Brain Dead (1990) Poster

(1990)

User Reviews

Review this title
45 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Neurological nightmare.
HumanoidOfFlesh11 December 2010
Bill Pullman plays a brilliant surgeon who decides to perform an operation on a psychotic mathematician.He tries to unlock corporate secrets hidden in his patient brain.As the result Pullman is plagued by a series of bizarre dreams and nightmares."Brain Dead" by Adam Simon is often confused with Peter Jackson's insanely gory horror comedy "Braindead".The script is clever and sophisticated,the atmosphere is quite chilling and the acting is solid.The film has pretty warped sense of humour,unfortunately the action is slow and there is no gore.A must-see for fans of "Twilight Zone","Blue Sunshine" or "Strange Behavior".7 homicidal mathematicians out of 10.
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
How Did I Miss This One Until Now?
gavin69424 October 2012
Dr. Rex Martin (Bill Pullman) is a leading neurosurgeon specializing in the cerebral malfunctions that cause mental illnesses, whose expertise is called up by an old school chum, Jim Reston (Bill Paxton), who is now part of the mega-corporation Eunice.

If you happen to be one of those people who cannot tell Pullman and Paxton apart, this might not be the film for you... they spend a fair amount of time on screen together. If you happen to be a fan of H. P. Lovecraft, this might be the film for you. While the writer is known for his work with "The Twilight Zone", there are at least two Lovecraft references in this story. Can you catch them?

I was already intrigued from the beginning with the wall of brains in jars and the face that could be remote-controlled. But I was in hook, line and sinker when Jack Halsey (Bud Cort) showed up -- he is the epitome of insane genius. The phrases, the mannerisms... even his appearance. Thank you, casting director. You aced a hole in one. The homeless guy is a nice touch, too.

Bonus: Kyle Gass of Tenacious D appears as an anesthesiologist.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
underrated movie
KyleFurr24 October 2005
This is a very underrated movie that somewhat reminds you of Jacob's Ladder. The movie starts out with Bill Pullman as a doctor who studies brains and has a lab full of brains in glass bottles. Pullman is friends with Bill Paxton and Paxton is in some trouble with the corporation he works with and tries to get Pullman to help him. Pullman agrees and and he has to try and find out if a brilliant doctor, played by Bud Cort, who went and killed his family is actually insane or not. Pullman says he his insane and Paxton isn't too happy about it because Cort has some top secret information in his head and Paxton doesn't want it to ever get out. Pullman operates on him and then and the next thing Pullman knows he is in a mental ward and his entire reality starts to mess with him and he can't tell what is real and what is not. It's a great movie that should be more well known.
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Strange chiller
loomis78-815-98903420 April 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Dr. Rex Martin (Pullman) is a brain specialist who is asked by his good friend Jim (Paxton) to help him with a matter at his corporate job. A man named John Halsey (Cort) who at one time worked for the company may have murdered his entire family and it is Dr. Martin's job to get some key figures from the man. Dr. Martin gets pulled in and is soon sharing the same paranoid and delusional visions Halsey is suffering from. Some of these bizarre visions include a creepy looking man who is splattered in blood who is following them around. Is this weird state of reality really happening, or not? No doubt Director Adam Simon wants to keep the audience off balance, but the film shifts reality so often it gets too confusing. Simon's direction is sharp, and all though it is confusing as hell, it remains interesting and entertaining for the audience. This movie features two future big stars in Bill Pullman and Bill Paxton who are early in their careers and provide strong acting in this well made and original chiller. The gore is minimal minus a few shots of some heads being cut open for brain examinations. This film isn't designed for jump scares but the bloody stranger haunting the two characters delivers some chills. 'Brain Dead's' biggest problem is its confusing narrative and ends up being a little too weird for its own good.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pure Madness and Insanity
Vogler1 November 2004
Warning: Spoilers
The advantage of making a movie about madness is that you can sell almost ANYTHING as long as it's all confusing. From this point of view, Brain Dead is brilliant. However, if you expect to find a solution in the end, you will be disappointed.

My interpretation of Brain Dead is that you can never tell what is reality and what is imagination of the main character (Bill Pullman). I even doubt that the brain surgeon story at the beginning is real. During the movie we learn that you can never tell who Pullmans character really is - Rex Martin, Dr. Halsey, who ever? Is he really a brain surgeon, or is that his own imagination, too? Or is he himself the mad-gone maths employee? Or is he just an insane patient suffering fear of somebody messing with his mind?

I think that the brain surgeon story is a very clever move to confuse the audience, because it seems to be the clue for what is going on, but at the end, it isn't. It reminds me of the psycho-drug story in Jacobs Ladder, which isn't real, either.

However, I'd have liked to see a clever explanation for all that weird stuff at the end.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
People who confuse the two Bill Ps ought to see THIS one.
Hey_Sweden31 March 2018
Bill Pullman and Bill Paxton star in this ambitious sci-fi thriller from director Adam Simon ("Carnosaur") and the late, great writer Charles Beaumont (known for his work on 'The Twilight Zone' and Roger Corman films). Pullman stars as Rex Martin, a brilliant young scientist who becomes involved in a plan to pry vital information from the mind of Jack Halsey (Bud Cort), an equally brilliant mathematician. Also worked into the plot is the idea of erasing unpleasant memories from peoples' brains, or otherwise changing their personalities.

It's all quite an intriguing set-up by Beaumont, although the film doesn't really reach its full potential due to ultimately telling a rather routine story. And it's a story that falls back on the time-honoured theme of forcing the lead character and audience to figure out what is fantasy and what is reality. As this tale progresses, Rex suffers from visions and hallucinations that may well be the product of a deteriorating mind. Eventually, it resolves itself in a way that isn't exactly unpredictable.

Still, the ride taken here is interesting. "Brain Dead" is certainly a notch above most product created by Concorde, the company formed by Corman after his departure from New World. It's played as well as it can be played by a top cast, with Pullman and Paxton in fine form. (One of the questions posed is whether or not Paxton, as Pullmans' friend, is a smarmy, self-serving jerk just out for himself.) George Kennedy does not get to do much as a corporation head, but sexy Patricia Charbonneau is easy to watch as Pullmans' wife, and character actor Nicholas Pryor has a field day in a trio of inter-related roles. Other familiar faces include Lee Arenberg, Willie Garson, Brent Hinkley, and Kyle Gass. Paxtons' father John has a bit as a board member. But it's Cort, a longtime specialist in quirky and offbeat parts, who tends to steal the show much of the time.

"Brain Dead" is, overall, adequately filmed, and it shows its audience a pretty good time. Some gore here and there, decent makeup effects (especially the "experimental face"), and a fine score by Peter Rotter help to keep it watchable.

Produced by Cormans' wife Julie.

Seven out of 10.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
That's the sound of your brain…CRACKING!
Coventry17 August 2005
Odd little movie, this "Brain Dead"…but nonetheless interesting and worth a look in case you can appreciate imaginative low-budget movies. This ultra-cheap looking gem (produced by who else than the Roger Corman clan) might look like one of those numerous and repetitive dream/reality intrusion thrillers that were made in the late 80's/early 90's, but that's only until you discover that the guy who wrote this film actually is Charles Beaumont, who died in 1967! So, this "Brain Dead" really is a trend-setter, when you come to think of it! This film teams Bill Paxton and Bill Pullman who're both quite famous and respectable actors with many B-horror movies on their repertoires. Both men work in some sort of medical research center; Pullman as the brilliant but confused Dr. Martin and Paxton as the shifty board member Reston. The latter convinces Dr. Martin to perform brain surgery upon their former colleague Dr. Halsey, who went paranoid and butchered his family. Shortly after the operation, however, Dr. Martin himself begins to experience Halsey's hallucinations. Pretty soon it becomes impossible to tell the difference between dreams and reality and Dr. Martin can't trust his own pair of eyes anymore. The downfall of paranoia and despair Pullman's character goes through is atmospherically illustrated with surreal landscapes (stormy clouds) and nightmarish visions (the doctor with his bloody white coat!). Too bad the very last sequences are overly misleading and you almost unwillingly stop to care. It feels like co-writer and director Adam Simon didn't really know how to end his film and he inappropriately inserts poetry-elements and fake mystery. A lame climax to an overall decent movie.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Brain Dead, really messy, but neat
Samiam319 September 2009
Brain Dead is many things, including a mess, but with an ambitious story which is enough to hide the idiocy (mostly), it becomes a fairly enjoyable mess.

Dr. Rex Martin is a renowned brain surgeon who is approached one day by a representative of the Eunice corporation. One of the corporation's best mathematicians has gone Brain Dead, but there are still some numerical data locked in the back of his mind which Eunice wants. Dr. Martin is asked to operate, but as he manages to tap into the patient's mind, he triggers something in his own. He starts behaving strangely. What follows is a seemingly endless series of dreams and illusions that follows the old rhetorical 'what is fantasy and what is reality' question.

As messy as Brain Dead is, it's not dull. The question is whether you enjoy being confused. Making do with a fragmented budget, first time director Adam Simon has constructed the film with a kind of post-modern sci-fi approach. There are times when it resembles some of David Cronenberg's early work, which shows that the film has intellectual potential, but I would'nt call Brain Dead an intelligent film. Then again, next to Carnosaur (simon's proceeding feature) This is actually pretty brilliant.

If I am interpreting correctly, it looks as if Brain Dead is trying to say that the brain is not merely a vital organ, it is a living thing. Whether I am right or not, means nothing. You can interpret this film any way you want.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
You'll have to watch carefully to understand, but is it worth it?
paulclaassen10 November 2020
I suppose the best word to describe this unusual film would be "weird".

'Brain Dead' is a good depiction of sanity vs insanity, but ultimately too weird. I guess not all is what it seems and one should read between the lines here. This is a complex and confusing story that will benefit from more than one viewing, but I'm not sure I want to sit through it again.

I rest my case on this one. It was just weird.

Would I watch it again? No.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fabulous B Movie Schlock/Dreamfest
alchemical-3869222 December 2021
As Keanu would say "woah"... So during pandemic I've been watching a LOT (like many people I'm sure) and I've watched everything on Netflix im done with "modern tv" I'm now onto Tubi and especially the genre of 70s/80s/90s horror/adventure/thriller. It just suits my 420 style (know what I mean?) to a) be able to watch actual plot driven movies over the effects driven drivel of today, and b) to be able to have a laugh at some old classics I've never seen.

So if this sounds like you and you're just chilling at home with time to kill and poppa got a brand new bag I highly (!) recommend this movie.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
By the Perception of the Illusion we experience Reality
sol-kay9 January 2006
(There are Spoilers) You begin to realize some 15 to 20 minutes into the movie "Brain Dead" that the film must have been badly edited and put together out of sequence. Things happen in the movie that give you the impression that they should have happened before rather then after the event your watching at the time.

For example when Dr. Martin, Paul Pullman, meets Vance, George Kennedy, the CEO of the Eunice Corp.it's obvious that Vance has never met Martin before but just some 10 minutes earlier in the film we see both Vance and Dr. Martin together at a board meeting at the Eunice Building. Scenes like the out of place Vance and Dr. Martin meeting are repeated all throughout the film giving it a dream-like quality but without a cohesive plot confusing the audience. like Dr. Martin who ends up like the title of the movie says "Brain Dead", if not all together deceased, if what's happening on the screen is real and not a dream or nightmare on Dr. Martin's part.

Being a top brain surgeon who loves his job, and his hundreds of jars of former patient's brains, Dr. Martin is called on by his friend Eunice executive Jim Reston, Bill Paxton, to go to the Lakeside Mental Facility. Martin's to talk to a former Eunice Corp. book-keeper as well as scientist Dr. Halsey, Bud Curt. Martin's meeting with Dr. Halsey is to get a secret formula, or numbers, that's vital to Eunice's future plans and operations. As Dr. Martin works on Dr. Halsey, getting friendly with him,to get the secret numbers hidden deep in his mind things start to go haywire for Dr. Martin with his laboratory. All the brains in Matian's lab were confiscated because the government cut his grants to operate it. Dr. Martin himself not only on the verge of losing his own mind by ending up as part of a dream that originates straight out of Dr. Halsey's sub-conscious.

The movie "Brain Dead" starts to get even weirder with suggestions that Dr. Martin isn't even real but a figment, or alter-ego, of Dr. Halsey's imagination. We begin to see Dr. Martin being totally ignored, as if he were invisible, by everyone he comes in contact with even his wife Dana, Patrica Charbonneau. Dana's having an affair with Marta in's best friend Reston as he just stands there unable to do or say anything. There's also a scene that immediately follows where Dr. Martin falls into a body of water that has Dr. Halesy swimming and drowning in it,or being eaten by a shark, that's supposed to be the inside of Dr. Halsey's brain!

The movie keeps getting stranger as it reaches it's final conclusion with Dr. Martin, or Dr. Halsey, being unsuccessfully lobotomized where he ends up dead on the operating table without giving the secret formula that Vance and the Eunice executives and shareholders so desperately wanted; as if the film-makers forgot what the original story of "Brain Dead" was supposed to be all about.

Nothing made sense in the film and even as a mind-blowing cult movie with a surprise ending, that at least ties a number of loose ends in the film together, it failed miserably. "Brain Dead" leaves you totally confused to what you were watching for the last 85 minutes and wishing that you forget what you saw as soon as possible.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
"We can't all do good, but at least do no harm."
Backlash00719 September 2001
Brain Dead...where do I begin? One could easily go crazy thinking about this movie. Brain Dead was written by the late Charles Beaumont (the man responsible for some of my favorite Twilight Zone episodes) and was directed by Adam Simon (The American Nightmare). It's basically one long chaotic nightmare and, at the same time, one of my favorite films. It's a real head trip where one is constantly questioning the sanity of the main characters. Is Bill Pullman crazy, is Bill Paxton out to get Bill Pullman, should the two Bills be taken seriously? In this movie, yes. The Bills are excellent and so is the rest of the cast. This is the film that really made me take notice of Bud Cort. He's hilarious as Halsey. If you're up for some serious insanity, give Brain Dead a spin. I give this movie a 10 on the psychological mind bender scale. It ranks up there with Cronenberg's Videodrome.

Note for genre buffs: Miskatonic University is mentioned by Dr. Martin in the film. That is the same school Dr. West attends in Re-Animator and is mentioned in many films based on the works of H.P. Lovecraft.
44 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sci-Fi/Horror With Many Twists and Turns
charlieoso4 May 2020
Bill Pullman plays Dr. Rex Martin who is a neurosurgeon who works on brains. His old roommate and buddy Jim Reston (Bill Paxton) shows up to let Dr. Martin know that a mathematician Jack Halsey (Bud Cort) who once worked for the company he is employed by Eunice has gone bananas and is being held at a mental institution. Reston is wanting Dr. Martin to work on his brain. That is just the start of it. There are some really cool twists that start near the middle of the movie. It was at this point I wasn't sure if I was really enjoying the movie or not. The twists come off quite nicely, made me enjoy the movie much more and plays out like an extended version of THE TWILIGHT ZONE. Which is kind of interesting because original screenwriter Charles Beaumont wrote for that TV show. Director Adam Simon got ahold of the script and rewrote it for modern times (or 1990 anyways). Also starring George Kennedy.

This sci-fi/horror film may in fact not be for everyone, but I enjoyed the twists and certainly know that it will be one I will watch again to piece some things together hopefully.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A total head-twister.
BA_Harrison9 July 2018
Mind bending horror Brain Dead (not to be confused with the 1992 Peter Jackson film of the same name) is one of those films where it's hard to determine what is real and what is imaginary. It features dreams within dreams (and maybe even dreams within dreams within dreams), with a central character who becomes increasingly unsure about his own identity. Based on a story by Twilight Zone scribe Charles Beaumont, the film becomes more and more labyrinthine, leaving the viewer in a state of bewilderment, waiting for a coherent conclusion that never comes.

Starring the two Bills Ps, Paxton and Pullman (which might be confusion enough for some viewers), the film sees neurosurgeon Rex Martin (Pullman) approached by associate Jim Reston (Paxton), who asks Rex if he can perform surgery on an old employee, mathematician Jack Halsey (Bud Cort), who has some vital information locked in his brain, but who is now residing in an asylum, having slaughtered his own family. What follows is a hallucinatory trip of a movie that delivers plenty of weirdness, all of which proves moderately entertaining, but would have been a whole lot more satisfying if director Adam Simon had managed to wrap up matters in a more comprehensible manner.

4.5 out of 10, rounded up to 5 for IMDb.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Decent Thriller with the 2 Bills!
the dude-234 March 2000
I didn't expect much from this movie, but it turned out to be decent thriller given its low budget and its cast - Bill Pullman and Bill Paxton, arguably the two dullest actors in Hollywood! Bill Pullman is Dr. Rex Martin, a brain scientist who has developed a technology to manipulate a person's thoughts and therefore their reality. He is recruited by a sleazy corporate administrator, Jim Reston (Bill Paxton), to use this technology on a former corporate genius, Dr, Hasley, turned paranoid psycho killer, to pry some valuable corporate information from his memory. Martin then suffers an accident, and then descends into a world of madness and paranoia, where objective reality is turned upside down. In true twilight zone fashion, it appears that Dr. Martin's technology is now being experimented on him. Pullman plays the part of the eccentric Martin well, and Paxton does a reasonable job as the ambitious, yet, sleazy, corporate type. I found the ending, at least my interpretation of it, somewhat conventional and a little disappointing. This movie has some genuine scenes of suspense without needing to resort to lavish special effects. There is also a gratuitous nude scene involving Martin's Wife, Praticia Charbonneau, which, of course, is always a bonus. Again I didn't expect much from this movie, and I was pleasantly surprised. For those who enjoy movies that involve the theme that objective reality is, or can be made to be, an illusion, this movie is worth seeing as a pre cyber version of this theme; the cyber version of course being the Matrix, The 13th Floor and Existenze.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bill Pullman AND Bill Paxton?? SCORE
Amthermandes11 September 2021
It was only while browsing the Tubi selection that I found this little gem: a sci-fi horror thriller, that star two actors who are often confused as each other by the average Cinephiliac wanna-be.

This movie has the feel of a Cronenberg flick (without most of the flagrant body horror special effects) mixed with the likes of "The Lawnmower Man," "Altered States," and "Re-Animator."

It has a conspiracy-driven plot, riddled with paranoia and a disconnect from reality. The common theme here is "shared mental disorder." You can chalk this up as a stimulating "mind-melder" or a simple "popcorn flick." Either way, I'm a mere purple people. Er, person pimple.

You know what I mean.

Good movie, worth a view, especially as a time waster.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A fun, well-made psychological horror-thriller
I_Ailurophile17 September 2023
The first act is a little slow, and once the plot does pick up it quickly becomes so deliberately scattered that the disparity is glaring. Even at that, we can readily make guesses as to where the plot is going - yet it's to the credit of screenwriter Charles Beaumont, and in turn filmmaker Adam Simon, that where exactly it will all end up remains shrouded in mystery. Why, I rather wonder if Beaumont hadn't fashioned his screenplay so that even he didn't know what the ending was going to be until he found it; alternatively, multiple endings could have been written. That is the tenor of psychological thrillers generally, yes, but this one seems particularly adept at shifting between broken realities and making one seem just as plausible as the next. This makes it all the more surprising, perhaps, that it was accordingly originally written for Roger Corman in the 60s, only to be rediscovered and updated; one can easily imagine how this might have looked if it had been produced 20-30 years earlier.

There's nothing specifically revelatory about 'Brain dead,' yet I'm pleased with just how good it is. It has no illusions about being something it's not; it's evident the budget was comparatively modest, and production values hover somewhere in the unremarkable middle ground. Yet the sets and filming locations are swell nonetheless, plus those stunts, effects, and props that are employed. There are some noteworthy names appearing here, given to some measure of recognition even in 1990, and in the very least Bill Paxton and Bill Pullman were no small get. Pullman is a solid lead, for that matter, ably navigating the spaces between all that is required of him at various points. Meanwhile, strong scene writing is extra important when the material deals with fractured perspectives, and the screenplay serves up a rich cornucopia of ideas while fashioning a compelling, satisfying narrative. I'm not saying that the title doesn't still leave a bit to be desired, especially as some themes and ideas rise and recede in accordance with the hops of the story, but overall the result is admirable.

Some spicier flavors of science fiction and horror likewise come and go throughout as this mystery thriller advances, though by and large the tone is such that, again, we can handily envisage it in Roger Corman's hands twenty or so years before. One way or another, the feature ably keeps us watching for the ultimate reveal, and the ride along the way is a fun one. Simon's direction is splendid in shaping the whole, and I think editor Carol Oblath deserves distinct credit for helping to shape the jumble into its final form. At length there's nothing so singular and grabbing about this as to demand viewership, but if one happens to come across it it's a good time, and worth checking out. It's neither as striking or as complex as some similar pictures, but 'Brain dead' stands quite sturdily on its own feet, and if you do have the opportunity to watch then I think it's worth checking out.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Waste of your time...
merklekranz14 April 2007
Even worse than the worst David Lynch "confusathon", "Brain Dead" makes no sense whatsoever. Shamefully wasted talent (Bill Pullman, Bill Paxton), bounce around like they are in a "Tom and Jerry" cartoon on acid. There is negligible character development. It simply starts climbing the "strange scale", until climaxing in total chaos. Do not get sucked into this because of the above fine actors. They are given nothing to work with, and you will be wondering what's going on throughout the entire, unbearable 85 minutes. I highly recommend avoiding "Brain Dead" at all costs, unless you are into scattering your brain with what amounts to total nonsense. - MERK
6 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A weird little movie...
nightshade07122 December 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Around the time I first saw Wes Craven's "The Serpent and the Rainbow," I became enamored with Bill Pullman as an actor. This ended up as a gateway through which I would ravenously hunt down as many early movies of his as I could, Brain Dead included...

Some might say this movie is downright bizarre. Well, I can't disagree with that. It's twisted, confusing, and surreal, all the while managing to be darkly humorous (although I have my doubts as to whether or not certain moments of hilarity were intended to be so). The whole thing plays out like an exaggerated fever dream and, as a result, makes it very difficult to give an accurate rating for this weird little movie.

While not a cinematic masterpiece by any means, it is not a bad movie - provided you can pay attention long enough to grasp what's going on! If you enjoy it enough, Brain Dead may warrant subsequent viewings. I have watched it around five or six times and always notice some new little oddity that I hadn't caught the previous time around.

Bill Pullman plays his role to nerdy perfection. Meanwhile, Paxton is the slightly skeevy business associate who may or may not be lusting after Pullman's wife (played by Patricia Charbonneau, who looks suspiciously like Sigourney Weaver these days. Hm...)

Far from perfect but highly entertaining, Brain Dead is a lost gem of the 90's that must be seen to be believed.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
This film proves one thing
bregund10 November 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Bill Pullman and Bill Paxton are not the same person. I had never heard of this film, and I've watched a lot of films over the years, and there it was on my media feed (name of streaming service omitted). So I thought what the heck, it will finally prove once and for all that Pullman and Paxton are not the same man. I hope I don't mix them up, but I never realized how much Pullman sighs and stares at the floor, but he does this in every scene. Meanwhile Paxton is smarmy and corporate, a gross caricature of an 80s yuppie that was out of date even when this film was released. The first half of the film is normal and presents a compelling mystery, but then continuity and lucidity are abandoned in favor of a confusing melange of disconnected scenes that are supposed to make you question what's real and what isn't. Though the story becomes frustrating and pointless, there are some amusingly philosophical scenes, such as this quick exchange between Pullman and Bud Cort: Pullman: "Didn't we do this before?" Bud Cort: "Are we doing this now?" As is typical of entertainment that keeps too many balls in the air (Game of Thrones), the ending is a quickly-written washout that cheapens the whole story and answers none of the questions it posed. Given the promising beginning of this film I expected so much more.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cult Classic, lifted by a good story & good performances
elect_michael18 April 2021
5.5 stars of 10. This film has turned into a bit of a Cult Classic through the years. The story is good, but many of the individual lines are not, and the directing is not good.

However, Bill Pullman picks up momentum about halfway through the film & ends up putting in a good performance with his subtle intricacies that we now know about as his career unfolded, and still is unfolding. We have to remember, this was only the 2nd good movie that Pullman starred in as 2 years earlier he starred in 'The Serpent And The Rainbow'. So this was very early in Pullman's career. Pullman got a late start to his movie career as he was in his mid-30s when he starred in each of these films. Pullman star's alongside Bill Paxton & Bud Cort in this movie & Cort puts on an extremely good performance in the film. Cort puts on a controlled dynamic performance that certainly works.

We lost Paxton at a very young age, a talented Actor & Director. He plays his role strangely but it works okay. While his performance is competent, it's not his best work & not one of his better roles as we learned what he could do in films that came after during his great career.

All together, this is a fairly good film that is lifted by Pullman, Cort & the story.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
yeah! what a masterpiece!
randoman7 May 2005
I felt brain dead, I'll tell you. This is the worst film I have ever bought. (in my ignorance I thought this was the Peter Jackson film of the same name). The performances are so terrible they are laughable. The special effects have not stood the test of time and look dire. The script promotes that kind of TV movie, stare into the middle distance kind of acting. The cast look as if they have been taking lessons from Joey Tribbiani, they have one look each, and stick to it. Plus I have never been confused by a movie until I sat down to watch this. The is it a dream or no plot is so terrible that frustration sets in within a few minutes. Avoid like a plague.
6 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Butterfly dreams of being a man
Semih8 August 2003
The great Taoist master Chuang Tzu once dreamt that he was a butterfly fluttering here and there. In the dream he had no awareness of his individuality as a person. He was only a butterfly. Suddenly, he awoke and found himself laying there, a person once again. But then he thought to himself, "Was I before a man who dreamt about being a butterfly, or am I now a butterfly who dreams about being a man?"

This quote is being used in the film and clearly illustrates the basis of the brilliant screenplay. The claustrophobia of not knowing reality from imagined reality is very real in this film. Earlier acts by Bill Pullman, and Bill Paxton make for a real viewing pleasure. But the real star of the film is Bud Cort (Harold, from the film Harold and Maude). Set designs and lighting make for a fine surreal experience. This movie is a great one with a fine story, fine actors, fine cinematography, special-fx and direction. The music sounds like synths left over from the 80's. But that adds to the B-effect of the film. Highly recommended.
32 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Reminded me when I ate too many edibles
shninabin-9352516 January 2023
Great cast, great idea but out of sync with its execution. You may guess the ending but you'll get no satisfaction in doing so because you'll then doubt if you got the ending right after all.

It's a film of its time, so much so that you'll probably date it to the exact day it was filmed, this isn't a bad thing because in 1990 all movies seemed to be action movies with huge budgets and this isn't one ... believe me.

It may seem as if I'm dissin'this movie, I'm really not, I gave it a fair 6/10 which is higher than some pictures I actually love (albeit as guilty pleasures).

If you like The Lawnmower man then you'll be entertained but you will see its flaws. I nearly gave this a 7/10 because of the end soundtrack but because it made me spill my coffee I thought"f##k ya".

85 mins went quite quickly which must mean I enjoyed it somewhat.

Please don't OD on edibles and watch this because you will join Bill Pullman in his loop.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Oddball
Leofwine_draca12 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
BRAIN DEAD is a low rent horror film that feels like an indie rip-off of RE-ANIMATOR. It's best known today for being confused with the Peter Jackson classic BRAINDEAD, with which it has nothing in common. It goes for a psychological approach to the material, but the story has been done better and more convincingly elsewhere. The cheapness is apparent throughout, particularly in the way a couple of white-painted rooms stand in for laboratories and the like. I was surprised that mainstream actors like Bill Pullman and Bill Paxton took roles in this as personally I think the material is beneath them. The story sees Pullman's brain surgeon going crazy and believing that he's a hallucination in a disturbed brain; the story becomes a thriller of sorts as his behaviour becomes more and more bizarre. It's oddball indeed, but not at all satisfying.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed