Royce (TV Movie 1994) Poster

(1994 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Weak
MovieAddict201619 January 2004
A so-called "spy spoof" that has James Belushi playing Agent Royce, who is called out of duty after the Cold War and sent on a new mission by his boss, played by Peter Boyle (who was in another James Belushi movie called "Red Heat," also starring Arnold Schwarzenegger).

Not very funny, and as much as I enjoy watching James Belushi do his thing in comedies, he doesn't work as a leading man in a spy caper. Watching him tote a gun and rescue hostages is sort of sad.

This is not very funny and is a poor imitation of "True Lies," released the same year.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pretty poor in all areas but just watchable
bob the moo18 January 2004
Royce is part of a secret group within the US government that is disbanded. The members of the group turn to crime and swear revenge on the senator that disbanded the group, however Royce chooses not to join them but instead sets out to find their plan and stop them.

I taped this as it was described as a spoof, however it was immediately apparent that I had been sold a dud! The film isn't really funny at any point, even if it has a sort of lackadaisical relaxed humour to it that makes it have the air of a comedy if not the laughs. Looking at the plot and delivery I can see that it never wanted to be a spoof, more an amiable action movie on a tvm budget. The scenes are mostly watchable despite the fact that the low production values of the film show in almost every regard. The script is clichéd and the action rather stilted and A-Team-like, but it is still watchable.

The main reason the film is just about watchable is that Belushi is quite amiable in the lead role. His character is dumb and I think he knows it - however he doesn't take it too seriously and is enjoyable despite everything else. Ferrer is good as the main villain, doing essentially what he normally does in second-rate films. Boyle has a minor, insignificant role and doesn't make much difference. Jefferson is quite cute but is just one big `female sidekick' stereotype.

Overall this is a pretty poor film that will annoy most of those who tune it to watch it. It must be said that a film who's main selling point is James Belushi is in real trouble and that is the case here. It's watchable if you are really looking for something that can be on in the background while you do chores in another room but as entertainment for 90 minutes? Forget about it!
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Belushi isn't the only thing that's flabby
frankfob24 November 2002
Jim Belushi is usually a pretty watchable actor. He's easygoing, and has an everyman quality that is actually sort of endearing. He's usually pretty convincing as a harried cop, a department store Santa Claus, or even a con-artist on parole. But a secret agent? Nahhh. In trying to make Belushi come across as a highly trained, lethal James Bond clone, the picture winds up making him look like an overweight, underachieving Ralph Kramden clone. The lame plot has Belushi's top-secret unit being disbanded, and several of its members turning renegade and plotting to steal nuclear weapons to sell to drug dealers, and Belushi has to stop them (for some reason this plan is revealed fairly early in the picture; you know that Belushi is going to succeed at stopping them, which pretty much kills whatever suspense there might have been). A good supporting cast (Miguel Ferrer, Peter Boyle) and a few bursts of action towards the end of the picture don't really help it much. The script is flat, the direction is workmanlike but nothing more, the location shooting in Eastern Europe is depressing (apparently the entire region looks like the industrial section of Jersey City), and there's really little suspense, style, or anything else that might break the monotony. Belushi is kind of fun to watch, but that's not enough of a reason to spend a couple of bucks to rent this picture. Don't bother.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
James - Belushi - Bond !
elshikh412 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This is a made-for-TV James Bond. So is it a bad thing? I don't think so, because I loved it.

The first 20 minutes are catchy and hot, as if it's a good cinematic movie. The plot is so smart; where ultra-secret service unit got disbanded after the cold war, several of its members turn renegade, and there is a plot to steal nuclear weapons to sell to drug dealers, and their only righteous patriotic, and funny, member has to stop them. (Miguel Ferrer) was so right as the villain. And the action sequences are fine; knowing that it's a TV movie after all.

It's not a made-for-TV James Bond only. In fact, it's more like James Belushi as Bond; where he's plump, unsophisticated, jocose, none-violent, not to mention being fatherly too (a matter that Bond didn't approach ever). It's like let the normal TV viewer see himself as Bond once in a life time.

But, on the other hand, it tried to be international, with no dazzling images shown. And it tried to be suspenseful, but I thought its second half was less tight.

Finally, name one Bond where: "M" is played by (Peter Boyle) having the name of (Huggins) the teacher in My Fair Lady, there is no "Q" at all, the lead *morally* gives an advise about a father and son's reunion, and ends up miserably playing chess with a kid?! I know, it's (Royce)!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed