A Night to Dismember (1983) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
33 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
This may be the funniest movie I've ever seen
happyendingrocks4 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This bizarre, hilariously inept offering must be seen to be believed. In a film as rife with gaffes and outright incomprehensibility as this one, it's probably pointless to articulate the unintentional comedic gold on display here. But it might be fun, so let's give it a shot.

For starters, this whole outing is so clumsily constructed that it seems impossible to imagine that creator Doris Wishman had ever even SEEN a movie before, let alone made one. The entire film is comprised of a series of choppily edited scenes that rarely follow any sort of logical sequence and are augmented by dubbed-in dialogue that doesn't match the moving of the actor's mouths. In keeping with the disjointed arrangement of the film, there are times when two distinctly different performers' voices are used for a character, sometimes within the same scene.

The majority of the plotting comes courtesy of a voice-over narration that blessedly spares the actors the trouble of having to actually talk to each other very often, but even this audio exposition seems to have been edited with the hatchet on the DVD cover. At times, the narrator's monologues cut off or start up in the middle of a sentence when the film leaps to the next scene, and the oration is so poorly written that even though the voice-over is describing exactly what we're seeing on the screen, it's still often completely impossible to understand any of it.

The almost silent-film sensibility is reinforced by the constant presence of a background score, the majority of which is '80s grocery store music. Like the video, the audio score jumps around with reckless abandon, sometimes in the middle of a scene, and there are times when you can actually hear the source record skipping. The soundtrack is used without regard for the unfolding images, so we often witness brutal (albeit extremely silly) acts of carnage accompanied by music that wouldn't be out of place in the elevator at a dentist's office.

The killings in the film are plentiful and loaded with gore, but the effects are staged with a sophomoric touch that matches the rest of the movie, so these scenes end up being the most humorous bits. Best of all, the film-makers used a real hatchet for several of the murder scenes, so we have the privilege of witnessing the deeds of a thoughtful killer who takes special care to only gingerly tap their victims with the edge of the blade.

The story, such as it is, revolves around a young woman named Vicki Kent who is released from a mental institution after murdering two neighborhood boys (I think) for no apparent reason. It's actually hard to tell who she killed because this part of her back story is nestled between vignettes of other homicides that are ostensibly committed by members of her extended family upon other members of her extended family, such as the quick introduction of another young Kent woman who murders her sister in the bathtub before inconveniently slipping and impaling herself onto her own axe. There's also a brief mention of a Kent aunt who walks around in her garden once a day with her ample breasts hanging out of her blouse, a habit that apparently irks her husband enough for him to hire a man to kill her, which he eventually confesses to before hanging himself. This brings us to about the three-minute mark of the film.

Upon Vicki's release, her sister and brother (who is played by two different actors within the course of about 30 seconds) start scheming to drive her insane so she'll be committed again. The first step of their nefarious plan is to lure her into a dark bathroom, where they fondle her breasts and smear blood all over her, which vanishes by the time a jump cut finds her fleeing into her bedroom. Later touches of brilliance include the brother dressing up like a zombie and chasing Vicki through the woods.

Vicki also has a beau of sorts, her beloved Frankie, who, in addition to shagging her sister, also has another girlfriend with whom he shares a hysterical semi-soft-core make-out scene in which the couple's awkward smooches make them look like they absolutely despise kissing each other. On that note, another definite absurdist highlight is our heroine's bizarre erotic hallucination later in the film (ably described by the narrator: "Suddenly Vicki felt like someone was making love to her in bright flashing colors"), where repeated shots show the lovers' bodies entwined in a way that would make any sort of sexual congress uncomfortable, if not impossible, while super-imposed images of crashing waves and psychedelic lights mingle with their naughty parts.

Frankie's demise is notable because of the way he screams with terror when a cat jumps out at him during the obligatory "is someone there?" build-up, yet barely reacts while he's being hacked to death. In fact, several of the hapless victims in the film look downright bored while they're being killed, which is pretty fitting because we do too.

I could go on, but space is a factor. Suffice to say that the rest of the film is as delightfully absurd as you can possibly imagine. Frame by frame, ANTD is a glorious example of awful, unwatchable cinema at its finest. If you're a disciple of the "so bad it's great" school of film fandom, you absolutely have to see this, because what we're dealing with here is "so bad it's the most amazing thing you'll ever see". All others should not only avoid this film, you should probably burn your computer after reading this.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
An Awesome Low
chris-251228 July 2005
A Night To Dismember makes any Ed Wood movie look like a Michael Bay production. Even Doris Wishman, God bless her, knew this film was a stinky disaster. According to the commentary on the DVD I unfortunately bought, Wishman says half of her rushes where lost by the lab, so she had to compensate by adding a voice-over that 'explained' the 'story'. Uh-oh. Her cameraman on the film, C. Davis Smith, is also featured on the commentary and asks Wishman if the lab lost the best parts or the worst parts. After actually sitting through the entire 67 grueling minutes of this film, I can only pray they lost the best parts.

The worst/best part of this film is that the voice-over itself sounds like it was written by Gertrude Stein. It features a lot of run-on sentences and repetition. "It was the darkest night Vicki had ever seen. Why was it so dark? Vicki wondered in the darkness. Darkness was all around Vicki.. etc... etc..." and so on and so on for an hour. The commentary never stops. It makes you wish you rented Derek Jarman's Blue or better, The Beast Of Yucca Flats! The DVD commentary for this disc is priceless. Basically, it's Wishman and Smith arguing about who should be blamed for the outcome of the film. They finally decide to blame each other. Convenient, no? As I mentioned, this film is around 70 minutes long but it feels like the longest movie you've ever seen. It makes Tarkovsky's Andrey Rublyov seem like a John Woo film. If you make it to the end, you are a true Z-film freak and should be mailed a badge.

To be fair, this isn't Wishman's worst film; that remarkable honour would go to her next film, a remake of her earlier flick Satan Was A Lady (And they say Van Sant's Psycho was unnecessary)! If you want to see a good Wishman film watch "Nude On The Moon" or "Bad Girls Go To Hell" and leave this one alone, especially if you haven't seen a Wishman film before. It's not the one to start with, that's for sure.
19 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Hard to find but hard to watch also!
drhannibal66614 November 2000
This incomprehensible slasher movie was the last-known feature directed by cult filmmaker Doris Wishman. Making heavy use of voiceover narration, the film stars legend Samantha Fox, in a rare non-hardcore role, and deals with a cursed family and an escaped mental patient.

Gory and violent, the film is filled with bloody decapitations and eviscerations, as well as peculiar use of negative and solarization effects. The results are unbelievably bad, and it is hard to imagine that this 70-minute mess took five years to make.

My Rating:3/10
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Released at last, but was it worth it?
Nozze-Foto21 July 2002
What can you say about a movie with a budget so very low they borrowed music from Andy Milligan's THE GHASTLY ONES? Doris Wishman has directed stuff like BAD GIRLS GO TO HELL, ANOTHER DAY ANOTHER MAN, NUDE ON THE MOON and the classic AMAZING TRANSPLANT. Okay, so she's no Ida Lupino you deffinitely won't sleep through any of her movies! A NIGHT TO DISMEMBER is as disjointed as the hacked up bodies the killer leaves behind. Why? Because some idiot at the processing lab either lost or erased about 34 minutes of film leaving Ms. Wishman to make some sense out of the 68 minutes she had left. Well she did, sort of. Vicki Kent (Samantha Fox) is released from a mental hospital several years after the unprovoked killing of two boys. Right away her brother and sister, who are jealous of her for no reason that I can figure out, decide to drive her crazy again and send her back to the hospital. Right about this same time several brutal murders take place and the finger of suspicion points to . . .guess who. Ah, but is she really guilty? hey, it's only a 68 minute movie so you won't have to wait long to find out. The gore effects are outrageous, an obvious dummy is barely tapped with a machete and the head falls off; hatchet hardly touches its victim for blood to spurt like a fountain; a woman's finger are cut off one by one but she is just making a fist and her hand is covered with stage blood. But it's things like this that make the movie fun. Also there is a detective narrating who describes things he could not possibly know. In one case he talks about what Vicki Kent is dreaming while he watches her through a window! Ridiculous? Yes! Fun? You bet! Worth seeing? What are you waiting for?
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Rare, maybe, but definitely boring
jan.verheyen29 October 2000
It might very well be a rare find - and the video copy I tracked down was of pretty poor quality - it is first and foremost dreadfully boring. Since apparently there was no money for a set sound recordist the whole film is 'explained' in voice-over...and still it doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Literally everything about it is bad, and not even funny-bad or entertaining-bad, just plain boring bad. A complete waste of time.
14 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What the hell just happened?
Sandcooler1 February 2012
B-movies don't tend to live by many rules, but here's something that usually seems to be true: the worse the movie, the better the back story. Movies can't be as bad as "A Night To Dismember" all on their own, surely there must be something I don't know. Thankfully, director Doris Wishman (often referred to as the female Ed Wood, how's that for an endorsement?) helps out on this matter. According to her a disgruntled lab employee destroyed almost half the footage of this movie, which I guess explains it...to a degree. I get now why the movie's such a jumbled mess and why the worst narrator in movie history constantly has to fill in blanks, but that's just the tip of the iceberg really. What's with the game show music during tension scenes? Why did they only bother to dub in about a third of the dialogue, making the actors look like total morons for most of the time? What's with all the unwatchable scrambled footage, was this accidentally sent to a meth lab? I'm sure that the original material, if it ever existed, could have made this movie into well, an actual movie, but I think it would have still been an absolutely terrible actual movie. Let's all just be grateful this was Wishman's only attempt at a slasher and stick to laughing at her nudie flicks.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Trashy,sleazy,gory and completely illogical.
HumanoidOfFlesh30 September 2005
Doris Wishman's "A Night to Dismember" is an ultra-cheap and sleazy slasher flick that simply has to be seen to believed.Wishman was an innovative low budget filmmaker.Her directing,editing and marketing of her films was all self-taught and almost all of her films were self-produced."A Night to Dismember" is her only full fledged horror film.It is also a big mess.The editing is beyond awful,the use of same location in several scenes is painfully obvious,the acting is amateurish and the story is illogical and confusing.Still the film is never boring and there are some fairly nasty scenes of gory carnage including ripped out hearts and chopped off fingers.Basically "A Night to Dismember" is about psychotic woman who gets out of an insane asylum and promptly starts butchering people around her.Give this low budget trash a look.4 out of 10.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Night to Dismember
Scarecrow-884 December 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This diabolical abomination is the patchwork of mishandled material, and I can't fault director Doris Wishman for trying to make something out of nothing. It was equal parts painful, frustrating, not to mention bizarrely watchable at times. I do consider myself a gore aficionado and an enthusiast of weird cinema, so to say that 'A Night to Dismember' was a total waste would be a falsity. This is the first time that I can remember seeing a decapitated head roasting in a fireplace! How could one not enjoy watching porn star Samantha Fox, starring in this film as a recently released asylum patient, gobbling ham! You get a heart pulled from a chest, a head squashed under a car tire, and fingers hacked off! The grisly shenanigans include a gash in the forehead of a victim from the use of the dreaded ax(..and, my favorite would have to be the scene where the murderer has trouble shaking the head from the ax!). This does have the same bloody charm of a HGL production(..sharp implements slowly burst skin, with methodical blood flow). A lot of random people fall to the ax-wielding maniac, who chops without abandon.

It's especially a treat to experience Fox's "method" performance. Part of the plot has Vicki(Fox)tormented by her sister and brother so she would return to the hospital(..it is feared that Vicki would take sis' boyfriend away from her!). The private dick who narrates the film(..I guess this is a homage to film noir while also providing Wishman with an outlet to explain details to the audience)is shown ogling Vicki, with her enjoying his eyes on her quite joyfully(..that is when she isn't asleep).

Pretty grisly nightmare sequence where Vicki's sister dreams of being stabbed multiple times in the throat, head, and torso(..we see the knife and ax sometimes penetrating flesh). You even see the aftermath of a ghastly eyeball gouge. And, there's nothing quite as resounding as a lingering shot of a dead, mutilated body in a refrigerator. As you'll see, special dedication was given in regards to the grue. Certain sound effects and pieces of music can be quite obtrusive and downright jarring, but something about this works appropriately with the dopey nature of the finished product. There is an amusing sight gag at the end with Uncle Sam I admired quite a bit. Revelation proves that deranged behavior runs in the family.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Bad enough to make your eyes bleed
BA_Harrison2 October 2010
According to director Doris Wishman, much of the negative for A Night To Dismember was wiped during processing by a disgruntled lab employee, forcing her to complete the film by re-editing the remaining material together with hastily shot new footage and a god-awful narrative to try and explain what the hell is going on (it fails: within minutes I hadn't a clue what was happening).

I'm not sure if I believe her story (after all, it's so easy to blame someone else for your own incompetent film-making), but if that's really the case, then what that lab guy did was unforgivable—I mean, he had the perfect opportunity to remove the entire thing from existence for good, but the douche-bag still left Wishman enough material to cobble together this abomination!

Anyway, whether Wishman's story is true or not, the fact remains that A Night To Dismember redefines the word 'awful', being a thoroughly incomprehensible, horribly dubbed mess of disjointed scenes that even a liberal sprinkling of unconvincing gore (beheadings, axe murders, finger chopping, a heart removed etc.,) and gratuitous nudity cannot improve.

Some call it 'surreal'; some describe it as 'so bad, it's good'; others call it 'a cult classic'. I call it s**t! Watch at your own risk.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What the...?
adriangr20 May 2009
I must have some kind of death wish to sit through Doris Wishman's "A Night To Dismember"...very rarely have I used the term "unwatchable" and meant it, but in this case it's absolutely true.

Where to begin? Wishman seems to have wanted to cook up some convoluted slasher-horror movie about insane girl released back into the care of her family only for mysterious killings to begin again. But what she ended up presenting was a muddled mess of catastrophic proportions, even by her standards. Apparently much of the footage shot was lost in a fire, so when the film was edited, large chunks were missing and lots of out-takes had to be substituted. Well, it sure does show.

Watching the movie proves to be a fractured, almost hallucinatory experience. Not a single shot has any location-sourced or ambient sound, all the soundtrack is made up of music, over-dubbed dialogue/narration, and slapped on sound effects. It's like watching a silent movie that has been given a hasty "make-do" soundtrack by someone else. In fact it's like watching a film with the sound off, in a room full of improv actors who are making up the lines as they go along, and bashing pots together to try and make matching sounds to go with the on-screen action. Then again, very few of the lines are actually spoken by the characters. A narration goes on for the entire length of the movie, explaining everything that is happening – however due to the incoherent nature of the film it's the ONLY way of understanding what's happening! And the music! Oh dear...Every type of stock music is laid on with a trowel, from lounge jazz to rock to Gothic chimes, and none of it EVER matches the mood of the on screen action. Maybe Wishman just threw whatever she had handy onto the turntable. And if this wasn't bad enough, the film jumps, cuts, jumps ,and jumps again, in fact every few minutes there is an abrupt change of music or lines of dialogue are abruptly cut off. And I do mean EVERY few minutes. Actually there are a few scenes when the music switches styles every 2 or 3 seconds.

There's all the usual Wishman madness such as shots of feet, hideous interior décor, backs of people's heads, someone moving position and the camera not realising they aren't even in shot any more, etc, etc. In a new level of excitement, we get close ups of people lifting slices of cheese off a dinner plate. Some scenes look as though they were shot twice or even three times – and all the shots are included in the film, so its like some horrible demonic rewind button that forces you to see everything multiple times. Oh and before I forget to mention it, about 30-40 percent of the movie is out of focus.

OK OK, I know there are some Doris Wishman fans out there who find this all part of her peculiar charm. The only other movies I have seen by her are the two Chesty Morgan films, and both of these are hilarious and highly recommended to any bad cinema junkie. So I do see the appeal of her unique style. But watching "A Night To Dismember" was nothing more than a trial. By the time I had reached the 15 minute mark I had had more than I could stand, but by some sheer force of will I managed to sit through the whole thing. Do not, I repeat, DO NOT try this at home. Utterly, utterly, mind-blowingly bad.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A glorious mess
BandSAboutMovies1 October 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Doris Wishman started filming this in 1978 to cash in on the slasher craze begun by Halloween, directing and producing the film from a screenplay by Judith J. Kushner. From there, things get weird. Wishman claimed that multiple reels were destroyed in the photo processing lab, resulting in her having to reshoot several scenes and use stock footage to make a releasable final film. After four years (!) of post-production, the film would remain unreleased until MPI Media Group put it out in 1989.

There's also an entirely different version of this film that was released in August 2018 on YouTube by the film's cinematographer, C. Davis Smith. This version features actress Diana Cummings in the lead role and an entirely different plot, as adult film actress Samantha Fox replaced Cummings after the destruction of Wishman's film.

According to Smith, Fox paid Wishman $2,000 to get the starring role of Vicki Kent. He said he doesn't know for sure, but he believes that Wishman faked the story that the original print was destroyed in a fire and reshot the film with Fox.

Whew! That's a lot of history to cover, but this is a film that has plenty of it. Let's get into what it's really all about!

The Kent family suffers from an ancestral curse that has caused nearly all of them to be murdered, often by one another. Bonnie was first, hacked to pieces by her sister Susan, who was upset that her father favored her sister. After the murder, she slipped on the blood and was killed by the very same axe.

Broderick Kent's wife Lola is next, murdered in the bathtub. While Kent tries to proclain his innocence, he eventually hangs himself.

That's when we get to Vicki Kent (Samantha Fox), who has just ben released from an insane asylum after killing two boys. Her brother and sister, Billy and Mary, want her to be committed again.

Despite wanting to rekindle her relationship with her ex-boyfriend, she struggles to make it in the real world, constantly hallucinating. Then again, with Frankie getting decapitated and his head burned in a fireplace, that relationship seems doomed.

Vicki tries to visit some relatives who turn her away before they're all killed by hatchet and by car. Even a trip to the lake is fraught with horror, as a zombie chases her around, only to be revealed to be her brother Billy who has been trying to frighten her back into the sanitarium.

This is the kind of movie that rewards your lack of attention with shifts in characters, hairstyles and clothing all within the same scene. It doesn't help that there is next to no voiced dialogue and only a narrorator's voice to carry us through every scene and change in tone. We go from Vicki performing a sexy dance and trying to seduce a detective to Vicki's sister Mary actually being the one behind all the killings.

The detective makes his way to the house where he finds a confused Vicki holding a hatchet. Despite hitting him several times with it, he manages to strangle her to death. That's when we get the voice over from the detective, telling us that Mary was the real guilty party, but she's escaped after killing a cab driver. And that's the movie, I guess.

To put it bluntly, A Night to Dismember is a mess. It's got songs that stop and start, horrible acting, bad gore and footage that appears to be the quality of a 1970's super 8 home movie. It's the kind of movie that if I watched it with a roomful of normal folks, they'd scoff and laugh. And that's why I woke up at 4 AM so that I could enjoy it all by myself, away from the insults of people not ready to cheerful enjoy a movie that combines the insane and the inane. There's also plenty of 1970's fashion and an unhinged voiceover to love, which continues over the credits, making me adore this piece of film even more.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An astoundingly abysmal hoot
Woodyanders29 April 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is a special kind of bad. There are bad movies and then there are Doris Wishman bad movies. Wishman had a uniquely off-kilter style and sensibility which gave her remarkably rotten celluloid abominations a distinctive identity that was wholly her own. Wishman's trademark singular ineptitude permeates every last fabulously fumbled frame of this faltering attempt at a slasher horror picture: plodding all-thumbs (mis)direction, a meandering ramshackle narrative, badly post-synced and recorded dialogue, bizarre lingering close-ups of people's feet, ridiculous sub-Jack Webbian "Dragnet"-style hard-boiled narration, chintzy cut-rate gore (the severed head that gets tossed in a fireplace is hilariously hokey!), a decent smidgen of gratuitous female nudity and soft-core sex, dreadful acting from a lame no-name cast (porn actress Samantha Fox in particular totally hams it up as the fragile and troubled Vicki), grating, redundant, and often inappropriate music, rough, grainy, shaky cinematography by frequent collaborator C. Davis Smith, choppy editing, tacky psychedelic visual flourishes, the ubiquitous false cat scare cliché, labored use of slow motion, clumsily executed murder set pieces, an absurd impromptu dance number, and a completely ludicrous "what the hell?" surprise twist ending all ensure that this exceptionally atrocious bilge is a gloriously ghastly marvel to behold from start to finish. Wonderfully rancid'n'wretched bottom-of-the-barrel schlock.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The old version and lost version reviewed!
daniel-mannouch3 October 2019
Warning: Spoilers
The story kind of goes like this for the lost version. Mary Kent is a mentally unstable woman who catches her boyfriend and best friend going at it. This sets her off on a killing spree that only ends when the child of her boyfriend she was carrying decides to make an appearance and makes this bad girl to go hell in the process.

Fast forward sixteen years and Vicki takes up the family business due to her adopted family being a bunch of melon farmers. More murders and mesmerising editing are abound.

Doris Wishman was a pioneering female filmmaker who at a time when independent film was owned and operated almost solely by men, she wrote, produced, directed and edited no more than forty one movies in a career that spanned forty seven years. Taking into consideration also that she operated exclusively within the cut-throat exploitation film business, Doris Wishman's Professional achievements are colossal. The films themselves however, especially A Night to Dismember, whose catastrophic production nearly stopped Wishman making films altogether, well, let's get to it.

Regarded by many of the few who have seen it as one of the worst slasher movies ever released, the abridged version of A Night To Dismember, which starred pornographic actress Samantha Fox and was released in 1989 by MPI video who probably had no earthly clue what they had in their hands, is a head on collision of 60's sexploitation cinematography, voice over that's more audio description than narration tool, poorly matches inserts of pornstar lead, an editing style whose spectrum ranges between avant-garde and interrogation device and perhaps the most randomly composed collection of library music in the history of cinema. No pun intended, this 1989 release is a nightmare pairing of 1960's sexploitation frugality and Herschell Gordon Lewis' enduringly crude shock tactics. Lord knows what people thought after they rented this out, like surely it was beamed in from another planet. No matter who you are, this purely aesthetic experience is at times more than mere flesh and blood can stand. For me personally, it's a work of art. I cannot even fathom myself trashing something this unique.

The story goes that A Night To Dismember had primary photography which took place in 1979, laid on the cutting room floor, and stayed there for a few years until Doris finally got some money together and put out an ad in Variety in 1983. Now after this, not much is known about what really happened to the product in question as the very existence of this unearthed en quote lost version of A Night To Dismember contradicts a lot of the only source of information regarding this film's production which was Doris Wishman's so called first hand account.

According to the late Wishman, many of the film's shortcomings, most notably the crackarse editing, were explained away as such. Doris always shot her movie trailers first as a promotional aid to sell the movie and complete the feature with whatever money she raised. So, after shooting the film and having sent it off to a certain MovieLab, (the film processing company in which all the processing and printing work was accomplished), a disgruntled lab employee set fire to the whole building to get back at his bosses and in the process destroyed most of the footage that would have made up the movie. Top this off with not having the film materials insured and the hubris that must naturally come with being Doris Wishman, the mad moolah of nylon feet spend eight months assembling a new version of the film, using outtakes, clips from her trailer, and the cheapest of re-shoots to help pad out what little was salvaged from the fire to the bare minimum feature length running time of 70 minutes. Quite a story, one of vindication, resolve, and ultimately, triumph. But I do not believe it anymore, and here's why...

Cinematographer Chuck C. Davis for whatever reason, I have none myself to pry, decided to just give one of only three existing copies apparently of the master tape of the original cut of A Night To Dismember to film appreciation club Hamilton Trash Cinema, who then subsequently ripped and released it on youtube, forever changing exploitation cinema history in the process. This monumental find proved that most of the footage not only was in tact, but was also compiled together and according to Davis was even released in Europe years ago. He doesn't trust his memory that much though on this apparently, but he did remember seeing paperwork from the film's distributor that heavily suggested that at least one print of the film was exported to Europe. And though no hard evidence of a European release exists, the fact of the matter remains that we now have a film that it's own director profusely claimed just did not exist. Well, it does. And I'll end this story with a little quote from Davis

"Diana Cummings was the lead in the original "LOST" version. She was replaced by Samantha Fox....not the English singer but the American Porn Star. Doris told me that she (Doris) needed money and that to "salvage" the results of the disgruntled MovieLab worker she re-edited the film from the undamaged negative. I'm not sure that I believe this as I know that Samantha gave Doris $2000 to be the lead in the updated version. The questions are #1. Did it need to be updated or #2 Did Doris need some cash?" And now, finally, i review the actual A Night To Dismember.

What can i say? Well, it seems to have had on-location sound for one thing. That's a surprise. There's a narrator that actually contributes to the film's structure. Hold me Abigail. What's also surprising is that there is an actual story here. One of hereditary mental illness, love triangles, and much to do about murder. It plays out much like an Andy Milligan film from round about the same time and say what you want about Milligan's work, at least it's more comprehensible than what A Night To Dismember used to be.

Being a Doris Wishman film, regardless which version, she would actually have had to try to not make A Night to Dismember the trash classic that it is. The most significant highlight of the lost version for me was how hyperbolic the story was in it's bleakness. Our protagonist is not only mentally unfit, she's also being cheated on, gets pregnant with her boyfriend's child, gets beat up by her dad because of it, died during childbirth and her offspring is forced to live on with the curse as it were of her mother's madness. Classical Wishman misanthropy, the default mood of New York exploitation cinema.

Two more stand out elements of the lost version are the truly ambitious gory set pieces which now have better build up and feature more coverage and secondly the seemingly now original insane music score which is by far one of the most unsettling you can come across within the entire slasher sub-genre. An esoteric, often oppressive offering that echoes the immaculate sound design work of Last House on Dead Street. Really great stuff.

So what else can I say other then that the lost version of A Night To Dismember is a prime slice of golden age era low budget slasher sleaze that is as grimy and hysterically depressing as you could ever hope to see emerge from New York's exploitation scene. I loved what we already had, but the comprehensiveness of the original version can only make this underseen slasher gem more exposed with it's improved accessibility. It would be a dream of mine to see both versions of this piece of exploitation history scanned in HD and made readily available. Highly, highly recommended.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Warning: causes irreparable damage to eyes and brain.
Coventry22 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Every living organism gradually gets better in what it does... It's a simple process called learning, or the principle of "practice makes perfect". Directors usually also have a learning curve, as the first couple of movies in their careers are often experimental tryouts while their final films are the best and most qualitative achievements. However, this seemingly doesn't apply to Doris Wishman, because her last films are just as terrible as the first films in her career. In fact, the latter films are arguably even worse! Films like "Bad Girls go to Hell" or "Nude on the Moon" were still enjoyable whereas this "A Night to Dismember" is downright unwatchable. After nearly three decades of experience, Doris' movies are still amateurish, unendurably boring, and inept. Every inexperienced but aspiring horror director should see this movie and take notes on how it is not done...

Like, do not make use of an awful voiceover to narrate the already simplistic plot, do not hire your untalented family members and neighborhood friends and pretend they are actors, do not use the world's most inappropriate and monotonous music from start to finish, do not assume that grotesque gore and splatter compensates for the lack of screenplay and so on, and so on...

I'm not even sure why I'm bothering but here's the plot synopsis: every member of the whole wide Kent family has the bad habit of dying in nasty axe-related accidents. Samantha Fox - no, not the one you think - plays Vicki Kent and she's prematurely released from a mental institution. Mum and day are ecstatic that the family is reunited again, but her wicked brother and sister want to send Vicky back to the looney bin as soon as possible. They do everything they can to drive her nuts and bloodied corpses start piling up again. Whenever the narrator isn't mumbling redundant nonsense, "A Night to Dismember" is just a horrible series make-up effects and laughable splatter situations that are practically impossible. I'm fully aware of the fact that the title sounds extremely cool and that the DVD cover image looks irresistible but be well advised it's one of the worst horror flicks in history.

*Note: this user-comments previously got deleted following a complaint. I edited some parts and offer my apologies in case it's still offensive to some people.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
There are some movies you just HAVE to see...
sexdwarf6 October 2002
A NIGHT TO DISMEMBER may not be one of them, but jesus, I honestly can't think of another film so disjointed, so visually unattractive, so inane and illogical beyond belief as this train wreck on film. So, because of that I strongly suggest anyone who seeks out the macabre, twisted, odd and unusual to do whatever it takes to see this movie. Thinking back, I'm almost sure it has to do with a woman released from an insane asylum and a whole lot of elevator music and narration. A detective narrates the entire film (!), telling us things that have absolutely no relation to what we are actually seeing. He stumbles and stutters his lines, coming across like an 8 year old with dyslexia. It's actually very funny. Occasionally, the actors in the film do get to speak (albeit they are HORRIBLY dubbed.) Much of the time when they are speaking, we aren't shown the actors' faces, rather their feet, a couch or a house plant! Oh yes, like any Doris Wishman film we get plenty of shots of people's feet. She must've had a foot fetish, like 99% of America I suppose. Ok, I'm trying to give you the plot of this car accident but it is physically impossible. Woman gets out of loony bin, her brother and sister try and drive her back there (for what reason, I have NO idea), a few gory murders take place (in the HG Lewis gory way) and before you know it, this 70 min. mess is over and you wonder to yourself JUST WHAT IN THE HELL YOU WATCHED. And just in case the movie itself isn't surreal or bizarre enough, Wishman throws in a couple of dream sequences to REALLY throw you off. In one dream, a woman is slashed and knifed to death about 100 times, slashing and knifing, over and over and over.. She moans like she's having an orgasm. Speaking of orgasm, A NIGHT TO DISMEMBER probably has a budget much lower than your average porn. Technically speaking, THIS IS UNDOUBTEDLY the worst motion picture made. Point blank. But, I found enough enjoyment to watch it multiple times. It's funnier than most comedies, and makes not a lick of sense that it BEGS to be watched. A true spectacle.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Clumsy
Leofwine_draca1 May 2022
A really bad attempt at an independent horror film from Doris Wishman. This has no real plot and is just a jumble of nightmarish sequences in which a series of people are hacked and slashed by an escaped psycho. It's laughably poor throughout, totally inept from beginning to end, and even the gore attempts are so clumsy that they make next to no impression on the viewer.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Good for a number of chuckles.
Hey_Sweden21 October 2014
Legendary exploitation filmmaker Doris Wishman fumbles her way through this inane ode to the slasher film. It's an oddly interesting mess. One does have to give Wishman credit for trying to make something out of nothing, with a bunch of ridiculous scenes and a whole lot of truly terrible acting connected by a voice-over narration. The splatter is absolutely wonderful in its utter tackiness and excess, the music is often wholly inappropriate, and there are a sufficient amount of scenes and moments that are sure to have cult horror aficionados laughing out loud. (A case in point? That decapitation sequence.)

Porn star Samantha Fox is the only "actor" here of anything resembling name value, as she plays Vicki, a young woman fresh out of an insane asylum. It seems that her brother Billy (William Szarka) is trying to send her right back there, and while this is going on, horrific axe murders take place. The intrepid detective on the case, O'Malley, provides all the exposition with his narration.

Wishman also co-edited this, along with Larry Marinelli, and one can only imagine how that process must have gone down, with the two of them assembling *something* resembling a story out of a bunch of spare parts. One good thing is that "A Night to Dismember" is often just surreal, and incompetent, enough to be utterly fascinating in spite of itself. It could conceivably bore some viewers, but others will undoubtedly find it quite funny, and endearingly dumb.

Five out of 10.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
'A Night To Dismember' Is A Film You Won't Soon Forget
BenTramerLives788 December 2020
A Night To Dismember is one of the weirdest films ever made. It's terrible and makes no sense, yet it's one you which you cannot stop watching. Almost all of the dialogue comes from the voiceover of a detective who tells us the story of a cursed family. Members of this family are always finding themselves dead and one of the girls of the family comes out of a mental institution only to have more family members end up dead. This is one of the worst made films of all time and yet I find it compelling at times. It mostly looks horrible, there's too much gore most of the time, and the acting is atrocious and yet it is a film not to be missed.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Almost unwatchable
Tikkin26 May 2006
A Night To Dismember is probably one of the worst slasher flicks in existence. I've seen loads, but this one really takes the crown. Perhaps it was the editing problems that made it so unwatchable, but as far as I'm concerned it would have been awful even without these. There is no passion whatsoever, from the director or the actors, which ultimately leads to a dull film. Most low-budget slasher flicks are entertaining in some way or another because the director was a fan of horror films. Not so in this case. The only remotely "decent" scene is when the girl gets stabbed to death in her dreams, and she moans erotically as if she's enjoying it. I didn't keep watching for much longer than this because the film was frying my brain.

All self-respecting horror fans should avoid this as it's not good on any level. This and another awful film called Blood Shack are at the top of my list of worst horror films.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
rarely seen splatter fest
dav07dan0225 July 2005
Director: Doris Wishman, Cast: Samantha Fox, Saul Meth, Miriam Meth

Slasher film starring Samantha Fox (not the singer)about the Kent family that all get murdered or dismembered by some deranged person. This film had the potential to be the most notorious film of all time for gore and violence but it is severely hindered by its low budget production. It is too cheap looking to be shocking or scary.It looks as if it was made by a film student! The movie was filmed without sound and the sound was dubbed in later. It has almost no dialog. Most of the film is narrated by the person playing the detective.

If one takes this film for what it is, a low budget slasher film, it is actually a fun little cult flick. It is a great film for fans of rare underground exploitation films. Doris Wishman made a lot of low budget exploitation and nudie films going back to the 1960's. The Elite DVD has a funny commentary with Wishman and her cinematographer.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I think the film was dismembered.
Nightman8518 November 2005
Famed lame-film maker Ed Wood doesn't have anything on DORIS WISHMAN! This celluloid train wreck is apt proof too.

Girl returns home from the loony-bin and someone begins to butcher the people around her. Who is the killer.... and will we care?

Hilariously awful slasher is a doozy from beginning to end. All the characters are dubbed (by about two people), the editing is completely chaotic, the gore FX extremely cheap, and the plot is nearly incoherent. Word has it that half of Wishman's shot footage for the film was destroyed and she had to go back and re-edit and re-write the film with the remaining footage. The film is just sloppy enough for it to be true.

The only good thing about A Night to Dismember is its memorable title and an amusing DVD commentary by director Wishman and her camera man. The bickering conversations between those two are worth more than a few laughs! The movie itself though is so terrible it's amazing that it was ever released.

BOMB out of ****
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A tour-de-force in bad filmmaking
drownsoda9010 August 2018
Poor psychotic Vicki Kent seems to be plagued by an ancestral curse that drives her and her family members to kill. Upon being released from a psychiatric institute after killing two neighborhood boys, Vicki soon picks up the hatchet and gets back to dismembering her family line.

Doris Wishman's "A Night to Dismember" is a true landmark in bad filmmaking-it's hard to say whether it is a result of the filmmakers' ineptitude or the troubled production history (which included multiple reels being destroyed, causing Wishman to rework the film with stock footage and an entirely new plot grafted onto the pre-existing footage). In any case, it has gone down in the annals of trash cinema for good reason.

I cannot pretend this is a worthwhile film for most moviegoers, but as a pure oddity, it is required viewing for hardened slasher fans. Pornographic actress Samantha Fox portrays the insane Vicki, and is surrounded by a group of equally inept actors. The entire film is narrated with a documentary-like voiceover from a policeman who investigated the crimes, and there is virtually no dialogue present; what is there is badly-dubbed and only accentuated by sloppy editing, bizarre montages, and amateurish special effects for good measure.

In any event, I found the film entertaining on a primal level, only because it feels like a fever dream pulled from the head of a madman. The fact that Wishman even finished it is something of a minor triumph, and it is weirdly amusing in all its badness. For the casual moviegoing majority, it is a laughable disaster, and even hardened fans of slasher films and camp trash will find elements of it almost too absurd; but midway through, I couldn't help but feel there was some earnestness behind it, and the bones of what could have been an at least average psycho-slasher flick. The result is many ranks below average of course, but it is a fun romp for people who find entertainment, genuine interest, or pure comedy in cheapjack horror. You have been warned. 5/10.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Night to Dismember delivers the laughs
smcarter196620 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
A Night to Dismember, a very catchy title indeed, had me ready because I knew it was cheese, and then I started to watch it. Simply hilarious.

Because much of the original film had been lost, new footage had to be shot to replace it, and it shows. Disjointed editing, a new soundtrack that replaces the old soundtrack which sound effects and the score just doesn't match the action on screen (a good example is when one of the main characters is being attacked during a dream sequence, the soundtrack doesn't have terror laden screams, it has moans akin to a porn film), and repeating footage makes this film a truly funny film.

The parodies of the slasher genre of the 1980's can't hold a candle to the laughs in this one. Watch it, you'll be glad you did.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Self-MSTing movie!
Vornoff-31 August 2003
For those of you who will not enjoy the surreal experience of a film completely composed of dubbed out-takes and low-budget gore without the companionship of certain silhouettes, there is hope! Simply rent the DVD version of this film and listen to the "commentary" by director Doris Wishman and her cinematographer, Chuck. They had me in stitches all the way through. It is obvious that neither one could follow the plot, or really figure out what to say to an audience about their opus, so they spend most of the time insulting each other and trying to remember who's apartment each scene was shot in. Doris: why won't you answer poor Billy Szarka's letter?
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Thrashy psycho-thriller fails
bruntt23 October 2000
Wishman's attempt at making a psycho-thriller fails completely.

The plot is hilarious: A girl returns from the asylum after five years. Her brother makes various attempts to make her go mad again. In the end it turns out that her (older?) sister is maybe not to be trusted.

The story is "told" by a private dick who most of the time sits at his desk doing nothing but telling us what time it is!

The most amazing thing about the movie is the soundtrack: Funky-jazzy-whatever music is playing all the time, ie. only very rarely do you actually hear the characters utter anything but one syllable words (noo, aargh, don't!). Actually the use of music is too far out - and the only reason the film gets a five/ten rating from me!

Another good thing to say about the movie is that if you really like movies that are so bad that they're funny - you definitely have to go and see this one (and "zeta one" - another of my favourites).
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed