For the Cause (2000) User Reviews

bad acting, bad writing, good effects

[bbbl67 · 3/10 · 26 May 2003]

There were some extremely good special effects in this movie. The sets were cheesy though.

They didn't explain why some of the double-crosses were happening or were even necessary.

A laughable video game.

[keelhaul-80856 · 2/10 · 1 October 2017]

This was utterly ridiculous.

Dean Cain is OK, but most of his movies suck.

This movie was purchased in a bundle of sci-fi and horror "gems" at the grocery store, or somewhere.

It looks like a 90s video game and I can't believe anyone even signed on for this project.

Two teams of dilberts fight over something, I don't even remember what, and some magical witches with lame CGI help or harm them-- again, it was so bad that you can only watch this film once, and you need to be extremely high or intoxicated to get through even one viewing.

It was literally worse than a Saturday cartoon or a daytime soap. The only redeeming values were laughter and some laser fights or something.

Utterly stupid, and the biggest waste of film since Pauly Shore, in the vein of the remake of Ghostbusters, but even sillier.

I can't even fathom who comes up with these scripts or the money to pay the actors and fund these fecal matter bore fests.

What a waste of potential

[JK-19 · 5/10 · 25 February 2001]

I really tried hard to like this movie, but most of it's elements just don't work. The acting is merely good enough, so is the music. Some of the CGI effects look good, some even great, but there aren't enough of them to hide the low budget. Some sets, like the inside of the glass wall, reminded me of old Star Trek episodes - TOS, that is. What's left is an intriguing scenario, ripped apart by the most disappointing feature: the plot. It starts well, descents into a slow and boring trip and even manages to screw up the showdown. "For the Cause" (aka Warhammer) is more like stretched version of a weak Outer Limits episode. Too bad Tim and David Douglas failed in bringing their obvious passion for film making into the movie.

Some interesting things in this misfire

[Wizard-8 · 6 January 2003]

I must admit it's hard to take *any* movie seriously that has Dean Cain or Thomas Ian Griffith in it, seeing how much made-for-video junk they have been in previously - and both of them appear in this movie! Overall this movie is a disappointment - many important elements that would have explained things are not here (I suspect they got edited out along the way), there is a lack of excitement in the action and the lack of war-weariness this 99 year-old war would have placed on its people. Some of the effects and sets (such as the glass caverns) would embarrass even Roger Corman. The climatic battle is straight out of a video game!

Still, a few effects (like some matte paintings) aren't bad, and there are some interesting ideas here and there, intriguing ideas that, in a better screenplay, could have made for a compelling adventure. As it is now, this plays like a (rough) first draft, and it's easy to see why Dimension released this directly to video stateside (after spending two years on the shelf.0

remake, anyone?

[JW-30 · 5/10 · 11 April 2004]

Some good idea and dialogue don't save the script from being too slow-paced for most moviegoers. That's no problem for me - but it lacks depth to make up for its length.

I appreciate the plot and I *really* appreciate something found almost only in B- and C-Movies - main characters getting killed. Permanently, no comeback. A remake with sufficient budget could result in a good mini-series, but I am afraid they wouldn't dare to have expensive actors only in parts of the movie - and then, it couldn't work.

So, in any case, interesting aspects, and potential that was not realized. If anybody tries a remake - really try to get it right, please, and put some more time in background and character development. You can save on the (cheap) atmospheric pictures. And: Don't count on your audience to know the Warhammer(tm) stories.

So bad, it's not only good, it's great

[laroers · 1/10 · 3 July 2004]

If you are as big a fan of B movies as I am, then you must see this movie. The only think that is keeping this from being any better a B movie is the lack of Eric Roberts, but the hokey effects and plot just about make up for it.

Also, if you ever plan on making great movies, then you must see this movie.

There are a lot of movies that are seamless and clean, and you can learn from those - like Seven Samurai or, generally the Lord of the Rings (with the exception of a few CGI problems), but this movie will lend excellent examples of how NOT to do so many things - yet, in many respects, the film comes so close to being good without ever actually coming close to being good. It is this feature that provides so many great illustrations of the differences between almost good and good movies.

This will never be a cult classic because it is not well done enough for that, but it is a "must see" for B movie lovers and movie makers.

Some nice FX, bad movie.

[martin-511 · 1/10 · 13 April 2004]

I rented this movie because it looked nice, nice cover, and some nice screen shots at the back cover. But the cover alone gives you a very wrong impression of the movie. It begins promising when you hear of the war that goes on for years and how the war devastates the people you hope to see some huge army that fights the final battle for survival. but non of that is in this movie. You can see a real nice futuristic fighter plane on the back-cover. Sadly its just for 3 sec in the movie. And the whole deal of those "witches" fighting against some computer animation is just strange and sometimes confusing.

The cause is low budget.

[shanfloyd · 6/10 · 13 May 2003]

Like all other low budget sci-fi flicks, this one also fell apart despite having an interesting plot. The set designing was okay, so was the costumes, equipments etc. But where this one lagged behind is the cinematography with special effects. An air of childish simplicity is revealed on this occasion. Everyone expects mature and massive use of special effects in a sci-fi war movie like this; but evidently due to low budget and less actors somehow you'll feel uneasy about the lack of completeness while watching. The background music also seemed insufficient.

But the producers and directors did everything else perfectly to make it worth watching. The story is quite interesting. They did everything necessary to create a wave of tension throughout. The screenplay is not that bad. Justin Whalin (Dungeons & Dragons) did not disappoint me. You do not expect much from the other actors in a movie like this and I'll say they did their part well. The locations were good chosen etc and etc.

So this is one movie which should become quite an eye-opener for new movie makers. If you don't have money, don't venture to make a sci-fi one.

just too short ...

[Scoobs_Turner · 7/10 · 25 August 2003]

I really liked the movie, but I think they 'd better made a mini tv-series instead. There was such potential to show more of this world with the two different cultures, develop the characters. There was just too less time to explain the background (about the witches for example) ... and all that.