Puppet Master II (Video 1990) Poster

(1990 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
63 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Yay puppets
BandSAboutMovies12 October 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Puppet Master 2 begins in 1990 as André Toulon's grave is being excavated by Pinhead, who opens up the coffin and pours a vial onto his creator's skeleton while Blade, Jester, Tunneler and Leach Woman watch. Soon, the skeleton raises his arms and Toulon is back from the dead.

Then, we return back to the hotel where Megan from the last movie has been killed and as a result, Alex is suspected of her death and is in an insane asylum. Nothing about the reanimated dog is mentioned.

Soon, the puppets are trying to steal away parapsychologists Carolyn Bramwell, who Toulon believes is the reincarnation of his dead wife Elsa. There's also a new puppet named Torch along for the ride. This one also explains why the puppets kill - they need brain tissue to stay alive.

This one ends with Toulon double crossing the puppets in the hope of bringing his wife back from the dead. Like I said before, no one should screw with the puppets, not even the Puppet Master.

Strangely enough, the only reason why Leech Woman was destroyed in this movie was that studio executives at Paramount hated her. Another bit of trivia - look for Mr. Punch from Dolls on Toulon's shelf.

Puppet Master II is the only movie that David Allen, who created the puppet special effects for the first film. Check out our review of The Dungeonmaster to learn way more than you may want to know about this talented artist with a dark secret.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A strange and eerie entry in the series
jokerman145615 June 2010
A lot of people consider this to be best out of the series but, I'm gonna haft to disagree with that but it's by far not the worst and you PM fans know what I'm talking about. There's just something really strange about this film, I think it's because towards the end of the film it gets really really far out and creepy.

After mutilating there selfish and evil Puppets Master, The puppets Blade, Pinhead, Jester, Tunneler and Leech Woman are back to resurrect there sweet and kind Puppet Master Andre Toulon but he's no longer sweet and kind, he's a psychopathic, evil, and greedy zombie that wants to kill the investigators of the Bodega Bay Hotel and in Andre's insane mind, he thinks one of the investigator is his wife incarnated.

The film introduces us to a new puppet by the name of Torch, who is a robot puppet that shoots flames out of his right arm, I still think Blade is the best though.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"They're back. No strings attached."
lost-in-limbo27 February 2010
An inevitable simple rehash, which is probably a little more expansive and wicked in its visions. Not as fun as the original, but nonetheless a respectable b-grade sequel by Full Moon productions. Which I believe, would be followed up by the best entry of the series "Puppet Master III: Toulon's Revenge", as after that film I didn't particularly care for the rest. The second film of the franchise keeps pretty much the same structure of the original, as a group of government paranormal researchers head to the ocean facing cliff top hotel to look into Alex Whitaker's stories (the survivor of the original now in a mental hospital) and soon become targets of the puppets and the resurrected Andre Toulon (dressed in bandages) from the dead in the quest to collect enough brain fluid for his reanimation serum to keep them alive. But when Toulon encounters Carolyn, he's quickly reminded of his dead wife Elsa and the plans seem to change.

Director / visual effects wizard David Allen does a resourceful job with his low-budget, instilling a clean-cut Gothic atmosphere with an underlining eeriness and donning sensational puppet creations (a newly added one too -- Torch) and stop motion effects. This gimmick is where the film's personality arrives from, outside a dementedly compulsive performance by Steve Welles (under some bandages and heavy make-up) as the cracking Toulon. Welles is the life of the party (getting plenty of screen time --- where a little more is explained about his character), as the rest of the cast (Elizabeth Maclellan, Collin Bernsen, Gregory Webb, Jeff Celentano and a perky Charlie Spradling) are immensely one-note. Also showing up in minor, but fruitful parts are Nita Talbot, Sage Allen and George 'Buck' Flower. When it came to the puppets doing Toulon's dirty work, while ominously nasty it just lacked the imagination found in the original's death set-pieces, but the meaty, if dark narrative seemed a little more fuller in its angle of dementia, betrayal and revenge. The pacing can have its stuffy moments too (being rather slow to get going), but the location for the developing macabre fits and Richard Band's brooding score is reused with that striking playful carnival arrangement.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The late, great David Allen's magnum opus
Cowman11 June 2001
The murderous puppets from part one (plus a new, fire-jetting doll named Torch) resurrect the long-dead corpse of their original puppet master, Andre Toulon. For some reason, Toulon is now an evil, spiteful b**tard who entices the little creatures to murder people and extract their brain tissue in order to create a serum which will reanimate his wife. Meanwhile, a group of government parapsychologists (is there really such a profession?) are conducting research at the eerie hotel (using a Commodore Amiga!) where both the puppet master and his creations dwell. As you would expect, they are not happy with the unwelcome visitors and decide to slaughter them all. The Full Moon company has outdone themselves yet again with this eye-opening feature, complete with awesome puppetry and mind-blowing special effects. The story seemed a little flat at times but it was told well enough to peak your interest for the duration of the film. The same eerie soundtrack from part one is reused here.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Puppet Master 2
skybrick73614 June 2014
While the creepy atmosphere still remains from the previous film there was an extreme drop off from the first Puppet Master. This sequel just didn't live up to what it could have possibly been. Nearly all the characters besides the main lead, Elizabeth Maclellan who was decent, all fell terribly flat and were uninteresting. The puppets didn't seem involved either in the movie as much as they should be. The new puppet Torch is a weak addition in my opinion too, he's basically unfair to deal with. The storyline was accurately tied into its predecessors and successors and Blade had a couple good scenes but that is pretty much it had going for it. Charles Band dropped the ball on his second sequel and I would advise not to watch this movie as a casual horror fan. Stick to the first and third movie those being the hands down best of the franchise.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A great B-Movie!
whammy66623 May 2006
Alright, so the original was a fairly smart film, but this is just a fun B-movie. SOme good gore, cool kills, and that feel of an 80's flick are all present. Plus the new puppet, Torch, is awesome, along with all the original puppets doing what they do best...kill. In this film, Andre Toulon is brought back by the puppets to create more carnage. The storyline is not strong, the acting is not excellent, but it all works and the movie turns out to be pretty darn fun. Also some cool kills, and better gore than the first. The special effects are also excellent by David Allen's great effects crew, as David Allen also takes the director's chair on this film. If you like the original, you will also love this one, that is my logic.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Dolls are back in Town
Coventry30 December 2018
Still enthusiast after the unexpectedly pleasant surprise that was "Puppet Master", I quickly watched the first sequel but found it slightly less imaginative than the original, yet still entertaining and recommendable enough. What I liked about part 2 is that certain plot enigmas of the first film are clarified and finally start making sense, like for example how André Toulon managed to bring his puppet creations to life, and that the stop-motion effects and make-up art are truly sublime. The latter is undoubtedly linked to the fact that special effects wizard David Allen exceptionally took place in the director's seat. Disappointing, on the other hand, is the complete lack of identifiable/likable lead characters and the weak depiction of André Toulon by Steve Welles. William Hickey's role as Toulon in the first film was brief but legendary, and I'm very curious to see what Guy Rolfe will do with the role in "Puppet Master III", but Welles (most of the running time dressed up like "The Invisible Man") doesn't add the raw and grim edge the Toulon character desperately needs. The opening sequences are terrifically grim and take place in an eerie graveyard at night, where the notorious puppets (Blade, Tunneler, etc...) exhume the remnants of their master and take it back to the Bodega Bay hotel. Fortunately, there's a new shipment of psychic investigators at the hotel, because the murder-dolls need to extract brain fluids from random victims to revive Toulon. There's also a new and bad-ass puppet in town! Its name is Torch, with a flamethrower arm, bullets for teeth and little patience for countryside problem children. The obvious thing to love about "Puppet Master II" is the gory killings, and personally I also very much liked the totally demented climax with life-size mannequin dolls.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Possibly an Improvement Over the First
gavin694213 October 2012
The puppets return, this time they hunt some paranormal researchers to take their brain fluid for the living-dead puppet master, Andre Toulon (Steve Welles).

This film has some good things going for it: first, more exposition on the background of the puppets. And second, a faster pace than the original film. Love it or hate it, the first film is a tad bit slow a times and really stretches material to fill its 90 minutes.

Here we run into some continuity issues, which is pretty standard for the film. The so-called "owner" of the house... was he really in Bucharest, or was he actually at home during the course of the first film? I am uncertain. And then, where did he comes from? And why does he confuse a main character for his wife? There are more than few questions.

However, the film looks slicker, and the villain is far more interesting this time around. And, thanks to the Blu-Ray release, you can watch in high definition and listen to Charlie Band commentary.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
supersized
SnoopyStyle14 January 2020
After the first movie, survivor Alex Whitaker had gone insane and the state had taken over the Bodega Bay Inn. The puppets dig up Toulon's grave next to the abandoned hotel and reanimates the corpse. A group of researchers breaks in to investigate the reported paranormal incident. Toulon builds a flame throwing puppet.

The basic premise is simple enough. I really wish that William Hickey could continue with the franchise. He's an unique actor and this movie misses him. A bandaged Toulon is a bit cheap. The bigger problem is that the group meets him and seems unconcerned. Basically, they meet the invisible man and nobody cares. These are paranormal investigators. There should be more questions. The best way is to keep him hiding like the Phantom of the Opera. The flashback and the story gets muddled. The more characters get added, the more unnecessary it becomes. This doesn't need to be much more than killer puppets taking out the group in an isolated place. The first half is exactly that and the movie is great up to that point. I did expect much worst. The production value has been raised. The acting is functional. It is an average B-movie horror until the last act. It turns supersized and rather camp. I can certainly see the comedic possibility of this campy turn in this long running franchise.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
still holding a Torch for the franchise
movieman_kev20 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Tunneler, Jester, Blade, Pinhead & Leech Woman are back to kill some more paranormal investigator types, this time once again under the thrall of the original Puppet Master, Toulon, after the puppets resurrect him, however zombie Toulon is a bit of a nut-case. However, he also made Torch, one of the more interesting puppets, in this outing. So it's all good.

I found myself enjoying this film despite of major continuity eras. In some respects it may seem like a bit of a rehash of the previous film, but it moves at a quicker pace and features some pretty cool kills. All in all, it's on par with the first film.

Eye Candy: Men get Charlie Spradling topless. The ladies get to ogle Collin Bernsen's posterior
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
This killer puppet movie pulls no strings! It's entertaining enough to sit through, but it's also kinda feel like I'm watching a rethread film.
ironhorse_iv9 December 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This direct to video movie is by no means, a puppet masterpiece. It's mindless fun from the mind from Charles Robert Band, the Founder of Full Moon Features, a company known for its direct-to-video B-List horror & sci-fi movies. Coming off, their first success, 1989's Puppetmaster, Full Moon quickly capitalize on a sequel to that film. It's just sad, that Puppet Master II: His Unholy Creations doesn't bring anything really new to the concept, and felt like a remake of the first film. Instead, of a film about a group of psychics coming to a hotel to investigate a recent murder; this movie has a group of parapsychologists, coming back to the abandoned hotel to investigate, the recent mysterious murders, a year prior. Without giving away too much of the movie, I have to say, it was somewhat disappointing to see that none of the previous human surviving characters from the first movie, return for this film. Megan Gallagher (Robin Frates) & Alex Whitaker (Paul Le Mat) are only given, toss away mention lines and never really explore, beyond that, but I kinda also glad, they didn't. I felt that the first movie was trying too hard to be a 1980's Shining, rip-off with its psychics and the film didn't need any more of that mess. This film feels a bit more focus on the anthropomorphic puppets being the killers than super naturals. However, I really don't get why the new batch of characters lead by final girl, Carolyn Bramwell (Elizabeth Maclellan) had to be ghost-hunters. They rarely seem like they were good at their job. They were more focus on, having making jokes and doing stupid stuff, than trying to solve the case. They get more irrational as the movie goes on, when members of their crew, started disappearing. Instead of; I don't know, seeking the police's help with the crime, they would rather partake in having sex with each other. Who does this!? This movie is so clichés. The age-old movie formula of people wandering off alone and getting killed one by one, stupid scenes of nudity, and toilet humor makes them, some of the worst caricatures of people, ever. Ever, when the evidences start to pile up, that the puppets are killing their members, they still think, it's has to be ghosts. I have to say, these are some of the dumbest ghost hunters, I have, ever witness. None of them, were really that, likable. The puppets in the other hand, were. They were the best thing, about this film. It's a bad sign, when the villains are more fascinating than your heroes. Each of them having an interesting way of killing people. Blade looks like a small version of the Fisherman from 1997's I Know What You Did Last Summer with a hook. Pinhead is a Conehead lookalike muscle man mixed with Addams Family Uncle Fester who punch and strangles people. Tunneler has a drill on his head that drills into people. Ms. Leech who is a Leech-puking doll that sadly was quickly killed off, in the film, due to producers finding the character way too disturbing and disgusting. In my opinion, she was one of the best puppets, out-there. Why couldn't they just killed, Jester instead. He's pretty much, useless for most of the series. Anyways, she was replace, by a new puppet, call Torch. By far, one of the coolest puppets to ever come into the series. The action scenes with them are quite enjoyable, but I never bought the struggle between man Vs puppets. I just can't see, how people in these film, can't overpower them. Anyways, their stop motion movement was always fantastic and creepy. It also helps that, the director of this film, is Dave Allen. Considered among the finest stop motion model animators of all time. One thing, I didn't like, about this film is how the puppets are now control, by a new owner called Eriquee Chanee (Steve Welles), whom in no surprised to anybody, turn out to be the reanimation body of Andre Toulon; looking for a new body to take over. First off, it's a bit jarring to see that body of Toulon was able to reanimation, due to the fact, that the character somewhat blew his brains out in the first movie. Isn't brain tissue, the secret ingredient that makes that reanimation formula to work in these films? Also, Toulon's death doesn't match up, with the first movie's timeline, in which he killed himself on 1939, not 1941. Anyways, like the first movie, what was Toulon's plan on betrayal his puppets. It seem very odd to do. Yes, a recent comic book adaption somewhat gives a motive, but it's never truly answer on film. Like the first movie, this film got a cult-following, to the point, that puppets were turn the good guys in most of the subsequent films, fighting various enemies including Nazis, Demonic Spirits and inter-dimensional aliens. Overall: The movie is watchable, however, the somewhat downer ending to this film is a bit hard to watch. In my opinion, the subsequent films, such as 1991's Puppet Master III: Toulon's Revenge are truly, the ones worth-watching, but if you find yourself, watching this film. At least, you might find it, somewhat entertaining.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Blade is Back...
Punk1923 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Have you ever watched Child's Play? You know the movie that has the walking talking toy doll that runs around killing people. Well this movie is something very similar, only it features puppets instead of a doll. The credits draw you in, a cemetery and a puppet digging a grave really makes you wonder what'll happen next, then a pair of skeleton arms stretch up and roll the black screen and more credits.

Puppet Master II draws you in from the first scene to the last. Who doesn't love seeing Blade, the puppet with the blade and hook instead of hands, slashing at unsuspecting peoples throats? What about Pinhead, the big puppet with huge hands and a tiny head, and his ways in strangling peoples necks? Hey, lets not forget Leech Woman who spits out leeches that suck out the blood of her victims and Jester, who hasn't a mean little bone in his wooden body.

Okay, so four parapsychologists go to the Bodega Bay Inn, where the events of the first film happened, to look up on claims by Alex Whitaker from the first film. Leading them is Carolyn Bramwell (Elizabeth Maclellan), a down right nice girl. Her brother Patrick (Gregory Webb) is killed the first night at the hotel, thanks to Tunneler and might I mention he was drunk. Then Camille (Nita Talbot) goes missing, luckily she had a son named Matthew (George 'Buck' Flower).

It's not long before the corpse from before, dressed in black and covered in bandages, appears and calls himself Eriquee Chaneé (Steve Welles). Events get stranger, Wanda (Charlie Spradling ) and Michael Kenney (Collin Bernsen) are murdered. Carolyn goes to confront Eriquee, whom she finds out is really Andre Toulon. He thinks she is the reincarnation of his late wife Elsa, and tries to put his and her soul into mannequins. Luckily, Blade intervenes and Andre is kill again for a second time.

I recommend watching the first three, forget about the rest.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A step down from the modest but underrated original
quridley31 May 2017
Part 2 is the classic Charles Band movie: cool premise wasted by cheap production and flat filmmaking. This sequel improves the villains from Part 1 (bringing us into a more Slasher setup) but everything else suffers. The setting is cheaper, the script is dumber and the actors are more comatose. The film has bright spots but they are wedged between painfully long filler scenes and bad soap opera acting. You see the beginning of the Full Moon formula for padding out movies with a handful of awesome moments with lots of nothingness. To its credit, PM2 is better shot and more entertaining than all of the sequels that followed. To many fans, PM2 is regarded as superior to the original because the standard DVD boxset release features a version that is sped up for cable. Watch the original and you will see its a drag-ass imitation of a much better film.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"My heart is not attuned to the merriments of children"
hwg1957-102-26570428 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Andre Toulon from the first 'Puppetmster' film is resurrected by his puppets and returns to the Bodega Bay hotel to continue his work, it being complicated by some psychic investigators moving in to the hotel too. Not as good as the previous movie, let down by a mainly dreary cast. As Toulon is played wrapped up in bandages you only have his voice to convey character and he just speaks with a pantomime German accent. Standing out in the cast is Nita Talbot as Camille but unfortunately she disappears early on in the film. Her sparkiness was sorely missed in the rest of the movie. The puppets though were in good form enhanced this time with the flame throwing puppet Torch. A slighter sequel.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Torch was great!
twisted_sista4 April 2004
I enjoyed this sequel better than the original. My reasons being was i thought the puppets were more entertaining in this one and you get to see them for longer. I loved the new Torch puppet, i consider him to be the most dangerous and scary out of all the puppets(he was even more scarier than Blade). He has a stump on his right arm that throws flames. In one funny scene he is tormented by a little boy and the little brat says something like 'Is that all you can do?, do something' and you can guess what Torch does to him. The actors did fine, the acting wasnt great but this is low-budget guys. If your'e a fan of this movie i recommend you get the DVD. I got this movie for only 5.99 and you get to see the behind the scene's footage, which was interesting and fun to see. The picture quality was excellent, colors are very strong and vibrant. Overall a fun B-movie, 6/10.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
An enjoyable sequel...
paul_haakonsen23 April 2023
Well, if you enjoyed the 1989 "Puppet Master" movie from Full Moon Entertainment, then you will definitely also enjoy this 1990 sequel titled "Puppet Master II".

I sat down here in 2023 to watch the 1990 movie "Puppet Master II" from director David Allen, as part of a "Puppet Master" movie marathon. I do remember having seen the movie once before, many years ago, but I have to admit that I had forgotten about the storyline.

Writers Charles Band, David Pabian and David Schmoeller put together a rather enjoyable script for the movie, and it felt like a good sequel to the original movie, though they actually had little in common. But the movie proved to be entertaining, nonetheless.

The acting performances in "Puppet Master II" were fair enough, though I was only familiar with actress Nita Talbot.

Visually then you know what you are getting here, provided you have already seen the 1989 original "Puppet Master" movie. The stop-motion effects for the puppets, while cheesy and campy, does add a certain enjoyable charm to the movie. And I will say that the make-up effects on the zombified Andre Toulon was actually quite good.

I enjoyed "Puppet Master II" as much as I enjoyed the original 1989 "Puppet Master" movie, so I was adequately entertained by this 1990 sequel.

My rating of "Puppet Master II" lands on a five out of ten stars.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Well,,,
atinder30 December 2012
I didn't think the first was that good however I thought it was decent

This sequel was start of really good, As the Puppets brought back the Master of the Dead.

I liked this movie just a bit a better then first movie, I liked the fact that show a lot more of the Puppets.

The movie didn't take to long to get started, i found most of really entertaining but however after second half, some parts did drag on a little and found those part a little boring,

The ending was just really odd and a bit Creepy,

I give this movie 6 out of 10 __________________
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
More atmospheric than the original, but turns rather weird.
paulclaassen17 June 2018
This film follows directly on the first film, with a group of paranormal investigators setting up in the hotel. This installment has more atmosphere than the original and the action starts a lot sooner. It started off more interesting than the original film, but then quickly turned ridiculous. Andre Toulon is an annoying character, all bandaged and looking like a cross between Darkman and Michael Jackson. The film turns utterly weird towards the end as the characters are being killed off.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Toulon, Toulon, Wherefore Art Thou, Toulon...
P3n-E-W1s312 August 2019
So we're back with a second instalment of the Puppet Master series. I like this stories concept. It picks up where the last story ended. A new group of paranormal researchers have turned up at the Hotel in Bodega Bay after learning of the previous occurrences. Luckily, or rather unluckily, for them all is not well in the hotel. The body of Andre Toulon, buried in the cemetery behind the hotel, has been desecrated... by the murderous marionettes... but to what cause? I think you can guess!

So it's not long before the mayhem starts and more of the mystery is revealed. In this episode, we get to learn of the puppets secret of life and we are introduced to four new dolls. Even though Torch is awesome and can throw his flame ten-foot, the scariest dolls are the lifesize mannequins of Toulon and his wife.

Though Charles Band and David Pabian give us a decent story that expands upon the marionettes mythos it's the direction that hurts the film the most. The same cleverness with lighting and camera techniques isn't visible here. The fact that David Allen steers this in the standard horror direction isn't a help. The scene in the homesteader's abode is one of the better clips. With the main light source being an open coal or log fire gives the entire scene atmosphere and power. If this had been the norm throughout the movie it would have created a stronger film.

A further drawback is the pace of the film. This is a tad on the slow side. The story warrants a varied pace, similar to the first film. It would have helped to build and create both tension and atmosphere, which is lacking in a few scenes.

Another thing this flick has going for it is the cast, which includes Nita Talbot and the great cameo George "Buck" Flower. Most of the lead characters are acted well, though the actress Elizabeth Maclellan as Carolyn and Elsa does come across a bit impassive at times. Steve Wells does a good portrayal of the creepy hotel guest, Eriquee Chancee.

Though it doesn't have the same mystique as the original, this sequel is still worth a watch, especially if you enjoyed the first. Though I wouldn't keep going back to watch this one again, in a rush... or any of the sequels, for that matter. Still, it's enjoyable for one watch on a cold and dark night since this is more firmly situated in the horror zone. Come and see where the film sits on my Absolute Horror list.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not as good as the first but still ok
thepearlpoint27 June 2021
Stop two on my Puppet Master journey! And what a weird one indeed. Odd acting, awkward direction, out of place sexual tension, all wrapped up with a few of kills. One thing that bugged me was all this science/technology talk, it was obvious they knew nothing about science and just decided to throw a bunch of words together.

Not as gory as the first and definitely slower than the first. But it's ok.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
My personal favorite of the series!
Jesse-453 June 2000
The Puppet Masters are usually looked at, as the exceptions of Full Moon Pictures. Their fun little B-horror flicks that work up good special effects and a fun time. This one is probably the most atmospheric and moody for me. And the nudity is great! The sequel to a good B-horror movie, followed by good B-movies, at least until the awful 6 and 7.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
There's a big boring patch in the middle
Mileskolehmainen17 June 2014
PUPPET MASTER II

🌕🌕🌕🌘🌑 3.1

It was cool, but there's this spot in the film where, besides a few attacks, nothing happens. The characters aren't interesting enough to help, and the story sorta gaps there. For me this dragged out and made the conclusion uninteresting. The fx were still good and the acting was alright, though. My only other problem was that the camera work sometimes makes the puppet effects look unrealistic (example: an attack scene were the puppet sorta just stands there for a long time.) this doesn't happen all the time but when it does it's sorta annoying. I dunno. Il watch it again and see if I can get over the boring patch.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Legendary silly comedy horror
beerplease19 September 2018
Inventive and utterly awsome creepy horror stupidity.soft shot just like shells wonderfull world of golf.was expecting big phil mickelson to get his face punched in by pinhead in what would have been a super cameo😲😂
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
GREAT SEQUEL!!
psycho_15327 December 1999
The Puppet Master series is great, and this is a very satisfying sequel. The puppets are back and this time Toulon has made a new puppet TORCH who uses a flame to torch his victims. The story is Toulon's puppets help collect brain tissue from human victims for Toulon to create his formula to animate the inanimate. The victims this time include a group of researchers from a US department, responsible for investigating the paranormal. Not everyone will like this series but if you are a fan of the series or you enjoy cheesy movies you have to watch this series.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Disappointing Sequel
ryan-1007521 August 2019
The puppets are back! Now they have brought back their creator Andre Toulon (this time played by Steve Welles) from the grave. Meanwhile a group of paranormal researchers (including late 80s/early 90s scream queen Charlie Spradling) are at the Bodega Bay Inn investigating.

One of the problems I had with this film was none of the characters are all that interesting. That even includes Toulon who is dressed up as The Invisible Man for 90% of the movie. With what could have been an interesting premise turns into a super-talky and draggy horror sequel. Some of the acting as well is spotty. Some viewers may in fact find this to be a boring movie.

A new main puppet is introduced and his name is Torch. I do think he is pretty cool and as the movie poster shows he has a flame thrower for a hand. He really...lights up the film.

Directed by David Allen, who did the effects for the original and worked on parts 3 through 5. Richard Band returns to do the music that worked so well with the original. Screenplay by David Pabian, based on a story by Charles Band, who was also executive producer. Also starring Nina Talbot and George "Buck" Flower.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed