Warriors of Virtue (1997) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
41 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Teenage mutant Kangaroos
May_lo30 June 2008
This film is one of those forgotten 90s rip-offs from the Ninja Turtle fall out. It's easy to forget how insane the turtle craze was but it is also easy to forget that the original TMNT movie was actually pretty decent. Most of it's sequels and copies were not.

Which brings us to this little gem...

It's a film so bad it's good. The fight scenes are sloe-mo with wind-blown leaves for no reason other than effect. The warriors of virtue are kangaroos with martial art skills, they personify the virtues eg patience....and it's fight to the death between good and evil. All told it's a great movie for kids that the adults can enjoy while pretending to be too old for it.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Good fight scenes and production design but...
Elwood_Blues8 May 1999
After I saw this film I had mixed feelings about it. The film has a good production design and some very well done fight scenes. On the other hand it has a lousy script. As soon as anybody opens his his mouth you start to cry and beg him/her to shut it immediately because it is really annoying to hear the same old cliches over and over again. It seems that the entire budget was invested in fight scenes etc. and the pitiful rest into the story and/or the actors. I give this film 5 out of 10.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Rather Slow and Boring With a Fun Villain
humanconvertable29 June 2011
Warriors of Virtue is a rather strange movie, but I find it a great bore. While the idea of martial art marsupials seems goofy and stupid, but at least it would be entertaining. This movie, however, seems to have a consistency of dragging dialogues, confusing setups, and poor delivery. It takes forever for the action to start up, and when it does, the cinematography is unnecessary and often hard to make out. The very idea of the movie may sound silly, it had promise to at least be ridiculously entertaining, but the slow route it takes and the basic "nothingness" it envelopes kind of makes it not so much a good movie. However, the one thing that always brought me back to this film was the villain. The acting in the villain's case is just so over-the-top and enjoyably hilarious that he makes the film worth watching. Give him props because he was starred in other movies like "Titus."
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good Movie, but most dont understand...
steven_goodell11 March 2004
This movie was actually very good for what it was trying to do, which is give a summary (very simply) of the VERY esoteric chinese philosophy of Taoism. Those who know nothing of Taoism will definitely find that this movie does not make much sense in some places.

All of the characters are embodiments of the virtues and faults presented in the Taoist Philosophy. Yes, this makes for quite the challenge to present it in childrens movie no less.

The movie is fun if you dont take it to seriously. It would seem that some of the people posting here thought they were there to see Gone With the Wind or some other Epic or adult piece. Take it as lighthearted and as a possible education on a foreign way of thought, if you are into that new things. (Then again you could just read books on Taoism to get a somewhat clearer view)

3 out of 5 for production, 4 out 5 for accomplishment
28 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Say what?
rob-231319 November 2008
Alright, I admit going in that I was predisposed to dislike this movie. I have studied Taoism for many years, and I guess I don't take kindly to it being reduced down to a 90 minute family friendly event. Although it came highly recommended to me, I was put off by it's kid friendly approach to something as complex as Eastern Philosophy.

Through out the film, I could not shake the vision I had of a Roos vs Turtles sequel.

Although not as bad as I feared, this film looks for all the world like it was edited by a Cuisinart. The over extended climatic fight scene had so many different editing styles present that it nearly gave me an epileptic fit. Either that, or my digital TV is on the blink.

I really cannot recommend this film to anybody except possible a few hard core gamers who would get off on the cartoon-like action sequences.
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Lazy fantasy, cool concept, maybe even a guilty pleasure
RichardKleiner19 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I stumbled upon this one basically by accident. While channel surfing at midnight, this came on, and saw an ordinary world kid in some pretty ancient looking forest, exploring it with a "where am I?" face, so I pretty much could tell this was some outsider boy who lives adventures in a fantasy world.

If you haven't noticed from the mere cover of the movie, this is no Lord of the Rings. Even worse, it doesn't live up to cult classic fantasies like Krull, Willow or Dark Crystal.

I'm a big fan of fantasy movies that deal with what I like to call "the outsider myth": some kid magically travels to a distant land and lives adventures (who wouldn't like to?), so I was left hypnotized with the potentially entertaining story and, (forgive me) the Elysia character.

However, one of many flaws with this movie are the Warriors of Virtue themselves. They're kinda rat or kangaroo-looking people with great martial arts knowledge. Rather out of place for this type of fantasy, and when you see them in action, it just doesn't work. It's like watching sports mascots practicing kung fu. Much more laughable than exciting.

This can be a turn off if you expected classic sword and sorcery swashbuckling, for instead, it delivers martial arts in flurry costumes.

The sets are awful, with no variety. No exploration of this fantastic (sarcasm) land is ever done, and all you see is a forest, an evil palace lair, the same forest and huts on trees in (you guessed it) the forest.

The main villain, one girly, over-the-top emperor, is both campy and not so evil. There appears to be a major battle to occur between his soldiers and the good guys, but no real sword fight ever occurs. Instead, you see more fluffy karate. The Evil Emperor inexplicably splits into five guys and fights all five warriors. If you thought that would be boring, they even show it in blurry vision, just another sign of the movie's inappropriately low budget. And by the end, the bad guy somehow has amnesia, forgets he was so cruel and joins the good guys (to make things even more yawn inducing). Like you could actually care. An underrated score by Don Davis helps the movie from falling completely into oblivion, but not an entirely new sound.

The mythology might sound good, so maybe a remake some decades later could squeeze some more juice to the premise. But, until that happens, you can keep "Warriors of Virtue" on the shelf and pass it on.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Marsupials of Tedium
tgbtg428 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Hokey over-sized Zen kangaroos using Buddhist philosophy and preposterous martial arts in cumbersome Halloween costumes (Who spray-painted the Barney outfit?) to defeat some demented creep in eye-liner while yakking interminably about virtue and Taoist theology.

Short on warriors, shorter on virtue, the potty-mouth dialogue is anything but virtuous, especially in the scripted lines written for 12-year-olds. (Make that "by 12-year-olds".) This turkey ranks with "The Neverending Story"...minus the "story". I'll bet the studios are still looking for the guy that took them on this one.

On your deathbed, you'll wish you had this 103 minutes back. If you haven't yet wasted your time on this bomb, repent of the notion while there's hope. Ralph Macchio should be thankful he was too old to be caught in the kid's role. Who writes this stuff???
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
So Cheesy It Is Amazing
shark-4321 April 2006
WOW -- this thing is so weird, so bad in many ways that it is a cheesefest for bad movie lovers. Now, Ronny Yu is a talented director - his magical fairy tale THE BRIDE WITH WHITE HAIR is beautiful and wonderful. I also know many horror fans enjoy his FREDDY v.s. JASON (I haven't seen it) but this film - an odd attempt to mesh a kiddie film, an adventure, martial arts, evil villains, music video art direction AND KANGAROOS that can kick butt with karate and ninja moves - has to be seen to be believed. There is a mopey kid with a bad leg who longs to play football - he is teased by the jocks who convince him to try a physical dare and he falls into a sewer plant's whirlpool (you with me??) and sucked into a magical world where HIS LEG IS OKAY - and gosh, once you have a group of kung-fu kangaroos, life is sweet. The make-up or masks - whatever they did to make the kangaroos' faces - well, its just plain creepy. And the villain in the fantasy world is played by Angus MacFayden who has gone on to be good in Braveheart and as Orson Welles in Cradle Will Rock- but, um,,,Angus gives a performance that is so over the top it is jaw-dropping. Major ham and cheese sub job. It's funny how an actor will know he's in some trainwreck and many times will just sleepwalk through it (or drink through it) and just mumble their way through it dead-eyed BUT sometimes they figure, Aw - what the hell - I know the movie's crap but I'm gonna have fun! And he does - made up to look like the lead singer of The Cure, he screams and pouts like a fey King Lear. It's wild. The movie has so many strange things in it that I highly recommend it for fans of cinema oddities.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A Great Cure for Insomnia.
bugg-640-25974812 March 2010
There are a lot of horrid, bad movies out there and there are a lot of unwatchable, boring movies out there. With this movie, we get the worst of both worlds.

1) The characters. The actual warriors have no real character; the movie has to list their personality traits! The kid himself is not interesting and the villain is just over-the-top goofy.

2) The visuals. The world of Tao (Actually pronounced "Dao") is nothing you haven't seen before and the puppetry is pitifully bad. Mouth movements by the warriors and others rarely match up with dialog. Fight scenes are simply unwatchable, with this weird frame-cutting technique.

3) The slug-like pace. If it wasn't for Mountain Dew, I would've fallen asleep numerous times.

At least with films like Battlefield Earth, we get entertainment, even at the expense of the movie. Here, we don't have such luck.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not half bad
La Gremlin8 March 2001
Alright, let's get the joke out of the way first of all:

"Crouching Glam Guy, Hidden Wallaby", anyone?

Seriously, I rented this movie expecting your typical late-80's fantasy with cheesey dialogue and bad special effects and annoying child actors. Well, to that end I got my money's worth. However, while this is nowhere nearly as good as, say, "the Neverending Story" or "Labyrinth", it's not nearly as bad as I expected.

Curiously, this is one of the few movies I've seen that might have been a *lot* better animated. Kung-fu kangaroos isn't exactly a concept best realized in live action. However, the crappy effects belie the clever premis. Give it a look.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
An Embarasment to Kangaroos
ecctv3 September 2001
This movie was horrible! The story is that this kid falls into a whirlpool (which we now call the Giant Toilet) and ends up in "Kangaroo Land" pretty much. He has to help his "Kanga-friends" fight the evil master who sleeps in half a clam shell. I think I've blocked the ending out of my memory. The movie is full of bouncing kangaroo-people and an evil leader who's hair is way too long and the director takes advantage of that, making him spin around and showing it in slow motion. Its so dramatic!!! Ugh, if you have to choose between watching this movie, and watching Kazaam! watch Kazaam! (And Kazaam isn't such a good movie in itself, to say the least.)
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fantastic if you're a Chinese traditional or Taoist
blackrose90922 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Well, as one of the other users pointed out, this movie is in fact based on the Taoist philosophy, which is somewhat religious. It uses most of the 8 virtues, as listed in ancient Chinese philosophy, which many people still value.

For people who are unaware of all this, especially those who care little for virtues and vices, I can see why this movie seemed so bad.

However, I do not think it is anywhere near the worst/cheesiest movie of all time. I personally enjoyed it immensely when I saw it as a child and later as a teenager. Why are people being so harsh? Do they not appreciate the concept of peer pressure and the triumph of good over evil. Well to be more precise, the movie revealed bad people as having good in them, which I think is important for everyone to remember.

People today are so very self-cantered and unforgiving and in this light, I believe this movie is more than just a kid's movie or action-flick and as such, deserves more credit than it is currently getting.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Entertaining
ricq918 April 1999
Kung fu fans and Fantasy film fan would like this film. After seeing a 4+ rating, I thought it's really bad. I guess it deserves a 7.0
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I punished my kids by making them watch this film
RodimusPrime75200022 March 2009
My kids were acting like little monsters, so I was going to just have them sit down and watch Spykids, but are DVD player wasn't working, so I turned on the VCR and made them watch a video from my best friends VHS collection.

I never saw the movie before and neither did my kids it took about 20 mins before the kids realized how bad this movie truly was! I said, "fine don't watch", but then they were acting up again. So, I sat them on the couch and told them they are going to watch the whole movie, til dinner was ready.

Lets just say from now on, when I really want to punish them, I put them in the basement and make them watch the movie as punishment. My kids have never been so well behaved.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ninja Kangaroos?
randjuke2 January 2000
This movie is like the little girl with the curl - when it's good it's very very good, when it's bad it's horrid. The sets are great and there are some neat effects, but for some reason whoever produced this decided to use five Ninja KANGAROOS as the heroes. I can just see the production meeting: "Hedgehogs? Noo. How about beavers? Noo. Kangaroos? Yeah, kangaroos!!".

The guy who plays Komodo (the head baddie) seems to have some talent and presence, but the director has him alternately mumbling, whining and screaming in a random pattern. The rest of the actors are an odd mix of caricatures and straight acting.

The plot and "message" are good but have been done before many times. Mr. Miyagi, oops I mean Yoda, er Obi-wan Kenobi, no I mean Master Chung keeps cropping up to spew some platitudes and even comes back after death to encourage Luke Skywalker, oops I mean Ryan, the boy hero.

This movie is not all bad and there's worse ways to waste an evening. The viewer ends up wishing, however, that the producers would have shifted some of their money away from sets and special effects and into a script and direction.
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Warriors of No Virtue.
anaconda-406589 June 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Warriors of Virtue (1997):Dir: Ronny Yu / Cast: Angus MacFadgen, Mario Yedidia, Marley Shelton, Jack Tate, Doug Jones: Represents the doing of good and prevention of evil but its violence is aimed at those poor folks who enjoyed Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. Both films resemble each other tremendously with the exception that this junk never caught on. That is due largely in part that this is eye candy crap. Children attending were introduced to such terms as "sh*t happens." A boy is sucked into a strange world and encounters the warriors of virtue. They resemble kangaroos and each gain power from nature via earth, wood, metal, fire, and water. Trained by their master to protect their village but the kid obtains a book that can render total power to the enemy. Overburdened with flaws including no plot. The violence is over the top and glorified to the delight of its young viewers. Director Ronny Yu is backed by fine production but the cast overact horribly. Among those who were suckered into starring in this crap are Angus MacFadgen, Mario Yedidia, Marley Shelton, Doug Jones, and Jack Tate. They provide no personalities to these kangaroo looking creatures and it is likely that their contribution will go unnoticed. The Ninja Turtles are slightly more entertaining and have personalities where these creatures do not. The result is a big pointless mess containing no virtue. Score: 2 / 10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Passion and effort are on display for a muddled and dull fantasy adventure.
IonicBreezeMachine5 April 2021
Ryan Jeffers (Mario Yedidia) is a young boy with a disabled leg who dreams of being able to play football alongside the other kids. After Ryan accepts a dare to paint his name on a wall in a drainage basin, Ryan is washed away by a deluge of water. Ryan awakens in the magical but dying world of Tao (pronounced with a "t" in the movie rather than a "d"). Ryan stumbles across the last remnants of resistance in Tao at the lifespring who are in a losing war against sorcerer/warlord Komodo (Angus Macfadyen) who has ravaged all of Tao's other lifespirng's in pursuit of eternal life. Ryan is told by Tao elder Master Chung (Chao-Li Chi) that Ryan is the Newcomer who will bring the Manuscript of Tao back and give the kangaroo Warriors of Virtue the chance they need to reclaim Tao from Komodo.

Warriors of Virtue has a very odd production history. The film was a passion project for the four Hong Kong born American Law Brothers (Ronald, Dennis, Christopher, and Jeremy) based on characters they created and using their personal finances that their father had accrued in the toy manufacturing industry. None of the brothers had any prior experience or connection with filmmaking, and fronted the entirety of the film's $35-36 million dollar shooting budget themselves (though the brothers claim other investors contributed) while MGM/UA fronted another $20 million in distribution and advertising costs. The brothers using their finances procured talent from both eastern and western film industries with effects artist Tony Gardner (Darkman, Army of Darkness, Hocus Pocus, etc.), Oscar winning production designer Eugenio Zanetti, and respected character actor Angus Macfadyen. You can tell the brothers had a lot of passion for the movie....it's just a shame the movie isn't very good.

The movie seems like it should be interesting even if by accident, but the movie shoots itself in the foot by making the titular Warriors of Virtue secondary (bordering on tertiary) characters while the main focus is on our main character Ryan who just isn't all that interesting. Ryan has a disable leg and wants to play football.....that's it. He has a loving family, a small but loyal circle of friends, and lives in nice conditions but we're supposed to buy into his "woe is me, I can't play football" plot because.... I honestly don't know. Once we actually get to Tao after Ryan engages in an ill advised bet with the stock "Bully" characters the movie doesn't get much more interesting. The scenes where Ryan is first introduced are very dry and exposition heavy and we're told second hand about the titular Warriors of Virtue rather than allowing them to speak for themselves. For comparison Imagine if in the 1990 Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Movie the entire movie was told from the point of view of Danny Pennington while April O'Neill got the 2nd most screen time, Splinter got the 3rd most, and we only ever had Splinter tell us about the turtles and their personalities rather than see them first hand. That's basically what they did in this movie and it makes for a frustrating viewing experience because all the potentially interesting characters are held at a distance. It's frustrating because it feels like a bait and switch from what was promised.

The world of Tao is well built, but unfortunately fails to standout because of its familiarity to so many of other films. You can definitely see traces of the Dagobah swamp and Ewok Village from Star Wars, the bandit hide out from Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves, and the Lost Boys treehouse from Hook just to name a few. It's an ugly movie to look at because it's bathed in a mixture of shadows, brown, and purple and just isn't all that pleasant to look at. Komodo's fortress is slightly more visually appealing, but there's a flimsiness to the sets that keeps them from coming to life. The animatronic Kangaroos by Tony Gardener are okay and reasonably well designed, but the face unfortunately is a major misstep as they fall into the uncanny valley by an attempt to make the Roo heads look too human. Sorry to bring up Ninja Turtles again, but that movie knew to keep the comic/cartoon design and not try to "humanize" the turtles. I could see these designs being appealing, but they'd need to dial back the humanoid features to do so.

The fight sequences are at least reasonably well staged. While the nature of the Roo animatronics and costumes meant they had to be filmed at a lower shutter speed resulting in a more blurred appearance to the fights, there's at least a good sense of special geography and impact thanks to the experience of Hong Kong action director Ronny Yu. The action isn't the best that has come from those with a Hong Kong film pedigree, but it does have a good level of craft and style to it. Angus Macfadyen also gives a scenery chewing performance as villain Lord Komodo over annunciating, changing voice volume on a moment's notice, and making silly sounds and gestures that are unintentionally(?) funny. Objectively speaking it's a terrible performance, but it's the best kind of terrible performance.

Warriors of Virtue is a misguided but well intentioned failure. There are good elements in Warriors of Virtue, but a lack of a compelling story and misplaced focus on an uninteresting protagonist make Warriors of Virtue a slog to sit through. While there are some decent fight scenes and an entertaining performance from Angus Macfadyen, they're bogged down by scenes of long dry exposition and a meandering plot with too many ancillary elements. In terms of martial arts adventures for family audiences this is better than the likes of 3 Ninjas, Ninja Turtles III, or Surf Ninjas, but it's nowhere near the level of superior movies like Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles I or II.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
nostalgia But the movie is too cliche
deadlynexos30 June 2019
Obvious bad guy, good guy. It's not bad it's just not good unless you want a super obvious story that smacks you in the face with cliche.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Average but Watchable Fantasy Flick
SpotMonkee12 December 2016
This movie is a strange time capsule of the late 1990s, falling into the odd little subgenre of "kids' fantasy movie" that was quite popular in that decade, but seems to have faded away into obscurity. At a time when Power Rangers was arguably at the height of it's popularity, this strange mix of late twentieth century adolescent filmmaking and classical Chinese philosophy might leave the average viewer perplexed. Originally conceived by Chinese superstar producing team the Law Brothers (more movies than I can count) after the passing of their father, Warriors of Virtue follows Ryan (Mario Yedidia; the very definition of milquetoast), your average kid from the suburbs who is magically transported to the mystical realm of Tao (the pronunciation of which the mostly-American cast seems incapable of nailing down), joining forces with a team of anthropomorphic kangaroos who know wire-fu (don't ask) in the struggle against the fashion-challenged warlord Komodo (Angus Macfayden, more on him later) and his army of generic goons. Mixed in are a series of periodic pop-philosophical platitudes that don't really seem to tie in to the overall story and characters. For a film where the Taoist philosophy is made the main focus, it feels incredibly artificial and tacked-on, as if the screenwriter(s) didn't fully understand it. This is compounded by the simple fact that no one seems to pronounce the word properly. (For the record, it's pronounced with a hard 'D' sound, as in 'Dao') You would think that a movie made by a mostly-Chinese crew partially filmed in China would have gotten this fairly noticeable detail right. It gives the impression that the filmmakers simply weren't trying. The set design comes across as bland and uninspired. It's every 'magical' forest you've ever seen in a movie or TV show. The movie wastes a potential opportunity to showcase some truly inspired production design, considering China's rich artistic and architectural history. The cinematography by powerhouse Hong Kong DP Peter Pau (Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon) is equally disappointing, coming across as incredibly bland, flat, and lifeless, with an overuse of slow-motion and a strange blur effect that makes many of the action sequences difficult to watch. The acting ranges from unfathomably hammy (Komodo is simply a joy to watch every time he's on screen) to blandly competent (Ryan is every protagonist from every kids movie ever made). The suits used for the eponymous Warriors come across as more unsettling than memorable, though the legendary Doug Jones (as the warrior Yee) does make an admirable acting effort. The stunt-work, while skillfully handled, isn't anything we haven't seen before and fails to impress. Veteran director Ronny Yu (The Bride With White Hair, Freddy Vs Jason) makes an admirable effort, but fails to show off any of the same energy and talent that made his Hong Kong films stand out. The only aspect of the film that rises above average is the incredible score by Don Davis (The Matrix, House on Haunted Hill). If anything, it shows that even the most unremarkable of films can still have memorable music. And that's really what this film is, unremarkable. It's isn't particularly bad. The acting is fine overall, script moves a long at a swift pace, and the effects work is decent. But that's all it is. Decent. It's watchable, yes, but far from extraordinary. And for a film about Taoist Kangaroos who know martial arts, that is a sin greater than any other.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
masterfuly directed, excellent story and acting
arker7 January 2001
I read all the comments about this movie, and I started to watch this movie with low expectations, everyone was saying that this movie sucks. But then at half the movie, I realized that the suckers were the ones writting the reviews. Let me tell you that at the end of the movie I wished that it had not one but several sequels with the same quality in general. The producers really created something imaginative, the director just rocks with this movie, the acting is real good. This movie is way up there, and even better in some aspects, with Matrix and Blade, the story even though it is not truly original in itself, it delivers the goods. The action and martial arts, and the conveyance of the feelings and emotions, is for all ages not just for kids. Do not believe the fools that say this movie is awful. Please watch this movie if you want to see something spectacular and emotive. This movie deserves a double ten out of nine!!.
17 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
wonderful family film
stargazer-199010 January 2008
I absolutely adore this movie! It's a wonderful family film, it has a great storyline, and the fight sequences aren't all that bad. The only bad thing is when they slow the camera down slightly for effect (and that's not even terrible in itself). The characters are lovable, there are several quite funny parts, and it leaves you with a warm feeling in your heart. Warriors of Virtue is a masterpiece. PS - in case anyone didn't know, the poster at the top of the page is not the poster for this Warriors of Virtue movie. That's the poster for the other version, from either Japan or China (can't remember). The actual poster has Mario Yedidia on it. You can find it on Google :)
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Very Good
ChaoticReviews27 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
First of all, yes it seemed to be one of the knock off attempts, of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, but The Warriors of Virtue was not the first to take from TMNT, anyone remember Street Sharks? Also I seen other reviews all over the web mention clichés...... what kids action movie does not have cliché lines? It comes with the territory. Yes it gives a lot of reference to Taoist (Daoist) philosophy, that could be confusing to a foreign ethnicity and youth. Yet, would you rather them give a detailed account of the Tao belief system or just reference? How much reference was made to Asian martial arts philosophy in TMNT?

The script was lacking, but the scenery, costumes, martial arts, cinematography and ideology of the film carried the story where the script failed. Not many children's movies with bad scripting can come close. It is obvious where the money went, when you actually look at the action scenes, costume and set design. Imagine how many "roo" costume repairs and adjustments were made because of the action scenes.

So lets take a closer look at the screenplay writers, shall we? Michael Vickerman and Hugh Kelley, both of them never wrote a screenplay before Warriors of Virtue and none of the films they are known for on IMDb have ratings that even go above 6.0 and most are below a 5.0, the lowest being Michael Vickerman's The Wicked with a 3.7/10. I think that may answer the issues with the script. So I give it a 9, I would give a ten had the script not been written by inexperienced and dull writers, who still have not improved much, with very little under their belt even today, 17 years later.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A wonderful, movie for people of all ages!
catc16783_201 November 2004
So many people are saying that this movie is not worth their time. I am a movie fanatic, and this movie is a perfect movie for people of all ages. It is similar to the Dark Crystal, and many others like it. But what makes this one different is that actual little kids or people with disabilities that have never fit in with the crowd can watch this movie and get some confidence from it. I sure that we all need something or other to show us that we're all right for who we are and maybe that the real message this movie was sending. Go on and think that this movie is horrible, but no matter what I'll show it to my kid and my grandkids, because I enjoyed this movie.
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Amazing Fantasy
marcusperryhutton15 October 2019
I'm current times where everyone is remaking animated movies into live action. This was the first live action "Anime" that I had ever seen.

The costuming was amazing

The make up was amazing

The choreography was VERY Manga style.

The story explain Taoism in a way that everyone can understand.

There isn't CGI, it's ALL acrobatics.

Angus Macfadyen (Komodo) plays insane "bad guy" so well I remember being 16 and being completely captivated by his performance.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
wonderful production, lame storytelling
Yonhap S10 November 1999
Like most users here commented, Warriors of Virtue had wonderful production design, but the story leaves something to be desired. Maybe it's because of how the writers "kiddy-fied" the story. The action is typical of what you may see from some Hong Kong movies. There's the incredible feats of stunts like jumping tall buildings in a single bound, running over water, and high-powered martial arts. You should especially see the beginning of the movie how chef Ming cooks. It's all done with a semi-slow mo technique. Unfortunately, someone must have a terrible obsession over this technique because you see this way too frequently and in the presence of many falling leaves. Thus, after a while it really gets tiring. The production is pretty good for indoor sets. The production people creates a convincingly large army. It's too bad the story just lack the punch and simply relies on action (slow-mo action at that).

The verdict: 2.5 of 5 stars.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed