THE BIRDCAGE is the hysterically entertaining Americanized version of the French classic LA CAGE AUX FOLLES. In this version Robin Williams plays the gay owner of a Florida nightclub who learns his straight son (Dan Futterman) is coming home and is engaged to be married. Williams learns from his son that his fiancée's parents (Gene Hackman, Dianne Wiest) are straight-laced and ultra-conservative and will not be comfortable meeting his gay father or his even more flamboyant lover (Nathan Lane) and suggests Williams send Lane out of town while Hackman and Wiest are in town. Instead, Lane puts on his best drag and meets the parents as Williams' wife in one of the most hilarious dinner party scenes ever filmed. This film is chock full of sparkling dialogue and sharp performances. I also found it rather refreshing to see Robin Williams playing straight man to Lane, who along with Hank Azaria as their housekeeper, practically steal the film from everyone else in one of the most entertaining comedies of the 90's. And the sight of Gene Hackman in drag is something everyone must experience.
254 Reviews
Charming and a lot of fun
TheLittleSongbird3 September 2010
Granted The Birdcage isn't perfect, it is a little too long and the ending came across as rather sudden, but I was really surprised at how much I enjoyed this film. It looks good, has a nice soundtrack, has a (I think) terrific script, good pacing, a fun story and above-decent direction from Mike Nichols. As for favourite scenes, there are some great scenes, but who can forget the dinner scene? The whole film is worth watching just for that scene for so many reasons. And the acting I had no problem with whatsoever. Robin Williams underplays but still delivers the laughs solidly, while Gene Hackman proves he is great as a comic actor. Dianne Wiest, Calista Flockhart and Hank Azaria also give terrific turns, however it is Nathan Lane's hilarious turn as Albert that steals the show. All in all, this is very good and very funny and charming. 8/10 Bethany Cox
Robin Williams and Nathan Lane as a gay couple
blanche-23 June 2006
Though nothing can beat "La Cage aux Folles," the film on which this American version is based, I still found "The Birdcage" delightful fun and hilarious at times, thanks to the comic geniuses of Robin Williams and Nathan Lane. Lane is the dramatic Albert, an over the top drag queen who has lived for years with Robin Williams, Armand, the owner of The Birdcage, where Albert performs. Armand once had a liaison with a woman, which produced a son, Val, who now wants to be married to the daughter of a conservative politician. In order for that to occur, Armand has to become butch, all gay art work, etc., needs to exit the apartment - and Albert must disappear for a few days.
Williams is hilarious - my two favorite scenes are his rehearsal with Albert and a young man appearing with him on stage, and the scene where he coaches Armand on being macho - priceless. Nathan Lane's shtick is familiar to me, as I've seen him in "The Producers" and "The Odd Couple" - he's a riot as the insecure, jealous, easily hurt Albert.
The role of Val is problematic, because how does one keep him from looking like a complete bastard as he shuts out Armand, who raised him. But Dan Futterman and Calista Flockhart as Barbara make a lovely young couple. Gene Hackman and Dianne Wiest are very funny as Barbara's befuddled parents.
It's been a long time since I've seen the French "La Cage aux Folles," and I saw the musical on Broadway as well. The French is superior to any version. The musical is quite poignant and emphasizes its statement in the song, "I Am Who I Am." The joy of the French film is that the actors playing the lovers, Ugo Tognazzi and Michel Serrault, play their roles very seriously, and the humor and poignancy come out of the situation and the outrageousness of the Armand character (Albin/Zaza in the French). In "The Birdcage," it's played for comedy all the way. That's okay. You'll still enjoy it. But see the original.
Williams is hilarious - my two favorite scenes are his rehearsal with Albert and a young man appearing with him on stage, and the scene where he coaches Armand on being macho - priceless. Nathan Lane's shtick is familiar to me, as I've seen him in "The Producers" and "The Odd Couple" - he's a riot as the insecure, jealous, easily hurt Albert.
The role of Val is problematic, because how does one keep him from looking like a complete bastard as he shuts out Armand, who raised him. But Dan Futterman and Calista Flockhart as Barbara make a lovely young couple. Gene Hackman and Dianne Wiest are very funny as Barbara's befuddled parents.
It's been a long time since I've seen the French "La Cage aux Folles," and I saw the musical on Broadway as well. The French is superior to any version. The musical is quite poignant and emphasizes its statement in the song, "I Am Who I Am." The joy of the French film is that the actors playing the lovers, Ugo Tognazzi and Michel Serrault, play their roles very seriously, and the humor and poignancy come out of the situation and the outrageousness of the Armand character (Albin/Zaza in the French). In "The Birdcage," it's played for comedy all the way. That's okay. You'll still enjoy it. But see the original.
We Are Family!
JSanicki16 February 2003
This film has the distinction of being quite possibly the funniest film that I've ever seen. I remember seeing this film the night it opened and laughing so hard that my friend told me she'd get up and leave me there if I didn't shut up!
Almost everyone I've talked to over the years swears by how hysterical this film is. There is a reason for that: Nathan Lane. This guy is a comic genius. He was nominated for a Golden Globe for his performance but should have been nominated for an Academy Award as well if you ask me. Originally when I first saw it, I didn't care for Robin Williams' character at all but the more I've seen it over the years (over fifty times) it grows on me. Dianne Wiest is her normal, ditzy self but is a scream here and Gene Hackman in that last scene...well, I don't want to give away anything.
Half of the fun of this film is the verbal repartee between the characters, especially anything between Hank Azaria, Nathan Lane or Dianne Wiest.
If you haven't seen this film, you owe it to yourself to just have fun and laugh the night away. Enjoy it!!!
My rating: 4 stars
Almost everyone I've talked to over the years swears by how hysterical this film is. There is a reason for that: Nathan Lane. This guy is a comic genius. He was nominated for a Golden Globe for his performance but should have been nominated for an Academy Award as well if you ask me. Originally when I first saw it, I didn't care for Robin Williams' character at all but the more I've seen it over the years (over fifty times) it grows on me. Dianne Wiest is her normal, ditzy self but is a scream here and Gene Hackman in that last scene...well, I don't want to give away anything.
Half of the fun of this film is the verbal repartee between the characters, especially anything between Hank Azaria, Nathan Lane or Dianne Wiest.
If you haven't seen this film, you owe it to yourself to just have fun and laugh the night away. Enjoy it!!!
My rating: 4 stars
Robin Williams and Nathan Lane: The Movie
johnnythegreaserboy11 February 2019
What do you get when you get two comedy legends like Nathan Lane and the brilliant Robin Williams and tell them to be as camp and lovable as possible? This movie. It's heartwarming how much Albert (Nathan Lane) tries to make himself 'normal' for his stepson's girlfriend, just to finally see he is normal. He's a wonderful mother figure, and that's all that matters. It's a funny, smart and sweet story that's a good thing to watch whenever you just want to feel better.
Hank Azaria shines
jewelp2427 December 2001
When I read a few of the user comments on the site, I noticed one thing was missing: Hank Azaria. He really made the movie what it is. It's a funny movie in general, but he really makes it funny. This movie is one of his very best performances.
If you don't get this movie, try some more gum
ironhorse_iv5 February 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I know that look. Hit me, go on. Hit me with why this movie isn't good, because I don't see that face plant of why I should hate this Mike Nichol's film. Yes, it might look like a pale copy of the original La Cage aux Folles, the 1978's French film in itself based on the 1973's play by Jean Poiret, but it's not a drag. Well, it's a drag in another way, but what I like about this remake is how they turns something from French, into a funny American movie. Armand Goldman (Robin Williams) owns a popular drag nightclub in South Miami Beach with his long-time lover Albert Goldman (Nathan Lane). Nathan Lane as Albert is a annoying character with his fits, non-stop complaining and diva like attitude. Some audience members might find the character too irritation to bother with the movie. Some audience members will look past that, due to fact that Albert is so hysterical due to his overreactions to everything. If some people dislike him, they would love the crude humor toward him from Armand. As much as Armand can not stand him, he sticks with Albert. Within the comedy, is a small great speech scene by Armand to Albert. These are two gay men of a certain age, and years of ostracism, threats and taunts would have conditioned them both to avoid any PDAs, no matter how strong the feeling between them. The speech gives the moment enormous poignancy feeling of genuine, heartfelt and caring to Albert. This scene is especially lovely, a great juxtaposition to the rest of the film which is wonderfully silly and comedic. Nathan Lane isn't the only one that nearly steals the movie from Robin Williams, as Armand's maid Agador Spartacus (Hank Azaria) takes a bite of funny throughout the film, with singing and dancing to music, making lousy food, and tripping over his own feet. Watching Agador was a delight, and pans away from Nathan Lane enough times, that we able to rest from his big, brassy yelling and complaining. Soon the Goldman's son Val (Dan Futterman) comes home to announce his engagement to Barbara Keely (Calista Flockhart), daughter of Kevin Keely (Gene Hackman), US Senator, and vice president of the extreme Committee for Moral Order and his wife (Dianne Wiest). First off, the actor Dan Futterman and Calista Flockhart were too old for the role, it felt weird in a way to see Calista play a awkward 18 year old. Both are in later scenes, boozing and smoking. Are we suppose to believe that a conservatism senator would allow his daughter to underage drink? Clearly both are wrong actors for the job. Gene Hackman as Kevin Keely is so extreme right conservatism, it makes the character seem like a political cartoon caricature less than a normal person. Kevin Keely decide to allow Barbara to marry Val only if they meet Val and his family at South Beach and use the marriage to get the media off of the scandal of his co-founder that been focus on him. While in Miami, Val fearing the worst like the Senator will not allow Barbara to marry him. Val tries to convince his father to hide his relationship with Albert and the fact that he is gay and Jewish. At first, Armand stood tall for his right to be open about his sexuality and his religious views, but seeing how much it would mean for him. He allow the dinner to happen, and to make himself seem straight and asking to get rid of Albert for the day was over the line. I just can't stand Dan Futterman's character, for this, what a jerk. First off, Calista's character is clearly old enough to get marry with or without her father permission, and second off, it was the 90's. It wasn't the Leave it to Beaver pre-sexualism freedom 1960's here. I felt it was wrong how Val treats his father to hide who his Father was, ask Albert to leave, all for a girl who only knew for a year. The whole thing was shameful on the part of the character. I know he wasn't in shame of his father's lifestyle, but he knew that Keelys wouldn't understand, and I know without this premise there is no movie, but still he only admit his fault to due to being catch, rather than seeing his wrongs on how he treated his father and Albert the last few days. I also felt the ending was a cop-out, as it's seem like there should had been an extra scene to show how the movie's plot got resolved. Yes it might seem like a bird-brained delight, but you just can't help loving it, and not taking it too serious. The movie acts less like La Cage aux Folles and more like a modern "You can't take it with you", a 1938 film. The music in the film is catchy, love the use of Sister Sledge- We are family, Gloria Estefan- conga, and Alan Lerner- I could have danced all night. It add with the positive good mood of the film. The whole singing scene before dinner was the best. What the movie does well is going beyond the stereotypes to see the character's depth and humanity, and that's why this movie should be check out. Try it, and you will find yourself liking it as much as I do.
An Old Fashoned Comedy
Hitchcoc5 January 2017
If it weren't for the fact this movie has as its world a gay nightclub and gay men, it could have starred Cary Grant and been one of those wacky comedies of the forties. This is absolutely a hoot. To start with, you have Robin Williams and Nathan Lane, two of the most amazing, on their feet comedians ever. Throw in the plot of "if we could pull this off for one night," and everything else is up for grabs. The dialogue is excellent with all its double entendres and dramatic irony. We have the Senator, thoroughly enjoying himself, without realizing he is flirting with a man, and everything else relating to that. Of course, there is constant backtracking and improvisation. You have to laugh.
A Film About Acceptance That Just Seems Too Fake To Accept
gavin69429 October 2006
I have heard from people over the years that "The Birdcage" is a good film and I thought it did fairly well at the box office. So I was hoping I would like it, and I wanted to like it... but I just can't bring myself to find a lot of redeeming qualities in this film.
What we have is a gay couple (Nathan Lane and Robin Williams) who have a grown son, and he is engaged to the daughter (Calista Flockhart) of a powerful conservative senator (Gene Hackman). When the senator gets invited to dinner, things get a little silly.
First, the nicest thing I can say is that the film is like a backwards version of "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner" because the socially acceptable people are entering the home of the social outcasts. But a backwards film exists already called "Guess Who", and I don't want to touch that. But anyway, in this context I guess the idea was alright.
Hank Azaria is also decent as the very flamboyant male maid (dressed more like a cabana boy). Any other actor doing this and I think the part would have been going over the top (as much of this film does), but Azaria is the kind of guy who makes over the top seem normal. And Calista Flockhart looks about as attractive as she ever could in this movie, which is the nicest thing I can say about her poor acting and usually poor screen presence.
The over-the-topness ruins some of what this film was trying to do, because it makes gays out to be extremely unlike other people, which I don't generally think is true. So if we are supposed to get a feel for gay lifestyles, why not make one more realistic? And the senator is just as cliché as a conservative senator (though I think he might be closer to reality than Nathan Lane is).
But worst of all about this film is the way the families interact. It is unbelievable and becomes more and more so as the film goes on. I know this is a comedy, but there were many key life lessons and dramatic scenes that were just completely defecated upon because the film put comedy and weak writing in places we absolutely did not need it.
This film fails, but as least it has Gene Hackman... the only reason I didn't give it less than a 5.
What we have is a gay couple (Nathan Lane and Robin Williams) who have a grown son, and he is engaged to the daughter (Calista Flockhart) of a powerful conservative senator (Gene Hackman). When the senator gets invited to dinner, things get a little silly.
First, the nicest thing I can say is that the film is like a backwards version of "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner" because the socially acceptable people are entering the home of the social outcasts. But a backwards film exists already called "Guess Who", and I don't want to touch that. But anyway, in this context I guess the idea was alright.
Hank Azaria is also decent as the very flamboyant male maid (dressed more like a cabana boy). Any other actor doing this and I think the part would have been going over the top (as much of this film does), but Azaria is the kind of guy who makes over the top seem normal. And Calista Flockhart looks about as attractive as she ever could in this movie, which is the nicest thing I can say about her poor acting and usually poor screen presence.
The over-the-topness ruins some of what this film was trying to do, because it makes gays out to be extremely unlike other people, which I don't generally think is true. So if we are supposed to get a feel for gay lifestyles, why not make one more realistic? And the senator is just as cliché as a conservative senator (though I think he might be closer to reality than Nathan Lane is).
But worst of all about this film is the way the families interact. It is unbelievable and becomes more and more so as the film goes on. I know this is a comedy, but there were many key life lessons and dramatic scenes that were just completely defecated upon because the film put comedy and weak writing in places we absolutely did not need it.
This film fails, but as least it has Gene Hackman... the only reason I didn't give it less than a 5.
Perfect Blend of Comedy and Family Drama
webwonk135722 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The Birdcage is so hilarious! Oh my goodness gracious, this movie just really leaves you gasping for breath because you can't stop laughing.
Past the "Fosse, Fossees" and "John Wayne imitations", this movie can be seen in a deeper level. It addresses the controversial topic of homosexuality and how people who are gay or lesbian are just like any other people. Nathan Lane plays the part of a woman so well that I still find myself forgetting that SHE is a HE.
The chemistry and interaction of the characters was played out so nice that the main message is clear. Amidst the sound of a nightclub, the first words the audience hears is "We are family..." This movie reminds people that no family is perfect.It shows the similarities between the contrasting serious and traditional family versus the lively, unorthodox family. Each family had its peculiarities and it shows the reality of family life. It is the love and genuine care for each other that makes up a family.
Past the "Fosse, Fossees" and "John Wayne imitations", this movie can be seen in a deeper level. It addresses the controversial topic of homosexuality and how people who are gay or lesbian are just like any other people. Nathan Lane plays the part of a woman so well that I still find myself forgetting that SHE is a HE.
The chemistry and interaction of the characters was played out so nice that the main message is clear. Amidst the sound of a nightclub, the first words the audience hears is "We are family..." This movie reminds people that no family is perfect.It shows the similarities between the contrasting serious and traditional family versus the lively, unorthodox family. Each family had its peculiarities and it shows the reality of family life. It is the love and genuine care for each other that makes up a family.
Who knew politics could be so funny? This movie had me laughing from start to finish!
Michael_Murry8 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
If you're interested in a more in depth review, please keep reading.
The GOOD: The casting in this movie is so perfect it still baffles me. Yes, Robin Williams is great in everything. Gene Hackman, is great is everything. But you put these two in a movie together and they do an incredible job of sharing the spot light. Each character has a memorable line, and an amazing interaction with the two flag ship actors. But Hank Azaria steals the show hands down. He is so funny in this movie, that I would watch a solo movie based on his character. I would really like to see a cooking show with Agador at some point. looking at you Netflix.
You can't talk about how funny everyone is in this movie without mentioning the set designs. The sets, give so many opportunities to the actors to just explore their characters. Every shot of the club is fantastic! I feel like I'm watching a drag show every time it comes on the screen. Not to mention the apartments transformation from gay couples home, to boring drab pad is sensational.
I have to talk about the direction as well. Working with an A-list cast means you have to let them run with their instincts, and that's exactly what happened. Not to say everything wasn't planned, but I'm sure half of what Robin said was not scripted, or Nathan for that matter.
The BAD: I'm not sure what the cinematographer was thanking for a few of the shots. It looks like the lens is just fuzzy. I understand he's trying to convey the scene that this takes place in Florida, but when is Florida fuzzy? The costume designer already conveyed the message by putting everyone is a Pepsi commercial from the 1980's.
The ending is left open with no idea whether or not the senator approves of his new family. We also don't get much of a reaction from Katherine, who is presumably seeing her son for the first time. She had more of a reaction when she saw Aramand for the first time in 20 years. Val also doesn't have a real reaction to meeting his birth mother for the first time, other then to just point out the huge sacrifice his parents are making by putting on this facade for the senator.
But the worst thing by a mile is the plan its self. You mean to tell me they couldn't just reschedule the meeting of the parents? If they did they could of had more time to either train Albert to be a man, or make the house "straighter". Even the senator could of had more time to deal with his campaign issues. A simple phone call and apology to say, "I'm so sorry we wont be able to make it this weekend to meet you. Things just took a major nose dive this week and I must stay here to clean up the mess."
Also, if the senator ate candy when he's stressed wouldn't he be 400lbs? Being a public official, in any capacity, is a very stressful job.
Now all that being said, this far and away one of my favorite movies of all time! Nathan Lane, Robbin Williams, Gene Hackman, and Hank Azaria are just phenomenal in these roles. One of the funnest moments in cinema history is when Robin is trying to teach Nathan how to act like a "straight guy". Also, Gene Hackman in a dress left me speechless, not to mention the way they exit the club, as a whole, at the end.
The GOOD: The casting in this movie is so perfect it still baffles me. Yes, Robin Williams is great in everything. Gene Hackman, is great is everything. But you put these two in a movie together and they do an incredible job of sharing the spot light. Each character has a memorable line, and an amazing interaction with the two flag ship actors. But Hank Azaria steals the show hands down. He is so funny in this movie, that I would watch a solo movie based on his character. I would really like to see a cooking show with Agador at some point. looking at you Netflix.
You can't talk about how funny everyone is in this movie without mentioning the set designs. The sets, give so many opportunities to the actors to just explore their characters. Every shot of the club is fantastic! I feel like I'm watching a drag show every time it comes on the screen. Not to mention the apartments transformation from gay couples home, to boring drab pad is sensational.
I have to talk about the direction as well. Working with an A-list cast means you have to let them run with their instincts, and that's exactly what happened. Not to say everything wasn't planned, but I'm sure half of what Robin said was not scripted, or Nathan for that matter.
The BAD: I'm not sure what the cinematographer was thanking for a few of the shots. It looks like the lens is just fuzzy. I understand he's trying to convey the scene that this takes place in Florida, but when is Florida fuzzy? The costume designer already conveyed the message by putting everyone is a Pepsi commercial from the 1980's.
The ending is left open with no idea whether or not the senator approves of his new family. We also don't get much of a reaction from Katherine, who is presumably seeing her son for the first time. She had more of a reaction when she saw Aramand for the first time in 20 years. Val also doesn't have a real reaction to meeting his birth mother for the first time, other then to just point out the huge sacrifice his parents are making by putting on this facade for the senator.
But the worst thing by a mile is the plan its self. You mean to tell me they couldn't just reschedule the meeting of the parents? If they did they could of had more time to either train Albert to be a man, or make the house "straighter". Even the senator could of had more time to deal with his campaign issues. A simple phone call and apology to say, "I'm so sorry we wont be able to make it this weekend to meet you. Things just took a major nose dive this week and I must stay here to clean up the mess."
- Senator Keeley to Armand
Also, if the senator ate candy when he's stressed wouldn't he be 400lbs? Being a public official, in any capacity, is a very stressful job.
Now all that being said, this far and away one of my favorite movies of all time! Nathan Lane, Robbin Williams, Gene Hackman, and Hank Azaria are just phenomenal in these roles. One of the funnest moments in cinema history is when Robin is trying to teach Nathan how to act like a "straight guy". Also, Gene Hackman in a dress left me speechless, not to mention the way they exit the club, as a whole, at the end.
One of the best comedies ever made
Koteas15 August 2005
First off; I can understand why people would dislike this movie; The characters are all portrayed in an extremely stereotypical way, the acting is considerably over the top most of the time, the story is rather cheesy and not very believable - I mean which gay couple would (or COULD) transform their eccentric home into a monastery-like environment in 24 hours to pretend to be a cultured family to impress the son's fiancée's parents?
...Yet I couldn't stop laughing all the way through, even after the 10th time. Why? It's BECAUSE the characters are so stereotypical, it's BECAUSE the acting is over the top, it's BECAUSE the whole thing is so unbelievable that it makes it scintillating to behold. Even though the characters are stereotypical, the script has obviously been written by someone who doesn't intend to contribute to the stereotypical view of the gay drag community, but who rather wanted to create characters that are lovable while at the same time shouting "don't take us seriously".
This isn't a movie portraying life in the gay society; and everyone who expects realistic (and hence probably rather unfunny) portrayal of such a theme is better off NOT watching a comedy featuring gays (don't most comedies thrive on making the stereotype seem funny?) It may not be politically correct all the way, but hey; society's too hung up on all this political correctness as it is,. The characters in this movie were lovable, perhaps BECAUSE they were stereotypical depictions. However they're brought to life so well by the actors playing them that it doesn't make you shake your head in frustration over yet ANOTHER movie portraying stereotypes, but rather makes you shake your head in laughter over the deadpan things they say and do, which are so obviously unreal at times that anyone who thinks this movie will promote a false picture of the gay community needs a reality check.
The script is amazing, and even though it may really be too over the top once in a while, it doesn't distract from the overall picture. The story isn't much; the focus on details is what makes this movie funny. Little gestures, frowns, face expressions and little subtleties make this movie one of the best comedies I have ever watched, and probably one of the best comedies I will ever be fortunate enough to see in my entire life. Contrary to what it may seem like at first sight, the humor is overly refined without being intellectual, instead of jumping in your face all the time.
What's more, the cast is great. Both Robin Williams and Nathan Lane are very fine comedians who have the touch it takes to play a role like this one. They make over-the-top stereotypes actually FUNNY, instead of just laughable.
And yes, I HAVE seen the original movie, not all too long ago actually, and I have to say the remake is twenty to the power of 99 times better than the original. I barely laughed, and the original version was in my eyes an utterly forgettable movie. And that coming from a person who usually hates remakes.
This movie gives the original "Birdcage" a fresh new shine and transports the story into the 90's. Well made, on all accounts, I can't think of a single criticism!
...Yet I couldn't stop laughing all the way through, even after the 10th time. Why? It's BECAUSE the characters are so stereotypical, it's BECAUSE the acting is over the top, it's BECAUSE the whole thing is so unbelievable that it makes it scintillating to behold. Even though the characters are stereotypical, the script has obviously been written by someone who doesn't intend to contribute to the stereotypical view of the gay drag community, but who rather wanted to create characters that are lovable while at the same time shouting "don't take us seriously".
This isn't a movie portraying life in the gay society; and everyone who expects realistic (and hence probably rather unfunny) portrayal of such a theme is better off NOT watching a comedy featuring gays (don't most comedies thrive on making the stereotype seem funny?) It may not be politically correct all the way, but hey; society's too hung up on all this political correctness as it is,. The characters in this movie were lovable, perhaps BECAUSE they were stereotypical depictions. However they're brought to life so well by the actors playing them that it doesn't make you shake your head in frustration over yet ANOTHER movie portraying stereotypes, but rather makes you shake your head in laughter over the deadpan things they say and do, which are so obviously unreal at times that anyone who thinks this movie will promote a false picture of the gay community needs a reality check.
The script is amazing, and even though it may really be too over the top once in a while, it doesn't distract from the overall picture. The story isn't much; the focus on details is what makes this movie funny. Little gestures, frowns, face expressions and little subtleties make this movie one of the best comedies I have ever watched, and probably one of the best comedies I will ever be fortunate enough to see in my entire life. Contrary to what it may seem like at first sight, the humor is overly refined without being intellectual, instead of jumping in your face all the time.
What's more, the cast is great. Both Robin Williams and Nathan Lane are very fine comedians who have the touch it takes to play a role like this one. They make over-the-top stereotypes actually FUNNY, instead of just laughable.
And yes, I HAVE seen the original movie, not all too long ago actually, and I have to say the remake is twenty to the power of 99 times better than the original. I barely laughed, and the original version was in my eyes an utterly forgettable movie. And that coming from a person who usually hates remakes.
This movie gives the original "Birdcage" a fresh new shine and transports the story into the 90's. Well made, on all accounts, I can't think of a single criticism!
Is Miami really this exuberant? I'm missing out.
Mr-Fusion4 November 2021
Siskel and Ebert are crackups, panning The Birdcage as an unnecessary remake of La Cage aux Folles. Well(!) . . . I'm a 'Murican and I ain't seen that French movie. So there!
But I'm well-acquainted with this movie and I think it's pretty great. Every actor here is perfect for their role; somehow Robin Williams is the serious one while Nathan Lane goes full drama queen (no pun intended) ; Gene Hackman is the ideal stick-up-his-ass Republican; and then there's Hank Azaria's flamboyant housekeeper, seemingly always around to make the situation worse. Everyone here is hysterical. The message of acceptance is timeless, the tone is just right, and it's (most importantly) just damn funny.
But I'm well-acquainted with this movie and I think it's pretty great. Every actor here is perfect for their role; somehow Robin Williams is the serious one while Nathan Lane goes full drama queen (no pun intended) ; Gene Hackman is the ideal stick-up-his-ass Republican; and then there's Hank Azaria's flamboyant housekeeper, seemingly always around to make the situation worse. Everyone here is hysterical. The message of acceptance is timeless, the tone is just right, and it's (most importantly) just damn funny.
I've given it three chances, and I still don't like it.
robfmdetroit3 April 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Let me preface this with two things:
1. Unlike some other negative reviews I'm seeing here, my opinion of this movie has nothing to do with the subject matter.
2. I have not seen the original French version.
Maybe I just don't appreciate "farce", a term which everyone who loves this movie seems to insist on using to describe it.
In my own terms, I'd describe this movie as battle-of-the-stereotypes trapped in a 95-minute long "Three's Company" episode--you're forced to watch as incredibly unreasonable and/or unrealistic decisions cause "misunderstandings" and "wacky situations" to pile up on each other, and you have to suffer through it all with uncomfortable anticipation because you know full well that at some point the paper-thin house of cards will all come crashing down. I find this kind of storytelling to be unbearable.
I love(d) Robin Williams, and maybe I'm just accustomed to seeing him in other roles, but I just don't entirely buy him in this role. It's not that it's a bad performance, it just seems more like a straight person's circa-1996 interpretation of what being gay is. He's believable as a loving partner, and he's actually the straight man (pun alert!) of his coupling with Nathan Lane, but there's at least one moment that stands out like something from his stand-up act -- too over-the-top and almost mocking to be in character.
Lane is grating. Again, another actor I like, but the character that he plays is so completely turned up to 11 at every moment--he's somehow loud, emotionally stunted, practically bipolar and a gentle snowflake all at the same time. Other reviews I've read here find him funny (I completely don't), but once again, I don't understand what's so funny about playing the character so unrealistically stereotypical. It also hurts the suspension of disbelief in Williams' character -- why would Williams' rather reasonable, down-to-earth character put up with Lane's character's nonsense?
And, a note regarding stereotypes: I've noticed some other reviewers here citing the overdone stereotypes as the REASON it's funny, and I couldn't disagree more. Yes, stereotypes can absolutely be cleverly and successfully worked into comedy--I would argue that the underrated "Undercover Brother" proves that--but these characters, most notably Lane, are just so loud and in-your-face that you get to a point where you just want them to shut up.
Another reviewer mentioned the son being a somewhat unlikeable character, and with the actions and demands he makes in the story, to that end, I agree. This is yet another casualty of this movie's disconnect from reality -- the son of a gay couple could never actually expect his parents to do what he's asking of them. Granted, it's probably because this movie is based on a relic of the late 70s, but still.
Despite mostly hating this movie, the reason I'm giving it 3 out of 10 is because it has a COUPLE of bright spots. Hank Azaria has a few good moments as Lane and Williams clownish house boy, and there are a couple of random funny bits sprinkled here and there (Williams trying to teach Lane how to be less outwardly gay is pretty funny). Also, I love Christine Baranski--unfortunately, she kinda gets shafted on screen time (part of the build-up to the "wackiness"). Gene Hackman and Dianne Wiest are both fine actors and play their roles well, I just wish it was in the service of a better story.
Bottom Line: I am a Mike Nichols fan, I like everyone in the cast, but I just don't see this movie as successful on any level. Maybe it just lost something in the translation from French.
1. Unlike some other negative reviews I'm seeing here, my opinion of this movie has nothing to do with the subject matter.
2. I have not seen the original French version.
Maybe I just don't appreciate "farce", a term which everyone who loves this movie seems to insist on using to describe it.
In my own terms, I'd describe this movie as battle-of-the-stereotypes trapped in a 95-minute long "Three's Company" episode--you're forced to watch as incredibly unreasonable and/or unrealistic decisions cause "misunderstandings" and "wacky situations" to pile up on each other, and you have to suffer through it all with uncomfortable anticipation because you know full well that at some point the paper-thin house of cards will all come crashing down. I find this kind of storytelling to be unbearable.
I love(d) Robin Williams, and maybe I'm just accustomed to seeing him in other roles, but I just don't entirely buy him in this role. It's not that it's a bad performance, it just seems more like a straight person's circa-1996 interpretation of what being gay is. He's believable as a loving partner, and he's actually the straight man (pun alert!) of his coupling with Nathan Lane, but there's at least one moment that stands out like something from his stand-up act -- too over-the-top and almost mocking to be in character.
Lane is grating. Again, another actor I like, but the character that he plays is so completely turned up to 11 at every moment--he's somehow loud, emotionally stunted, practically bipolar and a gentle snowflake all at the same time. Other reviews I've read here find him funny (I completely don't), but once again, I don't understand what's so funny about playing the character so unrealistically stereotypical. It also hurts the suspension of disbelief in Williams' character -- why would Williams' rather reasonable, down-to-earth character put up with Lane's character's nonsense?
And, a note regarding stereotypes: I've noticed some other reviewers here citing the overdone stereotypes as the REASON it's funny, and I couldn't disagree more. Yes, stereotypes can absolutely be cleverly and successfully worked into comedy--I would argue that the underrated "Undercover Brother" proves that--but these characters, most notably Lane, are just so loud and in-your-face that you get to a point where you just want them to shut up.
Another reviewer mentioned the son being a somewhat unlikeable character, and with the actions and demands he makes in the story, to that end, I agree. This is yet another casualty of this movie's disconnect from reality -- the son of a gay couple could never actually expect his parents to do what he's asking of them. Granted, it's probably because this movie is based on a relic of the late 70s, but still.
Despite mostly hating this movie, the reason I'm giving it 3 out of 10 is because it has a COUPLE of bright spots. Hank Azaria has a few good moments as Lane and Williams clownish house boy, and there are a couple of random funny bits sprinkled here and there (Williams trying to teach Lane how to be less outwardly gay is pretty funny). Also, I love Christine Baranski--unfortunately, she kinda gets shafted on screen time (part of the build-up to the "wackiness"). Gene Hackman and Dianne Wiest are both fine actors and play their roles well, I just wish it was in the service of a better story.
Bottom Line: I am a Mike Nichols fan, I like everyone in the cast, but I just don't see this movie as successful on any level. Maybe it just lost something in the translation from French.
Very entertaining!
AT-ATL6 February 2007
I've watched this movie countless times and never get bored. It provides sheer entertainment and some of the best one-liners I've heard in a movie. It is equal opportunity in its derogatory remarks and racism, and that's part of the charm. People get too worked up over stereotypes and "being offended" but they shouldn't -- this is a movie, not a political commentary. The actors have done a superb job of creating humour out of an awkward situation -- two men who happen to be gay, live together, own a business and must "play it straight" for the benefit of their son's in-laws.
I think I understand why the critical review has been mediocre -- it's likely because critics keep comparing 'The Birdcage' with the original 'La Cage Aux Folles'. I wish critics would rate a movie for what it is, and not for what it compares to. 'The Birdcage' as a stand-alone movie is witty, funny, silly, and entertaining. And that's what makes it so enjoyable! It's one of my favourite comedies and I can watch it over and over again.
I think I understand why the critical review has been mediocre -- it's likely because critics keep comparing 'The Birdcage' with the original 'La Cage Aux Folles'. I wish critics would rate a movie for what it is, and not for what it compares to. 'The Birdcage' as a stand-alone movie is witty, funny, silly, and entertaining. And that's what makes it so enjoyable! It's one of my favourite comedies and I can watch it over and over again.
The Birdcage is an enjoyable comedy drama film with well-developed main characters
ambusched9421 May 2022
A must-watch comedy drama of the '90s. Robin Williams and Nathan Lane are excellent in their roles and have a natural on-screen rapport. Agador, played by Hank Azaria, is a scene-stealer and a fun character.
However, I couldn't care less about the son and daughter characters. They are annoying and they are merely inserted into the film as plot devices.
However, I couldn't care less about the son and daughter characters. They are annoying and they are merely inserted into the film as plot devices.
Fabulous!!!!!!!
Smells_Like_Cheese4 November 2005
"The Birdcage" is a hilarious movie about a happily "married" gay couple, forced to play straight for the marriage for Armond's son and his conservative in-laws. Even though it is a bit stereotypical, it was played with charm and energy and is absolutely irresistible. I really enjoyed "The Birdcage" because it had a lot of serious issues, yet managed to turn into a fun joke. We take the politic stand on gay marriages so seriously, that I think this was needed just for a good laugh at it.
Nathan Lane and Robin Williams, what terrific performances! Again, I know it was stereotypical, but I have a couple friends that do actually act like that. So, I was more than willing to go with it. I loved the whole Nathan being the Mom dinner scene. It was just too hard not to laugh. I am little surprised by the rating of 6.5. I think people should see this film and just have a good time with it. Trust me, it's just a fun movie and it's not offensive in any way.
10/10
Nathan Lane and Robin Williams, what terrific performances! Again, I know it was stereotypical, but I have a couple friends that do actually act like that. So, I was more than willing to go with it. I loved the whole Nathan being the Mom dinner scene. It was just too hard not to laugh. I am little surprised by the rating of 6.5. I think people should see this film and just have a good time with it. Trust me, it's just a fun movie and it's not offensive in any way.
10/10
Absolutely fabulous!
paulclaassen19 May 2022
Not many gay-themed movies get mainstream releases (because they're generally boring and predictable) but thanks to a stellar cast and a truly funny script, 'The Birdcage' certainly got what it deserved.
I generally don't enjoy gay-themed movies for their predictability - or comedies for that matter - but I absolutely loved 'The Birdcage'. Robin Williams stars as cabaret club owner Armand, who - together with his life partner Albert (excellently portrayed by Nathan Lane) - live a flamboyant lifestyle. When Armand's son, Val (Dan Futterman) is about to get married to a conservative senator's daughter, though, their lives are about to change - with hilarious consequences!
'The Birdcage' is laugh-out-loud funny - thanks also to the brilliant cast. Nathan Lane and Hank Azaria (as their houseboy Agador) are hysterical!! And Robin Williams is a feast for the eyes with that hairy chest, which he loves flaunting to absolutely no complaints from my side!
I loved the characters, the premise, the script, the fantastic performances, and the set design. This is undoubtedly one of my favourite gay-themed movies, as well as one of my favourite comedies. It's absolutely fabulous, darling!!
I generally don't enjoy gay-themed movies for their predictability - or comedies for that matter - but I absolutely loved 'The Birdcage'. Robin Williams stars as cabaret club owner Armand, who - together with his life partner Albert (excellently portrayed by Nathan Lane) - live a flamboyant lifestyle. When Armand's son, Val (Dan Futterman) is about to get married to a conservative senator's daughter, though, their lives are about to change - with hilarious consequences!
'The Birdcage' is laugh-out-loud funny - thanks also to the brilliant cast. Nathan Lane and Hank Azaria (as their houseboy Agador) are hysterical!! And Robin Williams is a feast for the eyes with that hairy chest, which he loves flaunting to absolutely no complaints from my side!
I loved the characters, the premise, the script, the fantastic performances, and the set design. This is undoubtedly one of my favourite gay-themed movies, as well as one of my favourite comedies. It's absolutely fabulous, darling!!
A Scream!
EmperorNortonII4 November 2000
I saw "The Birdcage" because I'd already seen "La Cage aux Folles." And I thought this one was a great remake, if not better. Robin Williams and Nathan Lane give hilarious performances as the lead couple. I haven't seen "La Cage" in ages, but there were tidbits in "The Birdcage" that I remembered from the original. Of all American remakes of French movies, this is by far my favorite!
A thematic movie that pleased likes his French brother l!!!
elo-equipamentos29 October 2019
I shall to confess that had a slight rejection in both versions of those funny movies on first watch, due in the past my kind of education from my parents and an still immature brain didn't understood such thing, also some prejudice neither, after twenty years the world changes and today this thematic picture is no longer hurts the feelings of anyone with an open mind, the Birdcage wasn't not a bit offensive or walked on a low level, quite opposite, all sequence didn't have any a single nasty scene, they just living their lives as they want, the meeting from two families from opposite point of view is a priceless and unique, Robin Williams and mainly the odd Nathan Lane deserve a nominee to Academic Awards, revisiting this was a true pleasure look this with another eyes!!!
Resume:
First watch: 1999 / How many: 2 / Source: TV-DVD / Rating: 7.5
Resume:
First watch: 1999 / How many: 2 / Source: TV-DVD / Rating: 7.5
Absolutely Fabulous
aceyroxx156 July 2004
This movie is one of the best. Robin Williams and Nathan Lane are phenomenal and hilarious, but the best performance throughout the film is by Hank Azaria, as Agador, the adorable flaming butler. My favorite scene is when both families are sitting together eating dinner. I don't want to give anything away, but wow I was in tears. Gene Hackman is extremely funny as a conservative senator. This film is colorful, unique and will keep an audience roaring with laughter. Yes, the movie follows some typical stereo types among a gay male couple, however, is not offensive in anyway, shape or form. I think this is such a cute film, and if you haven't seen it, or if you happen to be in the mood for a laugh out loud movie rent The Birdcage.
My Rating: 9/10
My Rating: 9/10
A great comedy with splendid actors!
fireandlightning27 August 2014
I love Robin Williams work. Always have and always will. This was yet another proof of his brilliance and comedic skills and I watched it to honour his memory.
Beside Williams, there were a lot of recognizable names and they all did a splendid job. The acting of Hank Azaria (Friends, Mad About You, America's Sweethearts, Smurfs) alone is worth 10 stars, but the plot made me a bit sad and angry, and you'll know which scenes I mean.
This was the first time I noticed Nathan Lane's brilliance. The comedic skill and acting is great and so so funny! I don't want to spoil anything, I just want everybody to watch this movie because it'll make you laugh so loud so many times.
Gene Hackman (Superman, Wyatt Earp), Christine Baranski (Mamma Mia), Calista Flockhart (Ally McBeal), Dianne Weist (Footloose, Edward Scissorhands) and Dan Futterman (Judging Amy) were all great choices to this movie and I'm so glad that I finally saw it.
Beside Williams, there were a lot of recognizable names and they all did a splendid job. The acting of Hank Azaria (Friends, Mad About You, America's Sweethearts, Smurfs) alone is worth 10 stars, but the plot made me a bit sad and angry, and you'll know which scenes I mean.
This was the first time I noticed Nathan Lane's brilliance. The comedic skill and acting is great and so so funny! I don't want to spoil anything, I just want everybody to watch this movie because it'll make you laugh so loud so many times.
Gene Hackman (Superman, Wyatt Earp), Christine Baranski (Mamma Mia), Calista Flockhart (Ally McBeal), Dianne Weist (Footloose, Edward Scissorhands) and Dan Futterman (Judging Amy) were all great choices to this movie and I'm so glad that I finally saw it.
A movie farce that truly is "The Best of Times".
mark.waltz12 August 2014
Warning: Spoilers
While this Americanized remake of "La Cage Aux Folles" is not filled with all those snappy Jerry Herman songs from the 1983 Broadway musical, there are so many ironies which connect the two and make it O.K. that the story simply ended up a summertime comedy that packed in audiences, straight and gay. Ironically, in the movie "Popeye", Robin Williams claimed "I Yam What I Yam", and in "La Cage", his character's lover sang "I am What I am". Also ironic is the fact that Nathan Lane's "The Producers" co-star Gary Beach won great acclaim on Broadway for playing the same role which Lane plays here. Years later, Harvey Fierstein (who played Williams' brother in "Mrs. Doubtfire") would play the same role in the third Broadway production of "La Cage".
A big drag disco becomes the setting for the former "La Cagelles", right off the Atlantic coast down in Miami. Williams and Lane are a married gay couple dealing with the impending wedding of "their" son to the daughter of an ultra conservative politician (Gene Hackman) and his all-American wife (Dianne Wiest) who have no idea that their daughter's prospective in-laws are indeed two men which would rock Hackman's world considering that he is in charge of a "morality" commission determined to close all gay establishments and basically the gay community as well.
In addition to all this wackiness there is Hank Azaria, the feisty "maid" who longs to be in Williams' drag show (which stars Lane) but genuinely has no talent. Azaria brings out all his comic genius in this scene-stealing supporting part, especially when he is put in charge of redecorating the apartment in anticipation of Hackman and Wiest's arrivals. The film follows both the original French movie and the musical almost to the letter, with the presence of Christine Baranski as young Val's (Dan Futterman) real mother. Future "Ally McBeal" star Calista Flockhart is amusing as Hackman and Wiest's daughter who is as far removed from her parent's conservative ways as they are with the reality of changing times.
Plenty of comedy ensues out of the chaos, resulting in a drag show finale that has to be seen to be believed. There's enough music here to be its own juke-box musical, especially "We Are Family", the big production number for the various drag queens who provide their own share of amusement as they witness the crazy goings on around them. Wacky costumes and stylish wigs, in addition to the crazy art direction, add to the over-all direction by the legendary Mike Nichols. So go pluck yourself in the cage. You may find that you'll never want to be freed again.
A big drag disco becomes the setting for the former "La Cagelles", right off the Atlantic coast down in Miami. Williams and Lane are a married gay couple dealing with the impending wedding of "their" son to the daughter of an ultra conservative politician (Gene Hackman) and his all-American wife (Dianne Wiest) who have no idea that their daughter's prospective in-laws are indeed two men which would rock Hackman's world considering that he is in charge of a "morality" commission determined to close all gay establishments and basically the gay community as well.
In addition to all this wackiness there is Hank Azaria, the feisty "maid" who longs to be in Williams' drag show (which stars Lane) but genuinely has no talent. Azaria brings out all his comic genius in this scene-stealing supporting part, especially when he is put in charge of redecorating the apartment in anticipation of Hackman and Wiest's arrivals. The film follows both the original French movie and the musical almost to the letter, with the presence of Christine Baranski as young Val's (Dan Futterman) real mother. Future "Ally McBeal" star Calista Flockhart is amusing as Hackman and Wiest's daughter who is as far removed from her parent's conservative ways as they are with the reality of changing times.
Plenty of comedy ensues out of the chaos, resulting in a drag show finale that has to be seen to be believed. There's enough music here to be its own juke-box musical, especially "We Are Family", the big production number for the various drag queens who provide their own share of amusement as they witness the crazy goings on around them. Wacky costumes and stylish wigs, in addition to the crazy art direction, add to the over-all direction by the legendary Mike Nichols. So go pluck yourself in the cage. You may find that you'll never want to be freed again.
Still as funny as I remember
borowiczlucky7 August 2021
Plodding pace - slow - an hour too long
GoUSN6 November 2020
I didn't think the French original deserves all the acclaim it got. Predictable, each character a one-note stereotype, with laughs obtained because each stereotype performs according to type. How enlightened.
Then we have this film, a true step down in every regard. Robin Williams played the role oh so seriously. Nathan Lane, the opposite: All for laughs. The kid they raised was a ponderous bore. And his fiancée a spoiled child.
For excellent drag, watch The Milton Berle Show, or head to an actual bar or cabaret where men in witchy drag really know how to entertain.
This film was the other kind of major drag.
Then we have this film, a true step down in every regard. Robin Williams played the role oh so seriously. Nathan Lane, the opposite: All for laughs. The kid they raised was a ponderous bore. And his fiancée a spoiled child.
For excellent drag, watch The Milton Berle Show, or head to an actual bar or cabaret where men in witchy drag really know how to entertain.
This film was the other kind of major drag.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
