when he died at the age of 55 the year of this release. He'd started out in B westerns, and had never gotten an A budget in a quarter of a century, but he liked to give the audience some value for money.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Who is slashing the women of Manhattan?
mark.waltz15 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The police have sought the help of psychiatrist Kent Smith to help them detail the type of person who has been stalking the streets of a certain New York neighborhood at night, grabbing women's purses and slashing their face before taking off. Smith is certain that the culprit is desperate to be caught, but is he really right? He interviews various victims of the slasher and discovers that they are all of a similar sort, and brother investigates through the death of the sister-in-law of a cab driver pal of his who is found dead in the park, 3 months pregnant, and unmarried. The police send out a female officer, arrest the wrong man after she is attacked, and finally have a shocking discovery as to who the real culprit is.

This gritty crime thriller is evidence why low-budget films of the 50's often got it right in showing a realistic atmosphere while big-budget crime dramas often seemed too scared to delve into the darkness of human nature. This film deals with the sleaziest aspects of society, going into a neighborhood dancehall joint where Smith's police officer girlfriend (Nan Martin) often works undercover. Lots of interesting twists and turns along the way as well as location footage. "Golden Girls" viewers will recognize Martin as the nasty Frieda Claxton who literally dropped dead in court. There are a few small details that leave questions that are never answered, but overall, this is a decent, gritty street wise look at big city violence and the various kind of sickos who commit it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Early CSI or Quincy MD
user-3558320 January 2022
Less noir and more procedural crime caper. This one puts a consulting psychiatrist in charge of profiling and leading the investigation of a serial mugger who is terrorizing women and slashing their face. Those who remember Quincy MD will remember why these were compelling stories told from another angle. Deserves a better reputation.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Quite enjoyable and worth seeing despite a low budget.
planktonrules24 August 2012
"The Mugger" is a low-budget sleeper of a cop film from the late 1950s--the tail end of the American film-noir era. While the film doesn't have any major stars, the story is VERY modern for 1958 and might surprise you. Plus, it's a dandy little story about police profilers and a nasty case that's got everyone stumped.

Kent Smith was a very reliable actor who mostly was a supporting actor and star in Bs. In this film, he plays the lead, a police psychiatrist that's been called in to deal with a strange series of attacks. They involve women who were mugged and then slashed on the left side of the face--not a deep slash, but serious nevertheless. His job is to help determine what sort of guy would do this--the profile of what they should be looking for in the case. The story is compact, very interesting, takes a few nice detours to throw the audience off the scent and gets even more interesting when there is a murder. I'd say more but I don't want to give away the plot.

There were many good reasons I enjoyed the film--most of which boil down to dandy writing. The dialog was very snappy, there were some funny little touches (such as the blonde victim who REALLY liked Smith) and the film's not beating around the bush too much in discussing crime. You'll hear words like 'rape' and 'sexual attack' in the film and there is also a bit about a pregnant woman--stuff that the more permissive 50s films STILL rarely ever discussed but which made the movie much more realistic. I also enjoyed some of the supporting players--such as the way the policewoman handled herself in the park. Well worth seeing and a nice opportunity for Smith to show he was a very good actor with a likable style. The only negative at all I noticed was the confrontation scene at the end--who would confront a killer while the killer is driving the car?! Talk about a recipe for disaster! Oh, and the best line in the film: "Is he a friend of yours? He's in little pieces now".
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed