Passage à l'acte (1993) User Reviews

Astonishingly weird

[Maldoror-2 · 10/10 · 28 January 2004]

This little-seen (at least in the United States) experimental film is a truly astonishing experience. I saw it in a film class, the likely place most people will see it, and at first I wondered if I was dreaming or hallucinating. I looked around at the other students in the class to see if they had similarly bewildered reactions.

This short film appropriates a domestic scene from the classic film of TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD and plays around with it, like a hip-hop DJ manipulating a record on a turntable. A character begins to say something, and that brief second of footage repeats rapidly, so the character seems to twitch and stutter mechanically. The film continually halts and repeats infinitesimal instants.

Ignore whatever pretensions about "deconstruction" and the like the filmmakers have dressed "Passage" up in and, if you get the chance to watch it, just cherish how totally bizarre it is. I wish it was more readily available on video or DVD.

Wrinkling time

[StevePulaski · 9/10 · 16 November 2015]

Passage à l'acte takes roughly ten seconds from To Kill a Mockingbird and makes it an eleven minute short film by, essentially, putting its audio and visual track on a metaphorical turntable and spiraling everything into distortion. The result is a hypnotic auditory assault that relies on patterned out noise and nonsense for the entirety of the short's runtime. Sometimes funny, sometimes odd, and sometimes agonizingly repetitive, it's one of the most curious oddities of film I've yet to see.

Extracting a meaning from this is like trying to find a sand grain in a bag of dirt. While it may be there, good luck trying to find the exact spec that makes the process worthwhile. Because this is a work of experimentation, I find the meaning rests in the purpose of what Martin Arnold found fascinating enough to warrant the existence of Passage à l'acte. To me, that's the versatility and incredibly manipulative form of sound and film. The dialog in this short, composed, from what I can tell, of largely fragmented sentences said in a straight-forward, unambiguous manner by the actors, seems like it only has one way of being said. It isn't until Arnold slows the dialog down, speeds it up, interjects other noises and lines of dialog over it, and loops it that it sounds completely different. Scout, the little girl in the film, says "I'm trying" in the film, but here, it sounds like "I'm Twain," "Mark Twain," "I'm train," and "Train" at various different points in the short.

The manipulation of sound here is a huge reason, I feel, Arnold even bothered essentially remixing a rather unremarkable scene from one of American cinema's most beloved classics. The dialog in this To Kill a Mockingbird scene is so far past distorted it doesn't even mirror English; even the visuals become convoluted in the film, in addition to the sound effects, with Scout's concluding kiss on Atticus's cheek sounding less like a kiss and more like a repeated chomping at his cheek.

As far as its contribution to the world, it manages to either be the funniest eleven minutes of one's life, or the most agonizing, depending on how you look at it. It almost seems like one of the original internet memes, though it was made long before the internet was. At only eleven minutes long, it manages to go by fast enough where the joke doesn't become old or repetitive (paradoxically so), but long enough to fully realize the absurdity of the entire act.

Auditory manipulation and the use of diegetic sound has long been a factor in cinema and Passage à l'acte showcases what can happen when audio is distorted far beyond any kind of comprehension, to the point of being a series of audio patterns that, when looped, produce both comedy and tedium. It successfully manages to arbitrarily break down the anatomy of an ordinary scene in To Kill a Mockingbird right down to each noise and sound. Its existence is questionable, and a reward for patient viewers may not even exist; it's an absurdist way to break down and experiment by taking a straight-forward moment in a film and making it anything but.

Directed by: Martin Arnold.

Hilarious experimental piece

[Lotherr · 10/10 · 13 March 2005]

I had the pleasure of seeing this hard-to-get experimental film at the Tampere 35th Film Festival. Out of the 9 experimental films in that showing, this is definitely the one I enjoyed the most.

So, what is this movie? Approximately 10 seconds of American dining idyll stretched out to 12 minutes with the use of continuous, recurring repetition of tiny bits of film and sound. The simplest movement becomes a magical phenomenon of its own as it is repeated, reversed, repeated, reversed, to produce a stuttering and staggering effect that first puzzles and fascinates the viewer, then forces him to burst into uncontrollable laughter. Because as original and serious as the piece may be as art, it's also hilariously funny.

If you get the chance to see this title, do it. It'll be a film experience like none before, and you're guaranteed to enjoy it.