It's no Academy Award winner, but then no one watches the Academy Awards hoping to see Lisa Boyle tied to a bed in a girl-girl scene. Terrible dialogue and great scenery make this movie a decent rental for any Lisa Boyle fan.
7 Reviews
The Name Says It All
Thorwald-36 April 1999
An amusingly bad mix of post-Freudian psychology, sleep science, bedeviled women, and naked co-eds. This is a classic adult thriller, meaning that it is not thrilling and is really meant for frustrated teenagers. The acting is periodically horrible, but usually rises to the level of being just awful. The plot (about four students and a professor who conquer their sexual fears while lucid dreaming but--surprise!--meet a mysterious devil-woman in their dreams and must team up to defeat her) is intriguing in the let's-slow-down-and-look-at-the-overturned-tractor-trailer sort of way. Standard pay-TV after-dark fare.
If you want hot soft-core sex, then this is the flick for you
baseballnut570-121 January 2007
This otherwise awful movie has four redeeming features, the four lengthy and realistically presented love scenes involving extremely lovely actresses. As soft-core porn goes, this is probably as Hot as it can get. The rating of 7 applies only to the movie's position within the category of late night Blue movies.
Nothing else about the plot or its presentation is the least bit entertaining, which is too bad, since the original concept of entering and influencing the dreams of others is pretty cool--(See Dreamscape with Dennis Quaid) I would say that the problems stem from the budget, after shooting all the simulated intercourse, there must have been insufficient money to do more than one take of all the bad dialog.
Nothing else about the plot or its presentation is the least bit entertaining, which is too bad, since the original concept of entering and influencing the dreams of others is pretty cool--(See Dreamscape with Dennis Quaid) I would say that the problems stem from the budget, after shooting all the simulated intercourse, there must have been insufficient money to do more than one take of all the bad dialog.
Definitely, a surprise
guisreis13 January 2023
Imagine a B-film with cheap dated special effects which story mixes sexploitation, sci-fi (psychiatric revolutionary experiments) and fantasy (besides never explained divination abilities, there is a trip to the real of dream, where evil Devora reigns). It may be awful, don't you think? Well, I may admit that I surprisingly enjoyed it. It is B, it is exploitation, there is no great acting or amazing script, but I liked it. The story is interesting enough for a so unpretentious film, and eroticism (very softcore) is good. I did like Devora, a quite sexy character (kind of succubus dominatrix played by Patricia Skeriotis), that should have had more screen time.
Not bad
Steve-3314 July 1999
Aside from the sex it has a cool story. I loved watching Lisa Boyle. But anyways this film did need some better acting. I mean if a women that was trying to get into your nightmares and dreams what would you do. I wouldn't turn to people for help Anyways the best part I liked is when Grant thinks that he is having sex with Septemeber he is acutlly having sex with Devoia.
Patricia Skeriotis, is brilliant has she a fan club?
maurice_richards9 May 2002
Patricia Skeriotis is the only reason I watched this film she was brilliant as Devora. I am now a fan and wondered if she has got a fan club? The film is about a college lecturer who experiments with his students while they are asleep and the dreams that are induce and the lovely Miss Skeriotis enters their dreams
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
